[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-23 Thread Hamza Sood via Phabricator via cfe-commits
hamzasood updated this revision to Diff 156857.
hamzasood added a comment.

- Made the suggested test changes.

The compiler is meant to create these; Clang doesn't do this yet but I'm 
working on the implementation.

I was under the impression that the compiler support would require the library 
stuff to land first, but I just checked Clang's coroutine tests and it looks 
like they include their own coroutine header so it doesn't depend on the 
library. I suppose the same thing can happen here, in which case I agree it's 
probably best to put this on hold in the meantime.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647

Files:
  include/contract
  include/module.modulemap
  test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
  test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
  test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp

Index: test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp
===
--- test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp
+++ test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
+
+// 
+// class contract_violation
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+using CV = std::contract_violation;
+
+// Check for noexcept.
+static_assert(noexcept(std::declval().line_number()));
+static_assert(noexcept(std::declval().file_name()));
+static_assert(noexcept(std::declval().function_name()));
+static_assert(noexcept(std::declval().comment()));
+static_assert(noexcept(std::declval().assertion_level()));
+
+// Check return types.
+static_assert(std::is_same_v().line_number()),
+ std::uint_least32_t>);
+static_assert(std::is_same_v().file_name()),
+ std::string_view>);
+static_assert(std::is_same_v().function_name()),
+ std::string_view>);
+static_assert(std::is_same_v().comment()),
+ std::string_view>);
+static_assert(std::is_same_v().assertion_level()),
+ std::string_view>);
+
+int main()
+{
+}
Index: test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
===
--- test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
+++ test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
+
+// 
+
+#include 
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_VERSION
+#error _LIBCPP_VERSION not defined
+#endif
+
+int main()
+{
+}
Index: test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
===
--- test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
+++ test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
Index: include/module.modulemap
===
--- include/module.modulemap
+++ include/module.modulemap
@@ -255,6 +255,10 @@
 header "condition_variable"
 export *
   }
+  module contract {
+header "contract"
+export *
+  }
   module deque {
 header "deque"
 export initializer_list
Index: include/contract
===
--- include/contract
+++ include/contract
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===-- contract --===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
+#define _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
+
+/*
+contract synopsis
+
+namespace std {
+  class contract_violation {
+  public:
+uint_least32_t line_number() const noexcept;
+string_view file_name() const noexcept;
+string_view function_name() const noexcept;
+string_view comment() const noexcept;
+string_view assertion_level() const noexcept;
+  };
+}
+*/
+
+#include <__config>
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#ifndef 

[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-23 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists added inline comments.



Comment at: test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp:9
+//===--===//
+
+// 

All the tests need `// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17`


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-23 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists added a comment.

I'd like to be clear that I'm not against using `ASSERT_NOEXCEPT` or 
`ASSERT_SAME_TYPE` - that's fine.
But I'd rather you use `declval<>` - which is only useful in an unevaluated 
context, rather than having a function that takes a parameter - which someone 
might actually call.

Also, then you can move all the tests into `main` and get rid of the function.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-23 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists added a comment.

> Testing whether it's actually hooked up correctly is quite problematic; it 
> isn't meant to be instantiable. What's the best way to proceed with this?

The compiler is supposed to create these - right?
Does clang currently do this?

- If not, we should wait for them to catch up.
- If so, then we should have tests that have a contract violation, and pass 
these around.

Since the method for hooking up a CV proc is implementation-defined, those 
tests will probably have to go into `test/libcxx`.




Comment at: 
test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp:27
+
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.line_number());
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.file_name());

You can do this better with static_assert and declval:

   static_assert(noexcept(std::declval().line_number()), "");

and same with the types:

   static_assert(std::is_same_v().line_number()>, std::uint_least32_t>, "");


(It's shorter to write `using CV = const contract_violation;` and then 
`declval()`)



https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-23 Thread Hamza Sood via Phabricator via cfe-commits
hamzasood updated this revision to Diff 156808.
hamzasood added a comment.

- Added a missing visibility attribute.
- Added a simple test that type-checks the expected public interface.

Testing whether it's actually hooked up correctly is quite problematic; it 
isn't meant to be instantiable. What's the best way to proceed with this?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647

Files:
  include/contract
  include/module.modulemap
  test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
  test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
  test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp

Index: test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp
===
--- test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp
+++ test/std/language.support/support.contract/contract_violation.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
+
+// 
+// class contract_violation
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#include "test_macros.h"
+
+// Check that the expected public members exist and have the required type.
+// The contract_violation is taken as a const reference, which ensures that the
+// member functions we access are marked as const.
+void check_public_member_types(const std::contract_violation ) {
+  (void)violation;
+
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.line_number());
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.file_name());
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.function_name());
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.comment());
+  ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(violation.assertion_level());
+
+  ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(violation.line_number()), std::uint_least32_t);
+  ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(violation.file_name()), std::string_view);
+  ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(violation.function_name()), std::string_view);
+  ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(violation.comment()), std::string_view);
+  ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(decltype(violation.assertion_level()), std::string_view);
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+}
Index: test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
===
--- test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
+++ test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+// 
+
+#include 
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_VERSION
+#error _LIBCPP_VERSION not defined
+#endif
+
+int main()
+{
+}
Index: test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
===
--- test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
+++ test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
Index: include/module.modulemap
===
--- include/module.modulemap
+++ include/module.modulemap
@@ -255,6 +255,10 @@
 header "condition_variable"
 export *
   }
+  module contract {
+header "contract"
+export *
+  }
   module deque {
 header "deque"
 export initializer_list
Index: include/contract
===
--- include/contract
+++ include/contract
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===-- contract --===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
+#define _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
+
+/*
+contract synopsis
+
+namespace std {
+  class contract_violation {
+  public:
+uint_least32_t line_number() const noexcept;
+string_view file_name() const noexcept;
+string_view function_name() const noexcept;
+string_view comment() const noexcept;
+string_view assertion_level() const noexcept;
+  };
+}
+*/
+
+#include <__config>
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER
+#pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17
+
+class _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS contract_violation {
+public:
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY uint_least32_t line_number() const noexcept { 

[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-22 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists added a comment.

I get that lib++ will not make these things, but we still need some tests 
showing that the whole machinery works.


Repository:
  rCXX libc++

https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-22 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists added a comment.

Thanks for doing this, but it needs tests before it can land.
If I were to define `class contract_violation {};` that would pass the tests 
you've provided.
(Heck, if I removed the entire definition of `contract_violation`, it would 
still pass.)




Comment at: include/contract:41
+
+class contract_violation {
+public:

Needs `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS`


Repository:
  rCXX libc++

https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[PATCH] D49647: [libcxx] Library support for contracts (C++2a)

2018-07-22 Thread Hamza Sood via Phabricator via cfe-commits
hamzasood created this revision.
hamzasood added reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, rsmith.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, ldionne, christof.

This patch adds the library components needed for contracts in C++2a.

The wording says that a contract_violation object is populated in an 
implementation-defined manner. A private constructor that the compiler can call 
seems like the most sensible (and obvious) solution.


Repository:
  rCXX libc++

https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647

Files:
  include/contract
  include/module.modulemap
  test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
  test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp

Index: test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
===
--- test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
+++ test/libcxx/language.support/support.contract/version.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+// 
+
+#include 
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_VERSION
+#error _LIBCPP_VERSION not defined
+#endif
+
+int main()
+{
+}
Index: test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
===
--- test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
+++ test/libcxx/double_include.sh.cpp
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
Index: include/module.modulemap
===
--- include/module.modulemap
+++ include/module.modulemap
@@ -255,6 +255,10 @@
 header "condition_variable"
 export *
   }
+  module contract {
+header "contract"
+export *
+  }
   module deque {
 header "deque"
 export initializer_list
Index: include/contract
===
--- include/contract
+++ include/contract
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===-- contract --===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
+// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===--===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
+#define _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
+
+/*
+contract synopsis
+
+namespace std {
+  class contract_violation {
+  public:
+uint_least32_t line_number() const noexcept;
+string_view file_name() const noexcept;
+string_view function_name() const noexcept;
+string_view comment() const noexcept;
+string_view assertion_level() const noexcept;
+  };
+}
+*/
+
+#include <__config>
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER
+#pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17
+
+class contract_violation {
+public:
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY uint_least32_t line_number() const noexcept { return __line_number; }
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY string_view file_name() const noexcept { return __file_name; }
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY string_view function_name() const noexcept { return __function_name; }
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY string_view comment() const noexcept { return __comment; }
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY string_view assertion_level() const noexcept { return __assertion_level; }
+
+private:
+  _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+  constexpr contract_violation(uint_least32_t __line, string_view __file, string_view __fn,
+   string_view __comment, string_view __lvl) noexcept
+  : __line_number(__line), __file_name(__file), __function_name(__fn),
+__comment(__comment), __assertion_level(__lvl) {}
+
+  uint_least32_t __line_number;
+  string_view __file_name;
+  string_view __function_name;
+  string_view __comment;
+  string_view __assertion_level;
+};
+
+#endif // _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17
+
+_LIBCPP_END_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+#endif // _LIBCPP_CONTRACT
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits