Re: [CentOS-docs] becoming root
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > Cool - just wasn't sure if it needed something more :) I have made some minor addition and changes to the sudo section. Hope it is still looking good. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] becoming root
Alan Bartlett wrote: Ned, On 19/04/2008, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I seem to recall Ralph writing: Please mention the bash manual page (and the section about login shells), where this behaviour is explained in more detail. I kind of did here (end of su section): "For a more detailed explanation, see the bash manual page (man bash), particularly the section on INVOCATION and login shells." If you think it needs more, or a better explanation, feel free :) Oops. My eye-sight must *really* be failing me. Sorry. Alan. Cool - just wasn't sure if it needed something more :) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] becoming root
Ned, On 19/04/2008, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I seem to recall Ralph writing: > > > > Please mention the bash manual page (and the section about login > > > shells), where this behaviour is explained in more detail. > > > > > > I kind of did here (end of su section): > > "For a more detailed explanation, see the bash manual page (man bash), > particularly the section on INVOCATION and login shells." > > If you think it needs more, or a better explanation, feel free :) Oops. My eye-sight must *really* be failing me. Sorry. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] becoming root
Alan Bartlett wrote: I seem to recall Ralph writing: Please mention the bash manual page (and the section about login shells), where this behaviour is explained in more detail. Apart from that, it seems to be looking good. Alan. I kind of did here (end of su section): "For a more detailed explanation, see the bash manual page (man bash), particularly the section on INVOCATION and login shells." If you think it needs more, or a better explanation, feel free :) I'm sure there's other stuff too that people suggested that has been forgotten/missed :) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] becoming root
Ned, On 19/04/2008, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BecomingRoot > > *Everyone* I think we're nearing the point that we can sign off on this > page, and link to it in the TipsAndTricks/Admin tricks and shell one-liners > section once everyone is happy with the content. Any thoughts? I seem to recall Ralph writing: > Please mention the bash manual page (and the section about login > shells), where this behaviour is explained in more detail. Apart from that, it seems to be looking good. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] becoming root
Nils Ratusznik wrote: Akemi Yagi a écrit : Excellent! Guess Alan can polish it up if needed :-D Akemi Your help is also welcome ;) Here is what I wrote. I wrote it without wiki syntax so someone will surely polish it up. Regards, Nils Hi Nils, Your sudo content has now been posted to the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BecomingRoot Please do check that I haven't messed up any of the formatting and it appears as you intended :) Thank you again for the contribution! *Everyone* I think we're nearing the point that we can sign off on this page, and link to it in the TipsAndTricks/Admin tricks and shell one-liners section once everyone is happy with the content. Any thoughts? Regards, Ned ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Diskless Clients
John wrote: Matt has offered to help us setup and then maintain the cobbler packages ( along with the couple of deps that it needs ). So expect some action on that front in the next few days. It will need to still go via the whole testing -> stable route, but I will do my best to push it along. Thanks Karan! Will be looking forward to it. I was thinking that this coming week to pull the cobbler setup from the testing repo and see how things go from there. cool. That should work - the basic workflow etc from cobbler 0.6.x that we have in testing now, to 0.8.x ( the present upstream stable ) is unchanged. Most of the new work has been on requirements for large install base ( > 250 machines ) and the sort of things they want / need. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs