[Chicken-users] ANN: new eggs, pthreads and sqlite3pth
Hi all, two new eggs for the coop. Beware: requires recent chicken from git master to run reliably. pthreads: maintains a pool of pthreads sqlite3pth: yet another sqlite3 driver. Offloads sqlite queries to pthreads. Supports sqlite3 VFS to call back to chicken for blocks. Documentation is currently only at github: https://github.com/0-8-15/sqlite3pth not very interesting, just a dependency for the former: https://github.com/0-8-15/sqlite3pth Release-infos: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/pthreads/master/pthreads.release-info https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/sqlite3pth/master/sqlite3pth.release-info Have fun /Jörg ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] functor implementation of bindings egg
Hi all, the bindings egg is now implemented with a functor, so that you can replace the default dispatch table, which destructures mixed nested lists, vectors, strings and additional sequence types. For example, you might need lists only. In that case, you simply import list-bindings instead of bindings, circumventing dispatch alltogether. Note also, that I've changed the syntax of the where clause to be in sync with the procedural-macros egg: Fenders are now of the form (var ok? ...) so that one pattern variable, var, can be checked by zero or more predicates, ok? ... Cheers Juergen -- Dr. Juergen Lorenz Flensburger Str. 12 10557 Berlin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] A question regarding "hidden" eggs
Hi, I feel the need to have some space to stash away temporary glue code. Ideally the current version of it is always empty and not of interest to anyone. As documentation always lags behind, it is empty with high probability. However development is not ideal. Not listing as in being marked as "(hidden)" in the meta file is apparently what I want. Q: Would creating an egg at https://github.com/0-8-15/9-3 and informing @Mario be the way to go? Thanks /Jörg ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] functor implementation of bindings egg
Could you perhaps motivate with some sample code? Thanks, -Dan Juergen Lorenzwrites: > Hi all, > > the bindings egg is now implemented with a functor, so that you can > replace the default dispatch table, which destructures mixed nested > lists, vectors, strings and additional sequence types. For example, > you might need lists only. In that case, you simply import list-bindings > instead of bindings, circumventing dispatch alltogether. > > Note also, that I've changed the syntax of the where clause to be in > sync with the procedural-macros egg: Fenders are now of the form > (var ok? ...) > so that one pattern variable, var, can be checked by zero or more > predicates, ok? ... > > Cheers > Juergen signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users