Re: [Chicken-users] Any hope for new zmq bindings to version 3.2 or even 4.0?
Hi Matt and Kristian, Kristian Lein-Mathisen kristianl...@gmail.com writes: Moritz and I had some fun with zmq 3.2 in July. We didn't release our work, with the reason slipping my mind right now. I don't remember either :-) Matt, can you try whether it works for you or if you still run into trouble with that version? Moritz ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Any hope for new zmq bindings to version 3.2 or even 4.0?
I'll test this out soon. Thanks! On Nov 27, 2013 5:50 AM, Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de wrote: Hi Matt and Kristian, Kristian Lein-Mathisen kristianl...@gmail.com writes: Moritz and I had some fun with zmq 3.2 in July. We didn't release our work, with the reason slipping my mind right now. I don't remember either :-) Matt, can you try whether it works for you or if you still run into trouble with that version? Moritz ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Re: [Chicken-users] Any hope for new zmq bindings to version 3.2 or even 4.0?
Hi Matt, Moritz and I had some fun with zmq 3.2 in July. We didn't release our work, with the reason slipping my mind right now. I think it should be fairy stable, however. You can find it here: https://bitbucket.org/DerGuteMoritz/zmq/commits/branch/3.2 K. On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is anyone (Moritz?) working on new bindings or porting the existing bindings for zmq to the newer versions? Thanks! -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority... ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
