dim created this revision.
dim added reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists.
dim added subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits.
Some parts of the FreeBSD tree are still compiled with C++98, and until
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL288554 this has always worked fine. After that, a
complaint about the
newly introduced local _PairT is produced:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:3354:27: error: template argument uses local type
'_PairT' [-Werror,-Wlocal-type-template-args]
typedef __scalar_hash<_PairT> _HashT;
^~
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:3284:29: error: template argument uses local type
'_PairT' [-Werror,-Wlocal-type-template-args]
: public unary_function<_Tp, size_t>
^~~
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:3356:12: note: in instantiation of template class
'std::__1::__scalar_hash<_PairT, 2>' requested here
return _HashT()(__p);
^
As far as I can see, there should be no problem moving the _PairT
struct to just before the __hash_combine() function, which fixes this
particular warning.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28472
Files:
include/memory
Index: include/memory
===
--- include/memory
+++ include/memory
@@ -3344,12 +3344,13 @@
}
};
+struct _PairT {
+ size_t first;
+ size_t second;
+};
+
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
inline size_t __hash_combine(size_t __lhs, size_t __rhs) _NOEXCEPT {
-struct _PairT {
- size_t first;
- size_t second;
-};
typedef __scalar_hash<_PairT> _HashT;
const _PairT __p = {__lhs, __rhs};
return _HashT()(__p);
Index: include/memory
===
--- include/memory
+++ include/memory
@@ -3344,12 +3344,13 @@
}
};
+struct _PairT {
+ size_t first;
+ size_t second;
+};
+
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
inline size_t __hash_combine(size_t __lhs, size_t __rhs) _NOEXCEPT {
-struct _PairT {
- size_t first;
- size_t second;
-};
typedef __scalar_hash<_PairT> _HashT;
const _PairT __p = {__lhs, __rhs};
return _HashT()(__p);
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits