Re: [ceph-users] Is Ceph a provider of block device too ?

2013-11-21 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 11/21/2013 12:52 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:

 If you want a logically distinct copy (? this seems to be what Dimitri
 is referring to with adding a 3rd DRBD copy on another node)

Disclaimer: I haven't done stacked drbd, this is from my reading of
the fine manual -- I was referring to stacked setup where you make a
drbd raid-1 w/ 2 hosts and then a drbd raid-1 w/ the that drbd device
and another host. I don't believe drbd can keep 3 replicas any other way
-- unlike ceph, obviously.

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] Is Ceph a provider of block device too ?

2013-11-21 Thread John-Paul Robinson
Is this statement accurate?

As I understand DRBD, you can replicate online block devices reliably,
but with Ceph the replication for RBD images requires that the file
system be offline.

Thanks for the clarification,

~jpr


On 11/08/2013 03:46 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
 Does Ceph provides the distributed filesystem and block device?
 Ceph's RBD is a distributed block device and works very well; you
 could use it to replace DRBD. 

___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] Is Ceph a provider of block device too ?

2013-11-19 Thread Listas
Thank you! I am studying and testing CEPH. I think it will be very good 
for my needs


On 18-11-2013 20:31, Timofey root wrote:

On 09 нояб. 2013 г., at 1:46, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Listas lis...@adminlinux.com.br wrote:

Hi !

I have clusters (IMAP service) with 2 members configured with Ubuntu + Drbd
+ Ext4. Intend to migrate to the use of Ceph and begin to allow distributed
access to the data.

Does Ceph provides the distributed filesystem and block device?

Ceph's RBD is a distributed block device and works very well; you
could use it to replace DRBD. The CephFS distributed filesystem is in
more of a preview mode and is not supported for general use at this
time.


Does Ceph work fine in clusters of two members?

It should work fine in a cluster of that size, but you're not getting
as many advantages over other solutions at such small scales as you do
from larger ones.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


[ceph-users] Is Ceph a provider of block device too ?

2013-11-08 Thread Listas

Hi !

I have clusters (IMAP service) with 2 members configured with Ubuntu + 
Drbd + Ext4. Intend to migrate to the use of Ceph and begin to allow 
distributed access to the data.


Does Ceph provides the distributed filesystem and block device?

Does Ceph work fine in clusters of two members?

Thanks!
--
www.adminlinux.com.br
Thiago Henrique
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] Is Ceph a provider of block device too ?

2013-11-08 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Listas lis...@adminlinux.com.br wrote:
 Hi !

 I have clusters (IMAP service) with 2 members configured with Ubuntu + Drbd
 + Ext4. Intend to migrate to the use of Ceph and begin to allow distributed
 access to the data.

 Does Ceph provides the distributed filesystem and block device?

Ceph's RBD is a distributed block device and works very well; you
could use it to replace DRBD. The CephFS distributed filesystem is in
more of a preview mode and is not supported for general use at this
time.

 Does Ceph work fine in clusters of two members?
It should work fine in a cluster of that size, but you're not getting
as many advantages over other solutions at such small scales as you do
from larger ones.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com