Re: [CentOS-virt] Moving vmware guests to a CentOS KVM server

2010-02-20 Thread Kenni Lund
2010/2/20 S.Tindall tindall.sat...@brandxmail.com:

 On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 02:41 +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
 2010/2/18 compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com:
  I would also just use the e1000 emulation. Theres nothing
  better about the virtio devices...

 ...other than lower CPU utilization and higher throughout? Since these
 are CentOS/RHEL guests, I wouldn't even consider using e1000, I would
 just go for virtio_net.

 I don't have any links, but some time ago there were some benchmarks
 (on the KVM development list?), showing the e1000 maxing out at around
 300-400mbit/s while the virtio got around 900mbit/s. Even with the
 much higher throughput, the virtio_net driver still had the same or
 lower CPU utilization.

 Do your own testing if in doubt.

 Best Regards
 Kenni Lund

 Are you using test-signed drivers or do you have a redistributable
 source for release-signed drivers (that chain to a microsoft root)?

I don't think that anyone are talking about Windows in this thread?
You don't need Microsoft signing of drivers for Linux guests ;)

 Never got the chance to test relative performance of e1000 vs the netkvm
 drivers on a M$ guest, but on a centos5 guest, virtio absolutely blows
 the doors off e1000 performance.

 Using ttcp in both directions, typical C5-host-to-C5-guests for e1000
 was in the 30-60MB/s range and virtio was in the 300-400MB/s range.

Exactly... :)

Best Regards
Kenni Lund
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Moving vmware guests to a CentOS KVM server

2010-02-20 Thread S.Tindall
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:10 +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
 2010/2/20 S.Tindall tindall.sat...@brandxmail.com:
 
  Are you using test-signed drivers or do you have a redistributable
  source for release-signed drivers (that chain to a microsoft root)?
 
 I don't think that anyone are talking about Windows in this thread?

You are correct. Thought this was a continuation of the windows guest
thread (same people) and it is not:

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2010-February/001654.html

I missed the change in subject/title. Sorry for the noise.


Steve

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Mounting LVM contained ntfs systems.

2010-02-20 Thread Christopher G. Stach II
- Ben M. cen...@rivint.com wrote:

 If I try to mount the LV:
 
 ~
 [r...@vm1 ~]# mount -t ntfs /dev/thisvg00/thisw2kwe-b4change
 /mnt/ntfs
 NTFS signature is missing.
 Failed to mount '/dev/mapper/serv1vg00-w2kwe--b4cert': Invalid
 argument
 The device '/dev/mapper/serv1vg00-w2kwe--b4cert' doesn't seem to have
 a 
 valid NTFS.
 Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a
 partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?

Did you dd the disk or the partition? If you did the whole disk (verify with 
fdisk or something), you can use kpartx to add the LV as a disk and then mount 
the partitions that are created.

-- 
Christopher G. Stach II
http://ldsys.net/~cgs/
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt