Re: [CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

[Lokesh Mandvekar]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:37:46AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lars Kurth  wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the
> > Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it
> > was always clear that this would be a temporary thing until the SIG got
> > going. At the time, only Xen and CentOS folks were involved with the SIG.
> > Since then, we added oVirt and Docker maintainers, have a total of 5
> > maintainers and built good momentum.
> >
> > There are two reasons why I feel I should step down as leader of the Virt
> > SIG: a) I have been traveling too much and thus did not have the bandwidth
> > to do this job justice in recent months. b) In addition, it would also make
> > more sense for one of the Virt SIG maintainers who is more closely involved
> > with day-to-day activities to pick up this job. I will still be able to
> > help with PR and other items.
> >
> > When I was absent over the last few months, George Dunlap (gwd on irc) did
> > most of the groundwork and led SIG meetings on my behalf, so I wanted to
> > propose that George leads the SIG going forward. That is assuming that none
> > of the other SIG maintainers want to step up. George agreed in principle.
> >
> > In the last Virt SIG meeting, not all maintainers were present, so we
> > couldn't make a formal decision. KB said the following:
> >
> > kbsingh: I think if gwd is ok with it, and people are ok in the SIG, its
> > good for me
> >
> > This means that succession either has to be settled in the next SIG
> > meeting, or by e-mail responding to this thread. I don't think there is any
> > formal process, but I would suggest that the maintainers listed on
> > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization should have a
> > say either at the next IRC meeting or by replying to this email thread.
> >
> >
> +1 for George Dunlap
> 

+1 for gwd!

Sorry for the late reply, I've been out for a bit, new year+PTO etc. etc.
In other news, we have a co-maintainer for docker and co. packages who'll
probably be introducing herself over IRC or mailing list soon-ish.


-- 
Lokesh
Freenode: lsm5
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

[Sandro Bonazzola]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lars Kurth  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the
> Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it
> was always clear that this would be a temporary thing until the SIG got
> going. At the time, only Xen and CentOS folks were involved with the SIG.
> Since then, we added oVirt and Docker maintainers, have a total of 5
> maintainers and built good momentum.
>
> There are two reasons why I feel I should step down as leader of the Virt
> SIG: a) I have been traveling too much and thus did not have the bandwidth
> to do this job justice in recent months. b) In addition, it would also make
> more sense for one of the Virt SIG maintainers who is more closely involved
> with day-to-day activities to pick up this job. I will still be able to
> help with PR and other items.
>
> When I was absent over the last few months, George Dunlap (gwd on irc) did
> most of the groundwork and led SIG meetings on my behalf, so I wanted to
> propose that George leads the SIG going forward. That is assuming that none
> of the other SIG maintainers want to step up. George agreed in principle.
>
> In the last Virt SIG meeting, not all maintainers were present, so we
> couldn't make a formal decision. KB said the following:
>
> kbsingh: I think if gwd is ok with it, and people are ok in the SIG, its
> good for me
>
> This means that succession either has to be settled in the next SIG
> meeting, or by e-mail responding to this thread. I don't think there is any
> formal process, but I would suggest that the maintainers listed on
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization should have a
> say either at the next IRC meeting or by replying to this email thread.
>
>
+1 for George Dunlap




> Best Regards
> Lars
>
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>



-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

[Pasi Kärkkäinen]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:06:18PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 08:53 AM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the 
> > Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it 
> > was always clear that this would be a temporary thing until the SIG got 
> > going. At the time, only Xen and CentOS folks were involved with the SIG. 
> > Since then, we added oVirt and Docker maintainers, have a total of 5 
> > maintainers and built good momentum.
> > 
> > There are two reasons why I feel I should step down as leader of the Virt 
> > SIG: a) I have been traveling too much and thus did not have the bandwidth 
> > to do this job justice in recent months. b) In addition, it would also make 
> > more sense for one of the Virt SIG maintainers who is more closely involved 
> > with day-to-day activities to pick up this job. I will still be able to 
> > help with PR and other items.  
> > 
> > When I was absent over the last few months, George Dunlap (gwd on irc) did 
> > most of the groundwork and led SIG meetings on my behalf, so I wanted to 
> > propose that George leads the SIG going forward. That is assuming that none 
> > of the other SIG maintainers want to step up. George agreed in principle.
> > 
> > In the last Virt SIG meeting, not all maintainers were present, so we 
> > couldn't make a formal decision. KB said the following:
> > 
> > kbsingh: I think if gwd is ok with it, and people are ok in the SIG, its 
> > good for me
> > 
> > This means that succession either has to be settled in the next SIG 
> > meeting, or by e-mail responding to this thread. I don't think there is any 
> > formal process, but I would suggest that the maintainers listed on 
> > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization should have a 
> > say either at the next IRC meeting or by replying to this email thread.
> > 
> > Best Regards
> > Lars
> 
> Lars,
> 
> Slacker :)
> 
> George Dunlap is fine with me.
> 

+1 for George.


-- Pasi

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

[Johnny Hughes]

On 11/03/2015 08:53 AM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the 
> Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it was 
> always clear that this would be a temporary thing until the SIG got going. At 
> the time, only Xen and CentOS folks were involved with the SIG. Since then, 
> we added oVirt and Docker maintainers, have a total of 5 maintainers and 
> built good momentum.
> 
> There are two reasons why I feel I should step down as leader of the Virt 
> SIG: a) I have been traveling too much and thus did not have the bandwidth to 
> do this job justice in recent months. b) In addition, it would also make more 
> sense for one of the Virt SIG maintainers who is more closely involved with 
> day-to-day activities to pick up this job. I will still be able to help with 
> PR and other items.  
> 
> When I was absent over the last few months, George Dunlap (gwd on irc) did 
> most of the groundwork and led SIG meetings on my behalf, so I wanted to 
> propose that George leads the SIG going forward. That is assuming that none 
> of the other SIG maintainers want to step up. George agreed in principle.
> 
> In the last Virt SIG meeting, not all maintainers were present, so we 
> couldn't make a formal decision. KB said the following:
> 
> kbsingh: I think if gwd is ok with it, and people are ok in the SIG, its good 
> for me
> 
> This means that succession either has to be settled in the next SIG meeting, 
> or by e-mail responding to this thread. I don't think there is any formal 
> process, but I would suggest that the maintainers listed on 
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization should have a say 
> either at the next IRC meeting or by replying to this email thread.
> 
> Best Regards
> Lars

Lars,

Slacker :)

George Dunlap is fine with me.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

[Lars Kurth]

Hi all,

I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the 
Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it was 
always clear that this would be a temporary thing until the SIG got going. At 
the time, only Xen and CentOS folks were involved with the SIG. Since then, we 
added oVirt and Docker maintainers, have a total of 5 maintainers and built 
good momentum.

There are two reasons why I feel I should step down as leader of the Virt SIG: 
a) I have been traveling too much and thus did not have the bandwidth to do 
this job justice in recent months. b) In addition, it would also make more 
sense for one of the Virt SIG maintainers who is more closely involved with 
day-to-day activities to pick up this job. I will still be able to help with PR 
and other items.  

When I was absent over the last few months, George Dunlap (gwd on irc) did most 
of the groundwork and led SIG meetings on my behalf, so I wanted to propose 
that George leads the SIG going forward. That is assuming that none of the 
other SIG maintainers want to step up. George agreed in principle.

In the last Virt SIG meeting, not all maintainers were present, so we couldn't 
make a formal decision. KB said the following:

kbsingh: I think if gwd is ok with it, and people are ok in the SIG, its good 
for me

This means that succession either has to be settled in the next SIG meeting, or 
by e-mail responding to this thread. I don't think there is any formal process, 
but I would suggest that the maintainers listed on 
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization should have a say 
either at the next IRC meeting or by replying to this email thread.

Best Regards
Lars

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt