RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I am not sure what you mean by integrate with CFStudio. I am not sure if CFStudio has plugins to in effect have CSV a part of or extended feature for use in CFStudio. I do know there was such integration for other development tools. As for locked files... you could check out a file for read only when it was currently checked out. What I would typically do is check out for read only and then after the file was checked back in and I checked it out and lock it then I did a line comparison between the file I had checked out for read only and changed and the file I checked out for lock that had been checked back in. -MEB -Original Message-From: Bryan LaPlante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kory Bakken Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control EvaluationHas anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care to share your results? Kory Bakken Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kory Bakken Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control EvaluationHas anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care to share your results? Kory Bakken Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation From what I understood from the CVS documentation, each developer would check out a version of their site before development began. I assume this would mean that each developer would have to havea web server,CF server, andaccess to each of his datasources on his client. Additionally, like Glenn stated, a developer could have a document checked out for long periods of time before checking it back in, causing problems with parallel development. I am correct in these assumptions? -Kory -Original Message-From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kory Bakken Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control EvaluationHas anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care to share your results? Kory Bakken Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I always check in at least once a week, usually daily. For long-term development (like converting a site from access to sql server), CVS supports "branching" so I can check in without impacting the main trunk (until the "big merge" when the branch is ready to merge with the trunk). I usually have each developer set up with their own server and data instance, yeah. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kory BakkenSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:30 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation From what I understood from the CVS documentation, each developer would check out a version of their site before development began. I assume this would mean that each developer would have to havea web server,CF server, andaccess to each of his datasources on his client. Additionally, like Glenn stated, a developer could have a document checked out for long periods of time before checking it back in, causing problems with parallel development. I am correct in these assumptions? -Kory -Original Message-From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kory Bakken Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control EvaluationHas anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care to share your results? Kory Bakken Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]