Re: ColdFusion on Linux
On 7/14/06, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fedora should actually work quite nicely, not sure about the other. we're running CFMX 7 Enterprise on Ubuntu with no problems at all. -- mac jordan home: www.kestrel.org work: www.webhorus.net them: www.jordan-cats.org ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246499 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: 550 relay not permitted
On Thursday 13 July 2006 19:55, Brad Wood wrote: Is there an easy way just to install an SMTP server on my home computer and send through it? That might be out of the question, but I don't really know much about it. Most ISPs allow incoming SMTP connections to ADSL/cable connections, and you should be alright using their mail server as a 'smart host' to forward all your outgoing mail to from your local mail server. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246500 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Query help
Hello I am running the below union query which is giving me the correct
results of count of hits by country.
The query draws data from 2 databases which is not ideal but is the way
it is. This is why it is a union query.
The results are great but in some instances a country will appear twice,
with two different count values, I want the country to appear once with
the total count of both results.
For instance this is some results
Country count
Hungary2
Hungary10
Czech Rep9
Czech Rep13
This is what I want
Hungary12
Czech Rep22
Here is the query. I would like to do it all in the Q with my limited
knowledge all I can think of is doing some post processing which is not
ideal.
I am running ORACLE 9i
Thanks for reading.
Cheers
Martin
cfquery name=countByCountry
datasource=#variables.dsn#
select cl.COU_LIB COUNTRY, count(p.rowid) NB_PROFILES
from intermediary i, profile p, contact_intermediary
ci, country_lib cl
where i.INT_CODE = ci.INT_CODE
and p.CIN_ID = ci.CIN_ID(+)
and (cl.COU_ID = i.cou_id and cl.COU_LANG = 1)
and p.PRO_CREATION_DATE = to_date
('#StartDate#','dd/mm/')
and p.PRO_CREATION_DATE (to_date
('#EndDate#','dd/mm/') + 1)
group by cl.COU_LIB
union all
select newgide.country_iso.cis_lib AS COUNTRY, count(p.rowid)
NB_PROFILES
from profile p,
newgide.pers_eic, newgide.eic,
newgide.country_iso
where p.cin_pers_id = newgide.pers_eic.per_id(+)
and newgide.pers_eic.eic_code =
newgide.eic.eic_code(+)
and newgide.eic.pay_code =
newgide.country_iso.cis_code(+)
and newgide.country_iso.cis_lang = 'EN'
and p.PRO_CREATION_DATE = to_date
('#startDate#','dd/mm/')
and p.PRO_CREATION_DATE (to_date
('#endDate#','dd/mm/') + 1)
group by newgide.country_iso.cis_lib
order by COUNTRY
/cfquery
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246501
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: FAQ?
And I forgot to mention I got the SES URLs working, so here is the blog post on the Best Solutions app thing: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/index.cfm/2006/7/14/The-CF-Best-Solutions-Comparison-App Comments now work too - the CAPTCHA was stuffing up because of file permissions. If you have a requirement that you want to see in the app, please post a comment in the blog entry. Also feel free to post if you have an idea for a name, as The CF Best Solutions App Thingy won't look good in a web design :-) Perhaps just something like Rated CF Solutions or similar? On 7/14/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I got BlogCFC working after a session of hacking: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/?mode=entryentry=6A682CE1-BD02-01ED-7032AD32BDC536CA On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, no blog for now since BlogCFC requires a mapping and I'm on shared hosting. I'll work it out later. However, we can use the test galleon forum I setup a while ago: http://www.bifrost.com.au/forums/threads.cfm?forumid=67D7CB0E-F900-0235-18BAD35904E56A06 Post away. On 7/13/06, Mingo Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Holmes wrote: Sound good? Sounds good to me! see you on your blog (wherever that will be ;) ) Mingo. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246502 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Query help
The results are great but in some instances a country will appear twice, with two different count values, I want the country to appear once with the total count of both results. select COUNTRY, sum(NB_PROFILES) from (your entire select statement here) group by COUNTRY should do it? Nick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246503 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Query help
Hello Nick. Thanks for the reply. Yeah I just came up with the same myself as a Q of Qs. I tried it in the original union query, which would be the ideal solution for me having it all in the same query, but Oracle throws me an inconsistent data types error?? Can SUM be used in a union on oracle? Anyhoo it works with the Q of Q and no real difference in the performance. Again thanks for your reply. cheers Martin The results are great but in some instances a country will appear twice, with two different count values, I want the country to appear once with the total count of both results. select COUNTRY, sum(NB_PROFILES) from (your entire select statement here) group by COUNTRY should do it? Nick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246504 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: FAQ?
On Friday 14 July 2006 09:46, James Holmes wrote: if you have an idea for a name, as The CF Best Solutions App Thingy won't look good in a web design :-) Perhaps just something like Rated CF Solutions or similar? cfSolutions ? Coldfusion Community Conclusion (or C3 for short) ? -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246505 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: ColdFusion on Linux
On Friday 14 July 2006 02:46, Rick Root wrote: Rey Bango wrote: et al). This will be on a development server. Then partitioning is *really* unimportant. Seconded. Take the defaults the installer gives you. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246506 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: FAQ?
Ooh, the second one is really catchy. It would go well hosted at
cffaq.com (e.g. How do I get a text editor in my CF - {answer
here}... for the Coldfusion Community Conclusion on which ones to use,
click here). Sounds good.
On 7/14/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 09:46, James Holmes wrote:
if you have an idea for a name, as The CF Best Solutions App Thingy
won't look good in a web design :-) Perhaps just something like Rated
CF Solutions or similar?
cfSolutions ?
Coldfusion Community Conclusion (or C3 for short) ?
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at
St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is
available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner
in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by
the Law Society.
CONFIDENTIALITY
This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may
be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must
not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor
inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence
or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and
notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.
For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246507
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Query help
Martin Thanks for the reply. Yeah I just came up with the same myself as a Q of Qs. I tried it in the original union query, which would be the ideal solution for me having it all in the same query, but Oracle throws me an inconsistent data types error?? Can SUM be used in a union on oracle? I don't see why there should be a problem with the SUM. Maybe the data type inconsistency is between cl.COU_LIB and newgide.country_iso.cis_lib? Nick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246508 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: FAQ?
Tom Chiverton wrote: On Friday 14 July 2006 09:46, James Holmes wrote: if you have an idea for a name, as The CF Best Solutions App Thingy won't look good in a web design :-) Perhaps just something like Rated CF Solutions or similar? cfSolutions ? Coldfusion Community Conclusion (or C3 for short) ? I like it: C3! It's got my vote... But, shouldn't you post that on the blog as a comment :) Mingo. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246509 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: subscribe
On Thursday 13 July 2006 20:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NEW! COSMEO, THE ONLINE HOMEWORK HELP TOOL BROUGHT TO YOU BY DISCOVERY CHANNEL. FREE TRIAL AT HTTP://WWW.COSMEO.COM Have you seen my bag around anywhere ? About so big, black ? I'm sure I left it around here somewhere, and it's got a can of woop-arse in it I need to open... Failing that, anyone got some bead and mayo so I can make a spam sandwich ? -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246510 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: FAQ?
On Friday 14 July 2006 10:51, Mingo Hagen wrote: But, shouldn't you post that on the blog as a comment :) :wiggles nose *bing* I have... :-) -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246511 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246512 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? On 7/14/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246513 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Sorry, my bad, I thought you were referring to virtual pc for mac :(. Darn, I really wanted to run Flex 2, and IE 7.. On 7/14/06, B V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? On 7/14/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246514 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
man, they will give anyone a wikipedia page now days ;-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_PC direct link http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/default.mspx On 7/14/06, B V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? On 7/14/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246515 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Yes you should! If not for virtual servers then at least for testing on multiple windows/linux configurations. Set one up identical to your clients config, that should help in the development process. You could also set one up as a development server, but I guess the speed would be an issue there. I guess what i'm trying to say is go for it! Mingo. Rick Faircloth wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246516 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 13:06, B V wrote: Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? What makes you think you need VPC to run or build Flex 2 on the Mac ? -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246517 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I use VMWare and *love* it. It gives me a nicely self-contained environment for trying anything and everything that might destroy the system. If it does, then rolling back is easy if you've planned ahead and taken snapshots at critical points. I run several dev and testing servers on it and have never had a problem. BTW, it's free, too. http://www.vmware.com I should mention, though, that I haven't used the free edition. I run VMWare workstation on my PC and our servers run the old GSX server product that didn't used to be free. My understanding, though, is that the free version is taking over for GSX. On 7/14/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246518 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
It does what it says on the tin. -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 July 2006 12:56 To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246519 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I don't know, Adobe didn't list mac under reequirements, and the download is an exe. But I geuss you could also see my previous post about CFLINUX. So, how would I run FLEX 2 on a Mac without VPC? I have a G5 Is there soem special hack? On 7/14/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 14 July 2006 13:06, B V wrote: Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? What makes you think you need VPC to run or build Flex 2 on the Mac ? -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246520 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
You can download the SDK and use the command line to compile. -Original Message- From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:28 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I don't know, Adobe didn't list mac under reequirements, and the download is an exe. But I geuss you could also see my previous post about CFLINUX. So, how would I run FLEX 2 on a Mac without VPC? I have a G5 Is there soem special hack? On 7/14/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 14 July 2006 13:06, B V wrote: Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? What makes you think you need VPC to run or build Flex 2 on the Mac ? -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246521 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 13:16, Rob Wilkerson wrote: product that didn't used to be free. My understanding, though, is that the free version is taking over for GSX. Yeah, they are only going to charge for the full blown enterprise VMWare server - basically a slimed down Linux that sits under all the VMs and gives a nice little point'n'drool web interface. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246522 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 13:28, B V wrote: I don't know, Adobe didn't list mac under reequirements, and the download is an exe. But I geuss you could also see my previous post about CFLINUX. So, how would I run FLEX 2 on a Mac without VPC? I have a G5 Is there soem special hack? Running is easy - there is a (beta still I think) Flash 9 player on Labs. If you mean developing, it's straight forward enough to install Sun's Java JVM, the Eclipse framework, and the the free Flex2 SDK. Then you use the command line compiler and debugger, which are perfectly fine. There is *one* trick related to getting the compile running, something about fonts: http://www.simb.net/client/index.cfm/2006/7/10/Using-Flex-20-Final-SDK-on-the-Mac You can even get the RDS extensions for Eclipse as a separate download if you look in the list archives. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246523 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246524 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Creating a watermark for CFDOCUMENT
Hmmm...I didn't include all of the HTML elements. I'll try that.
-Original Message-
From: Sandra Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Creating a watermark for CFDOCUMENT
I got something working with the following code, the information shows
up in the PDF. Media style will mean nothing to PDF, it can only print
what it shows. Notice that the cfdocument must surround both the head
and body tags. It won't work if you just surround the body or the
information within the body. (In other words, you must use proper
markup (style belongs in the
head) and send all of that to the pdf.
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
cfdocument format=PDF pagetype=letter orientation=portrait
unit=in
encryption=none
fontembed=Yes backgroundvisible=Yes
head
title/title
style type=text/css
body{
background-image: url(hdr_right.jpg);
background-position: top right;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 11in;
width: 8.5in;
padding: .5in;
}
/style
/head
body
h1 This is a test/h1
/body/cfdocument
/html
Sandra Clark
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246525
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Does that mean I will be able to have the full felx experience that windows users have once I have installed the JVM, eclipse and the SDK? (And be able to deploy the builder on top of that) On 7/14/06, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 14 July 2006 13:28, B V wrote: I don't know, Adobe didn't list mac under reequirements, and the download is an exe. But I geuss you could also see my previous post about CFLINUX. So, how would I run FLEX 2 on a Mac without VPC? I have a G5 Is there soem special hack? Running is easy - there is a (beta still I think) Flash 9 player on Labs. If you mean developing, it's straight forward enough to install Sun's Java JVM, the Eclipse framework, and the the free Flex2 SDK. Then you use the command line compiler and debugger, which are perfectly fine. There is *one* trick related to getting the compile running, something about fonts: http://www.simb.net/client/index.cfm/2006/7/10/Using-Flex-20-Final-SDK-on-the-Mac You can even get the RDS extensions for Eclipse as a separate download if you look in the list archives. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246526 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 14:08, B V wrote: Does that mean I will be able to have the full felx experience that windows users have once I have installed the JVM, eclipse and the SDK? (And be able to deploy the builder on top of that) Again, if you mean the Flash player, yes. If you mean the Flex Builder IDE, no, not yet - the wizards don't work, you don't get drag and drop building etc. I'm on Linux myself, so in the same boat - and I don't miss them because that isn't the sort of app we're building at the mo, and Eclipse + RDS plugin + CFEclipse gives us everything we want (code highlight mainly). -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246527 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 13:45, Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. coughanti-trust/cough -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246528 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246530 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: BlogCFC
No. Reason being, if I remember right, you can't do username=. If I'm wrong, I could add that post release. On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since that release is coming soon, I'll wait. One thing I had to do in 5.0 was a global search/replace to add username and password attributes to the cfquery tags. Will this change in 5.1? On 7/14/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the 5.1 release, Ive abstracted out the textarea call in the editor. This will make it easier to use TinyMCE, or KTML, or whatever, as it's just one file with a textarea (basically). You can get this release from www.blogcfc.com and the Subversion service, but the documentation has NOT been updated yet. Anyway, glad you like it. On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After having played with BlogCFC for the last hour, I have to say it's great. Thanks again Ray for all your work in helping to bring decent open source CF to the community. All it needs now is TinyMCE in the editor ;-) I'll add this myself. -- CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246529 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
CFExecute and GnuPG
Hi, I am trying to execute this line: cfexecute name=c:\gnupg\gpg.exe arguments=--fingerprint timeout=50 outputfile=c:\gnupg\test2. file /cfexecute to no avail. The file is generated wtih no content. Even though I could run it successfully at the command line. Also, if I use the variable attribute and do a cfdump, it outputs an [empty string]. Any idea to what else I should I tried? Thanks for your help, Hon ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246532 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick Rick, I've been using Virtual PC since Connectix released version 1 on my Mac. Its worked great. I've been running the PC version since M$ bought it from Connectix. Its a very good way of running separate instances of Windows. I've been very satisfied with it. larry ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246531 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Creating a watermark for CFDOCUMENT
No dice. I tried with the doctype and html element outside CFDOCUMENT
and inside. I even popped a cfcontent reset=yes before it to make
sure my framework code wasn't enforcing a layout on it. Still nothing.
Viewing the output as HTML my background image is there, but CFDOCUMENT
refuses to use it.
I'm giving up. The client will have to be satisfied with the word
DRAFT in text at the bottom of every page. I have too many other
defects I need to be working on.
Thanks all for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Sandra Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Creating a watermark for CFDOCUMENT
I got something working with the following code, the information shows
up in the PDF. Media style will mean nothing to PDF, it can only print
what it shows. Notice that the cfdocument must surround both the head
and body tags. It won't work if you just surround the body or the
information within the body. (In other words, you must use proper
markup (style belongs in the
head) and send all of that to the pdf.
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
cfdocument format=PDF pagetype=letter orientation=portrait
unit=in
encryption=none
fontembed=Yes backgroundvisible=Yes
head
title/title
style type=text/css
body{
background-image: url(hdr_right.jpg);
background-position: top right;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 11in;
width: 8.5in;
padding: .5in;
}
/style
/head
body
h1 This is a test/h1
/body/cfdocument
/html
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246533
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Creating RSS feeds
I just wanted to thank everyone for help with the RSS feed stuff. I have decided to go the CDATA[] route for the blog entry descriptions. It seems to validate fine, and it shows up in SAGE correctly. I guess next, I will try to work the ATOM standard and I like the way they are doing things. Right now, I only have RSS 2.0. I will take a look at Ray's blogCFC to see how he does v.1.0. Thanks! http://www.bennadel.com/index.cfm?dax=blog.rss ... Ben Nadel www.bennadel.com -Original Message- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 5:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Creating RSS feeds On 7/7/06, Ben Nadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, Thanks for the post. That is some really good information. But, I have a follow up question maybe you can help me with. I am really new to this, so sorry if this makes no sense. I see his point about the Atom 1.0 standard, and I like it. But he is saying to also support RSS standards... Will the Atom feed degrade nicely for an RSS feed? Or is he saying to have two separate feeds, one RSS standard, one Atom standard and let the people choose? Because they are two different standards (lots of arguing and chest bumping between the backers on each side), you'll need to supply separate feeds if you plan to support both. If you'd like to see a ColdFusion implementation of generating RSS feeds (both RSS version 1 and 2), download Ray Camden's BlogCFC application (http://ray.camdenfamily.com/projects/blogcfc/) and look for the generateRSS() method in the monster blog.cfc template. Regards, Dave. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246534 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: ColdFuson Debug Tool To Premiere at NYCFUG!
i would like to see a beta of this software. On 7/12/06, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If everyone on the list goes to the FusionDebug page and registers for the beta or says that they are interested then maybe it'll show such a groundswell of interest that they'll take my suggestion to heart: http://www.fusion-reactor.com/fusiondebug How do you register for the beta? I've registered to be notified when it's released, is that what you meant? I'd love to get my hands on the beta, but I don't see how. -- This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246536 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Yeah I thought so.. Some people joke or rumor that apple is going to buy adobe, and that would be great if it happened; Never have to wait for Mac software to come out. On 7/14/06, Larry Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick Rick, I've been using Virtual PC since Connectix released version 1 on my Mac. Its worked great. I've been running the PC version since M$ bought it from Connectix. Its a very good way of running separate instances of Windows. I've been very satisfied with it. larry ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246535 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Creating a watermark for CFDOCUMENT
Everett, Al (NIH/NIGMS) [C] wrote: No dice. I tried with the doctype and html element outside CFDOCUMENT and inside. I even popped a cfcontent reset=yes before it to make this is easily done in itext but the rest of the content is way more work than cfdocument. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246537 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
-Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Yup... both server and standard. My home development box is a VPC Server host: one big box, lots of little (virtual) servers. Until I got him a dedicated box I also used VPC in a lifesaving application: to run a dedicated Windows 98 instance to install all the crappy games that my toddler son demanded. It saved my ass when Thomas and the Magic Annoying Choo-Choo decided it NEEDED to run at 256 colors at 640x480 and uninstalled DirectX to do it. For business use I've got a large collection of VPCs: all versions of Windows, several Linux distros and some oddballs (BeOS... just for kicks). I've also got a VPC with a second Windows XP license just to install my work software and keep it from infecting my actual PC (Lotus Notes, DB2 Client, etc). VPCs are good network citizens and I can happily VPN to the office from with in the VPC. All that said I've found no significant differences between VPC and VMWare: they both do exactly what they say they're going to do and both do it exceedingly well. What I really want is for one of them to allow OS X as a guest OS... Jim Davis ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246538 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: UNC shares and JRUN/CFMX Help
Yes This is how it is run we have a service account called [EMAIL PROTECTED] So it should have no problem accessing the UNC share under that account. What I am seeing is when we hijack the Web Root in jrun-web.xml. Jrun's parser is seems to only allow 1 '\' not '\\' even when I escape the slashes I see this in the error logs Error [web-2] - File not found: /probe.cfm The specific sequence of files included or processed is: \srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet\probe.cfm The exact way I have the web root set when this error was generated was srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet and it appears the same when I try //srv-intweb/webroot$/Intranet So it is clearly an issue with how JRun parses the file All works well under JRUN Connector but we cant use it with hardware load balancing Eric -Original Message- From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: UNC shares and JRUN/CFMX Help The JRUN service needs to run as a user that has access to network paths. By default it runs as SYSTEM which does not. snake -Original Message- From: Eric A. Haskins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 July 2006 23:36 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: UNC shares and JRUN/CFMX Help A quick addendum to my post. I believe JRUN parses the so if I specify A UNC of \\srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet When I check the logs I see Error [web-2] - File not found: /probe.cfm The specific sequence of files included or processed is: \srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet\probe.cfm Even when I escape the unc with srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet it still returns Error [web-2] - File not found: /probe.cfm The specific sequence of files included or processed is: \srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet\probe.cfm Anyone have any ideas??? Thx ~Eric Hello, Has anyone been able to successfully use a UNC share as the web root for JRUN ( JWS ). In our Dev distributed environment I am currently proxying from IIS6 to our JRUN/CFMX 7 Ent. Servers. All works well if I copy our website to both servers locally. I am now trying to get JRUN to see our share that holds our dev environment so I don't have to have 1 copy of the site for the 3 IIS frontend servers (on the UNC share) and 3 copies locally for each of the JRUN/CFMX boxes. This wouldn't be an issue if we were running the Jrun connector unfortunately we are using Hardware load balancers so we have to rely on JWS in JRUN. I am starting to think I may have to use mapped drives to make this function properly Been googling for 2 days on this one! Any ideas would be appreciated!! Thx, ~Eric ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246539 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Here you go... www.microsoft.com/virtualpc I suppose you're running it to run Windows on your Mac, right? I've been thinking about tinkering with Linux, but didn't want to dedicate an entire server to messing around with it. Looks like this would be a good way to setup my hardware server with Windows 2003 Server and CF7, and Linux, just to have someplace to test Win 2003 Server/CF7 and the Linux OS. Sound correct? Rick -Original Message- From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:06 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? On 7/14/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246540 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Sorry...I checked...looks like it $249 for Virtual PC for Mac...but who knows? Maybe they'll soon give that away, too! Rick -Original Message- From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Sorry, my bad, I thought you were referring to virtual pc for mac :(. Darn, I really wanted to run Flex 2, and IE 7.. On 7/14/06, B V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, I just run it on my Mac, but now that you mention it's free Flex 2, here I come! By the way, can you give me the link? On 7/14/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246541 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: BlogCFC
It works fine for me in Oracle. cfquery name=QMyQuery datasource= username= password= SELECT * FROM SomeTable /cfquery returned the correct results; in this case the username and password are saved in the DSN. Just to test, I then did this: cfset MyUName = cfset MyPW = cfquery name=QMyQuery datasource=MYDSNHERE username=#MyUName# password=#MyPW# SELECT * FROM SomeTable /cfquery which worked as well. So you are able to do what I did - add dbusername and dbpassword properties to the ini file and make them part of the instance data. On 7/14/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. Reason being, if I remember right, you can't do username=. If I'm wrong, I could add that post release. On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since that release is coming soon, I'll wait. One thing I had to do in 5.0 was a global search/replace to add username and password attributes to the cfquery tags. Will this change in 5.1? On 7/14/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the 5.1 release, Ive abstracted out the textarea call in the editor. This will make it easier to use TinyMCE, or KTML, or whatever, as it's just one file with a textarea (basically). You can get this release from www.blogcfc.com and the Subversion service, but the documentation has NOT been updated yet. Anyway, glad you like it. On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After having played with BlogCFC for the last hour, I have to say it's great. Thanks again Ray for all your work in helping to bring decent open source CF to the community. All it needs now is TinyMCE in the editor ;-) I'll add this myself. -- CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246542 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I guess what you're saying as far as software updates/patches is to perhaps setup two virtual OS's of the same OS and run updates/patches on one first, and, if they work well, then bring up the other and apply...if not, roll back? Rick -Original Message- From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:46 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246543 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Well... you could of course get Parallels or QEMU and install windows on that and then get the free version of VirtualPC, or would that be horribly slow?. Mingo. Rick Faircloth wrote: Sorry...I checked...looks like it $249 for Virtual PC for Mac...but who knows? Maybe they'll soon give that away, too! Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246544 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246545 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Thanks for the feedback, Larry, et al... Rick -Original Message- From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:35 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick Rick, I've been using Virtual PC since Connectix released version 1 on my Mac. Its worked great. I've been running the PC version since M$ bought it from Connectix. Its a very good way of running separate instances of Windows. I've been very satisfied with it. larry ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246546 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: BlogCFC
Hmm, strange I remember it not working for me as well... is that something that was fixed in CF5 James Holmes wrote: It works fine for me in Oracle. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246547 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
So...how much hardware, especially CPU and memory to run all the OS's at once? Are the system resources just taken up by Windows as the host and one other OS at a time for a Virtual OS? It's my understanding that the Windows would be always working as the host OS and then I would need to allow for extra memory, etc, for a Virtual OS that I might initialize. Sound right? -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Yup... both server and standard. My home development box is a VPC Server host: one big box, lots of little (virtual) servers. Until I got him a dedicated box I also used VPC in a lifesaving application: to run a dedicated Windows 98 instance to install all the crappy games that my toddler son demanded. It saved my ass when Thomas and the Magic Annoying Choo-Choo decided it NEEDED to run at 256 colors at 640x480 and uninstalled DirectX to do it. For business use I've got a large collection of VPCs: all versions of Windows, several Linux distros and some oddballs (BeOS... just for kicks). I've also got a VPC with a second Windows XP license just to install my work software and keep it from infecting my actual PC (Lotus Notes, DB2 Client, etc). VPCs are good network citizens and I can happily VPN to the office from with in the VPC. All that said I've found no significant differences between VPC and VMWare: they both do exactly what they say they're going to do and both do it exceedingly well. What I really want is for one of them to allow OS X as a guest OS... Jim Davis ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246548 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: BlogCFC
I'll consider this post 5.1. The release is done, I'm just updated db install scripts and documentation. On 7/14/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It works fine for me in Oracle. cfquery name=QMyQuery datasource= username= password= SELECT * FROM SomeTable /cfquery returned the correct results; in this case the username and password are saved in the DSN. Just to test, I then did this: cfset MyUName = cfset MyPW = cfquery name=QMyQuery datasource=MYDSNHERE username=#MyUName# password=#MyPW# SELECT * FROM SomeTable /cfquery which worked as well. So you are able to do what I did - add dbusername and dbpassword properties to the ini file and make them part of the instance data. On 7/14/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. Reason being, if I remember right, you can't do username=. If I'm wrong, I could add that post release. On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since that release is coming soon, I'll wait. One thing I had to do in 5.0 was a global search/replace to add username and password attributes to the cfquery tags. Will this change in 5.1? On 7/14/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the 5.1 release, Ive abstracted out the textarea call in the editor. This will make it easier to use TinyMCE, or KTML, or whatever, as it's just one file with a textarea (basically). You can get this release from www.blogcfc.com and the Subversion service, but the documentation has NOT been updated yet. Anyway, glad you like it. On 7/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After having played with BlogCFC for the last hour, I have to say it's great. Thanks again Ray for all your work in helping to bring decent open source CF to the community. All it needs now is TinyMCE in the editor ;-) I'll add this myself. -- CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246549 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
OT: Firefox, background, SSL
I just had the weirdest thing happen to me. I was messing with trying to get a background to be transparent in firefox and IE at the same time by following this example http://www.daltonlp.com/daltonlp.cgi?item_type=1item_id=217 . Firefox wouldn't work, just kept not displaying anything. So I thought it was my graphic, so I would put the whole path to their sample image and it would work fine, but then I put back in my image path which is images/yadda/yadda.png and it woudln't work, I try a gif, nothing. So just for giggles I put the full path, and magically it works. Is there an issue using relative paths to images with firefox in an SSL enviroment as a background? Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246550 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 15:19, Rick Faircloth wrote: It's my understanding that the Windows would be always working as the host OS and then I would need to allow for extra memory, etc, for a Virtual OS that I might initialize. Sound right? Yup. You need whatever resources your host O/S and applications need, plus whatever the guest (virtual) O/S needs. So, in todays terms, at least a gig of ram (512 each) (more better) and as much disk and Ghz as you can afford. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246551 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I have kind of a stupid question. Are people using these VM servers for production use? I've heard of people buying one top of the line piece of hardware and run multiple production servers on it using VM. This just scares me because it seems like one more point of possible failure, possible performance losses, etc. Am I just being antsy of a new thing or is this really not a good practice for production? I can definitely see the value in development environments but I'm not sure about production. Do the VMs have much overhead to them? Are there security and/or performance concerns that need to be taken into consideration? Obviously there's the don't put all your eggs in one basket thing with the hardware but if proper precautions are taken for redundancy and such is it really a viable solution? Also, how would all of this work when you get into clustering and such? Would you cluster each VM to the other VMs and then leave the base OS that all the VMs are running on alone and not cluster/replicate them? Any experience or knowledge you can lend would be awesome. John Burns -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246552 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 15:13, Mingo Hagen wrote: Well... you could of course get Parallels or QEMU and install windows on that and then get the free version of VirtualPC, or would that be horribly slow?. It'd still be near native. Both VPC and Parallels use the Vx stuff in the newer Apple CPUs. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246553 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I could see people using VM Servers in a production enviroment, mostly because you now have a hardware agnostic OS and software install. So while you see 1 point of failure, someone else sees a way to easily move their production server to new hardware if their old hardware fails. Even if you only run one server on the VM server you could still get the benefit of the hardware agnostic OS. Each VM or Microsoft Virtual Server run as though it were a machine on the OS. So you wouldn't need to cluster the VM, you can run clustering as though they were different machines. I don't know if there is a clustering options for the VMWare or Microsoft, not sure if it's even needed. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246554 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Thanks, Tom! It's good to verify what MS says on their site by someone with some field experience, rather than just relying on what the tin states, right Snake? Rick -Original Message- From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:31 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? On Friday 14 July 2006 15:19, Rick Faircloth wrote: It's my understanding that the Windows would be always working as the host OS and then I would need to allow for extra memory, etc, for a Virtual OS that I might initialize. Sound right? Yup. You need whatever resources your host O/S and applications need, plus whatever the guest (virtual) O/S needs. So, in todays terms, at least a gig of ram (512 each) (more better) and as much disk and Ghz as you can afford. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246555 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 15:35, Burns, John D wrote: hardware and run multiple production servers on it using VM. This just scares me because it seems like one more point of possible failure, It's a valid point. I think of it this way: If I was running X servers, I'd need 2*X bits of hardware to be redundant. With VM, I need 2 (beefy) servers. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246556 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:43 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I could see people using VM Servers in a production enviroment, mostly because you now have a hardware agnostic OS and software install. So while you see 1 point of failure, someone else sees a way to easily move their production server to new hardware if their old hardware fails. Even if you only run one server on the VM server you could still get the benefit of the hardware agnostic OS. Each VM or Microsoft Virtual Server run as though it were a machine on the OS. So you wouldn't need to cluster the VM, you can run clustering as though they were different machines. I don't know if there is a clustering options for the VMWare or Microsoft, not sure if it's even needed. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246557 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I have only used VirtualPC for mac, to run Windows on my mac at home. I hate to do it, but that aside, it works very well indeed and sometimes you still just have to run Windows. * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Rick Faircloth wrote: Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246558 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
With VMWare's VMotion, you can move an instance of a Windows server from one physical machine to another without anybody having any clue that you did it! That is the definition of cool. http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/vc/vmotion.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Burns, John D wrote: I have kind of a stupid question. Are people using these VM servers for production use? I've heard of people buying one top of the line piece of hardware and run multiple production servers on it using VM. This just scares me because it seems like one more point of possible failure, possible performance losses, etc. Am I just being antsy of a new thing or is this really not a good practice for production? I can definitely see the value in development environments but I'm not sure about production. Do the VMs have much overhead to them? Are there security and/or performance concerns that need to be taken into consideration? Obviously there's the don't put all your eggs in one basket thing with the hardware but if proper precautions are taken for redundancy and such is it really a viable solution? Also, how would all of this work when you get into clustering and such? Would you cluster each VM to the other VMs and then leave the base OS that all the VMs are running on alone and not cluster/replicate them? Any experience or knowledge you can lend would be awesome. John Burns -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246559 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 15:42, Rick Faircloth wrote: It's good to verify what MS says on their site by someone with some field experience, rather than just relying on what the tin states, right Snake? Pft, we use VMWare here :-) -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246560 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: CFExecute and GnuPG
Try creating an environment variable called GNUPGHOME and set the value to something like C:\gnupghome and then put all of your keyring stuff in there instead of the default location under C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\gnupg. Then try it again. * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Hon-Cheong Chan wrote: Hi, I am trying to execute this line: cfexecute name=c:\gnupg\gpg.exe arguments=--fingerprint timeout=50 outputfile=c:\gnupg\test2. file /cfexecute to no avail. The file is generated wtih no content. Even though I could run it successfully at the command line. Also, if I use the variable attribute and do a cfdump, it outputs an [empty string]. Any idea to what else I should I tried? Thanks for your help, Hon ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246561 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: UNC shares and JRUN/CFMX Help
Yes This is how it is run now we have a service account called [EMAIL PROTECTED] So it should have no problem accessing the UNC share under that account. What I am seeing is when we hijack the Web Root in jrun-web.xml via virtual-mapping resource-path/*/resource-path system-path//srv-intweb/webroot$/Intranet/system-path /virtual-mapping Jrun's parser is seems to only allow 1 '\' not '\\' even when I escape the slashes ( with or ) I see this in the error logs Error [web-2] - File not found: /probe.cfm The specific sequence of files included or processed is: \srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet\probe.cfm The exact way I had the web root set when this error was generated was srv-intweb\webroot$\Intranet and it appears the same when I try //srv-intweb/webroot$/Intranet So it is clearly an issue with how JRun parses the file All works well under JRUN Connector but we cant use it with hardware load balancing Eric -Original Message- From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: UNC shares and JRUN/CFMX Help The JRUN service needs to run as a user that has access to network paths. By default it runs as SYSTEM which does not. snake ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246562 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Apparently, VMotion is not free, even with the Starter edition of VMWare. I couldn't find a price for VMotion as an add-on to the Starter edition of VMWare... any idea how much it is? Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? With VMWare's VMotion, you can move an instance of a Windows server from one physical machine to another without anybody having any clue that you did it! That is the definition of cool. http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/vc/vmotion.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Burns, John D wrote: I have kind of a stupid question. Are people using these VM servers for production use? I've heard of people buying one top of the line piece of hardware and run multiple production servers on it using VM. This just scares me because it seems like one more point of possible failure, possible performance losses, etc. Am I just being antsy of a new thing or is this really not a good practice for production? I can definitely see the value in development environments but I'm not sure about production. Do the VMs have much overhead to them? Are there security and/or performance concerns that need to be taken into consideration? Obviously there's the don't put all your eggs in one basket thing with the hardware but if proper precautions are taken for redundancy and such is it really a viable solution? Also, how would all of this work when you get into clustering and such? Would you cluster each VM to the other VMs and then leave the base OS that all the VMs are running on alone and not cluster/replicate them? Any experience or knowledge you can lend would be awesome. John Burns -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246563 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
This sounds like the ultimate system cloning tool! It clones a system and all settings, state, etc, without any downtime. I see a migration can be scheduled and executed unattended, too...that's great. Does the original OS on the original hardware remain intact and operating as a migration takes place? I could see running a migration to an identical server each night or even multiple times per day as a backup system for an entire server. Is the entire OS, all files and databases, migrated as well or would they have to point to a third server which remains intact for data access? Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? With VMWare's VMotion, you can move an instance of a Windows server from one physical machine to another without anybody having any clue that you did it! That is the definition of cool. http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/vc/vmotion.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Burns, John D wrote: I have kind of a stupid question. Are people using these VM servers for production use? I've heard of people buying one top of the line piece of hardware and run multiple production servers on it using VM. This just scares me because it seems like one more point of possible failure, possible performance losses, etc. Am I just being antsy of a new thing or is this really not a good practice for production? I can definitely see the value in development environments but I'm not sure about production. Do the VMs have much overhead to them? Are there security and/or performance concerns that need to be taken into consideration? Obviously there's the don't put all your eggs in one basket thing with the hardware but if proper precautions are taken for redundancy and such is it really a viable solution? Also, how would all of this work when you get into clustering and such? Would you cluster each VM to the other VMs and then leave the base OS that all the VMs are running on alone and not cluster/replicate them? Any experience or knowledge you can lend would be awesome. John Burns -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246564 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I see that only the Starter edition is free...how does that compare to MS's free (full?) version? Rick -Original Message- From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:58 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? On Friday 14 July 2006 15:42, Rick Faircloth wrote: It's good to verify what MS says on their site by someone with some field experience, rather than just relying on what the tin states, right Snake? Pft, we use VMWare here :-) -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246565 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Firefox, background, SSL
I had similar issues and had to do some testing. The true question (to which I don't remember the answer) is, does the relative path have to be relative to the template linked to the css file, or to the location of the css file itself? If I remember right I created a virtual mapping on my server to my resources folder so that I could use the same basic relative path (/resources), regardless of which template I was in. This is a server mapping, not a CF mapping (there is an article on how to do this on CF standalone on my blog, but you can do the same thing with a Virtual Directory in IIS). Cutter _ http://blog.cutterscrossing.com Robert Everland III wrote: I just had the weirdest thing happen to me. I was messing with trying to get a background to be transparent in firefox and IE at the same time by following this example http://www.daltonlp.com/daltonlp.cgi?item_type=1item_id=217 . Firefox wouldn't work, just kept not displaying anything. So I thought it was my graphic, so I would put the whole path to their sample image and it would work fine, but then I put back in my image path which is images/yadda/yadda.png and it woudln't work, I try a gif, nothing. So just for giggles I put the full path, and magically it works. Is there an issue using relative paths to images with firefox in an SSL enviroment as a background? Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246566 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:20, Rick Faircloth wrote: I see that only the Starter edition is free...how does that compare It lets you run any number of virtual servers on a box. That's good enough for me ! You can back up by shutting down the VM, and copy the disk image, for instance. -- Tom Chiverton This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246567 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
OT: Javascript Menu that Displays Over IFrames
I know this is not a CF question, but since this list has a lot more activity than the Javascript one, I never get any questions answered there, I figured there are many more people on here that are more well-versed in javascript than I. I am looking for a free DHTML/Javascript Drop-Down navigation that will display over i-frames. If anyone knows of any, or even how to get a Javascript drop-down menu to display over i-frames in the first place, I would be extremely grateful. Thanks, Ali ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246568 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
CFLogin Difficulties
I am trying to use CFLogin to setup a secure area in a web site. The problem that I am having is that there is no login form ... the site uses an SSO provider for authentication, and I receive a few variables in the header stating who the user is after a successful login. This means that the SSO provider is set to authenticate the user when they make an http request of a specific file. So, what I was attempting to do was determine if the current page needs the user to be authenticated. If so, redirect them to the page that is protected by the SSO provider, which stores the information it gets from the SOO provider in the session scope, and then returns the user to the page they came from. I can then use that information to log the user in, check their roles, etc. The problem I am having is that when the SSO page stores its information in the session scope, it then performs a redirect and that information is being lost. I have tried cflocation with the addToken=yes, I have tried cfheader redirects, meta redirects, etc. and the session information is always lost. I have checked to make sure it is being set correctly before the redirect, but once the user is taken back to the original page, the session scope is empty. Anybody have any suggestions as to why I am loosing the session scope, or as to a better way to go about this? Thanks -- Jeff ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246569 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick VMWare and Microsoft emulate hardware to the OS. So no matter what kind of machine you're on, to the OS it's the exact same machine. So if you need to move your server instance to a beefer server that is running VMWare or Microsoft, then nothing will change. You wouldn't have issues with drivers, none of your software you installed that rely on hardware will have issues. It will just work. That's one of the beauties of virtulization. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246570 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
list issues?
Just checking inI posted 2 messages yesterday and so far have not seen them show up Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. phone: 250.480.0642 fax: 250.480.1264 cell: 250.920.8830 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246571 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
There's a pricing pdf here: http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/vc/vmotion.html#_tabbuy Infrastructure 3 Enterprise, which is $5,750 includes VMotion Other than that, I don't know how much it costs to add it to standard or starter * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Rick Faircloth wrote: Apparently, VMotion is not free, even with the Starter edition of VMWare. I couldn't find a price for VMotion as an add-on to the Starter edition of VMWare... any idea how much it is? Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? With VMWare's VMotion, you can move an instance of a Windows server from one physical machine to another without anybody having any clue that you did it! That is the definition of cool. http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/vc/vmotion.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Burns, John D wrote: I have kind of a stupid question. Are people using these VM servers for production use? I've heard of people buying one top of the line piece of hardware and run multiple production servers on it using VM. This just scares me because it seems like one more point of possible failure, possible performance losses, etc. Am I just being antsy of a new thing or is this really not a good practice for production? I can definitely see the value in development environments but I'm not sure about production. Do the VMs have much overhead to them? Are there security and/or performance concerns that need to be taken into consideration? Obviously there's the don't put all your eggs in one basket thing with the hardware but if proper precautions are taken for redundancy and such is it really a viable solution? Also, how would all of this work when you get into clustering and such? Would you cluster each VM to the other VMs and then leave the base OS that all the VMs are running on alone and not cluster/replicate them? Any experience or knowledge you can lend would be awesome. John Burns -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:14 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Ken, have you used MS's Virtual PC? I have no experience with either, so would be interested in how they compare for ease-of-use... Rick -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? ...free version of VMWare. Which is absolutely incredible. I've been playing with the free VMWare player and server for the last few days and, DAMN! That is freakin' cool!!! http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html * Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 * Bobby Hartsfield wrote: I'm sure Microsoft's recent change of heart has something to do with a free version of vmware. They are great ways to test the impact of software updates and try things without causing any damage to your main installation though. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246572 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I do know we are looking at doing this very soon. One great point is the fact you can have snapshots of servers when you make a change or upgrade a VM instance you can easily go back to a copy of the old instance. Not to mention with Vmotion you can fail over to another VM or even Motion an instance to another server if the server has problems. A great tool!! Cant wait to have it up and running!! Eric -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:43 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I could see people using VM Servers in a production enviroment, mostly because you now have a hardware agnostic OS and software install. So while you see 1 point of failure, someone else sees a way to easily move their production server to new hardware if their old hardware fails. Even if you only run one server on the VM server you could still get the benefit of the hardware agnostic OS. Each VM or Microsoft Virtual Server run as though it were a machine on the OS. So you wouldn't need to cluster the VM, you can run clustering as though they were different machines. I don't know if there is a clustering options for the VMWare or Microsoft, not sure if it's even needed. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246573 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
One thing that sucks at least I guess without the proper hardware is that it's slow. I know with Xeon's or some higher end processors you're supposed to get some improvements, but on a regular P4, it's pretty slow... There are other free virtualization options that are supposed to be better, such as Xen, and Virtuozzo, and although I believe they are strictly for Linux, they're supposed to provide minimal overhead. Russ -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick VMWare and Microsoft emulate hardware to the OS. So no matter what kind of machine you're on, to the OS it's the exact same machine. So if you need to move your server instance to a beefer server that is running VMWare or Microsoft, then nothing will change. You wouldn't have issues with drivers, none of your software you installed that rely on hardware will have issues. It will just work. That's one of the beauties of virtulization. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246574 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
List issues
I have sent the same message about 3 times too and it hasn't shown up. Stu ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246575 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: List issues
Please send the message again and CC me directly with it. I have sent the same message about 3 times too and it hasn't shown up. Stu ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246576 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: subscribe
It was a mistake. The user was already subscribed and accidently sent a subscribe message to the list. I have not added a direct email subscribe handler to the system yet as the subscriptions have always been from the list interface. I'll alter this to avoid such mistakes in the future. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246577 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: ColdFuson Debug Tool To Premiere at NYCFUG!
I just got an email from them to a real beta site with the latest beta and docs. If you have not gotten one yet, go to the site and sign up. i would like to see a beta of this software. On 7/12/06, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246578 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: List issues
Also, I have notices that sometimes we get multiples of the same email showing up right in a row. It hasn't happened to any of my posts, but I will see it a lot on this list. ... Ben Nadel www.bennadel.com -Original Message- From: Saturday (Stuart Kidd) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:58 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: List issues I have sent the same message about 3 times too and it hasn't shown up. Stu ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246579 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Any idea if VMotion can be added to the free VMWare Standard Edition, and, if so, for how much? Rick -Original Message- From: Eric A. Haskins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:55 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I do know we are looking at doing this very soon. One great point is the fact you can have snapshots of servers when you make a change or upgrade a VM instance you can easily go back to a copy of the old instance. Not to mention with Vmotion you can fail over to another VM or even Motion an instance to another server if the server has problems. A great tool!! Cant wait to have it up and running!! Eric -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:43 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I could see people using VM Servers in a production enviroment, mostly because you now have a hardware agnostic OS and software install. So while you see 1 point of failure, someone else sees a way to easily move their production server to new hardware if their old hardware fails. Even if you only run one server on the VM server you could still get the benefit of the hardware agnostic OS. Each VM or Microsoft Virtual Server run as though it were a machine on the OS. So you wouldn't need to cluster the VM, you can run clustering as though they were different machines. I don't know if there is a clustering options for the VMWare or Microsoft, not sure if it's even needed. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246580 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I hear VMWare is very fast because they have a very slim version of Linux running. It's fast not because it's Linux, but because they took out every bell and whistle that they could and make it so it only ran what was needed to run virtualization. Microsoft on the other hand has the full bloat of running Windows Server. YMMV. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246581 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: List issues
I've seen this but due to the way the list is coded, the reason is that the sender sent more than one post. Basically, each email has a messageid which is unique (unless forged). I treat each messageid as unique and if I get a message with the same ID, I dump the duplicate. Also, I have notices that sometimes we get multiples of the same email showing up right in a row. It hasn't happened to any of my posts, but I will see it a lot on this list. .. Ben Nadel www.bennadel.com -Original Message- From: Saturday (Stuart Kidd) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:58 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: List issues I have sent the same message about 3 times too and it hasn't shown up. Stu ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246582 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: subscribe
Well, at least it's a coldfusion website... Now I can go and get learned in all those subjects I slept though in class. On 7/14/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was a mistake. The user was already subscribed and accidently sent a subscribe message to the list. I have not added a direct email subscribe handler to the system yet as the subscriptions have always been from the list interface. I'll alter this to avoid such mistakes in the future. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246583 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I think you're talking about VMware ESX which is the non-free version of their server, and yes it would be faster then running VMware or Virtual PC on top of windows. But it's still slower then running Xen or Virtuozzo, I believe, but it will support Windows as well as Linux. Russ -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? I hear VMWare is very fast because they have a very slim version of Linux running. It's fast not because it's Linux, but because they took out every bell and whistle that they could and make it so it only ran what was needed to run virtualization. Microsoft on the other hand has the full bloat of running Windows Server. YMMV. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246584 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: CFLogin Difficulties
Are both of these pages on the same server and within the same application name? M!ke -Original Message- From: Jeff D.Chastain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:40 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFLogin Difficulties I am trying to use CFLogin to setup a secure area in a web site. The problem that I am having is that there is no login form ... the site uses an SSO provider for authentication, and I receive a few variables in the header stating who the user is after a successful login. This means that the SSO provider is set to authenticate the user when they make an http request of a specific file. So, what I was attempting to do was determine if the current page needs the user to be authenticated. If so, redirect them to the page that is protected by the SSO provider, which stores the information it gets from the SOO provider in the session scope, and then returns the user to the page they came from. I can then use that information to log the user in, check their roles, etc. The problem I am having is that when the SSO page stores its information in the session scope, it then performs a redirect and that information is being lost. I have tried cflocation with the addToken=yes, I have tried cfheader redirects, meta redirects, etc. and the session information is always lost. I have checked to make sure it is being set correctly before the redirect, but once the user is taken back to the original page, the session scope is empty. Anybody have any suggestions as to why I am loosing the session scope, or as to a better way to go about this? Thanks -- Jeff ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246585 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
What about licensing? Are OS licenses based solely on physical processors and such or would you need a separate license for each instance of the OS that you have installed on the server? John -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick VMWare and Microsoft emulate hardware to the OS. So no matter what kind of machine you're on, to the OS it's the exact same machine. So if you need to move your server instance to a beefer server that is running VMWare or Microsoft, then nothing will change. You wouldn't have issues with drivers, none of your software you installed that rely on hardware will have issues. It will just work. That's one of the beauties of virtulization. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246586 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: CFLogin Difficulties
Yep, both are on the same server, under the same domain and same cfapplication tag. I can see that cflocation does not work after setting a session or cookie variable, but what I cannot understand is why using a cfheader or meta redirect would not work as both of those are client-side redirects. Thanks. Are both of these pages on the same server and within the same application name? M!ke -Original Message- From: Jeff D.Chastain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:40 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFLogin Difficulties I am trying to use CFLogin to setup a secure area in a web site. The problem that I am having is that there is no login form ... the site uses an SSO provider for authentication, and I receive a few variables in the header stating who the user is after a successful login. This means that the SSO provider is set to authenticate the user when they make an http request of a specific file. So, what I was attempting to do was determine if the current page needs the user to be authenticated. If so, redirect them to the page that is protected by the SSO provider, which stores the information it gets from the SOO provider in the session scope, and then returns the user to the page they came from. I can then use that information to log the user in, check their roles, etc. The problem I am having is that when the SSO page stores its information in the session scope, it then performs a redirect and that information is being lost. I have tried have tried set correctly before the redirect, but once the user is taken back to the original page, the session scope is empty. Anybody have any suggestions as to why I am loosing the session scope, or as to a better way to go about this? Thanks -- Jeff ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246587 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I believe you need a separate license for each OS (although most linux version are free). CF seems to be based on physical processors, so you can run as many of them as you want on one physical machine, no matter how many virtual processors you have. Russ -Original Message- From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? What about licensing? Are OS licenses based solely on physical processors and such or would you need a separate license for each instance of the OS that you have installed on the server? John -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick VMWare and Microsoft emulate hardware to the OS. So no matter what kind of machine you're on, to the OS it's the exact same machine. So if you need to move your server instance to a beefer server that is running VMWare or Microsoft, then nothing will change. You wouldn't have issues with drivers, none of your software you installed that rely on hardware will have issues. It will just work. That's one of the beauties of virtulization. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246588 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
What about licensing? Are OS licenses based solely on physical processors and such or would you need a separate license for each instance of the OS that you have installed on the server? For MS Virtual Server, Windows guest OS licensing has recently been changed so that you don't need one license per VM. I don't know the details, but read it briefly in this month's Windows IT Pro magazine, so you should be able to find out pretty easily. For other virtualization products like VMware, I doubt that MS gives you a break. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246589 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I hear VMWare is very fast because they have a very slim version of Linux running. It's fast not because it's Linux, but because they took out every bell and whistle that they could and make it so it only ran what was needed to run virtualization. Microsoft on the other hand has the full bloat of running Windows Server. YMMV. VMware ESX provides its own OS, which is a streamlined, customized Linux. VMware Server, previously called VMware GSX, can be installed on Windows or Linux, but typically has a 30% increase in overhead compared to ESX. On the other hand, ESX is relatively expensive, and VMware Server and MS Virtual Server are free. The big advantages of ESX aren't just that it runs faster, but that it supports the VMware Infrastructure functionality - you can run ESX guests from SANs, you can move them from one ESX server to another without any downtime, etc. This kind of functionality is unparalleled by any other virtualization solution on the market today. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246590 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I guess, since I started this thread, I'll throw out another consideration... I just found out that MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 is free. It's my understanding that two identical setups can be run with Virtual Server and it will provide clustering support for Virtual Servers. That would be of much more interest than just Virtual PC for CF production servers. Rick -Original Message- From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? What about licensing? Are OS licenses based solely on physical processors and such or would you need a separate license for each instance of the OS that you have installed on the server? John -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick VMWare and Microsoft emulate hardware to the OS. So no matter what kind of machine you're on, to the OS it's the exact same machine. So if you need to move your server instance to a beefer server that is running VMWare or Microsoft, then nothing will change. You wouldn't have issues with drivers, none of your software you installed that rely on hardware will have issues. It will just work. That's one of the beauties of virtulization. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246592 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Wellmaybe, maybe not...Virtual Server 2005 R2 only supports Windows Server OS's and Windows Server System applications... But...the MS site does say that MS supports *only* Win Server OS's and applications...it doesn't say it won't run Linux, Apache, etc... Anyone have any experience with this? I wouldn't mind setting up a couple of clustered Windows Virtual Servers, and a Linux/Apache setup on a server... Rick -Original Message- From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? What about licensing? Are OS licenses based solely on physical processors and such or would you need a separate license for each instance of the OS that you have installed on the server? John -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Not quite sure what you mean by hardware agnostic OS and software...wouldn't each OS have to be just as aware of the hardware it's running on and the software running on it? Rick VMWare and Microsoft emulate hardware to the OS. So no matter what kind of machine you're on, to the OS it's the exact same machine. So if you need to move your server instance to a beefer server that is running VMWare or Microsoft, then nothing will change. You wouldn't have issues with drivers, none of your software you installed that rely on hardware will have issues. It will just work. That's one of the beauties of virtulization. Bob ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246591 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Any idea if VMotion can be added to the free VMWare Standard Edition, and, if so, for how much? VMotion requires ESX, to the best of my knowledge. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246593 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
I see that only the Starter edition is free...how does that compare to MS's free (full?) version? VMware Server is roughly equivalent to MS Virtual Server. Both run on an existing OS, but VMware Server is available for Linux, and probably provides better support for non-Windows guest OSs. One other interesting feature with VMware Server is the availability of appliances - pre-built VMs for various uses. For example, let's say you want a dedicated spam filter VM. You just download it, and start it up. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246594 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
CFNTauthenticate and PDC emulator
Environment: ColdFusion 6 and 7 running on Windows 2003 Servers Active Directory Domain running in Native Mode on Windows 2003 Servers I recently had a problem where CFNTauthenticate on ColdFusion 7 stopped working. All attempts to authenticate were failing with the error of UserNotInDir failure if thrownonerror was set to false. If throwonerror was set to true, then I got the message that : Could not find domain controller for this domain domainname. Additionally, similar results were experienced by ColdFusion 6 servers using the ntauth class for domain authentication. At the same time this occurred one of our domain controllers was down due to a switch failure. However we have many redundant domain controllers spread over three sites, including one in the same rack as our CF servers. No other services (Exchange, Machine Logins, etc) were impacted. Upon further inspection, it was determined that one of the dc's that was down was playing the Active Directory FSMO role of PDC emulator. Further testing shows that we cannot get authentication to work if a ColdFusion machine is unable to contact the PDC emulator regardless of the state of the rest of the domain. In order to work around this, I'm developing a alternative authentication piece that uses LDAP authentication against the domain, and can switch between domain controllers if one is down. I can do it, and make it pretty robust, but I'm worried though that I may be over thinking this. Has anyone else experienced this? If you have, short of getting the PDC emulator back online, is there a way around this. Any other opinions or feedback would be welcome. Terrence Ryan Senior Systems Programmer Wharton Computing and Information Technology E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246595 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Any idea if VMotion can be added to the free VMWare Standard Edition, and, if so, for how much? Rick VMotion is an ESX only product. Standard can move VMs between servers if you power them down first. Eric -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:08 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Any idea if VMotion can be added to the free VMWare Standard Edition, and, if so, for how much? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246597 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
Apple would never (and never get to) buy Adobe.. This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: B V [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Fri Jul 14 14:40:11 2006 Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Yeah I thought so.. Some people joke or rumor that apple is going to buy adobe, and that would be great if it happened; Never have to wait for Mac software to come out. On 7/14/06, Larry Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I get this email that MS has released Virtual PC for free. Not having used Virtual PC or anything like it, I have to ask.are any of you using Virtual PC or something similar in you CF work? Other ways? Should I bother? Rick Rick, I've been using Virtual PC since Connectix released version 1 on my Mac. Its worked great. I've been running the PC version since M$ bought it from Connectix. Its a very good way of running separate instances of Windows. I've been very satisfied with it. larry ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246599 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not?
So, What are the steps to setup a VM image/session? N This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: Eric A. Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Fri Jul 14 18:26:15 2006 Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Any idea if VMotion can be added to the free VMWare Standard Edition, and, if so, for how much? Rick VMotion is an ESX only product. Standard can move VMs between servers if you power them down first. Eric -Original Message- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:08 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Microsoft Virtual PC / Should I be interested, or not? Any idea if VMotion can be added to the free VMWare Standard Edition, and, if so, for how much? Rick ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:246601 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
