[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2020-01-24 Thread Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG80fd37f9d66e: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return value 
modeling for XNU lock functions. (authored by dergachev.a).
Herald added subscribers: Charusso, dkrupp, donat.nagy, jfb, Szelethus, 
mikhail.ramalho, rnkovacs, szepet, baloghadamsoftware.
Herald added a project: clang.

Changed prior to commit:
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806?vs=115029&id=240197#toc

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806

Files:
  clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
  clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h


Index: clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
===
--- clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
+++ clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
 extern int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t  *mutex, const 
pthread_mutexattr_t *mutexattr);
-extern int lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+
+typedef int boolean_t;
+extern void lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern void lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern boolean_t lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
 extern void lck_mtx_destroy(lck_mtx_t *lck, lck_grp_t *grp);
Index: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
===
--- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
+++ clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
@@ -226,12 +226,6 @@
   if (sym)
 state = resolvePossiblyDestroyedMutex(state, lockR, sym);
 
-  SVal X = C.getSVal(CE);
-  if (X.isUnknownOrUndef())
-return;
-
-  DefinedSVal retVal = X.castAs();
-
   if (const LockState *LState = state->get(lockR)) {
 if (LState->isLocked()) {
   if (!BT_doublelock)
@@ -254,25 +248,35 @@
   ProgramStateRef lockSucc = state;
   if (isTryLock) {
 // Bifurcate the state, and allow a mode where the lock acquisition fails.
-ProgramStateRef lockFail;
-switch (semantics) {
-case PthreadSemantics:
-  std::tie(lockFail, lockSucc) = state->assume(retVal);
-  break;
-case XNUSemantics:
-  std::tie(lockSucc, lockFail) = state->assume(retVal);
-  break;
-default:
-  llvm_unreachable("Unknown tryLock locking semantics");
+SVal RetVal = state->getSVal(CE, C.getLocationContext());
+if (auto DefinedRetVal = RetVal.getAs()) {
+  ProgramStateRef lockFail;
+  switch (semantics) {
+  case PthreadSemantics:
+std::tie(lockFail, lockSucc) = state->assume(*DefinedRetVal);
+break;
+  case XNUSemantics:
+std::tie(lockSucc, lockFail) = state->assume(*DefinedRetVal);
+break;
+  default:
+llvm_unreachable("Unknown tryLock locking semantics");
+  }
+  assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
+  C.addTransition(lockFail);
 }
-assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
-C.addTransition(lockFail);
-
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.
   } else if (semantics == PthreadSemantics) {
 // Assume that the return value was 0.
-lockSucc = state->assume(retVal, false);
-assert(lockSucc);
-
+SVal RetVal = state->getSVal(CE, C.getLocationContext());
+if (auto DefinedRetVal = RetVal.getAs()) {
+  // FIXME: If the lock function was inlined and returned true,
+  // we need to behave sanely - at least generate sink.
+  lockSucc = state->assume(*DefinedRetVal, false);
+  assert(lockSucc);
+}
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.
   } else {
 // XNU locking semantics return void on non-try locks
 assert((semantics == XNUSemantics) && "Unknown locking semantics");


Index: clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
===
--- clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
+++ clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
 extern int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t  *mutex, const pthread_mutexattr_t *mutexattr);
-extern int lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+
+typedef int boolean_t;
+extern void lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern void lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern boolean_t lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
 exte

[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2017-11-28 Thread Aleksei Sidorin via Phabricator via cfe-commits
a.sidorin accepted this revision.
a.sidorin added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Looks good to me.




Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp:271
 }
-assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
-C.addTransition(lockFail);
-
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.

NoQ wrote:
> zaks.anna wrote:
> > This comment is repeated several times...
> Because it is relevant in both places. Should i rephrase with "also"/"as 
> well"/"here too"?
Small rephrasing will be good because it will clearly state that it is not a 
copy-paste error :)


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2017-11-28 Thread Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
NoQ added a comment.

Hey wb! Get well :)




Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp:282
+}
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.

a.sidorin wrote:
> TODO?
That'd make a terrible project of choice for people grepping for TODOs and 
FIXMEs, so I guess rather not.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2017-11-13 Thread Aleksei Sidorin via Phabricator via cfe-commits
a.sidorin added a comment.

Hi Artem,

Sorry for long delay for reviews. Unfortunately, hospital is a bad place to do 
a code review and broken hand is a bad review assistant. This patch looks good 
to me, I have just a minor comment nit.




Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp:282
+}
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.

TODO?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2017-09-17 Thread Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
NoQ added inline comments.



Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp:271
 }
-assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
-C.addTransition(lockFail);
-
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.

zaks.anna wrote:
> This comment is repeated several times...
Because it is relevant in both places. Should i rephrase with "also"/"as 
well"/"here too"?



Comment at: test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h:29
+extern void lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern boolean_t lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
 extern void lck_mtx_destroy(lck_mtx_t *lck, lck_grp_t *grp);

zaks.anna wrote:
> Should there be a test added that uses the function?
The tests are already there for all three functions. I just fixed their 
prototype to match the real-world prototype, and then adjusted the code 
accordingly, so that the existing tests kept passing.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2017-09-13 Thread Anna Zaks via Phabricator via cfe-commits
zaks.anna added inline comments.



Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp:271
 }
-assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
-C.addTransition(lockFail);
-
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.

This comment is repeated several times...



Comment at: test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h:29
+extern void lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern boolean_t lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
 extern void lck_mtx_destroy(lck_mtx_t *lck, lck_grp_t *grp);

Should there be a test added that uses the function?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D37806: [analyzer] PthreadLock: Fix return values of XNU lock functions.

2017-09-13 Thread Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
NoQ created this revision.

`lck_mtx_lock()` returns `void`. The analyzer failed to model its effect 
because he was surprised that the return value is `Unknown`. Prepare for the 
aforementioned surprise and fix the tests accordingly.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D37806

Files:
  lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
  test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h


Index: test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
===
--- test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
+++ test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
 extern int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t  *mutex, const 
pthread_mutexattr_t *mutexattr);
-extern int lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+
+typedef int boolean_t;
+extern void lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern void lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern boolean_t lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
 extern void lck_mtx_destroy(lck_mtx_t *lck, lck_grp_t *grp);
Index: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
===
--- lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
+++ lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
@@ -230,12 +230,6 @@
   if (sym)
 state = resolvePossiblyDestroyedMutex(state, lockR, sym);
 
-  SVal X = state->getSVal(CE, C.getLocationContext());
-  if (X.isUnknownOrUndef())
-return;
-
-  DefinedSVal retVal = X.castAs();
-
   if (const LockState *LState = state->get(lockR)) {
 if (LState->isLocked()) {
   if (!BT_doublelock)
@@ -258,25 +252,35 @@
   ProgramStateRef lockSucc = state;
   if (isTryLock) {
 // Bifurcate the state, and allow a mode where the lock acquisition fails.
-ProgramStateRef lockFail;
-switch (semantics) {
-case PthreadSemantics:
-  std::tie(lockFail, lockSucc) = state->assume(retVal);
-  break;
-case XNUSemantics:
-  std::tie(lockSucc, lockFail) = state->assume(retVal);
-  break;
-default:
-  llvm_unreachable("Unknown tryLock locking semantics");
+SVal RetVal = state->getSVal(CE, C.getLocationContext());
+if (auto DefinedRetVal = RetVal.getAs()) {
+  ProgramStateRef lockFail;
+  switch (semantics) {
+  case PthreadSemantics:
+std::tie(lockFail, lockSucc) = state->assume(*DefinedRetVal);
+break;
+  case XNUSemantics:
+std::tie(lockSucc, lockFail) = state->assume(*DefinedRetVal);
+break;
+  default:
+llvm_unreachable("Unknown tryLock locking semantics");
+  }
+  assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
+  C.addTransition(lockFail);
 }
-assert(lockFail && lockSucc);
-C.addTransition(lockFail);
-
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.
   } else if (semantics == PthreadSemantics) {
 // Assume that the return value was 0.
-lockSucc = state->assume(retVal, false);
-assert(lockSucc);
-
+SVal RetVal = state->getSVal(CE, C.getLocationContext());
+if (auto DefinedRetVal = RetVal.getAs()) {
+  // FIXME: If the lock function was inlined and returned true,
+  // we need to behave sanely - at least generate sink.
+  lockSucc = state->assume(*DefinedRetVal, false);
+  assert(lockSucc);
+}
+// We might want to handle the case when the mutex lock function was 
inlined
+// and returned an Unknown or Undefined value.
   } else {
 // XNU locking semantics return void on non-try locks
 assert((semantics == XNUSemantics) && "Unknown locking semantics");


Index: test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
===
--- test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
+++ test/Analysis/Inputs/system-header-simulator-for-pthread-lock.h
@@ -22,7 +22,9 @@
 extern int pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *);
 extern int pthread_mutex_init(pthread_mutex_t  *mutex, const pthread_mutexattr_t *mutexattr);
-extern int lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
-extern int lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+
+typedef int boolean_t;
+extern void lck_mtx_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern void lck_mtx_unlock(lck_mtx_t *);
+extern boolean_t lck_mtx_try_lock(lck_mtx_t *);
 extern void lck_mtx_destroy(lck_mtx_t *lck, lck_grp_t *grp);
Index: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
===
--- lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
+++ lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/PthreadLockChecker.cpp
@@ -230,12 +230,6 @@
   if (sym)
 state = resolvePossiblyDest