Team,

Now that we're unforked, we want to concentrate on eliminating layout
test failures. Through the magic of the WebKit merge, we've
accumulated quite a few. Today, we expect around 400 failures, which
is not a good number by any stretch.

As one of the ways to help determine the source of the failures, I
propose that we resurrect the JSC build (and builder), so that we can
say with a fair degree of certainty if the cause is in the V8
bindings.

Those of you who were involved in maintaining a JSC build of Chromium
before may experience painful flashbacks and shortness of breath. My
hope is that this time around we should have easier time, since we're
unforked and the Script* abstractions are pretty well-defined to keep
most of the nasties at bay. Additionally, having gyp is certainly a
super-great help.

Based on the IM/hallway conversation, Dave Levin, Dmitry Titov, myself
and possibly a few others might be interested in helping out with the
project. We don't want this to be more than a 10% effort on our parts.
Since we hope to have a JSC build bot and ideally a canary bot, we may
need some help from the infrastructure gods.

So, do you think that resurrecting the JSC build is a:

a) terrible idea
b) great idea
c) whatcha talking bout, Willis?

:DG<

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to