Re: [musl] Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: Add support for musl-libc on Linux

[Szabolcs Nagy via cfe-commits]

* Lei Zhang  [2016-06-20 18:59:20 +0800]:
> 2016-06-20 17:37 GMT+08:00 Peter Smith :
> > - isTargetEHABICompatible()
> > I'm making the assumption that musl supports the ARM exceptions EHABI,
> > if so you'll want to add MUSL and MUSLHF here.
> 
> I'm not 100% sure about this. Could some insider from musl confirm this?

musl is ehabi agnostic.

ehabi and libc should be independent.

throwing exceptions across libc boundary is undefined
behaviour, all ehabi support is in the compiler runtime.
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Re: [musl] Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: Add support for musl-libc on Linux

[Szabolcs Nagy via cfe-commits]

* Rafael Esp?ndola  [2016-06-13 17:00:17 -0400]:
> Do you need someone to commit it for you?
> On Jun 13, 2016 9:50 AM, "Lei Zhang via cfe-commits" <
> > http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/plain/main/clang/clang-0004-Add-musl-targets-and-dynamic-linker.patch
> >
> > This looks neat :)

the dynamic linker names need to be updated (ppc64*, mips64*
mips*-sf are missing) and it defaults to x86_64 which can
be bad.

there is some musl setting already for mips in the driver
which should probably be fixed.
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits