[chromium-dev] Re: changing chrome_exe to chrome, converting chrome.exe to gyp
Hey Bradley, Thanks, I can build again from the command line. My CPU utilization is still annoying low. I made sure and NUM_CPUS is 4. Compare this to the Linux make build, which keeps my 4 cores at 100% cpu all the way through. Thanks -- dean On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Bradley Nelsonbradnel...@google.com wrote: Hi Dean, So I've dropped in a change that switches directories to have name like: (base) (test_shell) This will allow you to run things at the command line again. I don't find this choice particularly ascetic myself. But the options where limited, because the following characters cannot appear in solution folder names: / ? : \ *| # % Let me know if you run into any more problems with this. Also definitely let me know if someone thinks of something less ugly. -BradN On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote: This also broke building from the command line. I usually never open Visual Studio as an IDE. I build on the command line with something like: devenv chrome\\chrome.sln /Build release /Project test_shell It looks like project names like test_shell now have complicated names like test_shell (webkit\tools\test_shell\test_shell), and I haven't been able to manage supplying those on the command line. Is there a way we can get back our nice project names test_shell, chrome, etc? On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Andrew Scherkusscher...@chromium.org wrote: Here's a quick example: 1) Delete whole Debug directory 2) gclient runhooks --force 3) Set test_shell as startup project 4) Hit F5 Sample output of things that shouldn't be dependencies (mostly because they're other executables) sandbox (sandbox\sandbox) - Debug Win32 chrome_dll - Debug Win32 net_perftests - Debug Win32 base_unittests - Debug Win32 net_unittests - Debug Win32 v8_shell - Debug Win32 mini_installer - Debug Win32 test_support_unit - Debug Win32 test_support_ui - Debug Win32 codesighs (third_party\codesighs\codesighs) - Debug Win32 automated_ui_tests - Debug Win32 memory_test - Debug Win32 activex_test_control - Debug Win32 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com wrote: Andrew, can you give an example of something that built that shouldn't have for test_shell? Maybe we have some overspecified dependencies as well. -BradN On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org wrote: I'll see if I can repro this again before filing a bug, but similar to what Daniel and John reported, when I right click on test_shell and say Build it builds the minimal set required to fully build+link test_shell.exe However when I set test_shell as the start-up project and launch the debugger, Visual Studio warns that every other project in chrome.sln must be built before running (not true!). Is there a difference in build vs. runtime dependencies? Andrew On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote: All-- When you notice missing dependencies, pleased add them to the necessary .gyp file(s)! One of the main reasons we've been trying to land all this stuff is so that tracking down all these pieces isn't single-threaded through one person (or two). If you're not comfortable making the change yourself, then please file a bug so the dependency problems get tracked and fixed in an organized fashion. Re: unnecessary rebuilds: please file bugs so they don't get lost. Please include the target you were building, and the the libs/targets that were rebuilt unnecessarily. You don't have to be exhaustive about the list, it's more important here that at least some information gets collected and doesn't languish on the ML or get dropped on the floor. I'm working on a buildbot script that will test for missing dependencies by building every target from scratch individually, and will then test for unnecessary rebuilds by rebuilding each target after no updates. That's been taking a back seat to just getting the conversion completed, but I've accelerated my work on it as we wind down to the last few targets. --SK On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:10 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote: Yeah it happened to me before as well, I just figured I'd complain now.. Note another missing dependency is on crash_service.exe , npapi_layout_test_plugin, and npapi_test_plugin btw just to be clear, these are missing dependencies on ui_tests. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote: I actually had this problem _before_ this change. Guess I should have brought it up, but I figured it was just something funny on my system. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:21 PM, John
[chromium-dev] F5 Debug process
Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in Visual Studio 2008? Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long time to compile and build project test with him. How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests, interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe) project? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in Configuration Options (or something like that), you can select what to build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in Visual Studio 2008? Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long time to compile and build project test with him. How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests, interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe) project? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well. -- Mohamed Mansour On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote: At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in Configuration Options (or something like that), you can select what to build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote: Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in Visual Studio 2008? Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long time to compile and build project test with him. How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests, interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe) project? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the project depended on. Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options, go to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run Make sure Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run is checked. Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should not be building all those tests. Hope that helps. Finnur On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote: It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well. -- Mohamed Mansour On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote: At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in Configuration Options (or something like that), you can select what to build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote: Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in Visual Studio 2008? Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long time to compile and build project test with him. How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests, interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe) project? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote: It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well. Note: /MP is multiprocess build, not incremental build. PK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
Where exactly do I add /MP (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)?(I know extremely little about the whole environment..) Thank you. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote: It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well. Note: /MP is multiprocess build, not incremental build. PK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?
If not, where would be the most logical place to add this functionality? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?
Are you referring to some kind of an administrative feature that will not allow the user to download, even if one wants to? ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:22, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: If not, where would be the most logical place to add this functionality? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: If not, where would be the most logical place to add this functionality? No, and I Don't Know, but presumably as an extension, assuming we have an API or proposed API that allows an extension to respond to queries like what should the disposition of the link be. PK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?
Yeah, it would be an administrative feature for a version of Chromium that is being developed for Library use. The library admins don't want users to be able to download files. On Jul 3, 10:26 am, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: If not, where would be the most logical place to add this functionality? No, and I Don't Know, but presumably as an extension, assuming we have an API or proposed API that allows an extension to respond to queries like what should the disposition of the link be. PK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
I was having exactly this problem. It this configuration now when I click F5 (with chrome as my startup project) they build only the project and dependencies, no more the projects tests. Thanks for your hint, it was exactly what I was looking for to avoid the compilation of project tests(that are not necessary for me to debug chromium). On Jul 3, 2:04 pm, Finnur Thorarinsson fin...@chromium.org wrote: I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the project depended on. Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options, go to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run Make sure Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run is checked. Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should not be building all those tests. Hope that helps. Finnur On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote: It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well. -- Mohamed Mansour On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote: At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in Configuration Options (or something like that), you can select what to build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote: Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in Visual Studio 2008? Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long time to compile and build project test with him. How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests, interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe) project? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: Is there an option to block file downloads in Chromium?
Since you're building your own fork, you could simply disable the code by adding the #ifdef at the right places. You could use git to more easily manage the merge tracking. You could also setup a continuous build but note that our buildbot code doesn't support git at the moment. http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/testing/chromium-build-infrastructure M-A On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, it would be an administrative feature for a version of Chromium that is being developed for Library use. The library admins don't want users to be able to download files. On Jul 3, 10:26 am, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote: If not, where would be the most logical place to add this functionality? No, and I Don't Know, but presumably as an extension, assuming we have an API or proposed API that allows an extension to respond to queries like what should the disposition of the link be. PK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
Glad to hear its fixed.-F On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:40, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote: I was having exactly this problem. With this configuration, now when I click F5 (with chrome as my startup project) VS build only the project and dependencies, no more the projects tests. Thanks for your hint, it was exactly what I was looking for to avoid the compilation of project tests(that are not necessary for me to debug chromium). On Jul 3, 2:04 pm, Finnur Thorarinsson fin...@chromium.org wrote: I had a similar problem on VS 2005, maybe it is the same as yours. Turned out VS was set to build everything as opposed to just building what the project depended on. Not sure how to do it in VS2008, but in VS 2005, under Tools \ Options, go to: Projects and Solutions \ Build and Run Make sure Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run is checked. Then (if you make sure chrome is set as the startup project) it should not be building all those tests. Hope that helps. Finnur On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:32, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote: It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well. -- Mohamed Mansour On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote: At least in Visual Studio 2005, you can right click on the solution and in Configuration Options (or something like that), you can select what to build and what not to build.It does speed up the compiling process by at least half (for me). It still, generally, takes a lot of time. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:21, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone knows how to speed up the process of debugging chromium in Visual Studio 2008? Everytime I click in F5 to start debugging chromium it takes a long time to compile and build project test with him. How can I avoid the project tests like ipc_tests, interactive_ui_tests, perf_tests, etc, are compiled with chrome(exe) project? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
http://codereview.chromium.org/155057 -- maybe more
Is it time to make this default yet? It speeds up the build considerably
and almost everyone uses it now. It does make things a bit less
deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
state. And it's _much_ faster.
J
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi to...@chromium.org wrote:
Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
...
'VCCLCompilerTool': {
*'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
'ExceptionHandling': '0',
'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
'WarningLevel': '3',
'WarnAsError': 'true',
'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
},
...
If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Where exactly do I add /MP (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)?(I
know extremely little about the whole environment..)
Thank you.
☆PhistucK
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.orgwrote:
It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
Note: /MP is multiprocess build, not incremental build.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: [Windows CRichEditCtrl] question on parenthesis handling in right-to-Left CRichEditCtrl
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Xiaomei Ji x...@chromium.org wrote: 2. If CRichEditCtrl does not support this out of the box, we can do the dirty and hard work to make it work. It wont be easy since we need to handle all kinds of opening/closing punctuations, and we need back-trace to change the punctuation depending on the surrounding characters (for example, after abc, U+0028 will be displayed as ), but if we type in d, ) need to be changed to (.), and we might need some states-saving as well. I think the performance in textfield and omnibox will be degraded a lot by those. Is there any better way? The better way is use a WebKit textfield instead of a native control to provide the UI here. This was something I had hoped to prototype in Q2 but didn't get to. Help welcomed. Talk with Darin (Fisher) if you're interested. PK --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
thanks jeremy - applied that cl and got my cpus pegged even more ;)
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
http://codereview.chromium.org/155057 -- maybe more
Is it time to make this default yet? It speeds up the build considerably
and almost everyone uses it now. It does make things a bit less
deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
state. And it's _much_ faster.
J
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi to...@chromium.org wrote:
Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
...
'VCCLCompilerTool': {
*'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
'ExceptionHandling': '0',
'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
'WarningLevel': '3',
'WarnAsError': 'true',
'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
},
...
If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Where exactly do I add /MP (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)? (I
know extremely little about the whole environment..)
Thank you.
☆PhistucK
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.orgwrote:
It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
Note: /MP is multiprocess build, not incremental build.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Full pass of acid3.
As of r19910 (and with --enable-remote-fonts flag), we now fully pass the acid3 test. Thanks to brettw for his patience and to pkasting for guilting me into fixing this the right way. :DG --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Fwd: [webkit-dev] [V8] It's time for V8Proxy to come to Jesus
FYI because some people might not be on webkit-dev. BUT if this seems even remotely interesting to you, get on that list! (They recently split it into webkit-dev and webkit-help, so signal to noise should get better than it was before...in case that was a concern of yours.) J -- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org Date: Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM Subject: [webkit-dev] [V8] It's time for V8Proxy to come to Jesus To: webkit-...@lists.webkit.org Cc: Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com If you're uninterested in the V8 bindings, you can skip this email. Clocking in at 3255 lines (plus a 682-line header file), V8Proxy is out of control. Historically a bridge from the V8 bindings to the V8 engine, V8Proxy is responsible for a number of tasks including: 1) Creating new contexts 2) Implementing security checks 3) Supervising garbage collection 4) Caching event listeners 5) Executing scripts 6) Converting between frames, contexts, and global objects 7) Manging DOM wrappers 8) etc, etc, etc I propose we separate these concerns into a number of distinct classes that have clear, understandable purposes before things get worse. Please let me know if you have any in-progress patches to V8Proxy. I'd like to lock that file sometime next week while I rip it apart and put it back together. Thanks, Adam P.S., FrameLoader: you've escaped for now, but don't think I'm not watching you. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-...@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: F5 Debug process
Would be nice if we can make multiprocess build (/MP) integrated with gyp.
Don't know how that could be done.
-- Mohamed Mansour
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Actually, there are a couple spots to edit:
http://codereview.chromium.org/155057 -- maybe more
Is it time to make this default yet? It speeds up the build considerably
and almost everyone uses it now. It does make things a bit less
deterministic, but you can always clobber build if something gets into a bad
state. And it's _much_ faster.
J
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Tommi to...@chromium.org wrote:
Don't know if this is what most do but I ended up adding it to
build\common.gpyi (line 471 in my case)
...
'VCCLCompilerTool': {
*'AdditionalOptions': '/MP',*
'MinimalRebuild': 'false',
'ExceptionHandling': '0',
'BufferSecurityCheck': 'true',
'EnableFunctionLevelLinking': 'true',
'RuntimeTypeInfo': 'false',
'WarningLevel': '3',
'WarnAsError': 'true',
'DebugInformationFormat': '3',
},
...
If that's not what everyone else is doing, please let me know.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Where exactly do I add /MP (using Visual Basic Professional 2005)? (I
know extremely little about the whole environment..)
Thank you.
☆PhistucK
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 20:08, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.orgwrote:
It depends on the machine you have. CPU power. HD etc. ... If you have
incremental build turned on /MP it will take less time to compile as well.
Note: /MP is multiprocess build, not incremental build.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: Full pass of acid3.
Woot! What's --enable-remote-fonts, and will it be on by default soon? Thanks dglazkov! PK On Jul 3, 2009 12:13 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote: As of r19910 (and with --enable-remote-fonts flag), we now fully pass the acid3 test. Thanks to brettw for his patience and to pkasting for guilting me into fixing this the right way. :DG --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Joy of generated files
* PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT * As long as the generated project files will be in src/ and not in the $(outdir) http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15924, PLEASE fix the svn:ignore everytime generated project files are added or removed. For examples, see 19914 and 19915. Thanks, M-A --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] About hunspell
Recently I was playing with hunspell and got very displeased with its code (which claims to be cpp, but in fact 'classified' c). I even started to think about rewriting it in, you know, correct cpp. Then I realized that Chrome also uses hunspell and went to the repository. I saw a very useful patch to HashMgr, which in fact alters its behaviour pretty much. And at the same time all old code were left as is. So I have a question: why? Why didn't you just remove all that old and unused code? It's unlikely that your patches will be merged into hunspell. I'm asking because, as I said, I'm thinking of rewriting (well, 'correcting') hunspell and want to know in advance that someone else is interested. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: cygwin dependence missing?
Debugging this a bit more ... it seems to be some sort of XP vs. Vista thing. If I run wdiff exp.txt act.txt in a bash shell or a command prompt on Vista, it works. On XP, it works in a bash shell, but in a command prompt, I get the /tmp error. It looks like XP is expecting to find the cygwin environment, but isn't, and it is finding it on Vista. I don't see anything obvious in my environment that is different. I am running Cygwin 1.5.25, though. At this point, my knowledge of cygwin falters, so I'm out of ideas. Anyone else? -- Dirk On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Dirk Prankedpra...@google.com wrote: Oh, I should add that if I run the same binaries under Vista, everything works fine (no error from wdiff). -- Dirk On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dirk Prankedpra...@google.com wrote: Hi Marc-Antoine, I am getting the same wdiff: /tmp/t101c.0: No such file or directory errors ... I'm running an XP VM on a Vista 64 host, but I've tried both local files (running the tests on a virtual drive) as well as a network share to the host VM. I've tried the /etc/fstab, the CYGWIN=nontsec, and the changing of directory ACLs, all to no avail. Any other ideas? -- Dirk On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruelmar...@chromium.org wrote: 2009/7/1 Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com gyp should be setting CYGWIN=nontsec for actions and rules (unless you use the msvs_use_cygwin_shell:0). FYI, cygwin 1.7 doesn't honour CYGWIN=NONTSEC anymore. You need to modify /etc/fstab, e.g. c:\cygwin\etc\fstab to add something line: none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user,noacl 0 0 to have the same effect. M-A --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Issue 4576: Home/End and PageUp/PageDn buttons do not do anything in drop down lists
Hi, To fix issue #4576 how to get the page size? Fixing where would be considered as the best? Below I elaborate the issue. In WebCore, HTML Select element is rendered using either RenderMenuList or RenderListBox. RenderMenuList further uses PopupListBox as a popup. When popup is visible, PageUp/PageDn are working fine. Issue comes only when popup is closed. When popup is not visible, SelectElement.cpp present in dom folder of WebCore handles keyboard events and notifies its corresponding renderer. So the place where PageUp/PageDn events are handled knows only renderer. Only renderer can tell the number of visible lines considering current zoom level etc. Is it a good idea to ask renderer from SelectElement.cpp to return number of visible items? In case of RenderMenuList, it has to ask PopupListBox under platform chromium, and in the else part of this platform check we need to write code that will get called by rest of Webkit users. But is it fine if we decide what is correct for other users of Webkit? In case of RenderListBox, the method, numVisibleItems() that can return number of visible items is a private method. Changing it to public lets SelectElement.cpp to know the page size, but is it a good thing to do? Please suggest. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Sample Extension failing to install.
When attempting to install the Google Reader extension, Chromium gives this error. This is on a Chromium build 3.0.192.0 (19907) on a Windows 7 OS 7100 build. Install breaks also after Save Link As downloading it. Any ideas? ---Extension error--- Could not install extension from 'C:\Users\Doddi\Documents\Downloads \subscribe_page_action.crx'. Required value 'page_actions[0].icons' is missing or invalid. ---OK-- The Following link show's the error on a Save Link As downloaded .crx http://imgur.com/kuJLyl.png --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: cygwin dependence missing?
Hi Marc-Antoine, I am getting the same wdiff: /tmp/t101c.0: No such file or directory errors ... I'm running an XP VM on a Vista 64 host, but I've tried both local files (running the tests on a virtual drive) as well as a network share to the host VM. I've tried the /etc/fstab, the CYGWIN=nontsec, and the changing of directory ACLs, all to no avail. Any other ideas? -- Dirk On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruelmar...@chromium.org wrote: 2009/7/1 Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com gyp should be setting CYGWIN=nontsec for actions and rules (unless you use the msvs_use_cygwin_shell:0). FYI, cygwin 1.7 doesn't honour CYGWIN=NONTSEC anymore. You need to modify /etc/fstab, e.g. c:\cygwin\etc\fstab to add something line: none /cygdrive cygdrive binary,posix=0,user,noacl 0 0 to have the same effect. M-A --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: About hunspell
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Dmitry.Skibadmitry.sk...@gmail.com wrote: Recently I was playing with hunspell and got very displeased with its code (which claims to be cpp, but in fact 'classified' c). I even started to think about rewriting it in, you know, correct cpp. Then I realized that Chrome also uses hunspell and went to the repository. I saw a very useful patch to HashMgr, which in fact alters its behaviour pretty much. And at the same time all old code were left as is. Glad you like it! So I have a question: why? Why didn't you just remove all that old and unused code? It's unlikely that your patches will be merged into hunspell. We do this so we can tell what we changed so it's easier to merge to future versions of Hunspell. Of course it should be possible to do with SVN logs only, but it makes it a little easier. I believe there are some new capabilities we would like to take advantage of in the newer ones. Brett --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
