Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-14 Thread Ritika Garg
Was wondering why that occurred. Earlier I had installed adobe flash but
still videos didn't play.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Ritika Garg
I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of
firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message flash
player download required used to come.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Pintér Tibor
On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote:
 I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of
 firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message
 flash player download required used to come.

so what? is that a problem? you want your message back?

t
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Sven Aluoor
2010/12/13 Pintér Tibor tib...@tibyke.hu:
 On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote:
 I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of
 firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message
 flash player download required used to come.

 so what? is that a problem? you want your message back?

maybe because of the many security vulnerabilities? Because Flash is
proprietary, non-free? Because flash reduces battery life? Because
flash is prone to crash? Flash is mainly used in ads?

There are so many reasons why Flash is crap :-)

cheers Sven
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Jerry Franz
On 12/13/2010 12:05 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
 2010/12/13 Pintér Tibortib...@tibyke.hu:
 On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote:
 I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of
 firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message
 flash player download required used to come.
 so what? is that a problem? you want your message back?
 maybe because of the many security vulnerabilities? Because Flash is
 proprietary, non-free? Because flash reduces battery life? Because
 flash is prone to crash? Flash is mainly used in ads?

 There are so many reasons why Flash is crap :-)

So disable it if you don't want it.

Tools - Add-ons - Plugins - Shockwave Flash - 'Disable'.

-- 
Benjamin Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] adobe flash

2010-12-13 Thread Brian Mathis
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Jerry Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote:
 On 12/13/2010 12:05 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
 2010/12/13 Pintér Tibortib...@tibyke.hu:
 On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote:
 I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of
 firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message
 flash player download required used to come.
 so what? is that a problem? you want your message back?
 maybe because of the many security vulnerabilities? Because Flash is
 proprietary, non-free? Because flash reduces battery life? Because
 flash is prone to crash? Flash is mainly used in ads?

 There are so many reasons why Flash is crap :-)

 So disable it if you don't want it.

 Tools - Add-ons - Plugins - Shockwave Flash - 'Disable'.
 --
 Benjamin Franz


Or install the Flashblock extension that allows you to selectively
enable it when you want to.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-30 Thread Mike A. Harris
Chuck wrote:
 
 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2 
 install.

 From a stock CentOS 5 system, fully updated do the following:

1) Install Adobe's yum repository configuration:
rpm -ivh 
http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/adobe-release/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm

2) Install flash-plugin with yum
yum install flash-plugin

3) Start, or restart firefox.

This should work on any x86 or x86_64 installation of CentOS 5.  If it 
does not, then it is possible that someone has misconfigured something 
in the system, or in the user's firefox configuration that is 
conflicting or messing with flash.  Before messing with anything in the 
system to try and fix it, create a new dummy user account, and fire up 
firefox in the new user account to see if flash works in this default 
state.  If it does, but it does not work in your own user account, then 
something in your user account's firefox configuration might be 
interfering with its ability to see flash for some reason.

You can confirm that flash is present by going to about:plugins in the 
firefox location bar.

Once firefox is showing up in about:plugins and flash sites are 
displaying, you may encounter other problems with flash.  Visit YouTube, 
and if you notice that flash videos are incredibly slow and gimpy and/or 
audio cuts out, or the video/audio freeze for long periods of time 
especially on startup, then do the following:

1) Press CTRL-0 to unzoom the current webpage, and do not use the 
firefox CTRL+mousewheel zoom feature.  Reload the page to see if the 
video plays ok now.

2) If CTRL-0 above allows video to play back properly or even just 
better, then your X server might not be configured correctly.

3) Check your X server log to see if EXA acceleration is being used. 
If it shows that XAA is being used, then you may not be able to use 
the firefox zoom feature on flash enabled webpages unless you enable 
EXA acceleration for your video hardware (assuming the driver you are 
using supports EXA).


You may or may not experience other performance or video/audio glitch 
issues with flash.  Mozilla's bugzilla is chock full of tonnes of flash 
issues on Linux.

Anyhow, I hope this helps you get things working.  Good luck.

TTYL
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-30 Thread Mike A. Harris
Zube wrote:
 On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:
 
 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
 install.
 
 32-bit or 64-bit?
 
 The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit
 local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway).
 
 On my 64-bit 5.2 machines, I have a separate 32-bit install of firefox in
 /usr/local/firefox (downloaded from the mozilla site) and the plugin
 works fine.

32bit flash works on 64bit firefox just fine.  All you have to do is 
ensure that nspluginwrapper is installed, and 32bit flash is installed, 
then restart firefox.  It should Just Work(TM).

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
install.

From rpm install:
Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink in
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located in
/usr/lib/flash-plugins
nada.

SoI then copied the plugin directly into /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and
eliminated the symlink from the equation.
nada.

I then installed the plugin into the $HOME/.mozilla/plugins/ directory of a
normal user (and making sure everything was read/executable by that user).
nada.

At no time does the adobe flash pugin ever appear in the plugins panel when
viewing Tools-Addons from within the browser. I see no errors or any logs
of any kind getting generated anywhere.

An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin return with no complaints.

I see scads of posts on google regarding other adobe flash player woes but
none of the solutions i've found so far work.

Since most of the sites I require access to, even metalink, required adobe
flash this is a show stopper for me.

Thanks for any help,
CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Zube
On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:

 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
 install.

32-bit or 64-bit?

The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit
local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway).

On my 64-bit 5.2 machines, I have a separate 32-bit install of firefox in
/usr/local/firefox (downloaded from the mozilla site) and the plugin
works fine.

Cheers,
Zube
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube z...@cs.colostate.edu wrote:

 On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:

  I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
  install.

 32-bit or 64-bit?

 The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit
 local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway).

 On my 64-bit 5.2 machines, I have a separate 32-bit install of firefox in
 /usr/local/firefox (downloaded from the mozilla site) and the plugin
 works fine.

 Cheers,
 Zube
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


I'm running 32-bit centos. I'll try downloading firefox I guess... Also
having some oracle issues as well on centos 5.2 Might be reverting back
to suse if I run into any more roadblocks...

Thanks for the help,
CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:

 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
 install.

Are you using CentOS 5.2   32 bit or 64 bit?   I'm using 32 bit and
have Shockwave Flash installed and working  with Firefox v.3.0.6.
Does that work for you? When I test at this URL:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ it shows the 2nd one
working: Adobe Flash Player. For the animation at the top, for
Adobe Shockwave Player it shows that I need another plugin, so I
will try to get that
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Zube z...@cs.colostate.edu wrote:
 On Sun Mar 29 09:23:38 AM, Chuck wrote:
  I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
  install.
 32-bit or 64-bit?
 The adobe flash plugin is 32-bit only and won't work with the 64-bit
 local version of Firefox (I could never get it to work anyway).

 On my 64-bit 5.2 machines, I have a separate 32-bit install of firefox in
 /usr/local/firefox (downloaded from the mozilla site) and the plugin
 works fine.
snip
 I'm running 32-bit centos. I'll try downloading firefox I guess... Also
 having some oracle issues as well on centos 5.2 Might be reverting back
 to suse if I run into any more roadblocks...

Do you have the adobe Yum repository installed?  Also, there may be a
command you need to give, after you install the plug in, to get it
running. If that is true, I can't remember what the command is
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:

 2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
 
  I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
  install.

 Are you using CentOS 5.2   32 bit or 64 bit?   I'm using 32 bit and
 have Shockwave Flash installed and working  with Firefox v.3.0.6.
 Does that work for you? When I test at this URL:
 http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ it shows the 2nd one
 working: Adobe Flash Player. For the animation at the top, for
 Adobe Shockwave Player it shows that I need another plugin, so I
 will try to get that
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Yes adobe flash player is the one I can't get working. Shockwave came
default. Here is the version I am running: (with all updates)

Linux billabong 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux

billabong: == file /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
/usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel
80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped

billabong:~ == ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Mar 29 08:41 libflashplayer.so -
/usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so

billabong:~ == rpm --verify flash-plugin  echo $?
0

I have tried the rpm install and the manual install of adobe flash... md5 of
both binaries is the same.

Thanks for any help,
CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500
Chuck wrote:

 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
 install.

Do you have curl.i386 installed?  (I've been bitten by this before.)

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus 
 lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:

 2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
 
  I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
  install.

 Are you using CentOS 5.2   32 bit or 64 bit?   I'm using 32 bit and
 have Shockwave Flash installed and working  with Firefox v.3.0.6.
 Does that work for you? When I test at this URL:
 http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/welcome/ it shows the 2nd one
 working: Adobe Flash Player. For the animation at the top, for
 Adobe Shockwave Player it shows that I need another plugin, so I
 will try to get that
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



 Yes adobe flash player is the one I can't get working. Shockwave came
 default. Here is the version I am running: (with all updates)

 Linux billabong 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686
 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

 billabong: == file /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
 /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object,
 Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped

 billabong:~ == ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
 total 0
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Mar 29 08:41 libflashplayer.so -
 /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so

 billabong:~ == rpm --verify flash-plugin  echo $?
 0

 I have tried the rpm install and the manual install of adobe flash... md5
 of both binaries is the same.


 Thanks for any help,
 CC


Well I can't seem to download a viable firefox tarball... I've just
downloaded to 3 different machines (one vista, one xp, and my centos server)
-- all file sizes are different and bzip complains about a corrupt archive.
I don't see any mirror sites listed on mozilla.com either... /sigh The file
is supposed to be 8.6mb... The largest of my downloads so far was 6.4mb and
it wouldn't extract. So mozilla.com is having some problems... If anyone
knows of a mirror or doesn't mind emailing me the 3.0.8 32-bit tarball I'd
appreciate it. I was really hoping to get my php/oracle dev environment up
today but doesn't look good.

Thanks for any help,
-CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:

 On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:23:38 -0500
 Chuck wrote:

  I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent 5.2
  install.

 Do you have curl.i386 installed?  (I've been bitten by this before.)

 --
 MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com


Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and
storage virt.)

billabong:~ == rpm -q -a | grep -i curl
curl-7.15.5-2.el5
curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5

-CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 3/29/09, Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Lanny Marcus
 lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:
 2009/3/29 Chuck chuck.car...@gmail.com:
  I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent
  5.2
  install.
snip

 Yes adobe flash player is the one I can't get working. Shockwave came
 default. Here is the version I am running: (with all updates)

 Linux billabong 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008
 i686
 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

 billabong: == file /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
 /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object,
 Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped

 billabong:~ == ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
 total 0
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Mar 29 08:41 libflashplayer.so -
 /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so

 billabong:~ == rpm --verify flash-plugin  echo $?
 0

 I have tried the rpm install and the manual install of adobe flash... md5
 of both binaries is the same.

 Well I can't seem to download a viable firefox tarball... I've just
 downloaded to 3 different machines (one vista, one xp, and my centos server)

Why do you want to download a tarball? Installing from a tarball, when
an RPM is available, is strongly discouraged, in the documentation
available on centos.org  If you want to change the Source code, get
the SRPM.  Have you uninstalled the Firefox RPM? If so yum install
firefox will get a new copy for you.  I am not positive, but I think
that after I installed one Firefox Plugin that didn't work, someone on
the list gave me a command, to get it up and running. If that's the
case, I don't remember the command, but you may be able to search the
archives or on the Mozilla Support site for information about that. GL
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500
Chuck wrote:

 Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and
 storage virt.)
 
 billabong:~ == rpm -q -a | grep -i curl
 curl-7.15.5-2.el5
 curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5

 curl.i386

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:

 On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:51 -0500
 Chuck wrote:

  Yes curl is installed.. (I installed everything except virtualization and
  storage virt.)
 
  billabong:~ == rpm -q -a | grep -i curl
  curl-7.15.5-2.el5
  curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5

  curl.i386

 --
 MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com


Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info out
like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the
only 2 curl packages that ship with centos 5.2. Curl would only affect the
install process anyways, which I did. There is something deeper at fault
here.

-Chuck
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500
Chuck wrote:

 Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info out
 like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the
 only 2 curl packages that ship with centos 5.2.

You're absolutely  sure about that

ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/curl-7.15.5-2.el5.x86_64.rpm

 Curl would only affect the
 install process anyways, which I did. There is something deeper at fault
 here.

I set up a Centos x86_64 machine the other day and flash did not work until I
installed the i386 version of curl.  And that version is apparently not
installed by default.

Type this:

yum install curl.i386


-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Chuck
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:

 On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:12:44 -0500
 Chuck wrote:

  Those are i386 builds of curl. Not sure what tool is printing the info
 out
  like that for you but I have i386 build of curl installed. Those are the
  only 2 curl packages that ship with centos 5.2.

 You're absolutely  sure about that


 ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/curl-7.15.5-2.el5.x86_64.rpm

  Curl would only affect the
  install process anyways, which I did. There is something deeper at fault
  here.

 I set up a Centos x86_64 machine the other day and flash did not work until
 I
 installed the i386 version of curl.  And that version is apparently not
 installed by default.

 Type this:

 yum install curl.i386


 --
 MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com



Im on i386 platform as illustrated by my uname and file output above. Since
I'm running 32bit, there are only 2 packages of curl - the core package and
the dev libs Once again though, curl is used by the installer (man curl
to see what curl does), not once its installed.. I manually installed curl,
thus eliminating curl being the issue anyways.

-CC
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread William L. Maltby

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote:
 
 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent
 5.2 install.
 
 From rpm install:
 Running firefox as root -- I have verified there is a symlink
 in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins that points to the actual plugin located
 in /usr/lib/flash-plugins
 nada.
 
 SoI then copied the plugin directly into /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and
 eliminated the symlink from the equation.
 nada.
 
 I then installed the plugin into the $HOME/.mozilla/plugins/ directory
 of a normal user (and making sure everything was read/executable by
 that user).
 nada.
 
 At no time does the adobe flash pugin ever appear in the plugins panel
 when viewing Tools-Addons from within the browser. I see no errors or
 any logs of any kind getting generated anywhere.
 
 An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin return with no
 complaints.
 
 I see scads of posts on google regarding other adobe flash player woes
 but none of the solutions i've found so far work.
 
 Since most of the sites I require access to, even metalink, required
 adobe flash this is a show stopper for me.

Is the firefox losing almost all your plugins? I recently had problems
with this. If you go to Edit-Preferences-Advanced-General and see a
check for Always check to see if Firefox is the default browser on
startup it will wipe the ~/.mozilla/firefox/*.default/pluginreg.dat.

Make sure that is not checked. Instead, on a Gnome Desktop, from the
menu bar, System-Preferences-More Preferences-Preferred Applications
and select Firefox there.

I notice you said in another post that shockwave came default. Here too
I guess. But when I test at the site Lanny referenced, it fails for me
too. When I try to download, it says I'm not supported. I just wondered
if your shockwave works.

Oh well, that's really OT and for another day.

Anyway, I'm also on a 32 bit and flash installed and runs just fine.
Here's some tidbits.

$ rpm -aq|grep -i flash
flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386

$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-i386.repo 
[adobe-linux-i386]
name=Adobe Systems Incorporated
baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
priority=5
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux

That was obtained originally from the Adobe site, IIRC.

$ ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
total 2872
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Feb 25 05:19 libflashplayer.so
- /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
snip uninteresting entries
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 127260 Nov  5 18:51 nppdf.so

In my pluginreg.dat, I see

  /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins-wrapped/nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so:$

That reminds me that during my previous travails, someone suggested that
we needed the plugin wrapper. I don't know if this is so, but it's
working for me with the wrappers.

I don't recall how that is setup - I think from one of the FF
administration windows.

$ ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins-wrapped/
total 736
snip unrelated stuff
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Dec  6 14:27 npwrapper.so
- /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/npwrapper.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  80500 Dec  6 14:27
nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so
snip again
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  80500 Dec  6 14:27 nswrapper_32_32.nppdf.so

 ls -l /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/
total 344
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  31304 Jul 17  2008 npconfig
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   2714 Jul 17  2008 npviewer
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 137372 Jul 17  2008 npviewer.bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  80500 Jul 17  2008 npwrapper.so
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root  61420 Jul 17  2008 plugin-config

$ ls -l $(locate libflashplayer)  # I see an older version still there
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   39 Feb 25
05:19 /usr/lib/firefox-1.5.0.12/plugins/libflashplayer.so
- /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10131640 Feb  2
21:06 /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   39 Feb 25
05:19 /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
- /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root80500 Dec  6
14:27 /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins-wrapped/nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so

$ ls -l /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10131640 Feb  2
21:06 /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
[wild-b...@centos501 ~]$ file /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so
/usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object,
Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), stripped

My setup is box stock for this stuff, so I don't think you should need
to mess with tarballs, source, betas, etc.

 
 Thanks for any help,
 CC
 snip sig stuff

HTH
-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Adobe Flash Install Woes

2009-03-29 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 3/29/09, William L. Maltby centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote:
 On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 09:23 -0500, Chuck wrote:
 I am having a hell of a time getting adobe flash to work on a recent
 5.2 install.
snip
 An rpm check of both firefox and the flash plugin return with no
 complaints.

snip
 I notice you said in another post that shockwave came default. Here too
 I guess. But when I test at the site Lanny referenced, it fails for me
 too. When I try to download, it says I'm not supported. I just wondered
 if your shockwave works.

I believe, but am not positive, from some reading on the Adobe site,
that one of their viewers also contains the other one. So, I suspect
that the one it says is not available for your box or mine is included
in the one that we do have installed and running.

snip

 My setup is box stock for this stuff, so I don't think you should need
 to mess with tarballs, source, betas, etc.

So is my box and messing with tarballs, etc., when it is not
necessary, and it is not necessary in this case;  is *strongly*
discouraged by the CentOS developers and very knowledgeable people on
this list. Explained in the Support documentation (Wiki) on centos.org

Bill: Do you remember if there is a command one needs to use, to get
the plugin to work?
I'm not sure if I had to do that  for Flash or another Firefox Plugin
or if it was for something else.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos