Re: [CentOS-virt] Bug in reboot phase : workaround or patch ?

2010-05-25 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:16:56PM +0200, Erwan MAS wrote:
 Hello ,
 
 I use Centos 5.4 , with the redhat version of xen .
 I need for some guest to change the hardware for the network .
 So in my xen config i add the model option in the vif line .
 
 When the guest boot , i had the right emulation , but after a reboot , the 
 guest loose the configuration .
 

So when you first xm create it, it's ok, and after you reboot the guest,
the NIC model has changed?

 Someone can confirm the bug in centos 5.5 ?
 

Did you search Redhat bugzilla? 


-- Pasi


 Have someone a patch ?
 
 
 
 Extract of my config :
 
builder = hvm
vif = [ 'type=ioemu, mac=00:16:3e:50:10:45, bridge=xenbr0, model=ne2k_pci']
device_model = /usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm
 
 #grep spa.*/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm /var/log/xen/xend.log
 
 [2010-05-24 11:47:23 xend 3782] INFO (image:434) spawning device models: 
 /usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm ['/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm', '-d', '75', '-m', 
 '192', '-boot', 'dc', '-serial', 'pty', '-vcpus', '1', '-k', 'fr', 
 '-domain-name', 'orange', '-net', 
 'nic,vlan=1,macaddr=00:16:3e:50:10:45,model=pcnet', '-net', 
 'tap,vlan=1,bridge=xenbr0', '-vnc', '127.0.0.45:1']
 [2010-05-24 11:47:40 xend 3782] INFO (image:434) spawning device models: 
 /usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm ['/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm', '-d', '76', '-m', 
 '192', '-boot', 'dc', '-serial', 'pty', '-vcpus', '1', '-k', 'fr', 
 '-domain-name', 'orange', '-net', 
 'nic,vlan=1,macaddr=00:16:3e:50:10:45,model=rtl8139', '-net', 
 'tap,vlan=1,bridge=xenbr0', '-vnc', '127.0.0.45:1']
 
 #rpm -qa | grep ^xen
 xen-libs-3.0.3-94.el5_4.2
 xen-3.0.3-94.el5_4.2
 
 #xm info
 host   : james.mas.nom.fr
 release: 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5.centos.plusxen
 version: #1 SMP Wed Nov 4 10:10:32 EST 2009
 machine: x86_64
 nr_cpus: 2
 nr_nodes   : 1
 sockets_per_node   : 1
 cores_per_socket   : 2
 threads_per_core   : 1
 cpu_mhz: 2104
 hw_caps: 
 178bfbff:ebd3fbff::0010:2001::011f
 total_memory   : 4078
 free_memory: 1738
 node_to_cpu: node0:0-1
 xen_major  : 3
 xen_minor  : 1
 xen_extra  : .2-164.6.1.el5.
 xen_caps   : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 
 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 
 xen_pagesize   : 4096
 platform_params: virt_start=0x8000
 xen_changeset  : unavailable
 cc_compiler: gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
 cc_compile_by  : mockbuild
 cc_compile_domain  : centos.org
 cc_compile_date: Wed Nov  4 09:23:54 EST 2009
 xend_config_format : 2
 
 -- 
  
 / Erwan MAS /\
| mailto:er...@mas.nom.fr   |_/
 ___|   |
 \___\__/
 ___
 CentOS-virt mailing list
 CentOS-virt@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Bug in reboot phase : workaround or patch ?

2010-05-25 Thread Erwan MAS
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:43:23AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
 On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:16:56PM +0200, Erwan MAS wrote:
  Hello ,
  
  I use Centos 5.4 , with the redhat version of xen .
  I need for some guest to change the hardware for the network .
  So in my xen config i add the model option in the vif line .
  
  When the guest boot , i had the right emulation , but after a reboot , the 
  guest loose the configuration .
  
 
 So when you first xm create it, it's ok, and after you reboot the guest,
 the NIC model has changed?

It's a very old bug :-( .
Cf http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=867

  Someone can confirm the bug in centos 5.5 ?
  

Centos 5.5 use a new version of xen , and i hope than my bug is fixed in it , 
but before upgrade i want 
a confirmation .

 Did you search Redhat bugzilla? 

Yes .

-- 
 
/ Erwan MAS /\
   | mailto:er...@mas.nom.fr   |_/
___|   |
\___\__/
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


[CentOS-virt] Libvirt NAT-based network 2x-4x faster than Libvirt routed network?

2010-05-25 Thread Kenni Lund
Hi

Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster
than a libvirt routed network?

I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all
cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet
connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec, while the nat-based
network goes all the way to 10mbyte/sec. I've spend the last 6 hours
on trying to figure out the cause of this, changing settings,
reinstalling the system, but the problem persists and I can't find the
cause of it.

It is a clean and fairly simple setup:
- Clean installation of CentOS 5.5
- Installation of kvm+libvirt+virt-manager+xorg
- iptables service disabled
- 1 public IP for the host (xxx.yyy.zzz.215) on a /32 subnet with
xxx.yyy.zzz.193 as gateway
- 3 public IP for the routed network (xxx.yyy.zzz.251-253) on a /26
subnet with the same gateway as the host
- 1 virtual machine with either the NAT or the routed libvirt network assigned

I have no networking connection errors or similar, it works perfectly
with both the NAT and the routed network, but the routed network is
just 2-4 times slower than the NAT one.

Do you have any suggestions of what the problem might be? When I look
at the iptables rules generated by libvirt, and the routing table,
everything looks fine AFAICT. Traceroute from guest doesn't reveal
anything either. Ping times from the two networks are similar, so the
main issue seems to be throughput.

Any help or pointers to what I should look at, is highly appreciated... :)

I've copy pasted some of my relevant system configuration into pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/jtTrHLqA

Thank you,
Kenni
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt