Re: Remove all CF comments
If you need a tool that understands tags, the jericho html parser is probably a good bet. It won't get script comments though. :den -- I don't think nationalism is alone holding the field; it's in contention with a lot of different things. Peter Singer ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350171 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
RE: Arabic / Other languages POI Excel Writing
Our community has already tested it :) http://robertdudley.wordpress.com/2010/05/07/upgrade-java-poi-for-better-excel-support-in-coldfusion-8/ Guess it's going to be safe, will report if I face any issues. Thx rgds, Pradeep Viswanathan R -Original Message- From: Leigh [mailto:cfsearch...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:56 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: Arabic / Other languages POI Excel Writing I used the same source with CF 8 and 9 and it works properly in CF 9. Good to hear! I guess some of the changes between poi v2.5 (CF8) and v3.5 (CF9) must have involved unicode :) Guess updating few with the new versions will solve the issue. If they are compatible with CF8, yes. (I do not know). Just keep in mind the POI jars are also used by CF8. So there is the possibility updating the jars *might* break other things. -Lei ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350172 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
This is why we pair program. Eventually everyone on the team has seen each bit of code in the app (or at least most of it) and when new people come along they get to sit with someone who knows the app well and can reinforce the design expressed in the tests. Regardless of skill level they can then maintain the app, because face to face communication works better than written documentation. -- Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog http://www.bifrost.com.au/ On 1 March 2012 00:41, Bryan Stevenson br...@electricedgesystems.comwrote: Bingo Steve...well said! On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 08:25 -0500, Steve 'Cutter' Blades wrote: Beautiful sentiment, *if* you didn't inherit a 3500 template legacy application originally written on CF 4. Both (comments and TDD) have their place. Fact is, what is simple and clear and second nature for me is Greek to a noob, and I train those all of the time. Comments are for those who come behind, remembering that not all of them share my level of skill (or my preconceptions of what is right and wrong to do). ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350173 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
This is why we pair program. Eventually everyone on the team has seen each bit of code in the app (or at least most of it) and when new people come along they get to sit with someone who knows the app well and can reinforce the design expressed in the tests. Regardless of skill level they can then maintain the app, because face to face communication works better than written documentation. That's great, but it's not a solution for everything. What happens when a consultancy develops and delivers an application to a customer, who will maintain it in the future? What happens to applications which just don't get that much maintenance? I was just contacted this week about an .NET assembly I'd built five years ago that interacts with Adobe Connect's API. I didn't remember whether it had the ability to change a user's password in an external system, because it wasn't part of the specification (and therefore wasn't part of the test). Turns out that the API call used to create a user also works to modify that users, so the user of the assembly can just use the same method call. You seem to be staking a lot on saying no one ever needs comments, anywhere, for any reason and I just don't see why that's the hill you want to die on. Comments are not the exclusive solution to writing maintainable code, no one's saying they are, but they do provide something very simple that TDD and pair programming do not - the ability to explain your intent to any future reader of that source code. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350174 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
So what do you do ten years later when nobody on the team was there when the code was written? -- ~ Mike Stemle, Jr. On Feb 29, 2012, at 18:25, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.com wrote: This is why we pair program. Eventually everyone on the team has seen each bit of code in the app (or at least most of it) and when new people come along they get to sit with someone who knows the app well and can reinforce the design expressed in the tests. Regardless of skill level they can then maintain the app, because face to face communication works better than written documentation. -- Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog http://www.bifrost.com.au/ On 1 March 2012 00:41, Bryan Stevenson br...@electricedgesystems.comwrote: Bingo Steve...well said! On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 08:25 -0500, Steve 'Cutter' Blades wrote: Beautiful sentiment, *if* you didn't inherit a 3500 template legacy application originally written on CF 4. Both (comments and TDD) have their place. Fact is, what is simple and clear and second nature for me is Greek to a noob, and I train those all of the time. Comments are for those who come behind, remembering that not all of them share my level of skill (or my preconceptions of what is right and wrong to do). ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350175 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
I don't see why you care... -- Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog http://www.bifrost.com.au/ On 1 March 2012 22:30, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote: I just don't see why that's the hill you want to die on. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350176 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
Read the tests. -- Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog http://www.bifrost.com.au/ On 1 March 2012 22:33, Michael Stemle themanchic...@gmail.com wrote: So what do you do ten years later when nobody on the team was there when the code was written? ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350177 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
I just don't see why that's the hill you want to die on. I don't see why you care... Presumably for the same reason you cared enough to post in the first place? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350178 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
So what do you do ten years later when nobody on the team was there when the code was written? Read the tests. Wait a sec. Here's a summary of what's been posted. You: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter, me: Comments can help those who come to the source code later in ways that tests may not. You: That's why we pair program. Michael: What if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. Can you see why that's not a satisfactory answer to the people who disagree with you? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350179 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
That's misrepresenting the thread. This is more accurate: Me: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter: Noobs can't read tests Me: That's why we pair program. Michael: What do *you* do if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. (implication; I'm not a noob). -- Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog http://www.bifrost.com.au/ On 1 March 2012 22:49, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote: So what do you do ten years later when nobody on the team was there when the code was written? Read the tests. Wait a sec. Here's a summary of what's been posted. You: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter, me: Comments can help those who come to the source code later in ways that tests may not. You: That's why we pair program. Michael: What if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. Can you see why that's not a satisfactory answer to the people who disagree with you? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350180 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
You: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter, me: Comments can help those who come to the source code later in ways that tests may not. You: That's why we pair program. Michael: What if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. That's misrepresenting the thread. This is more accurate: Me: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter: Noobs can't read tests Me: That's why we pair program. Michael: What do *you* do if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. (implication; I'm not a noob). No, I think that's less representative than what I wrote: Cutter, me: Comments can help those who come to the source code later in ways that tests may not. Note the me there. Cutter mentioned noobs, I mentioned ways that comments provide information that tests don't. Again, I specified two cases where tests and pair programming wouldn't solve problems I had, and comments could. These are actual cases from my own personal experience in the last couple of weeks. If I accepted your answers at face value, they would contradict my personal experience from these two cases. Look, I think that TDD is great. And I think that pair programming is great, although it's not an option for many work environments. Everybody should do these things if they can, and they will solve more problems than comments would. But you have said, basically, that there is NO POSSIBLE CASE where comments can solve a problem that TDD and pair programming can't, and I think that's going to contradict many people's experiences. That's a pretty absolutist position. Hell, I suspect that if I asked Kent Beck himself, he'd say there are still some cases where comments provide value that TDD doesn't. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350181 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
I dont understand what's the problem with comments anyway.So what if we have comments peppered through the code?Do they slow down processing in any significant way?Yes, they cause the files to be somewhat larger, but if all that means is a bit more disk space gets used, so what?If they reduce maintenance cost because its quicker for other developers to maintain the code later on, that must surely more than offset any overhead due to the existence of comments. I get that the tests in TDD are a good way to see what's happening (or supposed to happen) in code. But whats the problem if there are comments in there too? (Assuming they're accurately reflecting what's going on in the code - if they're misleading because they reflect old or trial versions of the logic, that's bad but none of us is talking about that are we?) I just dont understand why this is even a discussion in the first place. As someone who often has to work on code that others have built before me (and normally aren't around to ask questions of) I can testify that comments make any program file MUCH MUCH MUCH easier to work on. As I said earlier in this thread, I once had to work on a 1500 line convoluted file, with nested cfif clientiD = peppered through it, just to change some text being displayed. It took me hours to find the exact line I had to correct because it wasnt every instance of the text in the file, but only one that had to be changed. It certainly didn't justify spending ages and ages looking through the whole logic of the application just to make a little tweak. A few comments here or there would have meant it cost the client a fraction of what I billed him for my time for that little job, then i could have got on to another much more important job he wanted done. You dont want comments in your code? I get that. Dont know why you dont, but I get it. But I'm a contractor who does a lot of temp work on existing code bases not written by me.I know I go a lot faster when I have comments I can read. Yes, I can read code, and I can write code. But the comments make it a LOT faster for me to work out what I'm working on and how to make the change I'm asked to do. Cheers Mike Kear Windsor, NSW, Australia Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer AFP Webworks http://afpwebworks.com ColdFusion 9 Enterprise, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:04 AM, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.com wrote: That's misrepresenting the thread. This is more accurate: Me: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter: Noobs can't read tests Me: That's why we pair program. Michael: What do *you* do if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. (implication; I'm not a noob). -- Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog http://www.bifrost.com.au/ ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350182 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
I will add my 2p that uncommented code drives me nuts. when you have to work on an app you have never seen before the lack of any useful comments usually results in it taking many x longer to figure stuff out and get up and running with the app. If you have a load a load of documentation and tests distributed with the app then than of course can help too, but this is usually not the cas ein my experience, any docs and tests are on someone else's computer somewhere and not distributed with the app at all. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote: You: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter, me: Comments can help those who come to the source code later in ways that tests may not. You: That's why we pair program. Michael: What if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. That's misrepresenting the thread. This is more accurate: Me: Don't use comments, use tests. Cutter: Noobs can't read tests Me: That's why we pair program. Michael: What do *you* do if all the developers who worked on the project are long gone? You: Read the tests. (implication; I'm not a noob). No, I think that's less representative than what I wrote: Cutter, me: Comments can help those who come to the source code later in ways that tests may not. Note the me there. Cutter mentioned noobs, I mentioned ways that comments provide information that tests don't. Again, I specified two cases where tests and pair programming wouldn't solve problems I had, and comments could. These are actual cases from my own personal experience in the last couple of weeks. If I accepted your answers at face value, they would contradict my personal experience from these two cases. Look, I think that TDD is great. And I think that pair programming is great, although it's not an option for many work environments. Everybody should do these things if they can, and they will solve more problems than comments would. But you have said, basically, that there is NO POSSIBLE CASE where comments can solve a problem that TDD and pair programming can't, and I think that's going to contradict many people's experiences. That's a pretty absolutist position. Hell, I suspect that if I asked Kent Beck himself, he'd say there are still some cases where comments provide value that TDD doesn't. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350183 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
First to the original poster, there is a way to do this but I would be asking why you would want to first. With comments being used for annotated validation for hyrule, to annotated comments for ORM. If it is just to purely find code that has been commented out, and needs removing then a search and look method is perhaps the best option. Secondly to the argument of TDD and comments. Let me first clear up that TDD and BDD and tests in general, are there to code coverage our code. So that there is no unexpected problems in the future, TDD and BDD are primarily for input and output. That doesn't mean you can't comment on the tests to say what ever you like to say. But tests will not cover the likes of known bugs and work around's to achieve such results, Now I have comments that as stated above are for annotated validation for hyrule. And although they are tested through TDD, they are still comments. Secondly, I have rest / web services that describe what is being returned from third parties. These are not covered by tests and my part as it is not my code, but the comments make it very clear what is returned in the body of the function. In that example the calls to the rest and web services, are not affecting the final output of the result returned, where tests cover that. But it does let the developer know that while in there making changes they can see the expected results and any further outcomes to the code. Sorry but I am on the side that comments are a big and necessary thing, that even I will admit to not doing enough off, but required in more cases than not. TDD is not the place to dictate why something was written the way it was written, its job is to secure and pass on anything that is / might be passed into that is not expected and cope with a return result. How would these tests know why I wrote certain code the way that I did, because of trying to get around a known issue? Would I place that comment in the tests, no I would not, the comment is related to the way the function behaves and not if it passes or fails because someone wants to ignore the comments. -- Regards, Andrew Scott WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/ Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543 ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350184 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
Mike, some arguments are comments are: 1) Repeats what's already obvious. For example: !--- Loops over my crap --- cfloop index=x from=1 to=#arrayLen(crap)# 2) Easy to become outdated. For example, a comment that says something like, This hunts for bears using a shotgun whereas the code was modified to hunt for bears using blunt toothpicks. Maybe another developer made that change and simply didn't feel like updating the code. The book, Clean Code (http://www.amazon.com/Clean-Code-Handbook-Software-Craftsmanship/dp/0132350882), has a whole chapter on it. Now to be clear, I don't actually agree with all the points. I'm Pro Comment, just sharing some reasons why. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Mike Kear afpwebwo...@gmail.com wrote: I dont understand what's the problem with comments anyway. So what if we have comments peppered through the code? Do they slow down processing in any significant way? Yes, they cause the files to be somewhat larger, but if all that means is a bit more disk space gets used, so what? If they reduce maintenance cost because its quicker for other developers to maintain the code later on, that must surely more than offset any overhead due to the existence of comments. -- === Raymond Camden, Adobe Developer Evangelist Email : raymondcam...@gmail.com Blog : www.raymondcamden.com Twitter: cfj ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350185 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: Remove all CF comments
I have certainly seen my fair share of bad comments. commented out comments. blocks of code which have been commented out and disabled but the comments are still there for that disabled code and have not been updated. comments for code which no longer exists. but it all comes down to the same thing really, poor documentation and commenting, regardless of the end result. I tend to put very simple comments in code, for anything major or for apps that were likley to be maintained by someone else I wrote documentation and refer to that in the code using in page header comments. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote: Mike, some arguments are comments are: 1) Repeats what's already obvious. For example: !--- Loops over my crap --- cfloop index=x from=1 to=#arrayLen(crap)# 2) Easy to become outdated. For example, a comment that says something like, This hunts for bears using a shotgun whereas the code was modified to hunt for bears using blunt toothpicks. Maybe another developer made that change and simply didn't feel like updating the code. The book, Clean Code ( http://www.amazon.com/Clean-Code-Handbook-Software-Craftsmanship/dp/0132350882 ), has a whole chapter on it. Now to be clear, I don't actually agree with all the points. I'm Pro Comment, just sharing some reasons why. On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Mike Kear afpwebwo...@gmail.com wrote: I dont understand what's the problem with comments anyway.So what if we have comments peppered through the code?Do they slow down processing in any significant way?Yes, they cause the files to be somewhat larger, but if all that means is a bit more disk space gets used, so what?If they reduce maintenance cost because its quicker for other developers to maintain the code later on, that must surely more than offset any overhead due to the existence of comments. -- === Raymond Camden, Adobe Developer Evangelist Email : raymondcam...@gmail.com Blog : www.raymondcamden.com Twitter: cfj ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350186 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: XML and unicode: 0x1a
I don't want to sound stupid but how does regex work? I could use something similar to this and always fall flat on my face every time someone mentions regex Ken Hammond IT Director The Salem Group Phone: 630-873-3018 Fax: 630-932-7010 Email: khamm...@saleminc.com www.saleminc.com On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Leigh wrote: Have you tried a regex replace of \x1a ? It *might* work. Worth a shot anyway. -Leigh ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350187 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
CFinclude issues
I am trying to code a cfinclude on a template page: cfinclude template=../includes/sponsors.cfm to show this include when its pages are displayed. The name of the include is correct, the location it is directing to is correct, but it will not work. Does someone have an easy solution to help me? ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350188 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
RE: CFinclude issues
Are you sure you need the .. in front of the first slash? It could be a relative path issue. What errors are you getting? Best regards, Bill Franklin -Original Message- From: Eileen Harberts [mailto:eil...@tdai.net] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:16 PM To: cf-talk Subject: CFinclude issues I am trying to code a cfinclude on a template page: cfinclude template=../includes/sponsors.cfm to show this include when its pages are displayed. The name of the include is correct, the location it is directing to is correct, but it will not work. Does someone have an easy solution to help me? ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350189 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: CFinclude issues
What do you meanby it does not work, is there an error, the file is not included, what? Regards Russ Michaels From my mobile On 1 Mar 2012 21:16, Eileen Harberts eil...@tdai.net wrote: I am trying to code a cfinclude on a template page: cfinclude template=../includes/sponsors.cfm to show this include when its pages are displayed. The name of the include is correct, the location it is directing to is correct, but it will not work. Does someone have an easy solution to help me? ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:350190 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
