RE: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
You reference it similarly to the way you reference a stuct, but it's silly to say that it is represented as such, because it certainly is not. That's like saying a query is represented as a struct just because you can access it similarly. The doc clearly says that "An XML Document Object is represented in CF as a structure," therefore you should be able to use struct related functions ON THE DOCUMENT OBJECT. Anyway, I think we've managed to figure out that it's just an error in the docs. Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 -Original Message- From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? I read the documentation that is confusing you. Description: Creates an XML document object. Returns: An empty XML document object. IsStruct will be no because if you use cfdump for the varaible, it returns an XML object and not a struct. The phrase that I see that you are referring to: Usage: An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure. Well, this statement may just be an incorrect way of stating the data type. The examples that they use is very much Structure related: MyDoc.xmlRoot.XmlAttributes["Version"] = "12b"; This is indeed a structure notation to get the "Version" item from the xmlRoot collection. The XMLAttributes portion of the XML Element is of type struct. XML Children for a given element is stored as an array. Where you test isStruct is really the issue. Teddy On 9/4/06, Teddy Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you using CF to create the XMl Document or are you reading in a XML > document? > > > >>What would be even better is if the agency who > >>created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which > >>would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. > > Why don't you create one to assist others? > > Teddy > > > On 9/4/06, Ken Ferguson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, I did. I can dump the xml doc object and all. I can get at all the > > > > data by using xmlsearch... But the docs said it is represented as a > > structure, so I thought this would work: > > xmlD = xmlParse(xmldoc); > > writeOutput(isStruct(xmlD)); > > > > Oddly though, this outputs NO. Seems to me that if the XML Document > > Object was actually represented as a structure (as the docs say), then > > that should output YES. I guess it's not that big a deal. It's not too > > difficult to get all the data out of the document. It'd just be nice to > > have a simple XmlToQuery or an XmlToStruct function built in to make > > things even simpler. What would be even better is if the agency who > > created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which > > would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Then I wouldn't have > > to fool with this at all and I could just load it all straight into the > > db. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken Ferguson > > 214.636.6126 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:59 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? > > > > You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? > > > > > > > > Then perform the struct calls on foo? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, > > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > > > > the > > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please > > note > > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or > > the > > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > > have > > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or > > call > > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within > > this > > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: CF-Talk > > Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 > > Subject: XML Document Ob
Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
I read the documentation that is confusing you. Description: Creates an XML document object. Returns: An empty XML document object. IsStruct will be no because if you use cfdump for the varaible, it returns an XML object and not a struct. The phrase that I see that you are referring to: Usage: An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure. Well, this statement may just be an incorrect way of stating the data type. The examples that they use is very much Structure related: MyDoc.xmlRoot.XmlAttributes["Version"] = "12b"; This is indeed a structure notation to get the "Version" item from the xmlRoot collection. The XMLAttributes portion of the XML Element is of type struct. XML Children for a given element is stored as an array. Where you test isStruct is really the issue. Teddy On 9/4/06, Teddy Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you using CF to create the XMl Document or are you reading in a XML > document? > > > >>What would be even better is if the agency who > >>created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which > >>would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. > > Why don't you create one to assist others? > > Teddy > > > On 9/4/06, Ken Ferguson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, I did. I can dump the xml doc object and all. I can get at all the > > > > data by using xmlsearch... But the docs said it is represented as a > > structure, so I thought this would work: > > xmlD = xmlParse(xmldoc); > > writeOutput(isStruct(xmlD)); > > > > Oddly though, this outputs NO. Seems to me that if the XML Document > > Object was actually represented as a structure (as the docs say), then > > that should output YES. I guess it's not that big a deal. It's not too > > difficult to get all the data out of the document. It'd just be nice to > > have a simple XmlToQuery or an XmlToStruct function built in to make > > things even simpler. What would be even better is if the agency who > > created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which > > would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Then I wouldn't have > > to fool with this at all and I could just load it all straight into the > > db. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken Ferguson > > 214.636.6126 > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:59 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? > > > > You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? > > > > > > > > Then perform the struct calls on foo? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, > > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > > > > the > > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please > > note > > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or > > the > > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > > have > > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or > > call > > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within > > this > > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: CF-Talk > > Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 > > Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? > > > > So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented > > in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I > > have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't > > access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other > > ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in > > the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and > > structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the > > docs? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken Ferguson > > 214.636.6126 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251989 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
RE: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
Yeah, that's the way I've been going about it as well. When I saw that line in the docs though, I though that'd make life even easier. Too bad... Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 -Original Message- From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? Can't say I have used the struct tags on XML docs but I do use the dot.notation to get the values etc. object.node.xmltext etc "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 18:24:50 2006 Subject: RE: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? Yeah, I did. I can dump the xml doc object and all. I can get at all the data by using xmlsearch... But the docs said it is represented as a structure, so I thought this would work: xmlD = xmlParse(xmldoc); writeOutput(isStruct(xmlD)); Oddly though, this outputs NO. Seems to me that if the XML Document Object was actually represented as a structure (as the docs say), then that should output YES. I guess it's not that big a deal. It's not too difficult to get all the data out of the document. It'd just be nice to have a simple XmlToQuery or an XmlToStruct function built in to make things even simpler. What would be even better is if the agency who created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Then I wouldn't have to fool with this at all and I could just load it all straight into the db. Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 -Original Message- From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? Then perform the struct calls on foo? "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the docs? Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251988 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
Are you using CF to create the XMl Document or are you reading in a XML document? >>What would be even better is if the agency who >>created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which >>would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Why don't you create one to assist others? Teddy On 9/4/06, Ken Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I did. I can dump the xml doc object and all. I can get at all the > data by using xmlsearch... But the docs said it is represented as a > structure, so I thought this would work: > xmlD = xmlParse(xmldoc); > writeOutput(isStruct(xmlD)); > > Oddly though, this outputs NO. Seems to me that if the XML Document > Object was actually represented as a structure (as the docs say), then > that should output YES. I guess it's not that big a deal. It's not too > difficult to get all the data out of the document. It'd just be nice to > have a simple XmlToQuery or an XmlToStruct function built in to make > things even simpler. What would be even better is if the agency who > created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which > would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Then I wouldn't have > to fool with this at all and I could just load it all straight into the > db. > > Thanks, > > Ken Ferguson > 214.636.6126 > > > > -Original Message----- > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:59 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? > > You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? > > > > Then perform the struct calls on foo? > > > > > > > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of > the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please > note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or > the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or > call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within > this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: CF-Talk > Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 > Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? > > So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented > in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I > have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't > access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other > ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in > the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and > structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the > docs? > > Thanks, > > Ken Ferguson > 214.636.6126 > > > > > > > > > > > ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251987 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
Can't say I have used the struct tags on XML docs but I do use the dot.notation to get the values etc. object.node.xmltext etc "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 18:24:50 2006 Subject: RE: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? Yeah, I did. I can dump the xml doc object and all. I can get at all the data by using xmlsearch... But the docs said it is represented as a structure, so I thought this would work: xmlD = xmlParse(xmldoc); writeOutput(isStruct(xmlD)); Oddly though, this outputs NO. Seems to me that if the XML Document Object was actually represented as a structure (as the docs say), then that should output YES. I guess it's not that big a deal. It's not too difficult to get all the data out of the document. It'd just be nice to have a simple XmlToQuery or an XmlToStruct function built in to make things even simpler. What would be even better is if the agency who created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Then I wouldn't have to fool with this at all and I could just load it all straight into the db. Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 -Original Message- From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? Then perform the struct calls on foo? "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the docs? Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251985 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
Yeah, I did. I can dump the xml doc object and all. I can get at all the data by using xmlsearch... But the docs said it is represented as a structure, so I thought this would work: xmlD = xmlParse(xmldoc); writeOutput(isStruct(xmlD)); Oddly though, this outputs NO. Seems to me that if the XML Document Object was actually represented as a structure (as the docs say), then that should output YES. I guess it's not that big a deal. It's not too difficult to get all the data out of the document. It'd just be nice to have a simple XmlToQuery or an XmlToStruct function built in to make things even simpler. What would be even better is if the agency who created this damned XML schema had created a sql annotated schema which would actually work with SQL Server's XMLBulkLoad. Then I wouldn't have to fool with this at all and I could just load it all straight into the db. Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 -Original Message- From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? Then perform the struct calls on foo? "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the docs? Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251983 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
I see you have, I has been a long day :-) "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the docs? Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251982 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: XML Document Object is NOT a struct?
You say it is a string? Have you ran it into ColdFusion with ParseXML? Then perform the struct calls on foo? "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Sep 04 16:43:52 2006 Subject: XML Document Object is NOT a struct? So, as per the docs for XMLNew, "An XML document object is represented in ColdFusion as a structure." This doesn't seem to be true though. I have an xml string I've parsed into an XML document object and I can't access it with any of the structure functions. I know there are other ways to access it and that's what I'm doing, but when I saw that line in the docs I got excited and was then disappointed when isStruct and structFind. falied to work. Am I insane, or is this just an error in the docs? Thanks, Ken Ferguson 214.636.6126 ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251980 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
