[cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-24 Thread nkosi
Hi All,

Can anyone point me to the 'alpha alpha alpha' Galaxy repo. I'd like
to take a gander.

I have been looking into SOA (well SOA-lite) for our internally hosted
web applications. We have CF, PHP, .Net applications and have had real
issues with cross compitability from WSDL generation to datatype
mismatches to SOAP Headers vs HTTP Headers and a few others. All of
which, I hasten to add, I have solved ... to a degree :)

I have looked at Sean Corfield's endpoint.cfc as a potential RESTful
adapter to our CF apps which solves some compatibility issues.

Hey, who knows, maybe I can contribute ... which'll be a first.

Cheers
Glen

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



Re: [cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-24 Thread Mark Mandel
Found it -
http://trac.rocketboots.com/os/wiki/GalaxySoa

Mark

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, nkosi glenrainb...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Can anyone point me to the 'alpha alpha alpha' Galaxy repo. I'd like
 to take a gander.

 I have been looking into SOA (well SOA-lite) for our internally hosted
 web applications. We have CF, PHP, .Net applications and have had real
 issues with cross compitability from WSDL generation to datatype
 mismatches to SOAP Headers vs HTTP Headers and a few others. All of
 which, I hasten to add, I have solved ... to a degree :)

 I have looked at Sean Corfield's endpoint.cfc as a potential RESTful
 adapter to our CF apps which solves some compatibility issues.

 Hey, who knows, maybe I can contribute ... which'll be a first.

 Cheers
 Glen

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 cfaussie group.
 To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcfaussie%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.




-- 
E: mark.man...@gmail.com
T: http://www.twitter.com/neurotic
W: www.compoundtheory.com

Hands-on ColdFusion ORM Training @ cf.Objective() 2010
www.ColdFusionOrmTraining.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



Re: [cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-24 Thread Robin Hilliard
On 25/03/2010, at 10:22 AM, Mark Mandel wrote:

 Found it -
 http://trac.rocketboots.com/os/wiki/GalaxySoa
 
 Mark
 
 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, nkosi glenrainb...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 Can anyone point me to the 'alpha alpha alpha' Galaxy repo. I'd like
 to take a gander.

Hi Glen (and thanks Mark),

I'll keep that link at the bottom of the page pointing at the latest alpha - 
it's just ticked over to 0.8, which includes local failover of service 
instances.

Note that the remote part of Galaxy is just standard cfc under the web root 
(remoting, web service, json, wddx) - the difference to the developer is that 
when you're calling a remote version of the service you actually use an 
instance of the service cfc rather than an instance of a webservice.

Please feel free to check it out and contribute - like I said, it's so out 
there that it's really going to take some good community feedback to turn it 
into something really useful.

Cheers,
Robin

 
ROBIN HILLIARD
Chief Technology Officer
ro...@rocketboots.com.au

RocketBoots Pty Ltd
Level 11
189 Kent Street
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
Phone +61 2 9323 2507
Facsimile +61 2 9323 2501
Mobile +61 418 414 341
www.rocketboots.com.au   
 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



Re: [cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-24 Thread AJ Mercer
Hi Robin,

Will you be showing this off at webDU?


On 25 March 2010 07:49, Robin Hilliard ro...@rocketboots.com.au wrote:

 On 25/03/2010, at 10:22 AM, Mark Mandel wrote:

 Found it -
 http://trac.rocketboots.com/os/wiki/GalaxySoa

 Mark

 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, nkosi glenrainb...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 Can anyone point me to the 'alpha alpha alpha' Galaxy repo. I'd like
 to take a gander.


 Hi Glen (and thanks Mark),

 I'll keep that link at the bottom of the page pointing at the latest alpha
 - it's just ticked over to 0.8, which includes local failover of service
 instances.

 Note that the remote part of Galaxy is just standard cfc under the web root
 (remoting, web service, json, wddx) - the difference to the developer is
 that when you're calling a remote version of the service you actually use an
 instance of the service cfc rather than an instance of a webservice.

 Please feel free to check it out and contribute - like I said, it's so out
 there that it's really going to take some good community feedback to turn it
 into something really useful.

 Cheers,
 Robin

 *ROBIN HILLIARD*
 *Chief Technology Officer*
 ro...@rocketboots.com.au

 RocketBoots Pty Ltd
 Level 11
 189 Kent Street
 Sydney NSW 2001
 Australia
 *Phone* +61 2 9323 2507
 *Facsimile* +61 2 9323 2501
 *Mobile* +61 418 414 341
 www.rocketboots.com.au



  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 cfaussie group.
 To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcfaussie%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.




-- 

AJ Mercer
http://webonix.net
http://twitter.com/webonix

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



Re: [cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-24 Thread Robin Hilliard
Funnily enough, at the time I was putting in my talk details it looked like I 
was going to be writing requirements documents all year (ah, the perks of high 
office) so I'm talking about requirements :-).  It will still be an 
earth-shatterlingly good presentation, of course...

Robin
 
ROBIN HILLIARD
Chief Technology Officer
ro...@rocketboots.com.au

RocketBoots Pty Ltd
Level 11
189 Kent Street
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
Phone +61 2 9323 2507
Facsimile +61 2 9323 2501
Mobile +61 418 414 341
www.rocketboots.com.au   
 

On 25/03/2010, at 1:13 PM, AJ Mercer wrote:

 Hi Robin,
 
 Will you be showing this off at webDU?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



[cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Robertson
Gavin, really pleased to see you got so much out of Robin's
presentation.
I would really urge you to speak with Robin regarding the readiness of
the code; as Robin says, it's experimental and alpha.
I'm assuming you're anticipating that by the time you're ready to go
into production, Galaxy will also be up for prime time?
So, not intending to discourage in any way, just signalling that there
is some risk that Galaxy may not get to release.

Cheers


Peter

On Mar 23, 2:01 pm, Gavin Baumanis beauecli...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Everyone,

 As a result of the Melbourne CFUG meeting last week, the company I
 work for has decided to some development work with Robins Galaxy code.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



[cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-22 Thread Gavin Baumanis


On Mar 23, 3:00 pm, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
 Didn't Robin say this was alpha,alpha,alpha? ;o)

Yup he did say that...


 All sounds pretty nifty though - good luck with it all.

To anyone was there will know that there was some discussion after the
end of the PUG surounding what framework is best for me; how do you
choose which one of the many to invest your time in?

But the promise of what galaxy can be and the ability that it
currently has - really struck a chord with me and seems to provide an
appropriate avenue for us to wrap our old application up and treat it
as a service for our new versin to consume. Robin and I have had a
quick phone call since and he did point out that I didn't require
Galaxy at all to the wrapping - but we have discussed it in house a
fair bit over the last couple days and everyone sees it as being
something to invest time into.

Hopefully by the time it makes it out of alpha, we'll know all there
is to know about it.
We'll have managed to contribute to it and finally,
We'll have allowed ourselves to provide a workable roadmap towards
abonding our dodgy old code-base and having an appropriately
architected application that inherently lends itself to code-reuse and
scalabaility.

I'm sure there will be pitfalls and setbacks - and I'll be certan to
share and ask for help!

 Mark

 On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Gavin Baumanis beauecli...@gmail.comwrote:



  Hi Everyone,

  As a result of the Melbourne CFUG meeting last week, the company I
  work for has decided to some development work with Robins Galaxy code.

  The use-case we have for wanting to use it two fold.
  Wrap an existing application into a service and consume that in a
  brand new aplication.
  and lastly to increase the modularity of our current application.

  The last point we already do for the most part.
  We write patient Management Software that is used in New Zealand and
  Australia.
  For the most part the applications are the same but there are some
  significant differences between the two locations.

  Thankfully, we already have a  separate Administration application for
  each install.
  We have a separate referral application for each install, etc.
  But this separation was more by fluke than good design and is internal
  to each install of the overall application package.
  So, for example, we have 15 copies of the referral application - one
  for each install.

  By being service oriented, we hope to replace the 15 versions of the
  referral application with two (one for AU and one for NZ).

  Similarly we hope to replace the authentication processes used by our
  application into a single authentication service that can be wired
  into any of our applications and we thought that this service would be
  a good candidate for us to use as our learning tool.

  The reason for writing here is;
  a) Lift the profile of the Galaxy OS project
  b) Solicit input into what people see as being required in the
  authentication service.

  Currently we're thinking of;
   - allow user authentication via DB username / password matching
   - as above but with LDAP
   - as above but with OpenId

  So our user authentication public method would have an argument for
  authentication type and then subsequent arguments that would be
  required for each of the suppoted authenticated types and it would
  simply return a boolean for whether or not the authentication was
  successful.

  There is also a requirement around expired passwords / grace logins  /
  intruder detection etc for directory servies enabled authentication
  methods.

  And if we get around to supporting Openid - then a simple boolean is
  not an appropriate return.

  We already have the code for this (LDAP / grace login testing /
  processing) - but is it appropriate to place this code in the service
  or is that best left in the home application.

  And, of course - certainly please feel free to comletely disagree - we
  don;t pretend to have all the answers.

  Gavin.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  cfaussie group.
  To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcfaussie%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.

 --
 E: mark.man...@gmail.com
 T:http://www.twitter.com/neurotic
 W:www.compoundtheory.com

 Hands-on ColdFusion ORM Training @ cf.Objective() 
 2010www.ColdFusionOrmTraining.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.



[cfaussie] Re: RocketBoots - Galaxy

2010-03-22 Thread Gavin Baumanis
Hi Scott,
I work for a company called PalCare, we provide a web-based PMS for
comunity-based palliative care in AU and hospice and community based
palliative care in NZ.
Feel free to ping me here or off-list for anything specific.

Gavin.

On Mar 23, 3:10 pm, Scott Thornton
scott.thorn...@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au wrote:
 Hi,

 What's the name of the PMS? and who do you work for if you don't mind me 
 asking?

 being in health myself... and doing cf, didn't think there where many 
 people out there like us

 Scott Thornton, Centralised Billing Unit
 Hunter-New England Area Health Service
 ext: 53358 p: +61 02 498 53358 m: 0413 800 242

  Gavin Baumanis beauecli...@gmail.com 23/03/2010 2:01 pm 

 Hi Everyone,

 As a result of the Melbourne CFUG meeting last week, the company I
 work for has decided to some development work with Robins Galaxy code.

 The use-case we have for wanting to use it two fold.
 Wrap an existing application into a service and consume that in a
 brand new aplication.
 and lastly to increase the modularity of our current application.

 The last point we already do for the most part.
 We write patient Management Software that is used in New Zealand and
 Australia.
 For the most part the applications are the same but there are some
 significant differences between the two locations.

 Thankfully, we already have a  separate Administration application for
 each install.
 We have a separate referral application for each install, etc.
 But this separation was more by fluke than good design and is internal
 to each install of the overall application package.
 So, for example, we have 15 copies of the referral application - one
 for each install.

 By being service oriented, we hope to replace the 15 versions of the
 referral application with two (one for AU and one for NZ).

 Similarly we hope to replace the authentication processes used by our
 application into a single authentication service that can be wired
 into any of our applications and we thought that this service would be
 a good candidate for us to use as our learning tool.

 The reason for writing here is;
 a) Lift the profile of the Galaxy OS project
 b) Solicit input into what people see as being required in the
 authentication service.

 Currently we're thinking of;
  - allow user authentication via DB username / password matching
  - as above but with LDAP
  - as above but with OpenId

 So our user authentication public method would have an argument for
 authentication type and then subsequent arguments that would be
 required for each of the suppoted authenticated types and it would
 simply return a boolean for whether or not the authentication was
 successful.

 There is also a requirement around expired passwords / grace logins  /
 intruder detection etc for directory servies enabled authentication
 methods.

 And if we get around to supporting Openid - then a simple boolean is
 not an appropriate return.

 We already have the code for this (LDAP / grace login testing /
 processing) - but is it appropriate to place this code in the service
 or is that best left in the home application.

 And, of course - certainly please feel free to comletely disagree - we
 don;t pretend to have all the answers.

 Gavin.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 cfaussie group.
 To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.