Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote: This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok. oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=138011820514388 The backporting oath? -- Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On 24.Sep.2013, at 17:51, Markus Falb wrote: Hi, With CentOS php53 I get an SSL Error ?php $handle = fopen(https://maps.google.com;, r); $contents = stream_get_contents($handle); fclose($handle); ? will result in something like Warning: stream_get_contents(): SSL: fatal protocol error in bla.php on line 3 This is wrong information. The error is only present with php 5.1.6, not php 5.3. I got this wrong. Sorry. But it it is a problem, I just do not know how to deal with it. https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=39039 -- Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
Markus Falb wrote on Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:44:15 +0200: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=39039 There's probably no way to work around. But it seems you can get along by suppressing errors. The bugs have to be corrected upstream at Red Hat (= backported from a newer php version), you would have to open a ticket there. I'd rather install php52 or newer instead of staying on that old version. php 5.2.17 (latest rpm available) should be fine for all software using 5.1.6. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
Am 25.09.2013 um 18:39 schrieb Markus Falb wne...@gmail.com: On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote: This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok. oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=138011820514388 The backporting oath? You wrote on this list something about php53 package, right? -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On 25.Sep.2013, at 20:22, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 25.09.2013 um 18:39 schrieb Markus Falb wne...@gmail.com: On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote: This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok. oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=138011820514388 The backporting oath? You wrote on this list something about php53 package, right? Sorry, I messed it up. This thing is about php (not php53), i.e. php-5.1.6-40.el5_9 -- Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On 25.Sep.2013, at 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.09.2013 18:39, schrieb Markus Falb: On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote: This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok. oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=138011820514388 The backporting oath? any why do you not update your crap? PHP 5.1 is irrelevant these days Now I am irritated. RHEL 5 is supported until 2017, so is CentOS 5, isn't it? It comes with php and it comes with php53. You tell me I am a crapper because I use php. I would have expected such things from the php mailing list, but on CentOS…. In other words, do not tell me on the CentOS Mailing List that I am dumb if I use a package provided by CentOS (that's silly) that's why CentOS/RHEL provides 5.3 packages without break environments rely on 5.1 It really doesn't break? I cant believe that. -- Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On 9/25/2013 11:46 AM, Markus Falb wrote: It really doesn't break? I cant believe that. indeed, updating a centos5 webserver I have from php5.1 to php53 broke a bunch of my webpiles, triggering a bunch of rework I hadn't planned. this particular set of webpiles are all charity work, various local clubs and such. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Markus Falb wne...@gmail.com wrote: On 25.Sep.2013, at 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 25.09.2013 18:39, schrieb Markus Falb: On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote: This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok. oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old http://marc.info/?l=php-generalm=138011820514388 The backporting oath? Yes, backporting makes this interesting when seeking support. Ultimately it's a question for CentOS (or Upstream). that's why CentOS/RHEL provides 5.3 packages without break environments rely on 5.1 It really doesn't break? I cant believe that. (Echoing John Pierce's warning...) If you update from PHP 5.1 or 5.2 to 5.3 you will have problems to deal with. I made the move and I too had broken code to fix! [ Although the fixes/modifications are rather easy (just in case you have to go that direction). ] -- Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php fopen ssl error
On 09/25/2013 06:14 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: Yes, backporting makes this interesting when seeking support. Ultimately it's a question for CentOS (or Upstream). Our policy on this has been pretty straight-forward from the beginning. We will reproduce what upstream provides. Bug for bug, and patch for patch as closely as we can. In this instance, it would seem that this issue should be filed in RH's bugzilla, or on the CentOS bugtracker with the relevant information so that it can be duplicated in RH's bugzilla, and then linked appropriately. So long as it's not a bug we introduced as part of the rebuild process, it's usually better to not have it addressed by us. Going down that road would move us away from the compatibility we strive for. Worst case scenario would be that our patch introduces other issues, or is incompatible with a future update from upstream. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
