OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Which is more secure:  Running your firewall on the NT 2003 Server or running
it on a router?

Andy



~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193864
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
 Which is more secure:  Running your firewall on the NT 2003 Server or running
 it on a router?

Both.

Jochem

~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193868
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Andy Ousterhout
LOL. So both can be equally secure?

-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Firewall question


Andy Ousterhout wrote:
 Which is more secure:  Running your firewall on the NT 2003 Server or
running
 it on a router?

Both.

Jochem



~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193871
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
 LOL. So both can be equally secure?

Yes, they can be equally secure. But why not run one on both?

Jochem

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193873
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Andy Ousterhout
Well, cause I don't need the router if I go directly to the NT machine (I've
got a hub too).  So the doubling up adds 1 more layer to be broken thru?  So
you route LAN through router into Server and out of Server to hub?

Andy

-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten

Andy Ousterhout wrote:
 LOL. So both can be equally secure?

Yes, they can be equally secure. But why not run one on both?

Jochem



~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193877
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


RE: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
With a hardware firewall to be extra safe.



-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 February 2005 16:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Firewall question

Andy Ousterhout wrote:
 LOL. So both can be equally secure?

Yes, they can be equally secure. But why not run one on both?

Jochem



~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193881
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


Re: OT: Firewall question

2005-02-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
 Well, cause I don't need the router if I go directly to the NT machine (I've
 got a hub too).  So the doubling up adds 1 more layer to be broken thru?  So
 you route LAN through router into Server and out of Server to hub?

Hub? LAN? WAN? Router? Firewall? How about some ASCII art?

Jochem

~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193888
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations  Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54


OT: Firewall Question

2000-11-29 Thread Jim Watkins

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0016_01C05A52.F1CFA7F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My network administrator insists that opening ports 2047 and 2048 =
through the Firewall is a security hazard.  Can anyone advise me on this =
please?  I need to do send and receive video transmission.

Jim Watkins
http://www.ngtcollege.org

--=_NextPart_000_0016_01C05A52.F1CFA7F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1"
META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR
STYLE/STYLE
/HEAD
BODY bgColor=3D#ff
DIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2My network administrator insists that =
opening ports=20
2047 and 2048 through the Firewall is a security hazard.nbsp; Can =
anyone advise=20
me on this please?nbsp; I need to do send and receive video=20
transmission./FONT/DIV
DIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2BRJim WatkinsBRA=20
href=3D"http://www.ngtcollege.org"http://www.ngtcollege.org/A/FONT/=
DIV/BODY/HTML

--=_NextPart_000_0016_01C05A52.F1CFA7F0--

~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists