[CentOS] Testing

[Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming]

Testing
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing

[Chris Weisiger]

Testing

Sent from my iPhone
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing

[Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming]

Testing
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[H]

On 03/18/2019 10:57 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 3/18/19 6:39 PM, H wrote:
>> Think I got it to work now, I needed to add the RUN export ... at the page 
>> you linked to.
>
>
> Running "export" in your Dockerfile won't change the image that gets built.
>
> I tried running geany in a container on Fedora and had to make two 
> adjustments.  First, the Fedora SELinux policy blocks access to 
> /tmp/.X11-unix, and second I had to enable local connections using xhost, so:
>
> $ sudo setenforce permissive
> $ xhost +local:docker
> $ docker run -i -t --rm -e DISPLAY=$DISPLAY -v /tmp/.X11-unix:/tmp/.X11-unix 
> -v ~/Documents:/root/Documents centos:7 /bin/bash --login
> [root@45fdbee081d2 /]# yum -y install epel-release > /dev/null 2>&1
> [root@45fdbee081d2 /]# yum -y install geany > /dev/null 2>&1
> [root@45fdbee081d2 /]# geany
> $ sudo setenforce enforcing
>
>
>> I can now get geany to open, have not yet figured out how to be able to 
>> access files on the host computer...
>
>
> You'd use docker-run's "-v" flag to bind-mount the directory containing your 
> files in the container, as I mounted my Documents directory above.  Take a 
> look at the "docker-run" man page and check the documentation for each of the 
> flags used in that command, at a minimum.
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Got it working, turned out all I had to do was to add another volume that is my 
home directory on the host computer. This relies on having the same user in 
both docker and on host computer.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[Gordon Messmer]

On 3/18/19 6:39 PM, H wrote:

Think I got it to work now, I needed to add the RUN export ... at the page you 
linked to.



Running "export" in your Dockerfile won't change the image that gets built.

I tried running geany in a container on Fedora and had to make two 
adjustments.  First, the Fedora SELinux policy blocks access to 
/tmp/.X11-unix, and second I had to enable local connections using 
xhost, so:


$ sudo setenforce permissive
$ xhost +local:docker
$ docker run -i -t --rm -e DISPLAY=$DISPLAY -v 
/tmp/.X11-unix:/tmp/.X11-unix -v ~/Documents:/root/Documents centos:7 
/bin/bash --login

[root@45fdbee081d2 /]# yum -y install epel-release > /dev/null 2>&1
[root@45fdbee081d2 /]# yum -y install geany > /dev/null 2>&1
[root@45fdbee081d2 /]# geany
$ sudo setenforce enforcing



I can now get geany to open, have not yet figured out how to be able to access 
files on the host computer...



You'd use docker-run's "-v" flag to bind-mount the directory containing 
your files in the container, as I mounted my Documents directory above.  
Take a look at the "docker-run" man page and check the documentation for 
each of the flags used in that command, at a minimum.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[H]

On 03/18/2019 09:32 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 3/18/19 6:05 PM, H wrote:
>> Thank you, visited that page and tried the above but get the following 
>> messages:
>>
>> No protocol specified
>> Geany: cannot open display
>
>
> Can you copy the text of the command you ran and its output from your 
> terminal, and paste that in a reply email?
>
> Also, run the command a second time, but add "echo -- " at the beginning so 
> you can see how variables are expanded.  Include that command and output in 
> your reply.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Think I got it to work now, I needed to add the RUN export ... at the page you 
linked to.

I can now get geany to open, have not yet figured out how to be able to access 
files on the host computer...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[Gordon Messmer]

On 3/18/19 6:05 PM, H wrote:

Thank you, visited that page and tried the above but get the following messages:

No protocol specified
Geany: cannot open display



Can you copy the text of the command you ran and its output from your 
terminal, and paste that in a reply email?


Also, run the command a second time, but add "echo -- " at the beginning 
so you can see how variables are expanded.  Include that command and 
output in your reply.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[H]

On 03/17/2019 04:28 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 3/17/19 1:08 PM, H wrote:
>> I am correct in that docker cannot be used, or? If it can be used, what 
>> changes would I need to make to be able to run geany from a docker?
>
>
> A google search for "run x11 app in docker" returns 
> http://fabiorehm.com/blog/2014/09/11/running-gui-apps-with-docker/ as the 
> first result.  That blog entry suggests running the app in container with the 
> DISPLAY environment variable, and with the /tmp/.X11-unix directory shared so 
> that the X11 unix sockets are available in the container:
>
> |docker run -ti --rm \ -e DISPLAY=$DISPLAY \ -v /tmp/.X11-unix:/tmp/.X11-unix 
> \ geany |
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Thank you, visited that page and tried the above but get the following messages:

No protocol specified
Geany: cannot open display

Perhaps there is something else I have to set up in the container?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[Gordon Messmer]

On 3/17/19 1:08 PM, H wrote:

I am correct in that docker cannot be used, or? If it can be used, what changes 
would I need to make to be able to run geany from a docker?



A google search for "run x11 app in docker" returns 
http://fabiorehm.com/blog/2014/09/11/running-gui-apps-with-docker/ as 
the first result.  That blog entry suggests running the app in container 
with the DISPLAY environment variable, and with the /tmp/.X11-unix 
directory shared so that the X11 unix sockets are available in the 
container:


|docker run -ti --rm \ -e DISPLAY=$DISPLAY \ -v 
/tmp/.X11-unix:/tmp/.X11-unix \ geany |


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[H]

On 03/17/2019 03:06 PM, Brent Earl wrote:
> A virtual machine running CentOS with the same environment and packages
> installed should do the trick.
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 8:02 AM H  wrote:
>
>> I need to test a new version of Geany but already have the repo version
>> installed on all my systems. In order not to foul up my current
>> installation, what is the suggested procedure for installing and testing
>> this new version?
>>
>> I tried installing in a docker container which of course went fine but
>> could not run it from there.
>>
>> Suggestions appreciated, thank you.
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I am correct in that docker cannot be used, or? If it can be used, what changes 
would I need to make to be able to run geany from a docker?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[Brent Earl]

A virtual machine running CentOS with the same environment and packages
installed should do the trick.

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 8:02 AM H  wrote:

> I need to test a new version of Geany but already have the repo version
> installed on all my systems. In order not to foul up my current
> installation, what is the suggested procedure for installing and testing
> this new version?
>
> I tried installing in a docker container which of course went fine but
> could not run it from there.
>
> Suggestions appreciated, thank you.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing software on CentOS 7

[H]

I need to test a new version of Geany but already have the repo version 
installed on all my systems. In order not to foul up my current installation, 
what is the suggested procedure for installing and testing this new version?

I tried installing in a docker container which of course went fine but could 
not run it from there.

Suggestions appreciated, thank you.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing

[Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming]

Please ignore.


===BEGIN SIGNATURE===

Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017

[1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/

[2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/

[3] 
https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming

===END SIGNATURE===
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing

[Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing - Is the CentOS Mailing list still working?

[William A. Mahaffey III]

On 06/05/16 19:46, Anthony K wrote:
I haven't received a single message since 3rd June and was wondering 
whether the mailing list is down.



Cheers,
ak.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



I have been receiving a dribble of messages dated 6/4/16 this A.M. 

--

William A. Mahaffey III

 --

"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
 ever devised by man."
   -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing - Is the CentOS Mailing list still working?

[Anthony K]

I haven't received a single message since 3rd June and was wondering 
whether the mailing list is down.



Cheers,
ak.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Benjamin Smith]

On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 07:28:13 PM Stephen Harris wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:17:25PM -0700, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
  I've already confirmed for example, that using openssl s_client as you
  mention above doesn't actually check the certs, just lists them.
 
 Actually it does check them as well.
 
 e.g.
   openssl s_client -connect localhost:443  /dev/null  /dev/null
   depth=0
 /C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/
 CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com verify error:num=18:self
 signed certificate
   verify return:1
   depth=0
 /C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/
 CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com verify
 error:num=10:certificate has expired
   notAfter=Aug  9 23:55:39 2014 GMT
   verify return:1
   depth=0
 /C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/
 CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com notAfter=Aug  9 23:55:39
 2014 GMT
   verify return:1
   DONE
 
 Notice the verify error lines; it's both self-signed _and_ expired.
 
 In chained certs it'll check each of the chains.
 
 e.g.
   openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443  /dev/null  /dev/null
   CONNECTED(0003)
   depth=3 /C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
   verify return:1
   depth=2 /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
   verify return:1
   depth=1 /C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
   verify return:1
   depth=0 /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com
 verify return:1
   ---
   Certificate chain
0 s:/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com
  i:/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
1 s:/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
  i:/C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
2 s:/C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
  i:/C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
 
 You can do a _LOT_ with the openssl command line (e.g. show all the
 intermediate certs in detail with -showcerts).  'man s_client'
 
 If you have a server with a broken intermediate chain then run the command
 and see what it returns.

I ended up discovering that curl recently added the option --resolve that 
allows me to do what I need. I had to download a statically compiled version 
and install in /usr/local to get it working on EL6. 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Leon Fauster]

Am 22.10.2014 um 20:14 schrieb Benjamin Smith li...@benjamindsmith.com:
 On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 07:28:13 PM Stephen Harris wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:17:25PM -0700, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 I've already confirmed for example, that using openssl s_client as you
 mention above doesn't actually check the certs, just lists them.
 
 Actually it does check them as well.
 
 e.g.
  openssl s_client -connect localhost:443  /dev/null  /dev/null
  depth=0
 /C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/
 CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com verify error:num=18:self
 signed certificate
  verify return:1
  depth=0
 /C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/
 CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com verify
 error:num=10:certificate has expired
  notAfter=Aug  9 23:55:39 2014 GMT
  verify return:1
  depth=0
 /C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/
 CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com notAfter=Aug  9 23:55:39
 2014 GMT
  verify return:1
  DONE
 
 Notice the verify error lines; it's both self-signed _and_ expired.
 
 In chained certs it'll check each of the chains.
 
 e.g.
  openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443  /dev/null  /dev/null
  CONNECTED(0003)
  depth=3 /C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
  verify return:1
  depth=2 /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
  verify return:1
  depth=1 /C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
  verify return:1
  depth=0 /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com
 verify return:1
  ---
  Certificate chain
   0 s:/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com
 i:/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
   1 s:/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
 i:/C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
   2 s:/C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
 i:/C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
 
 You can do a _LOT_ with the openssl command line (e.g. show all the
 intermediate certs in detail with -showcerts).  'man s_client'
 
 If you have a server with a broken intermediate chain then run the command
 and see what it returns.
 
 I ended up discovering that curl recently added the option --resolve that 
 allows me to do what I need. I had to download a statically compiled version 
 and install in /usr/local to get it working on EL6. 


just add your host into /etc/hosts

--
LF


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[lists]

So, with all the hubbub around POODLE and ssl, we're preparing a new load 
balancer using HAProxy. 

So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble 
validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a prototype 
foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address that matches 
DNS for foo.com? 

For non-ssl sites, I can specify the url like http://1.2.3.4/path and pass an 
explicit host: foo.com http header but that fails for SSL certificate 
validation. 

You can also set a hosts file entry, but that's also rather painful. Is there a 
better option? 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Travis Kendrick]

On 10/21/2014 04:57 PM, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 So, with all the hubbub around POODLE and ssl, we're preparing a new load 
 balancer using HAProxy. 

 So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble 
 validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a prototype 
 foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address that matches 
 DNS for foo.com? 

 For non-ssl sites, I can specify the url like http://1.2.3.4/path and pass an 
 explicit host: foo.com http header but that fails for SSL certificate 
 validation. 

 You can also set a hosts file entry, but that's also rather painful. Is there 
 a 
 better option? 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I just disabled SSLv3 altogether on my server and just use TLS. On my
site I only use TLS 1.2 and not earlier versions or SSL so I was never
affected by POODLE.
-- 
Travis Kendrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Stephen Harris]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:57:42PM -0700, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble 
 validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a prototype 
 foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address that matches 
 DNS for foo.com? 

openssl s_client -connect ip.ad.dr.ess:443
then decode the cert

e.g.
$ openssl s_client -connect 1.2.3.4:443  /dev/null | cert

Now you can use the x509 to look at various things
eg
$ openssl x509 -in cert -subject -noout
subject= 
/description=foobar/C=US/CN=ssl.example.com/emailAddress=f...@example.com

man x509

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[lists]

On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 06:07:29 PM Stephen Harris wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:57:42PM -0700, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
  So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble
  validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a
  prototype foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address
  that matches DNS for foo.com?
 
 openssl s_client -connect ip.ad.dr.ess:443
 then decode the cert
 
 e.g.
 $ openssl s_client -connect 1.2.3.4:443  /dev/null | cert
 
 Now you can use the x509 to look at various things
 eg
 $ openssl x509 -in cert -subject -noout
 subject=
 /description=foobar/C=US/CN=ssl.example.com/emailAddress=f...@example.com
 
 man x509

The issue is that I wouldn't consider myself qualified to make sense of this 
output. Curl noticed when an intermediate SSL cert wasn't installed correctly, 
so if possible I'd really like to use a CLI browser such as curl or wget. 
I've already confirmed for example, that using openssl s_client as you mention 
above doesn't actually check the certs, just lists them. 

Thus, the recent issues with firefox and intermediate certs would be tough to 
look for 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[lists]

On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 05:02:53 PM Travis Kendrick wrote:
 On 10/21/2014 04:57 PM, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
  So, with all the hubbub around POODLE and ssl, we're preparing a new load
  balancer using HAProxy.
  
  So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble
  validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a
  prototype foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address
  that matches DNS for foo.com?
  
  For non-ssl sites, I can specify the url like http://1.2.3.4/path and pass
  an explicit host: foo.com http header but that fails for SSL
  certificate validation.
  
  You can also set a hosts file entry, but that's also rather painful. Is
  there a better option?
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 I just disabled SSLv3 altogether on my server and just use TLS. On my
 site I only use TLS 1.2 and not earlier versions or SSL so I was never
 affected by POODLE.

As far as I can tell, this comment is not related to the question I asked... 
at all. 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Stephen Harris]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:17:25PM -0700, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 I've already confirmed for example, that using openssl s_client as you mention
 above doesn't actually check the certs, just lists them. 

Actually it does check them as well.

e.g.
  openssl s_client -connect localhost:443  /dev/null  /dev/null
  depth=0 
/C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com
  verify error:num=18:self signed certificate
  verify return:1
  depth=0 
/C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com
  verify error:num=10:certificate has expired
  notAfter=Aug  9 23:55:39 2014 GMT
  verify return:1
  depth=0 
/C=--/ST=SomeState/L=SomeCity/O=SomeOrganization/OU=SomeOrganizationalUnit/CN=a.example.com/emailAddress=r...@a.example.com
  notAfter=Aug  9 23:55:39 2014 GMT
  verify return:1
  DONE

Notice the verify error lines; it's both self-signed _and_ expired.

In chained certs it'll check each of the chains.

e.g.
  openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443  /dev/null  /dev/null
  CONNECTED(0003)
  depth=3 /C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
  verify return:1
  depth=2 /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
  verify return:1
  depth=1 /C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
  verify return:1
  depth=0 /C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com
  verify return:1
  ---
  Certificate chain
   0 s:/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=www.google.com
 i:/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
   1 s:/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority G2
 i:/C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
   2 s:/C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA
 i:/C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
  
You can do a _LOT_ with the openssl command line (e.g. show all the
intermediate certs in detail with -showcerts).  'man s_client'

If you have a server with a broken intermediate chain then run the command
and see what it returns.

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Travis Kendrick]

On 10/21/2014 06:24 PM, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 05:02:53 PM Travis Kendrick wrote:
 On 10/21/2014 04:57 PM, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 So, with all the hubbub around POODLE and ssl, we're preparing a new load
 balancer using HAProxy.

 So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble
 validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a
 prototype foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address
 that matches DNS for foo.com?

 For non-ssl sites, I can specify the url like http://1.2.3.4/path and pass
 an explicit host: foo.com http header but that fails for SSL
 certificate validation.

 You can also set a hosts file entry, but that's also rather painful. Is
 there a better option?
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 I just disabled SSLv3 altogether on my server and just use TLS. On my
 site I only use TLS 1.2 and not earlier versions or SSL so I was never
 affected by POODLE.
 As far as I can tell, this comment is not related to the question I asked... 
 at all. 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I thought you were talking about dealing with POODLE. Maybe I misunderstood.
-- 
Travis Kendrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing dark SSL sites

[Travis Kendrick]

On 10/21/2014 06:24 PM, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 05:02:53 PM Travis Kendrick wrote:
 On 10/21/2014 04:57 PM, li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote:
 So, with all the hubbub around POODLE and ssl, we're preparing a new load
 balancer using HAProxy.

 So we have a set of unit tests written using PHPUnit, having trouble
 validating certificates. How do you test/validate an SSL cert for a
 prototype foo.com server if it's not actually active at the IP address
 that matches DNS for foo.com?

 For non-ssl sites, I can specify the url like http://1.2.3.4/path and pass
 an explicit host: foo.com http header but that fails for SSL
 certificate validation.

 You can also set a hosts file entry, but that's also rather painful. Is
 there a better option?
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 I just disabled SSLv3 altogether on my server and just use TLS. On my
 site I only use TLS 1.2 and not earlier versions or SSL so I was never
 affected by POODLE.
 As far as I can tell, this comment is not related to the question I asked... 
 at all. 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Maybe I did misunderstood, in which case ignore my post and/or remove it
as it didn't help.
-- 
Travis Kendrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing packages for Xen, Xen Kernel, and centos-release-xen

[Johnny Hughes]

For those of you who use xen4centos, but are not on the centos-virt mail
list (shame on you if you do that :D) ..

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2014-October/004132.html

If you can test the auto update functionality of the kernel as outlined
in that post and report the results (hopefully to the virt mail list
:D), it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Johan Vermeulen]

This time in the normal repo or also in testing?
Greetings, j.

verzonden m.b.v Android
vandaar de beknoptheid.

Nux! n...@li.nux.roschreef:

On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
 On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
 n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Jake,

 Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
 I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
 Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
 scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any
 meta packages?
 Hi,

 The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a 
 LAN
 and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating
 delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.

 The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These 
 would
 usually be tagged with a .hr tag (ie,
 packagename-version.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal.

 But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would
 require a rebuild.

 So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice
 mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them 
 to
 /var/www/html/repository/arch (Which is actually just a link
 to /home/username/rpmbuild/RPMS)

 Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other
 packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:

 createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/arch
 createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS

 A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now
 from local machines on the LAN I would just use yum install 
 libobasis*
 libreoffice* etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra 
 packages.
 and yum update takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the
 above..)

 This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could
 also be done publicly, however it is still a messy method even if
 somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).

 I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for
 EL6.

 I guess that raises the question of You have the repo, rpmbuild
 etc setup, why don't you build them your self?, and to answer it:

 Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core
 here)

 But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).

And that's what I did as well. Check this out:
http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_format.html
I'll spam this in a separate message on the usual places.

Also, more good news comes from Redhat as RHEL 6.3 will contains 
Libreoffice 3.4.5!

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Nux!]

On 27.04.2012 07:32, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
 This time in the normal repo or also in testing?
 Greetings, j.

Johan,

I don't think this repo will be related to the CentOS project, so it'll 
only live on my server.

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Nux!]

On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
 On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
 n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Jake,

 Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
 I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
 Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
 scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any
 meta packages?
 Hi,

 The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a 
 LAN
 and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating
 delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.

 The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These 
 would
 usually be tagged with a .hr tag (ie,
 packagename-version.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal.

 But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would
 require a rebuild.

 So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice
 mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them 
 to
 /var/www/html/repository/arch (Which is actually just a link
 to /home/username/rpmbuild/RPMS)

 Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other
 packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:

 createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/arch
 createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS

 A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now
 from local machines on the LAN I would just use yum install 
 libobasis*
 libreoffice* etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra 
 packages.
 and yum update takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the
 above..)

 This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could
 also be done publicly, however it is still a messy method even if
 somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).

 I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for
 EL6.

 I guess that raises the question of You have the repo, rpmbuild
 etc setup, why don't you build them your self?, and to answer it:

 Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core
 here)

 But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).

And that's what I did as well. Check this out:
http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_format.html
I'll spam this in a separate message on the usual places.

Also, more good news comes from Redhat as RHEL 6.3 will contains 
Libreoffice 3.4.5!

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Philippe Naudin]

Le ven. 20 avril 2012 19:24:37 CEST, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit:

 On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
  I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official
  *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
  yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and
  then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now).
 
  So : me too ;)
  (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official
  LibreOffice...)
 
 
 My srpms for meta-package are here: 
 http://rpms.plnet.rs/plnet-centos5-srpms/RPMS.plnet-compiled/
 
 but my rpms also have problems with removing openoffice.

Thanks Ljubomir,

The problem occurs only when removing openoffice (like in yum
remove), or also when updating it ?

If it happens only when removing (and this is normal IMHO), it's
already a big progress in comparison with my previous attempts.

Cheers,

-- 
Philippe Naudin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Ljubomir Ljubojevic]

On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
 I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official
 *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
 yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and
 then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now).

 So : me too ;)
 (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official
 LibreOffice...)


My srpms for meta-package are here: 
http://rpms.plnet.rs/plnet-centos5-srpms/RPMS.plnet-compiled/

but my rpms also have problems with removing openoffice.

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

Jake Shipton writes:

 On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
 n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
 yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
 
 If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as
 you will run into conflicts!
 
 
 Thanks for your efforts Nux :-). 
 
 If at some point it would be possible for you to support 3.5 that would
 be great :-). I am currently using the 3.5.1 official RPM's in a home
 repo (so it's also shared to another CentOS box). But none-the-less
 it's good to see some progress regarding Libreoffice  CentOS :-).

Jake,

Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least 
Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages?


--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Philippe Naudin]

Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
 ...
 I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least 
 Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
 Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages?

One interest in using official RPMs, from OpenOffice or LibreOffice,
is their limited set of dependencies. They don't require gnome, and
this makes a big difference on headless, soundless machines.

I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official
*Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do 
yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and
then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now). 

So : me too ;) 
(I am interested to hear about a better way to install official
LibreOffice...)

-- 
Philippe Naudin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Jake Shipton]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Jake,
 
 Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
 I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least 
 Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
 scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any
 meta packages?
Hi,

The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN
and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating
delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.

The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would
usually be tagged with a .hr tag (ie,
packagename-version.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal. 

But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would
require a rebuild.

So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice
mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to
/var/www/html/repository/arch (Which is actually just a link
to /home/username/rpmbuild/RPMS)

Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other
packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:

createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/arch
createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS

A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now
from local machines on the LAN I would just use yum install libobasis*
libreoffice* etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages.
and yum update takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the
above..) 

This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could
also be done publicly, however it is still a messy method even if
somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).

I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for
EL6. 

I guess that raises the question of You have the repo, rpmbuild
etc setup, why don't you build them your self?, and to answer it:

Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core
here)

But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).

PS: Sorry for any typo's etc I was tired when I wrote this email, had
been awake only a few minutes.

-- 
Jake Shipton (JakeMS)
GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F
GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

Philippe Naudin writes:

 Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
 ...
 I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least 
 Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
 Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages?
 
 One interest in using official RPMs, from OpenOffice or LibreOffice,
 is their limited set of dependencies. They don't require gnome, and
 this makes a big difference on headless, soundless machines.
 
 I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official
 *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do 
 yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and
 then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now). 
 
 So : me too ;) 
 (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official
 LibreOffice...)
 
 -- 
 Philippe Naudin

Thanks for taking the time to reply, Philippe. I'll try to put all your guys 
opinions together and see if I can come with anything that could work long 
term.
Right now I'm trying to backport from Fedora, and while the heavylifting is 
done by Fedora people, it's still not easy to do this.
I'll keep you guys updated.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

Jake Shipton writes:

 On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
 n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
 Jake,
 
 Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
 I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least 
 Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
 scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any
 meta packages?
 Hi,
 
 The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN
 and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating
 delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them.
 
 The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would
 usually be tagged with a .hr tag (ie,
 packagename-version.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal. 
 
 But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would
 require a rebuild.
 
 So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice
 mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to
 /var/www/html/repository/arch (Which is actually just a link
 to /home/username/rpmbuild/RPMS)
 
 Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other
 packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run:
 
 createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/arch
 createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS
 
 A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now
 from local machines on the LAN I would just use yum install libobasis*
 libreoffice* etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages.
 and yum update takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the
 above..) 
 
 This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could
 also be done publicly, however it is still a messy method even if
 somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo).
 
 I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for
 EL6. 
 
 I guess that raises the question of You have the repo, rpmbuild
 etc setup, why don't you build them your self?, and to answer it:
 
 Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core
 here)
 
 But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-).
 
 PS: Sorry for any typo's etc I was tired when I wrote this email, had
 been awake only a few minutes.
 

Thanks Jake for the details.
Well, what you say about building it yourself is what I'm actually trying to 
do now, but it is not a piece of cake:
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice-testing/el6/i386/
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice-testing/el6/x86_64/
But at least it's done Fedora/Redhat way :-)

I will seriously look into making a proper repo out of the Libreoffice.org 
rpms.. I'll let you know how it goes.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Foster, Rilindo (Contractor)]

Arif,

You would want to run tcpdump (or some other sniffer() on the host server, so 
that you can confirm that there is two-way traffic. If tcpdump on the host 
server does not show any traffic from your client, something is blocking 
inbound. If you see traffic coming into the server, but nothing returning, you 
probably have issues around OSI layers 5-7. If you see a response, but you did 
not see from your client, then it may something blocking return traffic.

- Rilindo 


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
Arif Hossain
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:25 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now i want 
test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My udp daemon is 
running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i issue following command 
for putting udp datagram :
$nc -uvvz host port

it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does not 
returns from recv() call. 

my goal is to put arbitrary data on the udp socket by netcat. i do not have any 
experience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can help me out with this.

thanks in advance.

--
You have a voice
The King's Speech

Public Key : $ gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key C88CFC23

This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings 
Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may contain 
proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

Johan Vermeulen writes:

 Dear All,
 
 I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
 * I then have a Selinux module
 * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, 
 because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
 
 I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when 
 logging in with ssh -X and
 then opening LibreOffice.
 
 greetings, J.

Hi,

I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from 
Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*

If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you 
will run into conflicts!

[1] - 
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/nux-libreoffice-release-0-2.el6.nux.noarch.rpm

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

n...@li.nux.ro writes:

 Johan Vermeulen writes:
 
 Dear All,
 
 I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
 * I then have a Selinux module
 * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, 
 because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
 
 I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when 
 logging in with ssh -X and
 then opening LibreOffice.
 
 greetings, J.
 
 Hi,
 
 I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from 
 Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
 yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
 
 If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you 
 will run into conflicts!
 
 [1] - 
 http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/nux-libreoffice-release-0-2.el6.nux.noarch.rpm

Hopefuly Karanbir will quickly incorporate this in Centos-testing.. :)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Jake Shipton]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
 yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
 
 If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as
 you will run into conflicts!
 

Thanks for your efforts Nux :-). 

If at some point it would be possible for you to support 3.5 that would
be great :-). I am currently using the 3.5.1 official RPM's in a home
repo (so it's also shared to another CentOS box). But none-the-less
it's good to see some progress regarding Libreoffice  CentOS :-).

-- 
Jake Shipton (JakeMS)
GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F
GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Cliff Pratt]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Arif Hossain freefall1...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 14:11 +, Giles Coochey wrote:
 --ms00020507030501060609
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 On 14/03/2012 13:59, Arif Hossain wrote:
  On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
  On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Arif Hossainfreefall1...@gmail.com =
  wrote:
  i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. n=
 ow
  i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My=

  udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
  issue following command for putting udp datagram :
  $nc -uvvzhost  port
 
  it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which do=
 es
  not returns from recv() call.
 
  my goal is to ppience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can he=
 lp me
  out with this.
  Do you have iptables running?   The default config would probably
  block your udp traffic.
 
  here is my iptable-rules
 
  # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
  *mangle
  :PREROUTING ACCEPT [329554:95268521]
  :INPUT ACCEPT [88918:46924677]
  :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
  :OUTPUT ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
  :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
  COMMIT
  # Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
  # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
  *filter
  :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
  :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
  :OUTPUT ACCEPT [206514:24743648]
  -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dportport  -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
  -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
  COMMIT
  # Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
 
 And your INPUT chain rejects everything that is not matched by those=20
 lines above it.

 You'll need a:

 -A INPUT -p udp --dport port -j ACCEPT in there before you go to REJECT=
 =2E

 --=20
 Best Regards,

 for testing purpose i have flushed all rules in iptables -t filter

 $iptables -t filter --flush

 but still if try putting data by nc:

 $nc -uvv localhost 7160

 outputs :

 write error: connection refused.

Is the UDP daemon listening on 127.0.0.1 (localhost)?

Cheers,

Cliff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Arif Hossain]

i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now
i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My
udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
issue following command for putting udp datagram :
$nc -uvvz host port

it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does
not returns from recv() call. 

my goal is to put arbitrary data on the udp socket by netcat. i do not
have any experience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can help me
out with this.

thanks in advance.

-- 
You have a voice
The King's Speech

Public Key : $ gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key C88CFC23


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Les Mikesell]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Arif Hossain freefall1...@gmail.com wrote:
 i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now
 i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My
 udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
 issue following command for putting udp datagram :
 $nc -uvvz host port

 it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does
 not returns from recv() call.

 my goal is to put arbitrary data on the udp socket by netcat. i do not
 have any experience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can help me
 out with this.

Do you have iptables running?   The default config would probably
block your udp traffic.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Arif Hossain]

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Arif Hossain freefall1...@gmail.com wrote:
  i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now
  i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My
  udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
  issue following command for putting udp datagram :
  $nc -uvvz host port
 
  it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does
  not returns from recv() call.
 
  my goal is to ppience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can help me
  out with this.
 
 Do you have iptables running?   The default config would probably
 block your udp traffic.
 

here is my iptable-rules

# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [329554:95268521]
:INPUT ACCEPT [88918:46924677]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
COMMIT
# Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [206514:24743648]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT 
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT 
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT 
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport port -j ACCEPT 
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited 
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited 
COMMIT
# Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012


-- 
You have a voice
The King's Speech

Public Key : $ gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key C88CFC23


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Giles Coochey]

On 14/03/2012 13:59, Arif Hossain wrote:

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Arif Hossainfreefall1...@gmail.com  wrote:

i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now
i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My
udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
issue following command for putting udp datagram :
$nc -uvvzhost  port

it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does
not returns from recv() call.

my goal is to ppience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can help me
out with this.

Do you have iptables running?   The default config would probably
block your udp traffic.


here is my iptable-rules

# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [329554:95268521]
:INPUT ACCEPT [88918:46924677]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
COMMIT
# Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [206514:24743648]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dportport  -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT
# Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012

And your INPUT chain rejects everything that is not matched by those 
lines above it.


You'll need a:

-A INPUT -p udp --dport port -j ACCEPT in there before you go to REJECT.

--
Best Regards,

Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
UK Mobile: +44 7983 877 438
Business Email: giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Arif Hossain]

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 14:11 +, Giles Coochey wrote:
 --ms00020507030501060609
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On 14/03/2012 13:59, Arif Hossain wrote:
  On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
  On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Arif Hossainfreefall1...@gmail.com =
  wrote:
  i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. n=
 ow
  i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My=
 
  udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
  issue following command for putting udp datagram :
  $nc -uvvzhost  port
 
  it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which do=
 es
  not returns from recv() call.
 
  my goal is to ppience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can he=
 lp me
  out with this.
  Do you have iptables running?   The default config would probably
  block your udp traffic.
 
  here is my iptable-rules
 
  # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
  *mangle
  :PREROUTING ACCEPT [329554:95268521]
  :INPUT ACCEPT [88918:46924677]
  :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
  :OUTPUT ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
  :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
  COMMIT
  # Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
  # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
  *filter
  :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
  :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
  :OUTPUT ACCEPT [206514:24743648]
  -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dportport  -j ACCEPT
  -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
  -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
  COMMIT
  # Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
 
 And your INPUT chain rejects everything that is not matched by those=20
 lines above it.
 
 You'll need a:
 
 -A INPUT -p udp --dport port -j ACCEPT in there before you go to REJECT=
 =2E
 
 --=20
 Best Regards,

for testing purpose i have flushed all rules in iptables -t filter

$iptables -t filter --flush

but still if try putting data by nc:

$nc -uvv localhost 7160

outputs :

write error: connection refused. 

 

 Giles Coochey
 NetSecSpec Ltd
 UK Mobile: +44 7983 877 438
 Business Email: giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk
 Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
 Skype: gilescoochey
 
 
 
 --ms00020507030501060609--
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat

[Giles Coochey]

On 14/03/2012 14:56, Arif Hossain wrote:

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 14:11 +, Giles Coochey wrote:

--ms00020507030501060609
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 14/03/2012 13:59, Arif Hossain wrote:

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 08:37 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Arif Hossainfreefall1...@gmail.com  =

  wrote:

i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. n=

ow

i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My=
udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i
issue following command for putting udp datagram :
$nc -uvvzhost   port

it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which do=

es

not returns from recv() call.

my goal is to ppience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can he=

lp me

out with this.

Do you have iptables running?   The default config would probably
block your udp traffic.


here is my iptable-rules

# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
*mangle
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [329554:95268521]
:INPUT ACCEPT [88918:46924677]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7296:1924138]
COMMIT
# Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [206514:24743648]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dportport   -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT
# Completed on Wed Mar 14 19:58:13 2012


And your INPUT chain rejects everything that is not matched by those=20
lines above it.

You'll need a:

-A INPUT -p udp --dportport  -j ACCEPT in there before you go to REJECT=
=2E

--=20
Best Regards,

for testing purpose i have flushed all rules in iptables -t filter

$iptables -t filter --flush

but still if try putting data by nc:

$nc -uvv localhost 7160

outputs :

write error: connection refused.



Is SELinux installed and Enforcing?

--
Best Regards,

Giles Coochey
NetSecSpec Ltd
UK Mobile: +44 7983 877 438
Business Email: giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk
Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net
Skype: gilescoochey


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Ljubomir Ljubojevic]

On 03/05/2012 04:45 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:

 I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's
 release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop
 integration needed some work.

 It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I
 created virtual packages to install localized environment that pulls all
 packages I wanted. And update is much simpler from repository, that is
 why I am trying to force people to use it that way so we can move it to
 regular repository.

 So Ljubomir, you have unpacked the official rpms and made a repo out of
 them? That might work, with a meta-package that would pull in the core
 stuff.. Still not very elegant.
 I really wish LO people would make a proper repo …
 I'll mention this in my letter to Santa this year.

 In the meanwhile we're probably going to have LO 3.4.5 in 6.3, so it's nice.
 Apparently 3.5.0 was not quite ready for (enteprise) prime time.


Yes, I did that around CentOS 5.2 or 5.3, when Openoffice 3.1 came out, 
then upgraded to 3.2. I still have them in my repository for EL 5.x.

Main reason was that OpenOffice installer from tar was not working, and 
tar for Serbian language was lacking desktop integration for 
RHEL/Fedora, so I had to unpack and install via yum/rpm manually using 
complicated commands I had to write down to remember, then separately 
adding Serbian Language support, and I hated that.

Issuing yum install ooo3-sr to install it along with Serbian language 
support was much easier :D


-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:

 I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's 
 release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop 
 integration needed some work.
 
 It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I 
 created virtual packages to install localized environment that pulls all 
 packages I wanted. And update is much simpler from repository, that is 
 why I am trying to force people to use it that way so we can move it to 
 regular repository.

So Ljubomir, you have unpacked the official rpms and made a repo out of 
them? That might work, with a meta-package that would pull in the core 
stuff.. Still not very elegant.
I really wish LO people would make a proper repo …
I'll mention this in my letter to Santa this year.

In the meanwhile we're probably going to have LO 3.4.5 in 6.3, so it's nice. 
Apparently 3.5.0 was not quite ready for (enteprise) prime time.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[James B. Byrne]

On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:

 Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All
 that is
 necessary is for several people use packages from
 testing repo and
 report that they are working without issues to the
 Centos-devel mailing
 list in this thread:
 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-September/008159.html
 ,
 and packages will be moved to Extras repo.

 Hi,

 Several people have tested this successfully. You can even
 get slightly
 newer packages from here:
 http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that
 Karanbir hasn't
 yet got around to putting in testing (there's a *-release
 rpm there, too).
 I would advise against using libeoffice.org supplied RPMs
 at this stage as
 RHEL are also getting ready to release LO 3.4.5 in EL6
 that will (hopefully)
 gracefully upgrade my packages.


For what it is worth, I am running LibreOffice 3.5.0
installed from rpms provided by the document foundation
and having no troubles with write or calc. I do not really
use the other parts so on those I cannot comment.

In fact, the experience is far better than I had with 
OpenOffice-3.3, which was so bad I went back to the 3.2
version provided with CentOS.

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Johan Vermeulen]

Dear All,

I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
* I then have a Selinux module
* Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, 
because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.

I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when 
logging in with ssh -X and
then opening LibreOffice.

greetings, J.



On 27-02-12 09:00, wwp wrote:
 Hello,


 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguinvnpeng...@vnoss.org  wrote:

 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs  wrote:
 On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
 Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
 Same here. Download'ed .tgz from libreoffice.org, unpacked and
 installed the .rpm I wanted (help, languages, core stuff), integrated
 to the GNOME desktop and works like a charm.


 Regards,



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[wwp]

Hello Johan,


On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be 
wrote:

 Dear All,
 
 I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
 * I then have a Selinux module
 * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, 
 because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
 
 I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when 
 logging in with ssh -X and
 then opening LibreOffice.

Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this
solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo
and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often,
and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.


Regards,

 On 27-02-12 09:00, wwp wrote:
  Hello,
 
 
  On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguinvnpeng...@vnoss.org  wrote:
 
  On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs  wrote:
  On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
  You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
  Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
  Same here. Download'ed .tgz from libreoffice.org, unpacked and
  installed the .rpm I wanted (help, languages, core stuff), integrated
  to the GNOME desktop and works like a charm.
 
 
  Regards,
 
 
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-- 
wwp


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Markus Falb]

On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
 Hello Johan,
 
 
 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen 
 jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be wrote:
 
 Dear All,

 I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
 * I then have a Selinux module
 * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, 
 because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.

 I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when 
 logging in with ssh -X and
 then opening LibreOffice.
 
 Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this
 solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo
 and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often,
 and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.

You could restrict the testing repo to only libreoffice, see yum.conf(5)
includepkgs=libreoffice
or if there are dependencies needed from testing
includepkgs=libreoffice dep1 dep2 ...

-- 
Kind Regards, Markus Falb



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Ljubomir Ljubojevic]

On 02/27/2012 11:16 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
 On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
 Hello Johan,


 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan 
 Vermeulenjvermeu...@cawdekempen.be  wrote:

 Dear All,

 I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
 * I then have a Selinux module
 * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, 
 because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.

 I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when 
 logging in with ssh -X and
 then opening LibreOffice.

 Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this
 solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo
 and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often,
 and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.

 You could restrict the testing repo to only libreoffice, see yum.conf(5)
 includepkgs=libreoffice
 or if there are dependencies needed from testing
 includepkgs=libreoffice dep1 dep2 ...


Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All that is 
necessary is for several people use packages from testing repo and 
report that they are working without issues to the Centos-devel mailing 
list in this thread: 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-September/008159.html , 
and packages will be moved to Extras repo.


-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[nux]

Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:

 Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All that is 
 necessary is for several people use packages from testing repo and 
 report that they are working without issues to the Centos-devel mailing 
 list in this thread: 
 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-September/008159.html , 
 and packages will be moved to Extras repo.

Hi,

Several people have tested this successfully. You can even get slightly 
newer packages from here:
http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that Karanbir hasn't 
yet got around to putting in testing (there's a *-release rpm there, too).
I would advise against using libeoffice.org supplied RPMs at this stage as 
RHEL are also getting ready to release LO 3.4.5 in EL6 that will (hopefully) 
gracefully upgrade my packages.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Scott Robbins]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:10:49PM +, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
 
 
 Several people have tested this successfully. You can even get slightly 
 newer packages from here:
 http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that Karanbir hasn't 
 yet got around to putting in testing (there's a *-release rpm there, too).
 I would advise against using libeoffice.org supplied RPMs at this stage as 
 RHEL are also getting ready to release LO 3.4.5 in EL6 that will (hopefully) 
 gracefully upgrade my packages.


Working well for me--if you're the maintainer, then, Thank you.  :)


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Buffy: Do you remember that demon that almost got out the night I
died? 
Willow: Every nightmare I have that doesn't revolve around academic
failure or public nudity is about that thing. In fact, once I 
dreamt that it attacked me while I was late for a test and naked.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] New DRBD packages in CentOS-Testing

[Johnny Hughes]

DRBD Users,

There are new DRBD (drbd83) packages for CentOS-5 in the CentOS-Testing
repository.

The packages are located here:

http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/SRPMS/

The versions are:
drbd83-8.3.12-1.el5.centos*
drbd83-kmod-8.3.12-1.el5.centos*

Please test these so we can move them into CentOS Extras.

NOTE:  There are 3 other versions (8.3.9, 8.3.10-1 and 8.3.10-2) that
never got moved out of testing and 8.3.8 is currently the version in
Extras ... PLEASE, lets get these tested as if they work, people will
want them.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] testing

[Diego]

hello
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-testing php issues

[Rob Kampen]

Hi List,
I have been using the php 5.2.10 from the testing repo and note the 
following:

the php-suhosin packages in testing do not match the php version


PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: suhosin: Unable to initialize module
Module compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0, thread-safety=0
PHPcompiled with module API=20060613, debug=0, thread-safety=0
Also, does anyone know of a rpm for php-memcache and php-Fileinfo good 
for php 5.2.10? The rf ones are for base CentOS.

TIA
Rob

attachment: rkampen.vcf___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-testing php issues

[Keith Roberts]

On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Rob Kampen wrote:

 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 From: Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com
 Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-testing php issues
 
 Hi List,
 I have been using the php 5.2.10 from the testing repo and note the 
 following:
 the php-suhosin packages in testing do not match the php version

  PHP Warning:  PHP Startup: suhosin: Unable to initialize module
  Module compiled with module API=20050922, debug=0, thread-safety=0
  PHPcompiled with module API=20060613, debug=0, thread-safety=0
 Also, does anyone know of a rpm for php-memcache and php-Fileinfo good for 
 php 5.2.10? The rf ones are for base CentOS.

Remi repo also has a newer version of php.

Installed Packages
Name   : php
Arch   : i386
Version: 5.3.2
Release: 2.el5.remi
Size   : 3.3 M
Repo   : installed
Summary: The PHP HTML-embedded scripting language.



memcache repos:

Name   : php-pecl-memcache
Arch   : i386
Version: 2.2.3
Release: 1.el5_2
Size   : 32 k
Repo   : extras
Summary: Extension to work with the Memcached caching 
daemon
URL: http://pecl.php.net/package/memcache
License: PHP


Name   : php-pecl-memcache
Arch   : i386
Version: 3.0.5
Release: 1.el5.remi
Size   : 64 k
Repo   : remi
Summary: Extension to work with the Memcached caching 
daemon
URL: http://pecl.php.net/package/memcache
License: PHP

Fileinfo:

Name   : php-pecl-Fileinfo
Arch   : i386
Version: 1.0.4
Release: 3.el5.centos
Size   : 11 k
Repo   : extras
Summary: Fileinfo is a PHP extension that wraps the 
libmagic library
URL: http://pecl.php.net/package/Fileinfo
License: PHP License

Name   : php-pecl-fileinfo
Arch   : i386
Version: 1.0.4
Release: 2.el5.rf
Size   : 24 k
Repo   : rpmforge
Summary: PECL package to get file information through 
libmagic
URL: http://pecl.php.net/package/Fileinfo
License: PHP

Name   : php-pecl-Fileinfo
Arch   : i386
Version: 1.0.4
Release: 3.el5.remi
Size   : 11 k
Repo   : remi
Summary: Fileinfo is a PHP extension that wraps the 
libmagic library
URL: http://pecl.php.net/package/Fileinfo
License: PHP License

HTH and a very Merry Christmas.

Keith

-- 
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
in practice they are not.

This email was sent from my laptop with Centos 5.5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Latest BackupPC release in CentOS testing repo

[Max Hetrick]

BackupPC released 3.2.0 as a stable version a few weeks ago. The most 
current release is 3.1.0 in the testing repository. Are there any plans 
that this will be updated to 3.2.0 in the repo some time down the road?

Also, will the BackupPC package be moved out of testing and into extras 
ever? Or are there reasons behind this that are more complicated, making 
it not stable to be in extras? I've been running the 3.1.0 RPM for a 
long time with no issues. Just curious.

Thanks!
Max
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Latest BackupPC release in CentOS testing repo

[Les Mikesell]

On 8/11/2010 12:40 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
 BackupPC released 3.2.0 as a stable version a few weeks ago. The most
 current release is 3.1.0 in the testing repository. Are there any plans
 that this will be updated to 3.2.0 in the repo some time down the road?

 Also, will the BackupPC package be moved out of testing and into extras
 ever? Or are there reasons behind this that are more complicated, making
 it not stable to be in extras? I've been running the 3.1.0 RPM for a
 long time with no issues. Just curious.

To complicate this question a bit more - there is also a 3.1.0 version 
in the epel repository and not much point of having a separate one in 
centos-testing (or extras) with the danger of conflicts or different 
configurations.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Latest BackupPC release in CentOS testing repo

[Max Hetrick]

Les Mikesell wrote:

 To complicate this question a bit more - there is also a 3.1.0 version 
 in the epel repository and not much point of having a separate one in 
 centos-testing (or extras) with the danger of conflicts or different 
 configurations.

Yeah, I saw it was there as well.

Max

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] testing

[William Warren]

Having list issues..sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Niki Kovacs]

Hi,

I'd like to test the status of a remote machine in a script. Something like:

IF remote machine is switched on / connected to the network...

... THEN launch backup.

How would you go about that?

Cheers,

Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Benjamin Donnachie]

2009/10/25 Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net:
 IF remote machine is switched on / connected to the network...

Use ping and test the result; perhaps something similar to this:

 case `ping -qnc 1 10.0.0.2 21` in
   *'100% packet loss'*)
exit 1
;;
 esac

See the script at the bottom of
http://www.digitalpeer.com/id/configuringa for more info.

Ben
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Les Mikesell]

Niki Kovacs wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'd like to test the status of a remote machine in a script. Something like:
 
 IF remote machine is switched on / connected to the network...
 
 ... THEN launch backup.
 
 How would you go about that?

I always recommend backuppc (either from http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ or 
the 
package in epel) because it does all this for you and gets it right.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Niki Kovacs]

Les Mikesell a écrit :
 
 I always recommend backuppc (either from http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ or 
 the 
 package in epel) because it does all this for you and gets it right.
 

This looks interesting, and I will take a closer look.

I'm right now knee-deep in this :

http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/index.html

I'm adapting it to my environment, and it already works great.

Cheers,

Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Les Mikesell]

Niki Kovacs wrote:
 Les Mikesell a écrit :
 I always recommend backuppc (either from http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ or 
 the 
 package in epel) because it does all this for you and gets it right.

 
 This looks interesting, and I will take a closer look.
 
 I'm right now knee-deep in this :
 
 http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/index.html
 
 I'm adapting it to my environment, and it already works great.

The big win with backuppc is that it will also compress the files and find 
matches across multiple machines and hard-link all identical content.  Plus you 
get a nice web interface to configure it and browse/restore.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Niki Kovacs]

Les Mikesell a écrit :

 The big win with backuppc is that it will also compress the files and find 
 matches across multiple machines and hard-link all identical content.  Plus 
 you 
 get a nice web interface to configure it and browse/restore.
 

Sound nice. Probably a case of: now I found a solution with a long and 
complicated Bash script, I may as well use the nifty little app that did 
it nicely beforehand :o)

Cheers,

Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Les Mikesell]

Niki Kovacs wrote:
 Les Mikesell a écrit :
 
 The big win with backuppc is that it will also compress the files and find 
 matches across multiple machines and hard-link all identical content.  Plus 
 you 
 get a nice web interface to configure it and browse/restore.

 
 Sound nice. Probably a case of: now I found a solution with a long and 
 complicated Bash script, I may as well use the nifty little app that did 
 it nicely beforehand :o)
 

Backuppc is all perl - including a reimplementation of rsync that knows how to 
work with compressed local files while chatting with a stock remote version. 
But the way I look at it is that the complexity is irrelevant as long as 
someone 
else already did the work and it is well tested.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing remote machine status in a script ?

[Devin Reade]

The ping method or equivalent mechanisms (such as a test ssh into the
machine) should answer the original question.

However, in the specific context of backups, a few years ago I did for
a client an evalution of various backup solutions, including a lot of 
freeware and commercial products (including some high end and expensive
ones).  I was completely dismayed with what was available at the time
other than at the top end; products were either missing features that
I'd consider necessary for enterprise deployments, or had the features
but lacked stability.

However, about a year or two after that Bacula came out (www.bacula.org)
and I've been extreamly impressed with it.  This open source solution
is (IMO) at least as good as any of the commercial ones out there, including
the top end backup products.  It's very stable, has a fantastic feature 
set, fantastic response from the developers, and commercial support is
available for those companies wanting it.

And getting back to point, while its normal mode of operation is to back
up machines that are on the net 24/7, it can also be configured to back
up machines (like my laptop) that aren't always there.  By default an
unreachable client would be considered an error condition, but bacula can be 
set up so that it just reschedules the client for the next available
backup window.

Devin
-- 
A zygote is a gamete's way of producing more gametes.  This may be the
purpose of the universe.- Robert Heinlein

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing and using a microphone

[Niki Kovacs]

Hi,

What's the most simple way to check if my microphone works on a plain 
CentOS 5.3 desktop? Is there a simple way, for example, to record voice 
into a simple .wav file?

Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing and using a microphone

[lostson]

On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 13:36 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
 Hi,
 
 What's the most simple way to check if my microphone works on a plain 
 CentOS 5.3 desktop? Is there a simple way, for example, to record voice 
 into a simple .wav file?
 
 Niki

 this guy put together a short and sweet tut on how to do this from a
terminal, I know it works because i tried it here as well.


http://jordilin.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/howto-recording-audio-from-the-command-line/

-- 
LostSon

http://lostsonsvault.org

CentOS - It's not just for servers ya know...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing and using a microphone

[mark]

Niki Kovacs wrote:
 
 What's the most simple way to check if my microphone works on a plain 
 CentOS 5.3 desktop? Is there a simple way, for example, to record voice 
 into a simple .wav file?

audacity.

mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Testing and using a microphone

[Frank Cox]

On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:36:29 +0200
Niki Kovacs wrote:

 What's the most simple way to check if my microphone works on a plain 
 CentOS 5.3 desktop? Is there a simple way, for example, to record voice 
 into a simple .wav file?

arecord is probably already installed on your computer.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] testing

[bruce]

test.. please ignore..
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Testing out USB mic

[Robert Moskowitz]

I have a Plantronics DSP-400 headset on a Centos 5.2 system that I am 
using for testing with SIP Communicator.

How can I test the microphone on the headset to see if it is working in 
the system?



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] kbs-CentOS-Testing gnucash: status for CentOS 5?

[William L. Maltby]

I decided I would like to try GnuCash on my 5.x desktop system. I did an
available list and got this

   gnucash.i3862.2.4-1.el5.kb kbs-CentOS-Testi
   gnucash-docs.noarch 2.2.0-2.el5.kb kbs-CentOS-Testi

Did a

   yum --enablerepo=kbs-CentOS-Testing install gnucash\*

That produced

   Package gnucash-docs-2.2.0-2.el5.kb.noarch.rpm is not signed

I figured I had forgot to install the gpg key, so I did that. Well, now
I have to instances of that key. When I try to remove one copy,

   # rpm -e gpg-pubkey-3e13cf5b-422eea1c
   error: gpg-pubkey-3e13cf5b-422eea1c specifies multiple packages

I tried removing the /var/lib/rpm/__* and rebuild, but no help. Still
have two instances of the key. Any way to clean that without a remove and
reinstall of all the keys?

Anyway, a search of the archives has an entry indicating that gnucash
was available for CentOS 4.x, but nada about 5. Am I too early on this?

Anyhoo, figuring that docs could be addressed later, I then foolishly
(need more coffee?) did

   yum --enablerepo=kbs-CentOS-Testing install --exclude=gnucash-docs \
   gnucash

which, of course produced

   Error: Missing Dependency: gnucash-docs = 2.2.0 is needed by package
   gnucash-2.2.4-1.el5.kb.i386 (kbs-CentOS-Testing)

Undaunted, I figured to download via yum and force installation with
nodeps (hmm, yum --downloadonly didn't work. Nothing in the docs about
that though. Did 

   yumdownloader --enablerepo=kbs-CentOS-Testing gnucash-docs

and that worked)

Then

   rpm --install --nodeps gnucash-docs-2.2.0-2.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 

worked, but gave

   I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
  http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd
   I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
  http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd
   I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
  http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd

The docs were installed though AFAICT. ISTR seeing stuff similar to this
with other packages in the dim past. Don't recall any solutions though.

I wonder if there's a way to suppress that activity. I don't
particularly care for packages that require on-line references for local
and potentially sensitive work. I'm thinking there might be a
configuration file I could modify because I see some similar files
already on the system. I'll pursue that later if I get gnucash
installed.

Back to the primary task, did

   yum --enablerepo=kbs-CentOS-Testing install gnucash

That produced

   Package gwenhywfar-2.6.2-2.el5.kb.i386.rpm is not signed

At that point I felt maybe I was a bit premature as I had already
confirmed that I had the gpg key installed.

Any words of wisdom for me? If I don't need to worry about the signing
issues, I guess I could download and install all with --nodeps. Good/bad
idea? Anything I might do to help the process along? I've not done any
rpm work, so it might take awhile if there is anything too technical.

I'm going to fire up my 4.x and see if it works there. I can muddle
through there, with a small amount of inconvenience. But that might be
worth it.

Before I forget, thanks to you and all the crew for the hard work that
benefits us all.

TIA
-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kbs-CentOS-Testing gnucash: status for CentOS 5?

[William L. Maltby]

On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 15:17 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
 On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
 
  I figured I had forgot to install the gpg key, so I did that. Well, now
  I have to instances of that key. When I try to remove one copy,
 
# rpm -e gpg-pubkey-3e13cf5b-422eea1c
error: gpg-pubkey-3e13cf5b-422eea1c specifies multiple packages
 
 add the --allmatches  option to the rpm -e

Thanks! In the rpm man page I had searched for ignore and error and
a few other things I could think of to try and get around it. *sigh* I
guess someday I'll have to actually read the _whole_thing_ so that my
(used-to-be?) excellent memory for the generalities can save me.

 
 and it will work as you wish to elide that key
 
 -- Russ herrold
 snip sig stuff

BTW, in case KB is looking, the install on 4.x went just fine and I'm
now reading the tutorial (the _whole_thing_  8=O  )

Thanks again, Russ

-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] kbs-CentOS-testing rsyslog unsigned, yum won't update it on 5.1

[William L. Maltby]

As the subject says. Just an FYI.

-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] kbs-CentOS-testing rsyslog unsigned, yum won't update it on 5.1

[Akemi Yagi]

On Jan 8, 2008 5:31 PM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As the subject says. Just an FYI.

 --
 Bill

Please see this post:

http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12032forum=37

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos