Re: Serving Files via cfcontent - how much processing is required

2010-06-17 Thread William Attwood

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 17, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:


 In other applications I routinely use cfcontent to serve protected  
 files on
 extranet applications however the traffic ( 10-20 files/day) is  
 nowhere near
 as rigorous as will be required here with 12,000 per day of 40Meg  
 average
 per file.  I am considering serving the files now through cfcontent  
 via HTTP
 instead of FTP for a couple of reasons. 1) because most Internet  
 Security
 programs block FTP and we have to help people (mostly kids) open  
 the port
 and 2) to prevent direct linking to the files because this endeavor  
 is
 funded by ads on the website (and my wallet).

 I know the most efficient way to serve this quantity and size of  
 files is
 via ftp but what I don't know is what is required by the various CF  
 engines
 AdobeCF, OpenBD, Bluedragon, Ralio to serve up the same via HTTP.   
 Will our
 new server hardware handle that kind of HTTP file traffic (I  
 suspect so),
 will OpenBD/Tomcat be up to the task or will I need a different  
 CFML engine?
 Essentially what I need to know is what it would take to routinely  
 serve
 that many/size files through the CF engine. I don't want to go down  
 this
 road and find that people are having problems downloading because  
 the CF
 engine / Web server can't keep up.  Has anyone had experience with  
 this and
 can you offer some advice?

 My advice for you would be to avoid using CFCONTENT for this, as it's
 really not designed for this. Each request using CFCONTENT will use
 one of your threads, I think, and there are decent alternatives.

 The alternative I'd recommend would be the use of temporary symlinks.
 When someone is granted access to a file, you'd create a symlink for
 that file, pointing to a web-accessible location, then let the user
 download it via HTTP. Sometime after, you'd delete the symlink.
 Exactly how long after, I'm not sure - that would be a balance of
 convenience to the user (in case they don't download it immediately)
 versus the potential for abuse (the user provides the link to someone
 else).

 Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
 http://www.figleaf.com/
 http://training.figleaf.com/

 Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
 GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
 instruction at our training centers, online, or onsi




I would highly recommend using a Content Delivery Network like Mosso  
Files to store your files, then you can symlink to them by passing  
headers as a re-direct.  This way you don't have the overhead of  
distribution, hardware and requests... You pay a small fee per month  
for transfer and storage.  Do a cost analysis, including your time and  
sys admin time in upgrades to handle all of this badwidth.  Check out  
the CDN writeup on openboxitsolutions.com for some real life examples  
and price savings..  Feel free to reach out to me, as well for more  
information.  I highly recommend not hosting static delivery  
especially to the extent you're looking at without weighing CDN options.

William Attwood
Systems Engineer
Software Engineer
801-859-2987



 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:334634
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Home Site+ and Windows 7

2010-05-22 Thread William Attwood

Did you try to run it in XP compatability mode??

Sent from my iPhone

On May 22, 2010, at 6:56 PM, s...@who.net s...@who.net s...@who.net wrote:


 I just bought a new computer with Windows 7. My beloved Home Site+  
 won't work in Windows 7. It worked fine with XP and 2000.

 What are you all using for development on windows 7 that has similar  
 functionality to Home Site+?

 I was also using the client tools of Enterprise Manager for SQL  
 Server 2000 on Windows XP to remotely connect to my databases. Now  
 I've read that won't work either on Windows 7. Any suggestions for  
 that?

 Sebastian

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:333924
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Home Site+ and Windows 7

2010-05-22 Thread William Attwood

That's a different beast...  Try it, I guess

Sent from my iPhone

On May 22, 2010, at 7:15 PM, s...@who.net s...@who.net s...@who.net wrote:


 Did you try to run it in XP compatability mode??

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 22, 2010, at 6:56 PM, s...@who.net s...@who.net s...@who.net  
 wrote:



 William, I just did and it worked. kudos!

 Do you think the same thing can work with Enterprise Manager for SQL  
 server 2000?

 

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:333926
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm