Re: [CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
Solved it! After quite a lot of messing around... It turns out i was booting with the acpi=off option, but for the BIOS to see the 4 processors acpi has to be on. The problem was that with acpi=on, boot hangs, unless pci=nommconf is added to the boot options. To summarize, I now boot using the options acpi = on pci=nommconf Thanks. Julian. On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:29 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Julian Echave wrote: > >> > >> Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug > >> in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows > sees > >> all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...? > > > > > > yeah, looks like its probably broken ACPI data in the BIOS. see if the > > mainboard or system vendor has a BIOS update to fix this. just because > > operating system "X" works, doesn't mean its 'right'. > > > > You can try adding 'noacpi' to your boot string in your grub.conf file > and see if that helps. > > I have an AMD Athlon 64 x2 on an ECS mobo that is known to have a > problem with acpi. If I try to run without the noacpi switch, it runs > very poorly and crashes or halts within minutes of booting, if it > boots at all. With the flag, it runs smooth as silk. > > mhr > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
Thanks. I'll try the acpi thing. Regarding the Bios, I've got the last version. Kubuntu has no problems either to see the 4 cores... I'll see what I can do tomorrow. On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:29 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Julian Echave wrote: > >> > >> Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug > >> in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows > sees > >> all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...? > > > > > > yeah, looks like its probably broken ACPI data in the BIOS. see if the > > mainboard or system vendor has a BIOS update to fix this. just because > > operating system "X" works, doesn't mean its 'right'. > > > > You can try adding 'noacpi' to your boot string in your grub.conf file > and see if that helps. > > I have an AMD Athlon 64 x2 on an ECS mobo that is known to have a > problem with acpi. If I try to run without the noacpi switch, it runs > very poorly and crashes or halts within minutes of booting, if it > boots at all. With the flag, it runs smooth as silk. > > mhr > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:41 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Julian Echave wrote: >> >> Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug >> in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows sees >> all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...? > > > yeah, looks like its probably broken ACPI data in the BIOS. see if the > mainboard or system vendor has a BIOS update to fix this. just because > operating system "X" works, doesn't mean its 'right'. > You can try adding 'noacpi' to your boot string in your grub.conf file and see if that helps. I have an AMD Athlon 64 x2 on an ECS mobo that is known to have a problem with acpi. If I try to run without the noacpi switch, it runs very poorly and crashes or halts within minutes of booting, if it boots at all. With the flag, it runs smooth as silk. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
Julian Echave wrote: Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows sees all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...? yeah, looks like its probably broken ACPI data in the BIOS. see if the mainboard or system vendor has a BIOS update to fix this. just because operating system "X" works, doesn't mean its 'right'. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
Sure, find below, I add other stuff as well. Note that there is some bug in the Bios. This does not prevent Centos to boot, and, since Windows sees all four processors, I reckon it shouldn't be the problem...? uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5PAE #1 SMP Tue May 20 10:03:06 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux cat /proc/cpuinfo processor: 0 vendor_id: GenuineIntel cpu family: 6 model: 15 model name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz stepping: 11 cpu MHz: 2400.184 cache size: 4096 KB physical id: 0 siblings: 1 core id: 0 cpu cores: 1 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug: no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu: yes fpu_exception: yes cpuid level: 10 wp: yes flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc up pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 4802.08 * dmesg Linux version 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5PAE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-14)) #1 SMP Tue May 20 10:03:06 EDT 2008 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000e - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - cf213000 (usable) BIOS-e820: cf213000 - cf215000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: cf215000 - cf2c8000 (usable) BIOS-e820: cf2c8000 - cf3e5000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: cf3e5000 - cf3e8000 (usable) BIOS-e820: cf3e8000 - cf3f3000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: cf3f3000 - cf3f4000 (usable) BIOS-e820: cf3f4000 - cf3ff000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: cf3ff000 - cf40 (usable) BIOS-e820: cf40 - d000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: f000 - f800 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fff0 - 0001 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0001 - 00012c00 (usable) 3904MB HIGHMEM available. 896MB LOWMEM available. found SMP MP-table at 000fe200 Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range disabling kdump NX (Execute Disable) protection: active On node 0 totalpages: 1228800 DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:0 Normal zone: 225280 pages, LIFO batch:31 HighMem zone: 999424 pages, LIFO batch:31 DMI 2.4 present. Using APIC driver default Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4 Virtual Wire compatibility mode. OEM ID: Product ID: APIC at: 0xFEE0 Processor #0 6:15 APIC version 20 Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 0 I/O APICs BIOS bug, no explicit IRQ entries, using default mptable. (tell your hw vendor) Processors: 1 Allocating PCI resources starting at d200 (gap: d000:2000) Detected 2400.184 MHz processor. Built 1 zonelists. Total pages: 1228800 Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 acpi=off rhgb quiet mapped APIC to d000 (fee0) Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Initializing CPU#0 CPU 0 irqstacks, hard=c074 soft=c072 PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 16384 bytes) Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Memory: 4067796k/4915200k available (2078k kernel code, 46260k reserved, 859k data, 220k init, 3197740k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4802.08 BogoMIPS (lpj=2401041) Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized SELinux: Initializing. SELinux: Starting in permissive mode selinux_register_security: Registering secondary module capability Capability LSM initialized as secondary Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: After generic identify, caps: bfebfbff 2010 e3bd 0001 CPU: After vendor identify, caps: bfebfbff 2010 e3bd 0001 monitor/mwait feature present. using mwait in idle threads. CPU: L1 I cache: 32K, L1 D cache: 32K CPU: L2 cache: 4096K CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 CPU: After all inits, caps: bfebfbff 2010 0940 e3bd 0001 Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. SMP alternatives: switching to UP code Freeing SMP alternatives: 13k freed CPU0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ66
Re: [CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
Julian Echave wrote: Hi, I'm running Centos 5.1 on an Intel Quad 2 Core with four Q6600 processors. Despite Centos 5 supporting multiple cores (SPM), it doesn't seem to work for me: 1) a dmesg shows that only one processor is seen: "SPM alternatives: switching to UP code", etc. 2) file /proc/cpuinfo shows only one processor 3) top with option 1 (to toggle between seeing all processors or an average) shows only 1 processor. I've googled this, and other people have found this kind of trouble, but I was not able to find any solutions. it might help diagnose this if you paste the output of 'dmesg' at least up to that "SMP Alternatives" message and maybe a couple more lines after it... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] smp falls back to up mode on quad core
Hi, I'm running Centos 5.1 on an Intel Quad 2 Core with four Q6600 processors. Despite Centos 5 supporting multiple cores (SPM), it doesn't seem to work for me: 1) a dmesg shows that only one processor is seen: "SPM alternatives: switching to UP code", etc. 2) file /proc/cpuinfo shows only one processor 3) top with option 1 (to toggle between seeing all processors or an average) shows only 1 processor. I've googled this, and other people have found this kind of trouble, but I was not able to find any solutions. By the way: I've installed windows xp to see if it was a bios problem, but windows sees the 4 processors just fine. Any ideas? Thanks, Julian. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
