Re: imageGeEXIFMetaData

2011-10-08 Thread Mack

Do you have an image that demonstrates the problem ?

-- 
Mack

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348013
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Jenny Gavin-Wear

Thanks, Bobby, exactly along the lines I am thinking.

The mail address for me has no mailto:, it's just contained in a string.
I'm wondering if I'll have to check the whole string for the existance of an
email address by looping through each word, or if there is an
easier/faster way?

For example, this code would find the string.  However, I don't know if I
can use a regular expression, for example, to rereplace the string with
ascii?  (Never used regex before...)

Or could I use a regular expression to search AND replace the email address
with ascii on the whole string, which would be a lot faster?

cfset mystring = this is the email address myaddr...@home.com that I use
cfset mynewString = 
cfoutput
cfloop from=1 to=#listlen(mystring,  )# index=I
cfif  isvalid(email, listgetat(mystring, I,  ))
!--- now set this to ascii ---
#listgetat(mystring, I,  )#br
cfelse
cfset mynewString = #mynewString# #listgetat(mystring, I,  )#
/cfif
/cfloop
#mynewString#
/cfoutput


Jenny Gavin-Wear
Fast Track Online
Tel: 01262 602013
http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/


-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:bo...@acoderslife.com]
Sent: 08 October 2011 04:09
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Hiding email address from spiders



Here is a page with an example of the source:

http://cf4em.com/cf4em/index.cfm?mainaction=postsforumid=2threadid=63

The last post has my email address in the last sentence. This is what the
source of that mailto link looks like:

a
href=#109#97#105#108#116#111#58#98#111#98#98#121#64
#99#102#
52#101#109#46#99#111#109#98#111#98#98#121#64#99#10
2#52#101
#109#46#99#111#109/a


.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com




--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 4302 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message




~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348014
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Bobby Hartsfield

Here is a quick mod of the original. Just pass in the entire text block and
it takes care of the rest.

What it is doing is using rematch() to return an array of all email
addresses that it finds in the given string. 

It then loops over that array of email addresses, replacing all occurrences
in the given string, with the ascii encoded equivalent (the inner loop is
what I sent last time).

cfscript
function disguiseEmails(str){

var emailArr =
rematch(([[:alnum:]_\.\-]+@([[:alnum:]_\.\-]+\.)+(museum|travel|[[:alpha:]]
{2,4})), str);
var thisEmailAddr = ;
var i = 1;
var ii = 1;

for (i=1; i = arraylen(emailArr); i++)
{
for (ii=1; ii = len(emailArr[i]); ii++)
{
thisEmailAddr = thisEmailAddr  ## 
asc(mid(emailArr[i], ii, 1));
}
str = replace(str, emailArr[i], thisEmailAddr,
'all');
}   

return str;
}
/cfscript



.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com





-Original Message-
From: Jenny Gavin-Wear [mailto:jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk] 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 5:40 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Hiding email address from spiders


Thanks, Bobby, exactly along the lines I am thinking.

The mail address for me has no mailto:, it's just contained in a string.
I'm wondering if I'll have to check the whole string for the existance of an
email address by looping through each word, or if there is an
easier/faster way?

For example, this code would find the string.  However, I don't know if I
can use a regular expression, for example, to rereplace the string with
ascii?  (Never used regex before...)

Or could I use a regular expression to search AND replace the email address
with ascii on the whole string, which would be a lot faster?

cfset mystring = this is the email address myaddr...@home.com that I use
cfset mynewString = 
cfoutput
cfloop from=1 to=#listlen(mystring,  )# index=I
cfif  isvalid(email, listgetat(mystring, I,  ))
!--- now set this to ascii ---
#listgetat(mystring, I,  )#br
cfelse
cfset mynewString = #mynewString# #listgetat(mystring, I,  )#
/cfif
/cfloop
#mynewString#
/cfoutput


Jenny Gavin-Wear
Fast Track Online
Tel: 01262 602013
http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/


-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:bo...@acoderslife.com]
Sent: 08 October 2011 04:09
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Hiding email address from spiders



Here is a page with an example of the source:

http://cf4em.com/cf4em/index.cfm?mainaction=postsforumid=2threadid=63

The last post has my email address in the last sentence. This is what the
source of that mailto link looks like:

a
href=#109#97#105#108#116#111#58#98#111#98#98#121#64
#99#102#
52#101#109#46#99#111#109#98#111#98#98#121#64#99#10
2#52#101
#109#46#99#111#109/a


.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com




--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 4302 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message






~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348015
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Michael Grant

This may be academic, but be aware that this method isn't actually hiding
the address, simply ascii encoding it. It wouldn't surprise me in the least
if spider don't already evaluate ascii.

I stand by my statement that the most effective (though not elegant) is to
replace addy's with images. The likelihood of a spider also doing character
recognition is much less

Carry on.

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Jenny Gavin-Wear 
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:


 Thanks, Bobby, exactly along the lines I am thinking.

 The mail address for me has no mailto:, it's just contained in a string.
 I'm wondering if I'll have to check the whole string for the existance of
 an
 email address by looping through each word, or if there is an
 easier/faster way?

 For example, this code would find the string.  However, I don't know if I
 can use a regular expression, for example, to rereplace the string with
 ascii?  (Never used regex before...)

 Or could I use a regular expression to search AND replace the email address
 with ascii on the whole string, which would be a lot faster?

 cfset mystring = this is the email address myaddr...@home.com that I
 use
 cfset mynewString = 
 cfoutput
 cfloop from=1 to=#listlen(mystring,  )# index=I
 cfif  isvalid(email, listgetat(mystring, I,  ))
 !--- now set this to ascii ---
 #listgetat(mystring, I,  )#br
 cfelse
 cfset mynewString = #mynewString# #listgetat(mystring, I,  )#
 /cfif
 /cfloop
 #mynewString#
 /cfoutput


 Jenny Gavin-Wear
 Fast Track Online
 Tel: 01262 602013
 http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/


 -Original Message-
 From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:bo...@acoderslife.com]
 Sent: 08 October 2011 04:09
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: RE: Hiding email address from spiders
 
 
 
 Here is a page with an example of the source:
 
 http://cf4em.com/cf4em/index.cfm?mainaction=postsforumid=2threadid=63
 
 The last post has my email address in the last sentence. This is what the
 source of that mailto link looks like:
 
 a
 href=#109#97#105#108#116#111#58#98#111#98#98#121#64
 #99#102#
 52#101#109#46#99#111#109#98#111#98#98#121#64#99#10
 2#52#101
 #109#46#99#111#109/a
 
 
 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
 Bobby Hartsfield
 http://acoderslife.com
 http://cf4em.com
 
 


 --
 I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
 We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
 SPAMfighter has removed 4302 of my spam emails to date.
 Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

 The Professional version does not have this message




 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348016
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Bobby Hartsfield

Yep. Definitely not 100% (nor are images .. especially if you want them
linked). I'd imagine most bots aren't going to bother with either though.

I'd have to agree that non-linked images of the email text is less likely to
be deciphered by a bot than ascii equivalents. No doubt.

In all honesty though, if someone submits some text to their own site that
they know is going to be displayed and it has email addresses in it, they
probably don't care much about the subject.

.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com



-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz] 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 8:34 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Hiding email address from spiders


This may be academic, but be aware that this method isn't actually hiding
the address, simply ascii encoding it. It wouldn't surprise me in the least
if spider don't already evaluate ascii.

I stand by my statement that the most effective (though not elegant) is to
replace addy's with images. The likelihood of a spider also doing character
recognition is much less

Carry on.

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Jenny Gavin-Wear 
jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk wrote:


 Thanks, Bobby, exactly along the lines I am thinking.

 The mail address for me has no mailto:, it's just contained in a string.
 I'm wondering if I'll have to check the whole string for the existance of
 an
 email address by looping through each word, or if there is an
 easier/faster way?

 For example, this code would find the string.  However, I don't know if I
 can use a regular expression, for example, to rereplace the string with
 ascii?  (Never used regex before...)

 Or could I use a regular expression to search AND replace the email
address
 with ascii on the whole string, which would be a lot faster?

 cfset mystring = this is the email address myaddr...@home.com that I
 use
 cfset mynewString = 
 cfoutput
 cfloop from=1 to=#listlen(mystring,  )# index=I
 cfif  isvalid(email, listgetat(mystring, I,  ))
 !--- now set this to ascii ---
 #listgetat(mystring, I,  )#br
 cfelse
 cfset mynewString = #mynewString# #listgetat(mystring, I,  )#
 /cfif
 /cfloop
 #mynewString#
 /cfoutput


 Jenny Gavin-Wear
 Fast Track Online
 Tel: 01262 602013
 http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/


 -Original Message-
 From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:bo...@acoderslife.com]
 Sent: 08 October 2011 04:09
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: RE: Hiding email address from spiders
 
 
 
 Here is a page with an example of the source:
 
 http://cf4em.com/cf4em/index.cfm?mainaction=postsforumid=2threadid=63
 
 The last post has my email address in the last sentence. This is what
the
 source of that mailto link looks like:
 
 a
 href=#109#97#105#108#116#111#58#98#111#98#98#121#64
 #99#102#
 52#101#109#46#99#111#109#98#111#98#98#121#64#99#10
 2#52#101
 #109#46#99#111#109/a
 
 
 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
 Bobby Hartsfield
 http://acoderslife.com
 http://cf4em.com
 
 


 --
 I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
 We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
 SPAMfighter has removed 4302 of my spam emails to date.
 Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

 The Professional version does not have this message




 



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348017
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Michael Grant


 In all honesty though, if someone submits some text to their own site that
 they know is going to be displayed and it has email addresses in it, they
 probably don't care much about the subject.


Too right.


~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348018
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Claude Schnéegans

  if someone submits some text to their own site that
they know is going to be displayed and it has email addresses in it, they
probably don't care much about the subject.

May be they do care, but they just don't know how to hide their address.
And there are also all those who do care and do not put addresses
because they cannot hide them.

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348019
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: MXUnit - Fail a success

2011-10-08 Thread Dominic Watson

While I'm not sure why the test is not failing, I've done this before with:

var failed = false;

try {
 doSomething();
} catch( someError e ) {
 failed = true;
}

Assert(failed);

Your method is more elegant I think, would be interesting to see why
it isn't working.

Dominic

On 8 October 2011 00:27, Bobby Hartsfield bo...@acoderslife.com wrote:

 Thanks Matt. I did see that list but figured people here were likely users
 of MXUnit and gave it a shot.

 I'll resort to the google group if all else fails.

 Thanks again.

 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
 Bobby Hartsfield
 http://acoderslife.com
 http://cf4em.com




 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Quackenbush [mailto:quackfu...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 3:20 PM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: MXUnit - Fail a success


 I'm not certain the answer to your question, but wanted to make sure you
 know about the MXUnit list.  I suspect you might have better luck getting an
 answer over there.

 http://groups.google.com/group/mxunit

 (I would have also expected the test to fail, based upon what you've
 posted.)


 On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Bobby Hartsfield
 bo...@acoderslife.comwrote:


 Sounds like an odd request right? lol

 So I have a method that I have written some unit tests for. What I want to
 add is a test that tests missing arguments. There are two arguments in my
 method and both are required so I wanted a test for passing no arguments.

 This is what I tried:



                try

                {

                                local.result =
 instance.myService.meyMethod();

                                fail();

                }

                catch(Application e) { }





 The above test passed. I THOUGHT the fail() was going to ensure that if
 anyone came along and made the arguments not required that the test would
 fail but the catch appears to be catching that as well...

 For instance, I tried this.





                try

                {

                                local.result = 1;

                                fail();

                }

                catch(Application e) { }





 That test still passes...



 What I also thought was odd was that the exception type thrown by calling
 my
 method with no arguments was not the missingArgument type, it was
 application. I'm assuming that application type is simply catching
 whatever
 fail () is doing as well as my missing argument error and there for
 hitting
 the catch.



 Does anyone know a solution to make this work as expected?



 I am on CF 8.0.1 by the way and running mxUnit 2.0.3



 Thanks.





 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.

 Bobby Hartsfield

 http://acoderslife.com

 http://cf4em.com
















 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348020
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Clean URLs: Preferred IIS Method

2011-10-08 Thread Dominic Watson

Scenario 1:

- request comes to IIS/Apache
- URL gets rewritten
- ColdFusion gets request and deals with as normal

Scenario 2:

- request comes to IIS/Apache
- URL gets rewritten
- ColdFusion gets request
- Some code parses url to extract variables
- request carries on as normal

I know which I prefer. Scenario 1 has less code to go wrong, less code
to maintain, less code to run. Scenario 2 adds no clear benefits IMO.

Dominic

On 7 October 2011 18:58, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:

 Why would there be any additional code than what the OP already has to
 handle the current implementation?


 On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Wil Genovese jugg...@trunkful.com wrote:


 Because you will still have to write CF code to translate the URL in params
 whereas doing the rewrite to tradition url params makes the values available
 in the URL scope with no extra code.


 Wil Genovese
 Sr. Web Application Developer/
 Systems Administrator
 CF Webtools
 www.cfwebtools.com

 wilg...@trunkful.com
 www.trunkful.com

 On Oct 7, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Michael Grant wrote:

 
 
  I would be weary of rewriting a pretty url to another pretty url.
 
 
  Why?
 
 
 



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348021
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Bobby Hartsfield

In which case ascii encoding would make them feel better about themselves
because they don't know any better. ;-)

.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com





-Original Message-
From: Claude Schnéegans schneeg...@internetique.com
[mailto:=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claude_Schn=E9egans schneegans@interneti=71?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?ue.com=3E?=] 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 10:40 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Hiding email address from spiders


  if someone submits some text to their own site that
they know is going to be displayed and it has email addresses in it, they
probably don't care much about the subject.

May be they do care, but they just don't know how to hide their address.
And there are also all those who do care and do not put addresses
because they cannot hide them.



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348022
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: MXUnit - Fail a success

2011-10-08 Thread Bobby Hartsfield

Yeah, A couple of us were quite sure what I had should work and were
surprised when it didn't. 

Your example looks like a winner to get the test working like it needs to
though!


.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com





-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:watson.domi...@googlemail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 10:54 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: MXUnit - Fail a success


While I'm not sure why the test is not failing, I've done this before with:

var failed = false;

try {
 doSomething();
} catch( someError e ) {
 failed = true;
}

Assert(failed);

Your method is more elegant I think, would be interesting to see why
it isn't working.

Dominic

On 8 October 2011 00:27, Bobby Hartsfield bo...@acoderslife.com wrote:

 Thanks Matt. I did see that list but figured people here were likely users
 of MXUnit and gave it a shot.

 I'll resort to the google group if all else fails.

 Thanks again.

 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
 Bobby Hartsfield
 http://acoderslife.com
 http://cf4em.com




 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Quackenbush [mailto:quackfu...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 3:20 PM
 To: cf-talk
 Subject: Re: MXUnit - Fail a success


 I'm not certain the answer to your question, but wanted to make sure you
 know about the MXUnit list.  I suspect you might have better luck getting
an
 answer over there.

 http://groups.google.com/group/mxunit

 (I would have also expected the test to fail, based upon what you've
 posted.)


 On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Bobby Hartsfield
 bo...@acoderslife.comwrote:


 Sounds like an odd request right? lol

 So I have a method that I have written some unit tests for. What I want
to
 add is a test that tests missing arguments. There are two arguments in my
 method and both are required so I wanted a test for passing no arguments.

 This is what I tried:



                try

                {

                                local.result =
 instance.myService.meyMethod();

                                fail();

                }

                catch(Application e) { }





 The above test passed. I THOUGHT the fail() was going to ensure that if
 anyone came along and made the arguments not required that the test would
 fail but the catch appears to be catching that as well...

 For instance, I tried this.





                try

                {

                                local.result = 1;

                                fail();

                }

                catch(Application e) { }





 That test still passes...



 What I also thought was odd was that the exception type thrown by calling
 my
 method with no arguments was not the missingArgument type, it was
 application. I'm assuming that application type is simply catching
 whatever
 fail () is doing as well as my missing argument error and there for
 hitting
 the catch.



 Does anyone know a solution to make this work as expected?



 I am on CF 8.0.1 by the way and running mxUnit 2.0.3



 Thanks.





 .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.

 Bobby Hartsfield

 http://acoderslife.com

 http://cf4em.com
















 



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348023
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Jenny Gavin-Wear

What a strange assumption to make.

Jenny Gavin-Wear
Fast Track Online
Tel: 01262 602013
http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/ 


-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: 08 October 2011 15:15
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Hiding email address from spiders




 In all honesty though, if someone submits some text to their 
own site that
 they know is going to be displayed and it has email addresses 
in it, they
 probably don't care much about the subject.


Too right.




~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348024
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Al Musella, DPM

  I had the same problem.. what I did is store the email addresses in 
a database and then replace the email link with a link to a feedback 
form on your website. When people want to email someone, they click 
the link, fill out and submit the form. They never get to see the 
actual email address.
In my case, I needed to stop the recipients from getting spam, so 
I have the emails going into a queue where I have to approve them 
before they are sent. I check it every few hours - just a page of all 
of the emails. Usually easy to spot bad ones.. and I have a radio 
button for send / delete next to each one. Takes a few minutes a day. 
and got rid of 100% of spam to the recipients.
I just use an autonumber to link them, but you can use a UUID so 
people can't easily guess the sequence. ( I use a form field to make 
it a little harder.)

To see it in action, go to: 
http://virtualtrials.com/address.cfmhttp://virtualtrials.com/address.cfm 
and select any doctor.

Of course, I clearly state that we will be reviewing every email..
Al









~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348025
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


RE: Hiding email address from spiders

2011-10-08 Thread Bobby Hartsfield

You're welcome.


.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com





-Original Message-
From: Jenny Gavin-Wear [mailto:jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.uk] 
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 2:41 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Hiding email address from spiders


What a strange assumption to make.

Jenny Gavin-Wear
Fast Track Online
Tel: 01262 602013
http://www.fasttrackonline.co.uk/ 


-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: 08 October 2011 15:15
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Hiding email address from spiders




 In all honesty though, if someone submits some text to their 
own site that
 they know is going to be displayed and it has email addresses 
in it, they
 probably don't care much about the subject.


Too right.






~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:348026
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm