Re: [PATCH] rbd: handle parent_overlap on writes correctly

2014-06-13 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com wrote:
 On 06/11/2014 09:40 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:

 The following check in rbd_img_obj_request_submit()

  rbd_dev-parent_overlap = obj_request-img_offset

 allows the fall through to the non-layered write case even if both
 parent_overlap and obj_request-img_offset belong to the same RADOS
 object.  This leads to data corruption, because the area to the left of
 parent_overlap ends up unconditionally zero-filled instead of being
 populated with parent data.  Suppose we want to write 1M to offset 6M
 of image bar, which is a clone of foo@snap; object_size is 4M,
 parent_overlap is 5M:

  rbd_data.id.0001
   -|--|
  | should be copyup'ed | should be zeroed out | write ...
   -|--|
 4M5M 6M
  parent_overlapobj_request-img_offset

 4..5M should be copyup'ed from foo, yet it is zero-filled, just like
 5..6M is.

 Given that the only striping mode kernel client currently supports is
 chunking (i.e. stripe_unit == object_size, stripe_count == 1), round
 parent_overlap up to the next object boundary for the purposes of the
 overlap check.

 Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov ilya.dryo...@inktank.com
 ---


 Good catch! This should be included in any stable kernels 3.10 or later
 too.

 Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com

This commit in ceph-client already has the 3.10+ stable tag.

Thanks,

Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[no subject]

2014-06-13 Thread Mrs Teresa AU
Although you might be nervous about my e-mail as we have not met  
before. My name is Mrs Teresa Au, I work with HSBC Hong Kong; there is  
a sum of USD$23,200,000.00 business proposal I want to share with you.  
It is absolutely risk  free; if you are interested send me a reply to  
my private e-mail below : mrs_t...@126.com


Best Regards,
Email: mrs_t...@126.com
Mrs Teresa Au.







Provincia di Treviso - http://www.provincia.treviso.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support

2014-06-13 Thread Sushma Gurram
Hi Xinxin,

I tried to compile the wip-rocksdb branch, but the src/rocksdb directory seems 
to be empty. Do I need toput autoconf/automake in this directory?
It doesn't seem to have any other source files and compilation fails:
os/RocksDBStore.cc:10:24: fatal error: rocksdb/db.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.

Thanks,
Sushma

-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shu, Xinxin
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:00 PM
To: Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support

Hi mark

I have finished development of support of rocksdb submodule,  a pull request 
for support of autoconf/automake for rocksdb has been created , you can find 
https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/pull/2 , if this patch is ok ,  I will create a 
pull request for rocksdb submodule support , currently this patch can be found 
https://github.com/xinxinsh/ceph/tree/wip-rocksdb .

-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:12 AM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

Hi Xinxin,

On 05/28/2014 05:05 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
 Hi sage ,
 I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and 
 --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will compile 
 the code that get from ceph repository , with  --with-librocksdb option ,  in 
 case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile the rocksdb code 
 , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ?

 since current rocksdb does not support autoconfautomake , I will add 
 autoconfautomake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we should 
 fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .

I'm looking at testing out the rocksdb support as well, both for the OSD and 
for the monitor based on some issues we've been seeing lately.  Any news on the 
3.0 fork and autoconf/automake support in rocksdb?

Thanks,
Mark


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nel...@inktank.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM
 To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

 On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
 Hi, sage

 I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have 
 fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. 
 Then optimize on rocksdb performance.

 I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here.  Last winter 
 I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw 
 leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb.  I'm very interested in what you see with 
 rocksdb as a backend.


 -Original Message-
 From: Sage Weil [mailto:s...@inktank.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM
 To: Shu, Xinxin
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

 Hi Xinxin,

 I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that includes 
 the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb patch.  There 
 is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule.  I'm thinking that, 
 since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this point, this is 
 going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people.

 If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so 
 that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com.  I suspect 
 that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared 
 libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in 
 the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and 
 --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use the 
 static or dynamically linked one.

 Has your group done further testing with rocksdb?  Anything interesting to 
 share?

 Thanks!
 sage

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel
 in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
 info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the 
body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the 
body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that you have received this message in error and that any review, 
dissemination, distribution, or copying 

Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

2014-06-13 Thread David Zafman

Don’t forget when a new submodule is added you need to initialize it.  From 
the README:

Building Ceph
=

To prepare the source tree after it has been git cloned,

$ git submodule update --init

To build the server daemons, and FUSE client, execute the following:

$ ./autogen.sh
$ ./configure
$ make


David Zafman
Senior Developer
http://www.inktank.com
http://www.redhat.com

On Jun 13, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Sushma Gurram sushma.gur...@sandisk.com wrote:

 Hi Xinxin,
 
 I tried to compile the wip-rocksdb branch, but the src/rocksdb directory 
 seems to be empty. Do I need toput autoconf/automake in this directory?
 It doesn't seem to have any other source files and compilation fails:
 os/RocksDBStore.cc:10:24: fatal error: rocksdb/db.h: No such file or directory
 compilation terminated.
 
 Thanks,
 Sushma
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
 [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shu, Xinxin
 Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:00 PM
 To: Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
 Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support
 
 Hi mark
 
 I have finished development of support of rocksdb submodule,  a pull request 
 for support of autoconf/automake for rocksdb has been created , you can find 
 https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/pull/2 , if this patch is ok ,  I will create 
 a pull request for rocksdb submodule support , currently this patch can be 
 found https://github.com/xinxinsh/ceph/tree/wip-rocksdb .
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
 [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:12 AM
 To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
 
 Hi Xinxin,
 
 On 05/28/2014 05:05 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
 Hi sage ,
 I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and 
 --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will compile 
 the code that get from ceph repository , with  --with-librocksdb option ,  
 in case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile the rocksdb 
 code , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ?
 
 since current rocksdb does not support autoconfautomake , I will add 
 autoconfautomake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we should 
 fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .
 
 I'm looking at testing out the rocksdb support as well, both for the OSD and 
 for the monitor based on some issues we've been seeing lately.  Any news on 
 the 3.0 fork and autoconf/automake support in rocksdb?
 
 Thanks,
 Mark
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nel...@inktank.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM
 To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
 
 On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
 Hi, sage
 
 I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have 
 fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. 
 Then optimize on rocksdb performance.
 
 I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here.  Last winter 
 I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw 
 leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb.  I'm very interested in what you see with 
 rocksdb as a backend.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sage Weil [mailto:s...@inktank.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM
 To: Shu, Xinxin
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support
 
 Hi Xinxin,
 
 I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that 
 includes the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb 
 patch.  There is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule.  I'm 
 thinking that, since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this 
 point, this is going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people.
 
 If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so 
 that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com.  I suspect 
 that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared 
 libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in 
 the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and 
 --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use 
 the static or dynamically linked one.
 
 Has your group done further testing with rocksdb?  Anything interesting to 
 share?
 
 Thanks!
 sage
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel
 in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo
 info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the 
 body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
 http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support

2014-06-13 Thread Shu, Xinxin
Currently ceph will get stable rocksdb from branch 3.0.fb of  ceph/rocksdb  , 
since PR https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/pull/2 has not been merged ,  so if 
you use 'git submodule update --init' to get rocksdb submodule , It did not 
support autoconf/automake .  

-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sushma Gurram
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 2:52 AM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support

Hi Xinxin,

I tried to compile the wip-rocksdb branch, but the src/rocksdb directory seems 
to be empty. Do I need toput autoconf/automake in this directory?
It doesn't seem to have any other source files and compilation fails:
os/RocksDBStore.cc:10:24: fatal error: rocksdb/db.h: No such file or directory 
compilation terminated.

Thanks,
Sushma

-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shu, Xinxin
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:00 PM
To: Mark Nelson; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
Subject: RE: [RFC] add rocksdb support

Hi mark

I have finished development of support of rocksdb submodule,  a pull request 
for support of autoconf/automake for rocksdb has been created , you can find 
https://github.com/ceph/rocksdb/pull/2 , if this patch is ok ,  I will create a 
pull request for rocksdb submodule support , currently this patch can be found 
https://github.com/xinxinsh/ceph/tree/wip-rocksdb .

-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:12 AM
To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

Hi Xinxin,

On 05/28/2014 05:05 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
 Hi sage ,
 I will add two configure options to --with-librocksdb-static and 
 --with-librocksdb , with --with-librocksdb-static option , ceph will compile 
 the code that get from ceph repository , with  --with-librocksdb option ,  in 
 case of distro packages for rocksdb , ceph will not compile the rocksdb code 
 , will use pre-installed library. is that ok for you ?

 since current rocksdb does not support autoconfautomake , I will add 
 autoconfautomake support for rocksdb , but before that , i think we should 
 fork a stable branch (maybe 3.0) for ceph .

I'm looking at testing out the rocksdb support as well, both for the OSD and 
for the monitor based on some issues we've been seeing lately.  Any news on the 
3.0 fork and autoconf/automake support in rocksdb?

Thanks,
Mark


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nel...@inktank.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06 PM
 To: Shu, Xinxin; Sage Weil
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Jian
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

 On 05/21/2014 07:54 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
 Hi, sage

 I will add rocksdb submodule into the makefile , currently we want to have 
 fully performance tests on key-value db backend , both leveldb and rocksdb. 
 Then optimize on rocksdb performance.

 I'm definitely interested in any performance tests you do here.  Last winter 
 I started doing some fairly high level tests on raw 
 leveldb/hyperleveldb/raikleveldb.  I'm very interested in what you see with 
 rocksdb as a backend.


 -Original Message-
 From: Sage Weil [mailto:s...@inktank.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:19 AM
 To: Shu, Xinxin
 Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC] add rocksdb support

 Hi Xinxin,

 I've pushed an updated wip-rocksdb to github/liewegas/ceph.git that includes 
 the latest set of patches with the groundwork and your rocksdb patch.  There 
 is also a commit that adds rocksdb as a git submodule.  I'm thinking that, 
 since there aren't any distro packages for rocksdb at this point, this is 
 going to be the easiest way to make this usable for people.

 If you can wire the submodule into the makefile, we can merge this in so 
 that rocksdb support is in the ceph.com packages on ceph.com.  I suspect 
 that the distros will prefer to turns this off in favor of separate shared 
 libs, but they can do this at their option if/when they include rocksdb in 
 the distro. I think the key is just to have both --with-librockdb and 
 --with-librocksdb-static (or similar) options so that you can either use the 
 static or dynamically linked one.

 Has your group done further testing with rocksdb?  Anything interesting to 
 share?

 Thanks!
 sage

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel
 in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo 
 info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the 
body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--