Re: [Chicken-users] SRFIs in Chicken 5

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

Hi Sven,

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:50:51 +0200 (CEST) Sven Hartrumpf  
wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Is there a Chicken 5 version of the following
> document, which seems to belong to Chicken 4 (?):
>
> http://wiki.call-cc.org/SRFI-conformance

/SRFI-conformance is probably outdated (maybe it should be removed).

http://wiki.call-cc.org/supported-standards probably reflects better the
current state of SRFI support in CHICKEN.

All the best.
Mario
-- 
http://parenteses.org/mario

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.1.0 release candidate available

[Thomas Chust]

On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:07:34 +0200 Peter Bex  wrote:

> [...]
> CHICKEN 5.1.0rc1 is now available at this location:
> https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2019/06/08/chicken-5.1.0rc1.tar.gz
> [...]
> Please give it a test and report your findings to the mailing list.
> [...]

Hello,

testing the release candidate was successful in my environment :-)

Operating system: Linux Mint 18.3 (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS derivative)
Hardware platform: x86-64
C Compiler: GCC 9.1.0
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: yes
Installation of eggs works?: yes

The protobuf egg required another patch to work correctly with the changes 
regarding keywords and symbols, but that was a quick fix and a new version 
should soon be available for installation.

Ciao,
Thomas


--
Time only waits for black holes.

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

[Chicken-users] SRFIs in Chicken 5

[Sven Hartrumpf]

Hi.

Is there a Chicken 5 version of the following
document, which seems to belong to Chicken 4 (?):

http://wiki.call-cc.org/SRFI-conformance

Ciao
Sven

___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.1.0 release candidate available

[Alexander Shendi (Web.DE)]

Operating system: NetBSD 8.99.42
Hardware platform: arm64 aka aarch64 
C Compiler: GCC 7.4.0 (nb3 2019 03 19) 
Installation works?: yes 
Tests work?: yes (exit status 0)
Installation of eggs works?: (r7rs egg) yes

Best Regards,

Alexander 

Am 8. Juni 2019 15:07:34 MESZ schrieb Peter Bex :
>Hello everyone,
>
>We are happy to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
>CHICKEN 5.1.0.
>
>CHICKEN 5.1.0rc1 is now available at this location:
>https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2019/06/08/chicken-5.1.0rc1.tar.gz
>
>The SHA256 sum of that tarball is
>d520bf83e446b67508768de90768724b8a2ebb1953e6ece873ce790162a1b671
>
>The most important change is a breaking one: Keywords are now
>completely
>distinct from symbols.  Keywords are no longer accepted as identifiers
>nor as type names, which may mean you'll need to pipe-quote them or
>disable keyword syntax on your projects.
>
>The other important new features are the new cond-expand, c-object and
>object forms in .egg files.
>
>The complete list of changes since version 5.0.0 is available here:
>https://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2019/06/08/NEWS
>
>(Note that I accidentally left the entry for 5.0.1 under 5.1.0.  5.1.0
>includes those changes as well, this will be fixed in the next RC or in
>the final release)
>
>Please give it a test and report your findings to the mailing list.
>
>Here's a suggested test procedure:
>
>  $ make PLATFORM= PREFIX= install check
>  $ /bin/chicken-install pastiche
>
>If you want to build CHICKEN with a compiler other than the default
>one,
>just use C_COMPILER= (e.g., C_COMPILER=clang) on the make
>invocation.
>
>Of course, feel free to explore other supported build options (see the
>README file for more information) and actually use CHICKEN 5.1.0rc1 for
>your software.
>
>If you can, please let us know the following information about the
>environment you tested the RC tarball on:
>
>Operating system: (e.g., FreeBSD 12.0, Debian 9, Windows 10 mingw-msys
>under 
>mingw32)
>Hardware platform: (e.g., x86, x86-64, PPC)
>C Compiler: (e.g., GCC 6.4.0, clang 5.0.0)
>Installation works?: yes or no
>Tests work?: yes or no
>Installation of eggs works?: yes or no
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>The CHICKEN Team

--
You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it.

Scott McNealy 1999___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.1.0 release candidate available

[Jeronimo Pellegrini]

Operating system: Linux - LibreCMC/OpenWRT
Hardware platform: MIPS32
C Compiler: gcc (5.4.0 for LibreCMC and 7.4.0 for OpenWRT) with musl
Installation works?: yes
Tests work?: did not try (cross-compiled and installed in a router)
Installation of eggs works?: not supposed to (only csi works; csc needs
 gcc, and I couldn't yet get csc and gcc to work together on this
 platform)

Upgraded from 5.0.0 to 5.1.0rc1 and noticed nothing broken at all! :-)

J.


___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.1.0 release candidate available

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 10:23:14PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> The output of "make test" was over 20,000 lines, some of which do have the
> string "fail" in them.  I've posted it at
>  if anyone wants to take a look.

Hi John,

That's normal.  There are many tests which are testing the compiler and
which will print a warning like "foo in (if foo (error "assertion failed"))
 is always true".  There are also a few tests which check that something
fails, so it says "blabla failed, as it should".  And finally there's the
reports of some tests which simply say "0 assertions failed".

If the tests really fail, make will exit with an error.

Cheers,
Peter


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users