Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Front Page.
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Alan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whilst running my critical eye over the new front page of the wiki I noticed, in the first light-blue box: CentOS Planet is alive: Stay in touch with the CentOS community, take a look at CentOS Planet Planet CentOS or CentOS Planet, that is the question. D'oh. It's Planet CentOS, just like all other Planet \w+ sites. I'll fix this ;). Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] To have a new acces
What? ;) On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:55 PM, aymeric derbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have finished to translate the frontpage of the FAQ. Now I need a acces for translate this page http://wiki.centos.org/fr/FAQ/CentOS5 Since we have recursive permissions, you should be able to edit that page if you can edit http://wiki.centos.org/fr/FAQ. What happens if you use this URL (so, with '?action=edit' appended to the URL): http://wiki.centos.org/fr/FAQ/CentOS5?action=edit Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Article for wiki consideration
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Manuel Wolfshant wrote: vserver is quite popular, especially among debian admins and even among hosting companies, so I am very much in favor of publishing this article. Has anyone made contact with the admin / packager at the mentioned repo ? Good question! I have just dropped him a note, and invited him to this discussion. Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: Opening of the Wiki - Part I
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That should block the vast majority of spam, shouldn't it? On a Dutch forum we were dealing with a considerable amount of spam. Most spam account creation/posting is done automatically through scripts. So, we simply added an additional account creation field with a verification question the can only be answered by humans, like: Op welke dag is Kortjakje niet ziek? (On which day isn't Kortjakje ill?) There is this Dutch children's rhyme/song that everyone knows, and tells the story of Kortjakje, who is ill on every day except Sunday. There must be a nice English equivalent :). After this change there has been virtually no spam on the forum (I think only once through an unrelated bug). Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the Wiki - Part I
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aggree..I would like for the Authors name and Co-Authored names to remain on the article they have written. Since many people feel this is important, maybe we should. But I'd propose to include a note somewhere on the Wiki that it is ok to change 'someone else's pages', as long as it is an improvement, and that major changes can be discussed on centos-docs. Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Article for wiki consideration
Hi Scott, On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've recently documented simple use of a VServer with CentOS host and guest. toracat@ said that it might be worthwhile putting on the wiki. Hmmm, this requires a modified or a non-CentOS kernel. Do we really want to start recommending such kernels? Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Article for wiki consideration
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I mentioned, I would begin the article with something similar to the beginning of the custom kernel article, with dire warnings. However, if you and/or the other powers that be feel it is almost advocating something that has risks, I certainly understand that. Well, if there is a lot of interest in having container-type of virtualization. It might be interesting to see which of the various alternatives (linux-vserver or openvz) looks best, and see if we can provide it through e.g. the plus repository. Of course, this would require a volunteer who is willing to maintain such a set of patches against the kernel. But if someone is willing to do this, it can profit from CentOS quality assurance, and guarantee good compatibility with CentOS. Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the Wiki - Part I
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Akemi Yagi wrote: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2007-October/000734.html As you can see in that thread, placing a moderator's name on each page was opposed by a few core members of the CentOS team. Then the discussion sort of died down. I'd like to know, if the name(s) are hidden from the readers, assigning maintainers would be agreeable to them. Any more thoughts or ideas? I dont understand why someone's name needs to be on the page, for them to be able to subscribe to the changelog for a page ? I agree. I still agree with myself one year ago: I can only agree. Even it is not the intention to keep people away, people will feel like they have to consult with the author on every edit. This works against the goal of wikis: providing complete, correct, and understandable information. I know that you are not proposing to have visible names, but I think the same thing applies to ownership that is shown when a page is edited. Other than that, page subscriptions should do the job fine? And why can't the editors be responsible for all of the Wiki? I think it is better if abuse is fixed by the first person who spots it, rather than a special moderator. I can't really see what purpose this proposal serves ;). Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] FAQs
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Presumably it would be preferable if there was just one, and as the main site FAQs seem old, plus Akemi and I both have edit rights to the Wiki, we would propose to add missing content contained in the main site FAQs onto the Wiki page as necessary making this the most complete FAQ repository. Sounds like a good idea. +1 -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Helping translating...
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Lester Espinosa MartÃnez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the moment, the translation for this page is not available. In their place the page has been shown in English language. This is the missing translation page plugin kicking in, add '?action=edit' to the name of the page you want to edit. For instance: http://wiki.centos.org/es/HowTos/KVM?action=edit Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS wiki section for job postings?
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you dont want job postings to stay online for years do you ? For some reason, I'd still prefer a centos-jobs list. It's simply the geek's medium for communication ;). I like stuff being pushed to my mailbox, rather than having to visit some site to keep up. Many other projects also have a -jobs list, doesn't seem to be a problem there. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Doc for the Wiki
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] alternative methods to get the desired program/software. There are, however, situations in which compiling from the source is the only way. In this case, I will try to make sure the procedure does not touch any distro-provided files. It seems plone is in RPMForge? http://dries.ulyssis.org/apt/packages/plone/info.html Maybe someone can help Dag and Dries updating this to the latest Plone? Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] new translator
Hi Nicolas, On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:37 AM, nicolas dolisy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I introduce myself quickly, my name is nicolas dolisy, I use fedora since 2003, and centos since last year. I write this mail because i want to contribute to the french translation of the Wiki. So if an admin can let me access to the french pages, it would be nice... Could you provide some sample translations (e.g. for existing Wiki pages)? Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 17:36 +, Lance Davis wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Hey, one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Looks fine - I would do the same at the sides as well. I am not sure. It is known from studies that people can only read optimally up to a certain text width. Not that a fixed size is enforced now, but the smaller relative width it has now, improves the readability of longer texts. *If* we want to fill up the sides, I think it is better to do that with menus or some other content in the future. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Last Change for the css
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:09 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Nov 21, 2007 3:58 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Just joking. We already are live. See http://wiki.centos.org/. And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, show a big round of applause for Alain! Alain: Thank you in the name of the CentOS Team. Great work. Thank you, Alain and Ralph. The CentOS wiki finally looks so professional. Indeed, many thanks to both of you for making this happen! -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.7-2
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:57 -0500, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: On 11/16/07, Daniel de Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 15:22 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Daniel de Kok wrote: How about renaming these a bit: Better? Very nice! Looks good ... but it breaks navibar when I access a page different from those listed in navibar :-\ ... does it happen to you too ? That depends on the browser window width here. I've always found it unintuitive that the page title/path is shown in the navibar. Maybe we should think about leaving that out? -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.7-2
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 13:43 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Second: We still need to decide to which pages we link in the Navbar. Are any changes needed regarding the pages we have there at the moment? How about renaming these a bit: GettingHelp - Help/Getting help HowToContribute - Contributing/Contribute/How to contribute (The normal Wiki syntax can be used in the Moin config.) -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] GoogleAds on wiki.centos.org
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 14:55 -0500, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: There are some troubles with the two searchform variant, the version modern-CentOS-1.6-7 fix this by removing the searchform at bottom and just leaving the upper one. http://wiki.centos.org/FrontPageProposal?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=modern-CentOS-1.6-7.tar.gz What do you think ? would be convenient to have the searchform at bottom too ? I haven't kept track of the full discussion, but I think this layout is definitely an improvement over the current layout. Some comments: - The tab color for the selected page doesn't match up nicely with its background. - I think a full-blown background for every heading within the page is not easy on the eyes. How about just a colored heading (with no background)? Thanks for making this happen Alain! -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: CentOS Wiki Access [was Re: [CentOS-docs] need a TOC]
Hi Phil, On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote: 1. Join the -docs list and offer to contribute something. 2. Implement the contribution and respond to comments. 3. Remain active for some probationary period, TBD. 4. Request members Wiki access granting privileges to edit existing pages not explicitly protected and create new pages in public areas of the Wiki. [1] Basically this has been the procedure, while there is a (sorta) 3.5 step: actively contribute to other parts of the Wiki as well. But I agree that we should be more generous in giving frequent contributors write access to public parts of the Wiki. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] SSH contribution?
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Ned Slider wrote: Also, is it possible for any contributor to have a personal Wiki profile page or is this something restricted to more Senior Contributors/CentOS Devs? AFAIK this doesn't require additional rights, just edit your own WikiName like this: http://wiki.centos.org/YourWikiName?action=edit -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Clarification in HowTos/MigrationGuide page
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 13:42 -0400, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: See where it says --- Although both can be used together --- . Just for confirmation: they will work together, but it is generally a bad idea, because one of the plugins override packages that the other is supposed to protect. I agree that this page should be changed in this respect. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Untranslated page redirection
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 02:26:49PM -0400, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: On 8/10/07, Daniel de Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 14:50 +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote: will show the English page with a small message on top. I forgot to mention that if you'd like to have that message altered for your language, please send a translation of it to the list. Thanks Daniel ... here you have a Spanish translation for the redirection wiki message: == Actualmente, la traducci?n para esta p?gina no se encuentra disponible. En su lugar se ha mostrado la p?gina en idioma Ingl?s. == Sorry for missing this, it should work now :). -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Untranslated page redirection
Hi all, Just a heads-up: we have added the untranslated page redirection plugin that was discussed on this list a while ago. This means pages that are requested under a language prefix that don't exist, are redirected to the English page if it does exist. For instance, there is no Spanish translation for /HowTos/FreeNX yet, so visiting http://wiki.centos.org/es/HowTos/FreeNX will show the English page with a small message on top. People with edit privileges in such contexts can create/edit a page by adding '?action=edit' to the URL. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs