Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
> Il 14/12/20 23:47, Ruslanas Gžibovskis ha scritto: >> your suggestions? > > It is the debian family time man. I'm converting many stuff to debian > buster and some on Ubuntu LTS 20.04. > > Would be great if FreeBSD will be largely adopted now. FreeBSD becomes more and more my favorite now: - it feels closer to EL6 and more home to me than any newer Linux (except Devuan and the like). - doesn't have systemd and all the other new stuff :-) - is stable and has a friendly community - has ZFS - is very _well_ documented! Ok, I came from a UNIX background before Linux was born so I got much used to the UNIX way. Have been toying with FreeBSD and other BSDs for years but it's more likely than ever that I'll make the switch now. Regards, Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
Il 14/12/20 23:47, Ruslanas Gžibovskis ha scritto: your suggestions? It is the debian family time man. I'm converting many stuff to debian buster and some on Ubuntu LTS 20.04. Would be great if FreeBSD will be largely adopted now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On 12/15/20 2:05 AM, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: Oracle Linux, only after Oracle Solaris will shine again with their awesome SPARC arch... Which has an amazing features... Solaris tried to take over the "Sunos/bsd status quo", that was a disaster, it was a good idea but licensing killed it. Nice, I did not check Devuan for a long time, if they still alive... hmm, I have hope in Rocky then, but would be more fun if guys do not just scrap everything fast into distro, and then, k, how do we work with it now... I believe Rocky will be a good thing, but hope other projects will merge into it instead of building their own. Even if everyone of us want to build our own :D I think that 'Rocky idea' has some potential. But still, after this move, I do not have the same trust in RH as it was previously. Do you, People, still have a stone-proof trust in RH after last week's news? Centos and RH are dead, well in a hopeless coma for now. It's IBM, Torvalds' Linux almost killed off IBM, Oracle, Novell and did a lot of 'damage' to MS in that market, IBM is still a dinosaur with the same 70's brain capacity, it won't be able to pull it off even if they had a monopoly on OS' in general. On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 09:56, R C wrote: On 12/15/20 1:32 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 15/12/2020 à 08:17, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.: https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux ) and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder. Right now Rocky Linux is not much more than a README file on Github. That is how Linus Torvalds started. be careful underestimating/ridiculing talent. On the other hand, Oracle Linux has been a well-tended free-as-in-beer RHEL clone with some nifty extra features for the last 14 years. Wozu in die Ferne schweifen, wenn das Gute liegt so nah? (Goethe) :o) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
Oracle Linux, only after Oracle Solaris will shine again with their awesome SPARC arch... Which has an amazing features... Nice, I did not check Devuan for a long time, if they still alive... hmm, I have hope in Rocky then, but would be more fun if guys do not just scrap everything fast into distro, and then, k, how do we work with it now... I believe Rocky will be a good thing, but hope other projects will merge into it instead of building their own. Even if everyone of us want to build our own :D But still, after this move, I do not have the same trust in RH as it was previously. Do you, People, still have a stone-proof trust in RH after last week's news? On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 09:56, R C wrote: > > On 12/15/20 1:32 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > Le 15/12/2020 à 08:17, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : > >> My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.: > >> > https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux > ) > >> and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder. > > Right now Rocky Linux is not much more than a README file on Github. > > > That is how Linus Torvalds started. be careful > underestimating/ridiculing talent. > > > > > > On the other hand, Oracle Linux has been a well-tended free-as-in-beer > RHEL > > clone with some nifty extra features for the last 14 years. > > > > Wozu in die Ferne schweifen, wenn das Gute liegt so nah? (Goethe) > > > > :o) > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On 12/15/20 1:32 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 15/12/2020 à 08:17, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.: https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux) and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder. Right now Rocky Linux is not much more than a README file on Github. That is how Linus Torvalds started. be careful underestimating/ridiculing talent. On the other hand, Oracle Linux has been a well-tended free-as-in-beer RHEL clone with some nifty extra features for the last 14 years. Wozu in die Ferne schweifen, wenn das Gute liegt so nah? (Goethe) :o) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On 12/15/20 9:32 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 15/12/2020 à 08:17, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : >> >> My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.: >> https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux) >> and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder. > > Right now Rocky Linux is not much more than a README file on Github. > > On the other hand, Oracle Linux has been a well-tended free-as-in-beer RHEL > clone with some nifty extra features for the last 14 years. > > Wozu in die Ferne schweifen, wenn das Gute liegt so nah? (Goethe) > > :o) > Springdale is also already available: https://puias.math.ias.edu/ -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
Le 15/12/2020 à 08:17, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : > > My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.: > https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux) > and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder. Right now Rocky Linux is not much more than a README file on Github. On the other hand, Oracle Linux has been a well-tended free-as-in-beer RHEL clone with some nifty extra features for the last 14 years. Wozu in die Ferne schweifen, wenn das Gute liegt so nah? (Goethe) :o) -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
It is not that we haven't been here before, this is just history repeating itself. IBM, SCO, Sun, Novell, etc. majorly have screwed up because of some geniuses having a great business idea. (that's how BSD disappeared, Solaris was a disaster, Xenix never made it.. and whatever happened to SCO etc?) But here is the point, RHEL for example is used at scale a lot now, because there are people that know how to deal with it (far and few beyond) and the ones I know use Centos for their own stuff (at home) because it is so similar. It is already a problem to find qualified people that can use/deal with RHEL in a production environment at scale (if you know what you're doing, you easily can get a cosy 6 figure job, because it's next to impossible to find a decent sys person with experience, for sure not for at scale operations) , and those are not going to pay hundreds/thousands for a RHEL license at home, that is why they use Centos, while at work working with RHEL. I am in that situation, I request 5-6 figures worth of RHEL licenses on a regular basis, and use several Centos machines at homes (yeah I am that guy that doesn't have a life and my 'hobby' is kinda like my work.) It will be a very freaking cold day in hell before I start paying thousands to have virtually 'the same thing' at home as at work. If a few months down the road, if I decide to use Linus XYZ, or whatever, than that is what we'll be using where I get my pay check from ... and if not, well, good luck finding someone that can keep things running there. Because that is what it comes down to. It is not the product that determines what the "industry standard" is.. it is the ones that have experience and can actually make stuff work. I think Centos is dead because RHEL just committed suicide. Ron On 12/15/20 12:06 AM, Simon Avery wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:48, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: your suggestions? Different: Debian, OpenSuse, Ubuntu-server. All good choices. Not quite so different: Rocky, (Maybe one of the corporate sponsored centos-a-likes, (OEL, Cloudlinux etc) but we've now learned it would be nicer to rely on a distro that wasn't provided at the whim of someone who might need to cut costs at any time) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On 15/12/2020 12:47 π.μ., Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: your suggestions? My course of action is to wait for Lenix (Ref.: https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux) and Rocky Linux (https://rockylinux.org/) by CentOS original founder. IMHO, both will end to what we really want/need, because they care. As I have already mentioned, I would encourage projects to join forces to produce a single platform. I won't go to Ubuntu, Debian, FreeBSD. You may call it a personal preference. I feel much more comfortable with EL. I would try to avoid OL (as it is governed by a large corp which can drop it easily). Cheers, Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:48, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: > your suggestions? > > Different: Debian, OpenSuse, Ubuntu-server. All good choices. Not quite so different: Rocky, (Maybe one of the corporate sponsored centos-a-likes, (OEL, Cloudlinux etc) but we've now learned it would be nicer to rely on a distro that wasn't provided at the whim of someone who might need to cut costs at any time) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
I am centos guy last 20 years but not anymore. I have started looking into Ubuntu. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 14, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: > > if it is currently changed over the night... > How can you be sure that the CentOS8 stream will not be dropped tomorrow? > How about CentOS9, CentOS10, CentOS Core?! > How can you be sure that what was "promised" will not be canceled in one > second? > I think most of the derivatives will be dead with one or two releases, like > was with Debian, such as Devuan, never got a new version... > > In general, I would blame "DevOps" mindset! That might have played the bad > thing here and forced all to this decision. > > Maybe RH wanted something like Debian GNU/Linux Testing/stable concept (in > some cases TESTING more stable than prod, as it had the possibility to have > a newer major version with rewritten codebase)? > > In either way, RH showed, that after IBM have got them, IBM KPI's forced RH > to do some moves which we never ever were expecting to happen before IBM RH. > Maybe even a first thing that could be a sign, changing Logo into a > "simple" one... > > What is left now to treat as trust worthful OS? My decision would be to bet > on: > * Debian (biggest arch and package selection, which is quite up to date, > and can easily upgrade from 2 to 10, yeah, of course, you will need to do > some mambo jumbo), You can find some things like parrotOS, previous > backtrack and much more in there, so just ADD repo, and download package > what you miss in debian repos. And a shame thing, bubuntu is based on deb, > so, same here, just add missing repos from bubuntu for particular package > (but I have never ever seen such case, when bubuntu had smth needful, what > debian didn't. > * OpenBSD (very very very clear way forward, very openminded OS, but at > the same time SEC on a first place!), already has vmd, written with a clean > codebase, looks very promissing replacement for kvm in general usages. > * FreeBSD, AnyOtherBSD BSD, you know... LOTS of appliances work on it! Has > ZFS support... behyve... > * Arch or Gentoo? Why not LFS then? But both have quite good support and > showed themselfs. > > your suggestions? > > > >> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 23:25, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:50:00PM +0100, Walter H. wrote: >>> it is called "rolling release" and no one gave officially a >>> statement to the question I asked, >> >> It should not have been called a rolling release. It is not a rolling >> release in the sense that many Linux distributions use it. >> >>> if it is meant like that of Win10 ... >> >> I don't know what that means. No. It will not be like Win 10 in pretty much >> every way. >> >> >>> a beta release is not the same that many expect as a stable system, >>> as they are used to have with CentOS; >> >> It is not a beta release. >> >> >>> you should think of renaming CentOS to something different, because >>> with Enterprise this CentOS Stream has nothing in common; >> >> Maybe. But I think it has more in common than you think >> >>> and does Redhat really expect everone - even private people - afford >>> a RHEL subscription¹ just to have a stable system? >> >> No. In many cases, CentOS Stream will provide a stable system for the needs >> of individuals. In many other cases, upcoming low- and no-cost RHEL >> programs >> will address many of these needs. As an individual, you can already get >> RHEL >> with no cost through the Developer Program, although it isn't as easy as it >> could be and usage is limited. The upcoming plans are intended to address >> those problems. It's unfortunate that the timing is such that those aren't >> anything but future promises at this point, but they are coming. See >> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q10 and email >> centos-questi...@redhat.com with your specific needs. That address goes to >> real people who are working on these programs, not sales or anything like >> that. >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthew Miller >> >> Fedora Project Leader >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > > -- > Ruslanas Gžibovskis > +370 6030 7030 > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:48 PM Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: > I think most of the derivatives will be dead with one or two releases, like > was with Debian, such as Devuan, never got a new version... > Devuan 3.0 was released in June. https://www.devuan.org/os/announce/beowulf-stable-announce-060120 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
if it is currently changed over the night... How can you be sure that the CentOS8 stream will not be dropped tomorrow? How about CentOS9, CentOS10, CentOS Core?! How can you be sure that what was "promised" will not be canceled in one second? I think most of the derivatives will be dead with one or two releases, like was with Debian, such as Devuan, never got a new version... In general, I would blame "DevOps" mindset! That might have played the bad thing here and forced all to this decision. Maybe RH wanted something like Debian GNU/Linux Testing/stable concept (in some cases TESTING more stable than prod, as it had the possibility to have a newer major version with rewritten codebase)? In either way, RH showed, that after IBM have got them, IBM KPI's forced RH to do some moves which we never ever were expecting to happen before IBM RH. Maybe even a first thing that could be a sign, changing Logo into a "simple" one... What is left now to treat as trust worthful OS? My decision would be to bet on: * Debian (biggest arch and package selection, which is quite up to date, and can easily upgrade from 2 to 10, yeah, of course, you will need to do some mambo jumbo), You can find some things like parrotOS, previous backtrack and much more in there, so just ADD repo, and download package what you miss in debian repos. And a shame thing, bubuntu is based on deb, so, same here, just add missing repos from bubuntu for particular package (but I have never ever seen such case, when bubuntu had smth needful, what debian didn't. * OpenBSD (very very very clear way forward, very openminded OS, but at the same time SEC on a first place!), already has vmd, written with a clean codebase, looks very promissing replacement for kvm in general usages. * FreeBSD, AnyOtherBSD BSD, you know... LOTS of appliances work on it! Has ZFS support... behyve... * Arch or Gentoo? Why not LFS then? But both have quite good support and showed themselfs. your suggestions? On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 23:25, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:50:00PM +0100, Walter H. wrote: > > it is called "rolling release" and no one gave officially a > > statement to the question I asked, > > It should not have been called a rolling release. It is not a rolling > release in the sense that many Linux distributions use it. > > > if it is meant like that of Win10 ... > > I don't know what that means. No. It will not be like Win 10 in pretty much > every way. > > > > a beta release is not the same that many expect as a stable system, > > as they are used to have with CentOS; > > It is not a beta release. > > > > you should think of renaming CentOS to something different, because > > with Enterprise this CentOS Stream has nothing in common; > > Maybe. But I think it has more in common than you think > > > and does Redhat really expect everone - even private people - afford > > a RHEL subscription¹ just to have a stable system? > > No. In many cases, CentOS Stream will provide a stable system for the needs > of individuals. In many other cases, upcoming low- and no-cost RHEL > programs > will address many of these needs. As an individual, you can already get > RHEL > with no cost through the Developer Program, although it isn't as easy as it > could be and usage is limited. The upcoming plans are intended to address > those problems. It's unfortunate that the timing is such that those aren't > anything but future promises at this point, but they are coming. See > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q10 and email > centos-questi...@redhat.com with your specific needs. That address goes to > real people who are working on these programs, not sales or anything like > that. > > > > -- > Matthew Miller > > Fedora Project Leader > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Ruslanas Gžibovskis +370 6030 7030 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:50:00PM +0100, Walter H. wrote: > it is called "rolling release" and no one gave officially a > statement to the question I asked, It should not have been called a rolling release. It is not a rolling release in the sense that many Linux distributions use it. > if it is meant like that of Win10 ... I don't know what that means. No. It will not be like Win 10 in pretty much every way. > a beta release is not the same that many expect as a stable system, > as they are used to have with CentOS; It is not a beta release. > you should think of renaming CentOS to something different, because > with Enterprise this CentOS Stream has nothing in common; Maybe. But I think it has more in common than you think > and does Redhat really expect everone - even private people - afford > a RHEL subscription¹ just to have a stable system? No. In many cases, CentOS Stream will provide a stable system for the needs of individuals. In many other cases, upcoming low- and no-cost RHEL programs will address many of these needs. As an individual, you can already get RHEL with no cost through the Developer Program, although it isn't as easy as it could be and usage is limited. The upcoming plans are intended to address those problems. It's unfortunate that the timing is such that those aren't anything but future promises at this point, but they are coming. See https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q10 and email centos-questi...@redhat.com with your specific needs. That address goes to real people who are working on these programs, not sales or anything like that. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] The conclusio: CentOS is dead
Dear, I think we are all in the same position and situation and I do not think it is time to cry over spilled milk, now and without putting hands in favor of RedHat, to which I no longer believe anything, we have to move on and support the Community initiatives that are appearing and that I believe will come with the same strength and spirit of our deceased CentOS. Cheers, On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:50 PM Walter H. wrote: > Why? > > it is called "rolling release" and no one gave officially a statement to > the question I asked, > > if it is meant like that of Win10 ... > > a beta release is not the same that many expect as a stable system, as > they are used to have with CentOS; > > you should think of renaming CentOS to something different, because with > Enterprise this CentOS Stream has nothing in common; > > and does Redhat really expect everone - even private people - afford a > RHEL subscription¹ just to have a stable system? > > ¹ I would in case I only need just one RHEL subscription for ALL my > private used VMs (including the ones hosted in internet as VPS) > > - a DNS server > - a proxy server (squid) > - a mail server (mail store - cyrus-imapd) > - a mail server (mail router f. outgoing mails) > - a mail server (mail scanner f. incoming mails with SpamAssassin and > ClamAV) > - a 2nd proxy server (squid, with SSL interception and Squidclamav plus > ClamAV) > - a web server (apache) > - a jump host > - a 6in4 router > - desktop with graphical UI (plus Firefox and Thunderbird) is a now a > SL, but they decided several time ago, >not to do their own system based on RHEL, they use CentOS, that is > now a little bit bad for this/SL's use case; > > - a VPS with OpenVPN (used with my smartphone) > - a VPS with a proxy (squid, to avoid censorship due to geolocation > blocking) > - a VPS as the other end of 6in4 > - a VPS with storage of my own files >(all VPS run a bind, too) > > Thanks for read; > > Walter > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Victor ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
