Re: [Chicken-users] sequential version of set!
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Alexej Magura wrote: > > Is there a sequential version of set!, as in setq? See http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/moremacros#stiff-set > ___ > Chicken-users mailing list > Chicken-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] sequential version of set!
Alexej Magura scripsit: > Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/? There isn't, though it would be straightforward to write a macro. Scheme doesn't put as much emphasis on mutation as Common Lisp does; note that while `do` looks the same in Scheme as in Common Lisp, it does not mutate the iteration variables but rebinds them, and named `let` is all about looping while rebinding. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org You know, you haven't stopped talking since I came here. You must have been vaccinated with a phonograph needle. --Rufus T. Firefly ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
[Chicken-users] sequential version of set!
Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/? ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
