date:20150109

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12:14AM +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
 On 2015-01-09, Fred Smith
 fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
 
 --- SNIP ---
 
  trying to grab the edge of a window feels like the grabbable region
  is only one pixel (or maybe one mickey) wide and it's still hard nto
  place the pointer right on it. I may be getting old, but I don't
  have any palsy/tremor problems.
 
 Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have larger
 grab areas.

Which makes me wonder how one modifies a theme... there must be a
special toolkit for it somewhere... ??


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
 glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior
 be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
 all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-09 Thread Robert Nichols


On 01/09/2015 06:07 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:

 I'm still trying to find the
thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it switches
way too fast.


I presume you're talking about panels with Autohide set. If you have
the GUI gconf-editor installed, it's under apps/panel/global/panel_show_delay.
You can also set it from the command line:

gconftool-2 --type int --set /apps/panel/global/panel_show_delay 500

(The default is 300, unit is milliseconds).

--
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora

2015-01-09 Thread Warren Young

On Jan 9, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:

 unless the USA people, who have decimated my language
 (English), have a new definition for technology”.

If you roll back all the changes made to English since colonial times, you’re 
left with Middle English.  So, how do you feel about Chaucer?

Those who try to fight the inevitable changes that language goes through end up 
as laughing stocks:

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acad%C3%A9mie_fran%C3%A7aise#Conservatism

 On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:35 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
 
 Once a thing becomes reliable, it stops being technology.
 
 Warren are you serious that things that do not work well are
 technology but things that do work well are *not* technology ?

It’s a bit of a glib observation, but there’s a serious core to it.

Pencils, paper, carpet, and toasters were once technology.  They were luxury 
items, manufactured by skilled artisans.  Now they come off an assembly line, 
durable and perfect, every time.

The original sense of the word “technology” comes from its Greek roots, meaning 
a treatise on some art, such as a book on how to brew beer.  We don’t use the 
word that way any more.  In the 1970s, we started to distinguish some 
technology as “high” technology, then high-tech, and now just tech.

I’m not really serious about this new definition for technology, but it is a 
useful one.  It is entirely within the normal scope of language evolution for 
it to become the new sense of the word.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C-6, Gnome question

On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
 On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 15:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
  On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:34:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
   On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 09:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
Hi all!

Using the default Gnome desktop on Centos-6, I keep having difficulty
getting the mouse pointer to lineup exactly on the edge/corner of a
window when I want to resize the window. It seems that you have to 
have it on a line exactly one pixel in width, and I'm finding it
increasingly hard to do (who, me? getting old? nah!)
   snip
 
Wondering if there is a gnome setting somewhere among the myriad
settings that could be used to configure the accuracy with which
the mouse pointer must be placed so one can grab edges of things.
I've dug thru the settings in the Gnome configuration editor, but
so far nothing leaps out at me.

Can anyone offer advice?
   
   Have you gone into System-Preferences-Mouse and changed some of the
  snip
 
 
  Thanks for the reply.
  
  I've got acceleration all the way to the slow end, sensitivity all the way
  to the low end, drag and drop threshold all the way to the small end,
  and I've tried them all at other settings, too, to no avail.
  
  trying to grab the edge of a window feels like the grabbable region
  is only one pixel (or maybe one mickey) wide and it's still hard nto
  place the pointer right on it. I may be getting old, but I don't
  have any palsy/tremor problems.
  
 
 Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the
 thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
 over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it switches
 way too fast.

in C6  it's in SYSTEM | PREFERENCES | WINDOWS
there's a slider titled interval before raising.

 
 I recall some folks mentioning something like gnome-config or similar
 and I figure that'll be my next attempt. I looked to see if there was
 anything in the drop-downs from System to see if anything else jumped
 out. I didn't see anything about border widths. There's a Desktop
 Effects that I don't know if that has any effect on your problem:
 System-Preferences-Desktop Effects. Has some text in it about 3D
 hardware acelleration.
 
 You know wht? I'm thinking it's something to do with the mouse driver.
 Usb mouse? ISTR some jerkiness in that human interface stuff in the
 past.
 
 One other (likely?) difference that may be making my unit better
 behaved. I have gpm installed so that I can CP on text-based standard
 terminals (console tty). I've noticed that when X or Gnome starts up it
 seems aware.
 
 You might want to try installing gpm, have it start up on boot and see
 if that helps. Not a true solution, but may be a work around until the
 true solution is found.
 
 HTH,
 Bill

-- 
---
 .Fred Smith   /  
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : / 
 //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
//  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 
 Jude 1:24,25 -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-09 Thread Bill Maltby (C4B)

On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 15:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:34:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
  On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 09:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
   Hi all!
   
   Using the default Gnome desktop on Centos-6, I keep having difficulty
   getting the mouse pointer to lineup exactly on the edge/corner of a
   window when I want to resize the window. It seems that you have to 
   have it on a line exactly one pixel in width, and I'm finding it
   increasingly hard to do (who, me? getting old? nah!)
  snip

   Wondering if there is a gnome setting somewhere among the myriad
   settings that could be used to configure the accuracy with which
   the mouse pointer must be placed so one can grab edges of things.
   I've dug thru the settings in the Gnome configuration editor, but
   so far nothing leaps out at me.
   
   Can anyone offer advice?
  
  Have you gone into System-Preferences-Mouse and changed some of the
 snip


 Thanks for the reply.
 
 I've got acceleration all the way to the slow end, sensitivity all the way
 to the low end, drag and drop threshold all the way to the small end,
 and I've tried them all at other settings, too, to no avail.
 
 trying to grab the edge of a window feels like the grabbable region
 is only one pixel (or maybe one mickey) wide and it's still hard nto
 place the pointer right on it. I may be getting old, but I don't
 have any palsy/tremor problems.
 

Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the
thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it switches
way too fast.

I recall some folks mentioning something like gnome-config or similar
and I figure that'll be my next attempt. I looked to see if there was
anything in the drop-downs from System to see if anything else jumped
out. I didn't see anything about border widths. There's a Desktop
Effects that I don't know if that has any effect on your problem:
System-Preferences-Desktop Effects. Has some text in it about 3D
hardware acelleration.

You know wht? I'm thinking it's something to do with the mouse driver.
Usb mouse? ISTR some jerkiness in that human interface stuff in the
past.

One other (likely?) difference that may be making my unit better
behaved. I have gpm installed so that I can CP on text-based standard
terminals (console tty). I've noticed that when X or Gnome starts up it
seems aware.

You might want to try installing gpm, have it start up on boot and see
if that helps. Not a true solution, but may be a work around until the
true solution is found.

HTH,
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-09 Thread Liam O'Toole

On 2015-01-09, Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:

--- SNIP ---

 trying to grab the edge of a window feels like the grabbable region
 is only one pixel (or maybe one mickey) wide and it's still hard nto
 place the pointer right on it. I may be getting old, but I don't
 have any palsy/tremor problems.

Have you tried different window manager themes? Some of them have larger
grab areas.

-- 

Liam


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Camera doesn't works after yum upgrade


The file has been filtered... This is the yum log

Jan 09 12:09:30 Installed: yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.30-30.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:12:27 Erased: R-devel
Jan 09 12:12:54 Erased: ntfsprogs
Jan 09 12:13:32 Erased: xorg-x11-drivers
Jan 09 12:13:32 Erased: xorg-x11-drv-intel
Jan 09 12:15:12 Updated: libgcc-4.4.7-11.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:13 Updated: xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.7-9.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:14 Updated: libX11-common-1.6.0-2.2.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:15 Updated: xkeyboard-config-2.11-1.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:16 Updated: 1:autocorr-en-4.0.4.2-14.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:16 Updated: centos-indexhtml-6-2.el6.centos.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:17 Updated: tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:18 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:18 Updated: mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20100122-4.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:19 Updated: libwacom-data-0.8-1.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:20 Updated: system-config-keyboard-base-1.3.1-6.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:20 Updated: mesa-dri-filesystem-10.1.2-2.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:21 Updated: tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:15:22 Updated: nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:23 Updated: bash-4.1.2-29.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:28 Updated: glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:36 Updated: glibc-common-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:37 Updated: 1:perl-Pod-Escapes-1.04-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:37 Updated: 1:perl-Module-Pluggable-3.90-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:37 Updated: 3:perl-version-0.77-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:38 Updated: 4:perl-libs-5.10.1-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:39 Updated: 1:perl-Pod-Simple-3.13-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:42 Updated: 4:perl-5.10.1-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:42 Updated: libstdc++-4.4.7-11.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:43 Updated: libselinux-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:43 Updated: libcom_err-1.41.12-21.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:44 Updated: libxml2-2.7.6-17.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:45 Updated: nss-util-3.16.2.3-2.el6_6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:45 Updated: libudev-147-2.57.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:46 Updated: cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.23-15.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:47 Updated: grep-2.6.3-6.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:47 Updated: elfutils-libelf-0.158-3.2.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:48 Updated: audit-libs-2.3.7-5.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:48 Updated: coreutils-libs-8.4-37.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:50 Updated: coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:51 Updated: pam-1.1.1-20.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:57 Updated: fontconfig-2.8.0-5.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:58 Updated: 2:shadow-utils-4.1.4.2-19.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:58 Updated: libuuid-2.17.2-12.18.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:59 Updated: keyutils-libs-1.4-5.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:15:59 Updated: krb5-libs-1.10.3-33.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:00 Updated: 1:perl-Locale-Maketext-Simple-0.18-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:00 Updated: 1:perl-Params-Check-0.26-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:01 Updated: xz-libs-4.999.9-0.5.beta.20091007git.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:01 Updated: avahi-libs-0.6.25-15.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:02 Updated: 1:cups-libs-1.4.2-67.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:02 Updated: libdhash-0.4.3-11.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:03 Updated: libblkid-2.17.2-12.18.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:04 Updated: glib2-2.28.8-4.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:05 Updated: shared-mime-info-0.70-6.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:06 Updated: libgudev1-147-2.57.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:06 Updated: hal-libs-0.5.14-14.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:07 Updated: file-libs-5.04-21.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:07 Updated: libgfortran-4.4.7-11.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:08 Updated: elfutils-libs-0.158-3.2.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:09 Updated: libxcb-1.9.1-2.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:09 Updated: libX11-1.6.0-2.2.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:10 Updated: libXext-1.3.2-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:11 Updated: libXrender-0.9.8-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:12 Updated: pango-1.28.1-10.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:12 Updated: libXt-1.1.4-6.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:13 Updated: libXrandr-1.4.1-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:13 Updated: libXi-1.7.2-2.2.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:14 Updated: libXtst-1.2.2-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:14 Updated: pulseaudio-libs-0.9.21-17.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:15 Updated: libXinerama-1.1.3-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:15 Updated: libXfixes-5.0.1-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:16 Updated: libXcursor-1.1.14-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:16 Updated: pciutils-libs-3.1.10-4.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:17 Updated: libsss_idmap-1.11.6-30.el6_6.3.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:18 Updated: ca-certificates-2014.1.98-65.1.el6.noarch
Jan 09 12:16:19 Updated: openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.4.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:20 Updated: libXxf86vm-1.1.3-2.1.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:21 Updated: polkit-0.96-7.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:22 Updated: glib2-devel-2.28.8-4.el6.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:22 Updated: 1:perl-Module-Load-0.16-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:23 Updated: perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.30-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:23 Updated: 1:perl-Log-Message-0.02-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:23 Updated: perl-IO-Compress-Base-2.021-136.el6_6.1.x86_64
Jan 09 12:16:24

[CentOS] Camera doesn't works after yum upgrade


Hi,

I've launched  a yum upgrade command on a CentOS6 laptop which has updated 
nearly 600 packages. Automatic updates were not working because of a conflict on 
a package.


So the laptop is now uptodate but the camera did not works after this. The 
message is:


kernel: uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) UVC control 6 on unit 2: -110 (exp. 
2).

The camera is detected as USB, lsusb shows:
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0c45:646b Microdia

I've tryed to boot on alternative kernels but no change:
- vmlinuz-2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 (which solve a camera problem on 
my laptop)

- vmlinuz-2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64
- vmlinuz-3.10.63-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64

Any idea about a faulty package ?
I've added the upgrade log in attachment but it's quite big. The first four 
erased item were because of conflicts. Some are re-installed after the upgrade 
(end of the log file)


Thanks

Patrick

--
===
|  Equipe M.O.S.T. |  |
|  Patrick BEGOU   | mailto:patrick.be...@grenoble-inp.fr |
|  LEGI|  |
|  BP 53 X | Tel 04 76 82 51 35   |
|  38041 GRENOBLE CEDEX| Fax 04 76 82 52 71   |
===

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Customising a CentOS 6.6 installation disk

2015-01-09 Thread James Bishop


On 08/01/15 20:30, Greg Bailey wrote:

On 01/08/2015 11:18 AM, James Bishop wrote:

I apologise if this is not the appropriate list for the following
issue, but...

Is it possible to upgrade the Linux kernel on a kickstart CD?

I've changed the vmlinuz and initrd.img files in the isolinux
directory from the distro's ISO image; so kernel
2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.i686 now boots from a DVD, and loads the
appropriate modules and firmware from the stage 1 initrd.img.

However, anaconda (13.21.229) exits abnormally with a DBusException
(org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply); possibly because NetworkManager
is unable to launch the wpa_supplicant.

Anaconda appears to be choking during initialisation:

anaconda.id = instClass.installDataClass(anaconda, extraModules,
opts.display_mode, anaconda.backend)
  File /usr/lib/anaconda/instdata.py, line 324, in __init__
self.reset()
  File /usr/lib/anaconda/instdata.py, line 64, in reset
self.network = network.Network()
  File /usr/lib/anaconda/network.py, line 308, in __init__
self.update()
  File /usr/lib/anaconda/network.py, line 326, in update
devhash = isys.getDeviceProperties(dev=none)
  File /usr/lib/anaconda/isys.py, line 375, in getDeviceProperties
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/_dbus.py, line 202, in
__new__
private=private()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/_dbus.py, line 108, in
__new__
bus = BusConnection.__new__(subclass, bus_type, mainloop=mainloop)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py, line 125, in
__new__
bus = cls._new_for_bus(address_or_type, mainloop=mainloop)
dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did
not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application
did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the
reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
install exited abnormally [1/1]
The system will be rebooted when you press Ctrl-C or Ctrl-Alt-Delete.

The shell prompt is available on tty2; and so I can see the syslog,
which has repeated messages at its tail end:

INFO NetworkManager: info Trying to start the supplicant

So, something needs to be changed somewhere (kernel recompilation?
missing module? wpa_supplicant / NM upgrade? stage 2 install.img?)
which is where I'm stuck. Do I need to hack Wifi NIC related lines out
of anaconda?

The reason that I'd like the final kernel version to be running during
the install, is that it's needed to compile the low-level driver for a
FIPS-140 crypto coprocessor. The target system will be an off-line
certification authority system, and will certainly not need Wifi (in
fact the hardening procedure foresees removal of most network hardware
drivers).

I know I could do everything in three stages (initial install -
software upgrade - crypto driver install); but being able to do
everything in one go would simplify business continuity / bare metal
recovery.

In the meantime, I'm very happy to have learned something about
anaconda / kickstart and so on, which will be very useful in future.

If there's a quick fix to the above issues, I'd be happy to hear it.

Thanks in advance
James Bishop


Sounds like the Rolling media announced in:

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-December/020807.html

could be useful to you, although judging by the kernel version you
mentioned, it looks like you're looking for CentOS 6 updates.
Unfortunately, it appears the rolling media is only available for CentOS
7 at the moment.

Did you update modules.dep and modules.alias in the stage1 image?

-Greg

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Thanks Greg,

I think so: I used depmod in the attached bash script 
(update_initrd.sh); on my system, the command expands to:


/sbin/depmod -b /tmp/initrd -F 
/tmp/root/boot/System-map-2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.i686 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.i686


where /tmp/initrd is the working directory for preparing the initrd file 
system; /tmp/root is where the kernel and kernel-firmware packages have 
been extracted.


The script is my attempt at copying only the kernel modules already 
present in the original initrd. It also looks for RPMs required by the 
latest kernel version (it identified kernel-firmware, initscripts and 
iproute), and copies changed executables (only the ip command).


Thankyou for suggesting the Rolling media; I'll take a look at that.

I'm using CentOS 6 because I based my hardening process on the DISA STIG 
for RHEL6; I haven't checked to see if there is now an equivalent for 
CentOS 7.


James
--

_
James Bishop
European Commission - Joint Research Centre
IPSC Unit G.5 (TP.723)
Via E.Fermi, 2749
I - 21027 Ispra (VA)
Italy

Tel.:   +39 0332 786225
Fax.:   +39 0332 786280
e-mail: james.bis...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
___
CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Camera doesn't works after yum upgrade

2015-01-09 Thread Akemi Yagi

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Patrick Begou
patrick.be...@legi.grenoble-inp.fr wrote:
 Hi,

 I've launched  a yum upgrade command on a CentOS6 laptop which has updated
 nearly 600 packages. Automatic updates were not working because of a
 conflict on a package.

 So the laptop is now uptodate but the camera did not works after this. The
 message is:

 kernel: uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) UVC control 6 on unit 2: -110
 (exp. 2).

 The camera is detected as USB, lsusb shows:
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0c45:646b Microdia

 I've tryed to boot on alternative kernels but no change:
 - vmlinuz-2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 (which solve a camera
 problem on my laptop)

I am a bit confused. Was the camera problem solved with the centosplus
kernel? Or are you referring to yet another camera problem? If the
former, this is a known issue:

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7815

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Camera doesn't works after yum upgrade


It was a previous problem on my personal laptop.
The current problem is for the laptop of a student and changing the kernel 
doesn't solve it.


I'm sorry to be confused with tghis information.

Patrick

Akemi Yagi wrote:

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Patrick Begou
patrick.be...@legi.grenoble-inp.fr wrote:

Hi,

I've launched  a yum upgrade command on a CentOS6 laptop which has updated
nearly 600 packages. Automatic updates were not working because of a
conflict on a package.

So the laptop is now uptodate but the camera did not works after this. The
message is:

kernel: uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) UVC control 6 on unit 2: -110
(exp. 2).

The camera is detected as USB, lsusb shows:
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0c45:646b Microdia

I've tryed to boot on alternative kernels but no change:
- vmlinuz-2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.centos.plus.x86_64 (which solve a camera
problem on my laptop)

I am a bit confused. Was the camera problem solved with the centosplus
kernel? Or are you referring to yet another camera problem? If the
former, this is a known issue:

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7815

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




--
===
|  Equipe M.O.S.T. |  |
|  Patrick BEGOU   | mailto:patrick.be...@grenoble-inp.fr |
|  LEGI|  |
|  BP 53 X | Tel 04 76 82 51 35   |
|  38041 GRENOBLE CEDEX| Fax 04 76 82 52 71   |
===

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Camera doesn't works after yum upgrade


Thanks Marc for your answer, I have a /dev/video0 but no /dev/video.
Should I create a link ?
Or a new rule in udev ?

Patrick

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

Patrick Begou wrote:

Hi,

I've launched  a yum upgrade command on a CentOS6 laptop which has
updated nearly 600 packages. Automatic updates were not working because

of a

conflict on a package.

So the laptop is now uptodate but the camera did not works after this. The
message is:

kernel: uvcvideo: Failed to query (GET_DEF) UVC control 6 on unit 2: -110
(exp. 2).

The camera is detected as USB, lsusb shows:
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0c45:646b Microdia

snip
We use motion, so I' m not familiar with camera, but does it load an v4l2
kernel module, and so create /dev/video0? If so, does the /dev/video
device exist?

 mark




--
===
|  Equipe M.O.S.T. |  |
|  Patrick BEGOU   | mailto:patrick.be...@grenoble-inp.fr |
|  LEGI|  |
|  BP 53 X | Tel 04 76 82 51 35   |
|  38041 GRENOBLE CEDEX| Fax 04 76 82 52 71   |
===

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

2015-01-09 Thread Nux!

Have EL7 working great on a DN2820FYKH; everything works including remote 
control. 
Had to use the Elrepo kernel-ml to get graphics working properly though, also 
had to update the BIOS to get rid of some bugs.
You may not encounter any of the above issues since you are running it headless.

HTH
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: david da...@daku.org
 To: centos@centos.org
 Sent: Thursday, 8 January, 2015 19:32:17
 Subject: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

 Folks
 
 The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a
 server that doesn't have significant computational load.  In my
 environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage
 needed.  I wonder if anyone has had experience with it, and can answer:
 
 1)  Does Centos6 and/or Centos7 install from a USB connected optical
 drive? or a USB flash drive?  I'd prefer to do a NetInstall.
 
 If the answer is essentially no, there's no point in continuing.
 
 2) Is the Ethernet connection supported by NetInstall and the subsequent OS?
 
 3) Is it possible to add an additional NIC for possible use as a home
 router/gateway?  If not internally, then via a USB connected NIC?
 
 Any thoughts on the subject would be appreciated.
 
 David
 San Francisco
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C-6, Gnome question

On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:34:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
 On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 09:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
  Hi all!
  
  Using the default Gnome desktop on Centos-6, I keep having difficulty
  getting the mouse pointer to lineup exactly on the edge/corner of a
  window when I want to resize the window. It seems that you have to 
  have it on a line exactly one pixel in width, and I'm finding it
  increasingly hard to do (who, me? getting old? nah!)
 
 I'm also getting old, but I don't have the problem on C-6 at all.
 
  
  Wondering if there is a gnome setting somewhere among the myriad
  settings that could be used to configure the accuracy with which
  the mouse pointer must be placed so one can grab edges of things.
  I've dug thru the settings in the Gnome configuration editor, but
  so far nothing leaps out at me.
  
  Can anyone offer advice?
 
 Have you gone into System-Preferences-Mouse and changed some of the
 doohickeys there? I don't recall anything related to your problem, but
 it may be related to Acceleration or Sensitivity? I've set my
 Sensitivity to about 1/3rd off of low and acceleration to mid-range.
 There's an alternative if, like me, you prefer KB anyway - Alt-F8.
 It's drawback is it's not as fine-grained though. But for me it's really
 faster anyway.

Bill:

Thanks for the reply.

I've got acceleration all the way to the slow end, sensitivity all the way
to the low end, drag and drop threshold all the way to the small end,
and I've tried them all at other settings, too, to no avail.

trying to grab the edge of a window feels like the grabbable region
is only one pixel (or maybe one mickey) wide and it's still hard nto
place the pointer right on it. I may be getting old, but I don't
have any palsy/tremor problems.


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
  it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.  
 Hebrews 4:12 (niv) --
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C-6, Gnome question

2015-01-09 Thread Bill Maltby (C4B)

On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 09:17 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 Using the default Gnome desktop on Centos-6, I keep having difficulty
 getting the mouse pointer to lineup exactly on the edge/corner of a
 window when I want to resize the window. It seems that you have to 
 have it on a line exactly one pixel in width, and I'm finding it
 increasingly hard to do (who, me? getting old? nah!)

I'm also getting old, but I don't have the problem on C-6 at all.

 
 Wondering if there is a gnome setting somewhere among the myriad
 settings that could be used to configure the accuracy with which
 the mouse pointer must be placed so one can grab edges of things.
 I've dug thru the settings in the Gnome configuration editor, but
 so far nothing leaps out at me.
 
 Can anyone offer advice?

Have you gone into System-Preferences-Mouse and changed some of the
doohickeys there? I don't recall anything related to your problem, but
it may be related to Acceleration or Sensitivity? I've set my
Sensitivity to about 1/3rd off of low and acceleration to mid-range.
There's an alternative if, like me, you prefer KB anyway - Alt-F8.
It's drawback is it's not as fine-grained though. But for me it's really
faster anyway.

 
 thanks!

HTH,
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora

2015-01-09 Thread Dave Stevens


Quoting Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net:



On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:35 -0700, Warren Young wrote:


Once a thing becomes reliable, it stops being technology.


Oh No. Just because something works well it does not stop being
technology unless the USA people, who have decimated my language
(English), have a new definition for technology.


ah, yes. Two great nations, divided by a common language...

Dave



Warren are you serious that things that do not work well are
technology but things that do work well are *not* technology ?


--
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie !


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





--
As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business,
the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance.

-- John Dewey





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora

2015-01-09 Thread John R Pierce


On 1/9/2015 2:32 PM, Always Learning wrote:

Enterprise, in the RHEL context, suggests stability or have I
misunderstood the USA definition of Enterprise ?



Enterprise to me implies large business.   Businesses that don't adapt 
to external changes become fossils and die off.


--
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora


On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 14:20 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:

 Quoting Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net:
 
  Oh No. Just because something works well it does not stop being
  technology unless the USA people, who have decimated my language
  (English), have a new definition for technology.
 
 ah, yes. Two great nations, divided by a common language...

The one east of the Atlantic continues to decline and is only great
when compared in size to Brittany in the north-west of La France. 

Great Britain actually means a Brittany bigger than the French area
called Bretagne.

The USA has certainly damaged my language. These days (ever since George
W) one no longer devises a plan. Instead one makes a road map :-)


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.   Je suis Charlie.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora


On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 14:36 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 1/9/2015 2:32 PM, Always Learning wrote:
  Enterprise, in the RHEL context, suggests stability or have I
  misunderstood the USA definition of Enterprise ?
 
 
 Enterprise to me implies large business.   Businesses that don't adapt 
 to external changes become fossils and die off.

Adapt sounds more pleasant than disruptive change. It suggests a less
abrupt change process :-)

-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora


On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:35 -0700, Warren Young wrote:

 Once a thing becomes reliable, it stops being technology.

Oh No. Just because something works well it does not stop being
technology unless the USA people, who have decimated my language
(English), have a new definition for technology.

Warren are you serious that things that do not work well are
technology but things that do work well are *not* technology ?


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie !


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora


On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:55 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:

 On 1/8/2015 8:44 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:

  But now that I'm approaching retirement ...
 
 is that a promise ?   please, hurry up.   I, for one, am tired of your 
 diatribes about how change is bad, and I suspect I'm not the only one.

Is change for advantage and betterment or merely because someone wants
to do the same tasks in a different manner and wants everyone else to
abandon their existing methods of working ?

Changes are not inherently bad but changes prompted by others' amusement
are usually unproductively disruptive.

Enterprise, in the RHEL context, suggests stability or have I
misunderstood the USA definition of Enterprise ?

-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.   Je suis Charlie


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora

2015-01-09 Thread Elvinas Piliponis

Hello,

Kt, 2015 01 08 11:32 -0600, Valeri Galtsev rašė:

right: snorkel ;-) One of the pushing points was: already then on
average every 30-45 days was either glibc or kernel update, meaning you
have to reboot the box (and on multiple threads here there was a bunch of
other unpleasant things mentioned so I'll skip them...). Linux from

And your point? From my previous Linux Engineer experience in some
small enterprise, being one of the top 5 biggest banks, there was a
push to make mandatory scheduled server reboots every month or two.

Rationale was simple: keeping long uptimes does not makes sense, when
updates (not necessary OS but also userspace) piles up and after
unexpected reboot shit happens as server is no longer able to boot.
This was the experiences with various systems, including RHEL5 on x86
and IBM AIX on Power, Windows and other lovely bunch of hardware. As
there were multiple incidents, it was decided to move to a mandatory
reboot schedule to have maintenance windows. I believe the only system
that was excluded from such plans was mainframe.

Of course this requires to design systems to have load balancing,
failover and other stuff available and working.

So, several of those people fled to open solaris. My journey was
different, I ended up migrating a bunch of most important boxes to
FreeBSD. I know how many on this list are already allergic to me saying
this, I promise, this is the last time. I'm using as excuse something
familiar I feel in James's post...

And does FreeBSD have magic bullet against reboot requirement after
kernel/libc update? Or are you simply not patching system (which you
can do on Linux too) ?

BTW Linux already (again) procedes to rebootless kernel upgrade.
Unfortunately now there are 4 different implementations (thanks goes to
Oracle for buying KSplice and making this exclusive to OL). Although if
my memory does not fail there were talks about unification.

Elvinas Piliponis

[cid:1420798946.4375.1.camel@ltkaude5005]

Studentų g. 59-B707, LT-51365, Kaunas, Lietuva
Email:
elvinas.pilipo...@virtustream.comhttps://exchangevs.virtustream.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=C7sp-jyqTEeF3k7ArpiVF1dOSht06dEImQkOuwrkH1VgCkmkTLcZmzDuYzOe4cWdlcZqPVHpALo.URL=mailto%3aelvinas.piliponis%40virtustream.com
| Mobile: +370 69807947

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to this message and deleting the email and its attachments from all
computers without copying or disclosing it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)

2015-01-09 Thread Ned Slider



On 08/01/15 18:51, Fred Smith wrote:
 Hi all!
 
 Running Centos-6.latest on an AMD six-core Vishera processor. It's
 been running for a year on that hardware.
 
 today I swapped out the video card (from Nvidia 9800GT to Nvidia 460 GTX)
 hoping to get a little more horsepower, and the ability to run the
 Folding At Home GPUclient.
 
 I know that's an old card, it's a hand-me-down from my son who just
 replaced it with a new 970 GTX card.
 
 So, I got the hardware installed, close up the case, connect all the
 cables, boot it up and booting stops with this message on the screen
 in plain text mode:
 
   Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)
 
 I can reboot and edit the kernel commandline to add edd=off at the
 end then it comes up all the way.
 
 I haven't made any changes in the Nvidia drivers, because nvidia's
 web site tells me it uses the same driver as the 9800GT card did.
 
 I'm using the RPMs from elrepo, so it uses akmod to do a rebuild when
 a new kernel is installed. But I didn't install a new kernel, so it
 didn't get rebuilt, and I'm wondering if that's the cause of the
 problem... different card works with the same driver version but may
 need recompiling due to the different hardware ?
 
 If so, I don't think I know how to force akmod to do the rebuild.
 Thoughts/or actual knowledge on this would be appreciated.

No, the elrepo packages are kABI-tracking kmod packages that are
compatible with the RHEL kernels stable ABI. These drivers work across
all RHEL kernel releases, no rebuilding takes place. This is unique to
Enterprise Linux (RHEL and it's clones) and different to how things may
happen on other distros or when using the NVIDIA installer.

Your card is supported by the latest elrepo driver release, so just make
sure you are yum updated to the latest release (currently
kmod-nvidia-340-65):

yum --enablerepo=elrepo update kmod-nvidia

Reboot if the driver gets updated and you should be good to go.

 
 Also, among the googling I did, I found one posting that said that message
 means an unexpected (DOS??) interrupt occurred, but it did't  help me
 any with how to resolve it.
 
 Your suggestions will be welcomed, thanks in advance!
 
 Fred
 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 3

2015-01-09 Thread centos-announce-request

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2015:0017 CentOS 7 libibverbs BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CEBA-2015:0017  CentOS 7 libmlx4 BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2015:0018 CentOS 6 sblim-sfcb BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:01:08 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0017 CentOS 7 libibverbs BugFix
Update
Message-ID: 20150108150108.ga29...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0017 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0017.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
eb24f744406f3e6ef455f01d0ffe0355ee4481981fd862e7548481bafc551fd0  
libibverbs-1.1.8-1.el7_0.i686.rpm
0caede2c4f3a20abd7dba3a438d5f2276598bbbd19c718467100c9708362d8da  
libibverbs-1.1.8-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
f6a84e17349204ed40454f77540ed95152a74e449c5a640fd94dbce58b038f71  
libibverbs-devel-1.1.8-1.el7_0.i686.rpm
9c9b61f82b02b384349e3f08e20d7d31b8ea1391d7487a0eef7f7a9e171a8c36  
libibverbs-devel-1.1.8-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
9860db42b53a85d98932a5e289816267a37c8b7407808b70b0d0031387cc050e  
libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.8-1.el7_0.i686.rpm
c65788cf7296cd308cc9a8e779e58c31de00dbdff51eeb95fe7e4989a694a867  
libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.8-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
83e9dbdabfa0cb9b3d399833a50f81b6b6f855ba3365f419dfe87ca441dc7e15  
libibverbs-utils-1.1.8-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm

Source:
89d56585fb91fab8ac459cee5e1bb4ff5cda4be9746f6905b8548d41648ec81c  
libibverbs-1.1.8-1.el7_0.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:01:20 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0017  CentOS 7 libmlx4 BugFix
Update
Message-ID: 20150108150120.ga29...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0017 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0017.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
1e796a0967c805e15027e8c819a7e6508b9220e4c1d93d186942c7f037234646  
libmlx4-1.0.6-1.el7_0.i686.rpm
446415eeca2e3eb825b7e453458c1706bff5d250421eba2caefcc8b49ddc2ac8  
libmlx4-1.0.6-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm
fb2366651f8f06a6978d0ff65c68c5d055ac85402048b03730ff43b066469c5c  
libmlx4-static-1.0.6-1.el7_0.i686.rpm
12be5b9f6d6ae735762f9c67725b72c7148045d10f7552b0ef6d9860597deedf  
libmlx4-static-1.0.6-1.el7_0.x86_64.rpm

Source:
57ff98b608c9cfedc62643769f9d784d20780cfe12244dc7c9e0424c8d9388a4  
libmlx4-1.0.6-1.el7_0.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:02:17 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0018 CentOS 6 sblim-sfcb BugFix
Update
Message-ID: 20150108150217.ga30...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0018 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0018.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
cdeb719e515149ee673dde3ddaa9bee21fc20ec06b5a9e54fb9b3b1b0c3c73f2  
sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-3.el6_6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
f96e93a058a2a3b8903000aaf6b0a93f8c60d1c557726e78cf8ae6a78bb5b3ae  
sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
c12b395e917726280c75b8bee4ca85aa3118a44a8527bdaa690061c82ad5b40e  
sblim-sfcb-1.3.11-3.el6_6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 3
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C-6, Gnome question