Re: [ceph-users] a bug of rgw?
rgw_admin.cc not rgw_main.cc or rgw_code.cc. 2014-12-04 16:14 GMT+08:00 han vincent hang...@gmail.com: rgw_admin not rgw_main.cc or rgw_code.cc. 2014-12-04 16:02 GMT+08:00 han vincent hang...@gmail.com: I am sorry, I have made a mistake. The source file of the code is rgw_code.cc instead of rgw_mian.cc. 2014-12-04 11:13 GMT+08:00 han vincent hang...@gmail.com: hello, every one. when I read the source code of ceph of which the version is 0.80.1. I found that line 1646 in rgw_main.cc wrote as following: uint64_t total_time = entry.total_time.sec() * 100LL * entry.total_time.usec(); I did not understand the meaning of this line of code. I think the second operation symbol of “*” should be changed to +. so this line should be uint64_t total_time = entry.total_time.sec() * 100LL + entry.total_time.usec(); . Is it a bug? ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] a bug of rgw?
rgw_admin not rgw_main.cc or rgw_code.cc. 2014-12-04 16:02 GMT+08:00 han vincent hang...@gmail.com: I am sorry, I have made a mistake. The source file of the code is rgw_code.cc instead of rgw_mian.cc. 2014-12-04 11:13 GMT+08:00 han vincent hang...@gmail.com: hello, every one. when I read the source code of ceph of which the version is 0.80.1. I found that line 1646 in rgw_main.cc wrote as following: uint64_t total_time = entry.total_time.sec() * 100LL * entry.total_time.usec(); I did not understand the meaning of this line of code. I think the second operation symbol of “*” should be changed to +. so this line should be uint64_t total_time = entry.total_time.sec() * 100LL + entry.total_time.usec(); . Is it a bug? ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Re: [ceph-users] a bug of rgw?
I am sorry, I have made a mistake. The source file of the code is rgw_code.cc instead of rgw_mian.cc. 2014-12-04 11:13 GMT+08:00 han vincent hang...@gmail.com: hello, every one. when I read the source code of ceph of which the version is 0.80.1. I found that line 1646 in rgw_main.cc wrote as following: uint64_t total_time = entry.total_time.sec() * 100LL * entry.total_time.usec(); I did not understand the meaning of this line of code. I think the second operation symbol of “*” should be changed to +. so this line should be uint64_t total_time = entry.total_time.sec() * 100LL + entry.total_time.usec(); . Is it a bug? ___ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
