Re: [ChurchillChat] Re: Churchill’s Admiration for Napoleon

2019-09-17 Thread Jonathan Hayes
Doesn't surprise me.  When you look at his other accomplishments, it's quite 
amazing.  They were both workoholics  -  Napoleon was known to dictate to 
several secretaries on different subjects at once  -  a feat WSC didn't (to my 
knowledge) attempt.

Jonathan Hayes  
 

On Tuesday, September 17, 2019, 2:11:12 PM PDT, Richard Langworth 
 wrote:  
 
 On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 5:32:45 PM UTC-4, Keith Bleddyn wrote:
I’ve long been puzzled by Churchill’s admiration for Napoleon, a man he 
described as “a great emperor and warrior..."

I forwarded your question to Andrew Roberts, author of Napoleon the Great, who 
asks me to post this excerpt from his speech at the British Embassy in Paris on 
being awarded the Grand Prix of the Fondation Napoleon:


 

"As an English Tory, I was expecting not to like Napoleon when I took up my 
pen, the man whom many Britons of the generation older than me still called 
‘Bonaparte’, or even occasionally ‘Boney’. Yet it was one of the most enjoyable 
parts of researching this book to discover that of course the Emperor had a 
hugely engaging personality and attractive character, and particularly that he 
had a deliciously dry, ironic wit. This made the job of researching his life a 
great pleasure, as I was always looking to where the next Napoleonic joke would 
come from. My favourite of them all was when the Grand Almoner of France, the 
Archbishop de Rohan, wrote an extremely oleaginous letter to Napoleon at the 
time of the Coronation, comparing him to Jesus and saying that he wished he had 
the opportunity to die for the Emperor. ‘Please pay the Archbishop Fr.12,000,’ 
Napoleon noted in the margin of the letter, ‘out of the theatrical fund.'  




"The reason that I entitled my book Napoleon the Great was because far too many 
British historians persist in seeing only the dictator in his, and not the 
positive aspects of the man I like to think of as the Enlightenment on 
horseback. The builder, the educator, the encourager of science and industry, 
the self-made man, the thinker, the writer, the giant and the genius. Instead 
my countrymen only see the soldier, the conqueror, the invader. They blame all 
the Napoleonic Wars on him – ignoring his pleas for peace and despite the fact 
that many more wars were declared on France by the seven coalitions than he 
declared against others.


     "In the words of George Home, a midshipman aboard HMS Bellerophon, 
Napoleon ‘showed us what one little human creature like ourselves could 
accomplish in a span so short.’"   
 

 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to churchillchat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/churchillchat/8331125c-3695-4f80-93c7-ee0b5a1bdbd8%40googlegroups.com.
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to churchillchat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/churchillchat/1013720814.5962518.1568761554573%40mail.yahoo.com.


[ChurchillChat] Re: Churchill’s Admiration for Napoleon

2019-09-17 Thread Richard Langworth
On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 5:32:45 PM UTC-4, Keith Bleddyn wrote:
>
> I’ve long been puzzled by Churchill’s admiration for Napoleon, a man he 
> described as “a great emperor and warrior..."


I forwarded your question to Andrew Roberts, author of *Napoleon the Great,* 
who 
asks me to post this excerpt from his speech at the British Embassy in 
Paris on being awarded the Grand Prix of the Fondation Napoleon:

 

"As an English Tory, I was expecting not to like Napoleon when I took up my 
pen, the man whom many Britons of the generation older than me still called 
‘Bonaparte’, or even occasionally ‘Boney’. Yet it was one of the most 
enjoyable parts of researching this book to discover that of course the 
Emperor had a hugely engaging personality and attractive character, and 
particularly that he had a deliciously dry, ironic wit. This made the job 
of researching his life a great pleasure, as I was always looking to where 
the next Napoleonic joke would come from. My favourite of them all was when 
the Grand Almoner of France, the Archbishop de Rohan, wrote an extremely 
oleaginous letter to Napoleon at the time of the Coronation, comparing him 
to Jesus and saying that he wished he had the opportunity to die for the 
Emperor. ‘Please pay the Archbishop Fr.12,000,’ Napoleon noted in the 
margin of the letter, ‘*out of the theatrical fund.'*  


*"*The reason that I entitled my book *Napoleon the Great* was because far 
too many British historians persist in seeing only the dictator in his, and 
not the positive aspects of the man I like to think of as the Enlightenment 
on horseback. The builder, the educator, the encourager of science and 
industry, the self-made man, the thinker, the writer, the giant and the 
genius. Instead my countrymen only see the soldier, the conqueror, the 
invader. They blame all the Napoleonic Wars on him – ignoring his pleas for 
peace and despite the fact that many more wars were declared on France by 
the seven coalitions than he declared against others.

 
"In the words of George Home, a midshipman aboard HMS *Bellerophon*, 
Napoleon ‘showed us what one little human creature like ourselves could 
accomplish in a span so short.’"   

>  

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChurchillChat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to churchillchat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/churchillchat/8331125c-3695-4f80-93c7-ee0b5a1bdbd8%40googlegroups.com.