Yes, indeed. The code in clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp makes that
–march is always parsed, leaving out /arch unused, no matter in which order
they appear.
De : Nico Weber
Envoyé : 10 septembre 2018 12:14
À : reviews+d51806+public+c25b17a1aa94d...@reviews.llvm.org; Senthil Kumar
Selvaraj via Phabricator
Cc : Alexandre Ganea ; cfe-commits
Objet : Re: [PATCH] D51806: [clang-cl] Enable -march
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:33 AM Hans Wennborg via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
hans added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51806#1228893, @aganea wrote:
> @hans Just an after thought: maybe we should prevent usage of `-march=` and
> `/arch:` at the same time. What do you think? I can add another patch for
> that purpose.
Hmm, yes, at least we should warn or do something smart. Currently it doesn't
look like they'd interact well together in x86::getX86TargetCPU
Wouldn't you get an "unused arg" for /arch if you use -march and /arch at the
same time?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51806
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org<mailto:cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits