Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix isnormal() on Mingw, restore tests (fixing #1062 properly)
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:25:07AM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Unfortunately it doesn't work for me. I get Error: assertion failed: (equal? 1.0 (numerator 0.0)) (library tests) for both mingw and mingw-msys (Windows XP 32bit). Thanks for testing. This is very strange. Either one of us messed up or it's a Windows XP-specific issue. Can you try under Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8? Official support for XP ends this April. So I think we shouldn't support it either, and it's not worth testing under. You can download a free as in beer Windows VM for testing purposes in various VM formats from http://www.modern.ie Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix isnormal() on Mingw, restore tests (fixing #1062 properly)
On Feb 23, 2014, at 4:48 AM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi all, While investigating how to make isnormal() work on Solaris (but before figuring out we need to define __C99FEATURES__), I came across an alternate solution involving __builting_isnormal, which apparently is a GCC builtin that performs the same function as the isnormal() macro defined in math.h. This builtin seems to work properly on Mingw, so I think it's safe to undefine the broken isnormal and replace it with the builtin one Passes check w/ MacOS 10.9 on Windows. Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net 0001-Fix-isnormal-problem-on-MingW-by-using-gcc-builtin-i.patch___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
