Re: [ceph-users] rgw windows/mac clients shitty, develop a new one?

2019-04-19 Thread Brian :
I've always used the standalone mac and Linux package version. Wasn't aware
of the 'bundled software' in the installers. Ugh. Thanks for pointing it
out.

On Thursday, April 18, 2019, Janne Johansson  wrote:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/8t4xrl/filezilla_malware/
>
> not saying it definitely is, or isn't malware-ridden, but it sure was
shady at that time.
> I would suggest not pointing people to it.
>
> Den tors 18 apr. 2019 kl 16:41 skrev Brian : :
>>
>> Hi Marc
>>
>> Filezilla has decent S3 support https://filezilla-project.org/
>>
>> ymmv of course!
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 2:18 PM Marc Roos 
wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I have been looking a bit at the s3 clients available to be used, and I
>> > think they are quite shitty, especially this Cyberduck that processes
>> > files with default reading rights to everyone. I am in the process to
>> > advice clients to use for instance this mountain duck. But I am not to
>> > happy about it. I don't like the fact that everything has default
>> > settings for amazon or other stuff in there for ftp or what ever.
>> >
>> > I am thinking of developing something in-house, more aimed at the ceph
>> > environments, easier/better to use.
>> >
>> > What I can think of:
>> >
>> > - cheaper, free or maybe even opensource
>> > - default settings for your ceph cluster
>> > - only configuration for object storage (no amazon, rackspace,
backblaze
>> > shit)
>> > - default secure settings
>> > - offer in the client only functionality that is available from the
>> > specific ceph release
>> > - integration with the finder / explorer windows
>> >
>> > I am curious who would be interested in a such new client? Maybe better
>> > to send me your wishes directly, and not clutter the mailing list with
>> > this.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> ___
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
> --
> May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
>
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] rgw windows/mac clients shitty, develop a new one?

2019-04-18 Thread Janne Johansson
https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/8t4xrl/filezilla_malware/

not saying it definitely is, or isn't malware-ridden, but it sure was shady
at that time.
I would suggest not pointing people to it.


Den tors 18 apr. 2019 kl 16:41 skrev Brian : :

> Hi Marc
>
> Filezilla has decent S3 support https://filezilla-project.org/
>
> ymmv of course!
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 2:18 PM Marc Roos 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have been looking a bit at the s3 clients available to be used, and I
> > think they are quite shitty, especially this Cyberduck that processes
> > files with default reading rights to everyone. I am in the process to
> > advice clients to use for instance this mountain duck. But I am not to
> > happy about it. I don't like the fact that everything has default
> > settings for amazon or other stuff in there for ftp or what ever.
> >
> > I am thinking of developing something in-house, more aimed at the ceph
> > environments, easier/better to use.
> >
> > What I can think of:
> >
> > - cheaper, free or maybe even opensource
> > - default settings for your ceph cluster
> > - only configuration for object storage (no amazon, rackspace, backblaze
> > shit)
> > - default secure settings
> > - offer in the client only functionality that is available from the
> > specific ceph release
> > - integration with the finder / explorer windows
> >
> > I am curious who would be interested in a such new client? Maybe better
> > to send me your wishes directly, and not clutter the mailing list with
> > this.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>


-- 
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


Re: [ceph-users] rgw windows/mac clients shitty, develop a new one?

2019-04-18 Thread Brian :
Hi Marc

Filezilla has decent S3 support https://filezilla-project.org/

ymmv of course!

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 2:18 PM Marc Roos  wrote:
>
>
> I have been looking a bit at the s3 clients available to be used, and I
> think they are quite shitty, especially this Cyberduck that processes
> files with default reading rights to everyone. I am in the process to
> advice clients to use for instance this mountain duck. But I am not to
> happy about it. I don't like the fact that everything has default
> settings for amazon or other stuff in there for ftp or what ever.
>
> I am thinking of developing something in-house, more aimed at the ceph
> environments, easier/better to use.
>
> What I can think of:
>
> - cheaper, free or maybe even opensource
> - default settings for your ceph cluster
> - only configuration for object storage (no amazon, rackspace, backblaze
> shit)
> - default secure settings
> - offer in the client only functionality that is available from the
> specific ceph release
> - integration with the finder / explorer windows
>
> I am curious who would be interested in a such new client? Maybe better
> to send me your wishes directly, and not clutter the mailing list with
> this.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


[ceph-users] rgw windows/mac clients shitty, develop a new one?

2019-04-18 Thread Marc Roos


I have been looking a bit at the s3 clients available to be used, and I 
think they are quite shitty, especially this Cyberduck that processes 
files with default reading rights to everyone. I am in the process to 
advice clients to use for instance this mountain duck. But I am not to 
happy about it. I don't like the fact that everything has default 
settings for amazon or other stuff in there for ftp or what ever.

I am thinking of developing something in-house, more aimed at the ceph 
environments, easier/better to use. 

What I can think of:

- cheaper, free or maybe even opensource
- default settings for your ceph cluster
- only configuration for object storage (no amazon, rackspace, backblaze 
shit)
- default secure settings
- offer in the client only functionality that is available from the 
specific ceph release
- integration with the finder / explorer windows

I am curious who would be interested in a such new client? Maybe better 
to send me your wishes directly, and not clutter the mailing list with 
this.








___
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com