[cia-drugs] Fwd: After Botching Virtual Fence on Border, Boeing Awarded a Do-Over Contract

2008-04-23 Thread Kris Millegan

 


 


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 8:27 pm
Subject: After Botching Virtual Fence on Border, Boeing Awarded a Do-Over 
Contract
















Virtual fence on Mexican border to be 
replaced


Apr. 22, 2008 03:38 PM
Associated Press 


http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/04/22/20080422virtual-fence0422-ON.html




TUCSON - The government will replace its highly touted virtual fence on the 
Arizona-Mexico border with new towers, radars, cameras and computer software, 
scrapping the brand-new $20 million system because it doesn't work 
sufficiently, officials said.


The move comes just two months after Homeland Security Secretary Michael 
Chertoff officially accepted the completed fence from The Boeing Co. With the 
decision, Customs and Border Protection officials are acknowledging that the 
so-called Project 28 pilot program to detect illegal immigrants crossing the 
U.S.-Mexico 
border doesn't work well enough to keep or to continue tweaking.


Chertoff accepted the program on Feb. 22 after Boeing apparently resolved 
software 
glitches. But less than a week later, the Government Accountability Office told 
Congress it did not fully meet user needs and the project's design will not be 
used as the basis for future developments.? 


The project consists of nine towers along a 28-mile section of border 
straddling the border crossing at Sasabe, southwest of Tucson.


DHS will put in about 17 new towers, some holding just communications gear, 
others featuring new cameras or new radars, at an undetermined cost.


The department also is spending at least $45 million to have a customized 
computer program written so the collected data is more quickly and efficiently 
fed to Border Patrol agents.


Although the system is operating today, it hasn't come close to meeting the 
Border Patrol's goals, said Kelly Good, deputy director of the Secure Border 
Initiative program office in Washington.


Probably not to the level that Border Patrol agents on the ground thought 
that they were going to get. So it didn't meet their expectations.


The Border Patrol had minimum input in designing the prototype but will have 
more say in the final version, officials said.


Agents began using the virtual fence last December, and the towers have 
resulted in more than 3,000 apprehensions since, said Greg Giddens, executive 
director of the SBI program office in Washington.


But that's just a fraction of the several hundred illegal immigrants believed 
to cross through the Sasabe corridor daily.


The towers, equipped with radars, optical and thermal imaging cameras and 
other sensors, are supposed to show nearby Border Patrol agents a complete 
picture of the border on the laptop computers in their patrol trucks. But the 
system's less-than-optimal results have been heavily criticized by politicians 
and others.


Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano's office hasn't been told 
of the plans, her press secretary said Tuesday. It would have been nice of 
them 
to say anything to us, spokeswoman Jeanine L'Ecuyer said. If there have been 
new plans made regarding the virtual fence, they have not shared that.


We certainly hope they will, and we've made inquiries to that effect to find 
out what's going on.


The virtual fence is part of a national plan to use physical barriers and 
high-tech detection capabilities to secure the Mexican border - and ultimately 
the Canadian boundary too.


The new software Boeing is creating to provide agents a complete and rapid 
picture is considered the core of any new operating system. The contractor will 
use another $19 million for later upgrades.


That's a fraction of some $860 million the company has been awarded for 
technology, physical fences and vehicle barriers.


Boeing used off-the-shelf software and other equipment initially to get the 
system up and running quickly.


Project 28 was not intended to be the final, state-of-the-art system for 
catching illegal immigrants, Giddens said. I think some people understood that 
and some didn't. We didn't communicate that well.


The problems with the system involved not just the computer software but the 
radar and satellite links used to send the information. All will be replaced 
with different types.


Groundbreaking for the permanent towers is expected in July, and locations 
will be moved for at least five of the current tower sites, Good said.


Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, 
said it's encouraging that Boeing will do laboratory tests before the new 
equipment is deployed, given the fact that Boeing has already botched it 
once.








Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL 
Autos.

 



[cia-drugs] Fwd: VA Concealed --and Lied About-- Suicide Epidemic among Veterans

2008-04-23 Thread Kris Millegan

 


 


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 8:42 pm
Subject: VA Concealed --and Lied About-- Suicide Epidemic among Veterans














Apr 21, 2008 11:29 pm US/Eastern 


http://wbztv.com/national/VA.suicide.risk.2.705269.html 




VA Hid Suicide Risk, Internal E-Mails Show


NEW YORK (CBS News) ― The 
Department of Veterans Affairs came under fire again Monday, this time in 
California federal court where its facing a national lawsuit by veterans rights 
groups accusing the agency of not doing enough to stem a looming mental health 
crisis among veterans. 


 


As part of the lawsuit, internal e-mails raise questions as to 
whether top officials deliberately deceived the American public about the 
number of veterans attempting and committing suicide. CBS News chief 
investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian reports. 

In San 
Francisco federal court Monday, attorneys for veterans' rights groups accused 
the VA of nothing less than a cover-up -- deliberately concealing the real risk 
of suicide among veterans.

The system is in crisis and unfortunately the 
VA is in denial, said Veterans Rights Attorney Gordon Erspamer.

The 
charges were backed by internal emails written by Dr. Ira Katz, the VA's head 
of 
Mental Health.

In the past, Katz has repeatedly insisted while the risk 
of suicide among veterans is serious, it's not outside the norm.

There 
is no epidemic in suicide in VA, Katz told Keteyian in November.

But in 
this e-mail to his top media advisor, written two months ago, Katz appears to 
be 
saying something very different, stating: Our suicide prevention coordinators 
are identifying about 1,000 suicide attempts per month among veterans we see in 
our metical facilities.

Katz's email was written shortly after the VA 
provided CBS News data showing there were only 790 attempted suicides in all 
2007 - a fraction of Katz's estimate.

This 12,000 attempted suicides per 
year shows clearly, without a doubt, that there is an epidemic of suicide among 
veterans, said Paul Sullivan of Veterans for Common Sense.

And it 
appears that Katz went out of his way to conceal these numbers.

First, he 
titled his e-mail: Not for the CBS News Interview Request.

He opened it 
with Shh! - as in keep it quiet - before ending with
Is this something we 
should (carefully) address … before someone stumbles on it?

Today we 
showed the e-mail to Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., who chairs the House Committee 
on Veterans Affairs.

This is disgraceful. This is a crime against our 
nation, our nation's veterans, Filner told CBS News. They do not want to come 
to grips with the reality, with the truth.

And that's not 
all.

Last November when CBS Newsexposed an epidemic of more than 6,200 
suicides in 2005 among those who had served in the military, Katz attacked our 
report.

Their number is not, in fact, an accurate reflection of the 
rate, he said last November.

But it turns out they were, as Katz 
admitted in this e-mail, just three days later.

He wrote: there are 
about 18 suicides per day among America's 25 million veterans.

That 
works out to about 6,570 per year, which Katz admits in the same e-mail, is 
supported by the CBS numbers.

In an e-mail late Monday to CBS News, Katz 
wrote that the reason the numbers were not released was due to questions about 
the consistency and reliability of the findings - and that there was no public 
cover-up involved.






Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL 
Autos.

 



[cia-drugs] Fwd: Army 'MUST continue 'stop-loss' until late 2009 -- or 2011 -- or 2025 ...

2008-04-23 Thread Kris Millegan

 


 


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 8:38 pm
Subject: Army 'MUST continue 'stop-loss' until late 2009 -- or 2011 -- or 2025 
...



















  
Beating the Drums of War. 

  
US Troop Build-up: Army  Marines Authorize “Involuntary 
  Conscription”

  
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=20060823articleId=3042

  
It is now being openly stated that the U.S. Marines have 
  started recalling or legally summoning thousands of ‘inactive servicemen’ to 
  serve in Iraq and the Middle East, where the number of U.S. troops and 
  contracted security personal are dropping towards haphazard levels[…]. The 
  U.S. Army, undermined by shortfalls in manpower, has ordered over a reported 
  14,000 ‘inactive servicemen’ back to fight in what is cited as the ‘War on 
  Terror,’ as opposed to ‘fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan.’ Already 
  thousands of servicemen have disserted, even applying for refugee status in 
  Canada, and thousands more are AWOL.  […]  

  
This seems to be nothing but a [euphemistic] 
  ‘military draft,’ only the continuation of a systematic forced 
  conscription of military troops in a stealthy and cautious 
  manner.

  
 




Army needs 'stop-loss' until [--at least--] late 
2009





By PAULINE JELINEK 
  | Associated Press 
  Writer 
  
2:35 PM CDT, April 21, 2008
 
  
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-army-tours,1,7040369.story

  
 








WASHINGTON - It will be more than a year before the Army can 
end the unpopular practice of forcing soldiers to stay in the service beyond 
their retirement or re-enlistment dates, a top official said Monday.

Lt. 
Gen. James D. Thurman, deputy chief of staff for operations, said he hoped that 
wartime demand for troops will decline enough by around the fall of next year 
to 
end stop-loss. He said there are more than 12,000 currently serving under the 
practice -- an action that critics have called a backdoor 
draft.

Thurman also said that as officials continue to increase the size 
of the Army, it could be possible by the fall 
of 2011 for troops to be home two years for every year 
they are deployed.

The two issues of stop loss and long tours of duty 
have been among the Pentagon's most disliked practices among troops. Thousands 
have been forced to stay in the service beyond their contracts since the start 
of the global war on terrorism. And tours of duty were increased to 15 months 
from 12 months a year ago so the Army could come up with the extra forces 
President 
Bush ordered for the troop buildup in Iraq.
















Now that most of the extra troops are being drawn down by the end of July, 
Bush early this month ordered the tours cut back to 12 months, a move Thurman 
said would help the Army begin to restore its balance.

We want to reduce 
the strain and stress on our soldiers and our families, he told a Pentagon 
news 
conference.

There are currently 17 Army combat brigade teams deployed -- 
15 in Iraq and two in Afghanistan. Two are scheduled to come out of Iraq in the 
drawdown.

Though that allows officials to shorten tour lengths, it will 
be a while before they also can end stop-loss, he said.

As the demand 
(for troops) comes down, we should be able to get us weaned off of stop-loss 
... 
it's our intent to do that, Thurman said.

But demand exceeds supply right now, he told a Pentagon news 
conference.

He said he hoped, but couldn't promise, 
that if demand stabilized at around 15 brigades, the use of stop-loss could be 
ended by the end of budget year 2009, or beginning of budget year 
2010.

Those currently being held even though their service is supposed to 
be finished include more than 6,800 active-duty Army, about 3,800 in the Army 
National Guard and close to 1,500 in the Reserves, he said.

The high 
tempo of operations in recent years has not only strained troops and increased 
separations and stress on their families, but prevented troops from training 
for 
the full range of possible operations. They have focused training on 
counterinsurgency operations and neglected other skills because 
counterinsurgency is what's needed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Though the 
Pentagon is expected to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan sometime 
next year, Thurman said he had not been asked for such troops.

Could 
that happen? Yes, he said.

The United States now has about 31,000 troops 
there -- the most since the war began in October 2001 -- and also has been 
pressing the allies to contribute more.


 


More troops forced to stay in armed 
forces


Despite '07 decision, tours extended more 
than 6 months on average


Tom Vanden Brook 


USA Today, Apr. 22, 
2008 12:00 AM
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/04/22/20080422stop-loss0422.html




WASHINGTON - The Army has accelerated its policy 
of involuntary extensions of duty 

[cia-drugs] Fwd: [ctrl] 30 Years Ago Haiti Grew All the Rice It Needed. What Happened?

2008-04-23 Thread roadsend

 


 


 

-Original Message-
From: Alamaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CTRL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:10 am
Subject: [ctrl] 30 Years Ago Haiti Grew All the Rice It Needed. What Happened?

























April 21, 2008

30 Years Ago Haiti Grew All the Rice It Needed. What Happened?

The U.S. Role in Haiti's Food Riots

http://counterpunch.com/

By BILL QUIGLEY



Riots in Haiti over explosive rises in food costs have claimed the  lives  

of six people.  There have also been food riots world-wide in Burkina   

Faso, Cameroon, Cote d’Ivorie, Egypt, Guinea, Mauritania, Mexico,  

Morocco,  Senegal, Uzbekistan and Yemen.



The Economist, which calls the current crisis the silent tsunami, reports  

that  last year wheat prices rose 77% and rice 16%, but since January rice  

prices have  risen 141%. The reasons include rising fuel costs, weather  

problems, increased  demand in China and India, as well as the push to  

create biofuels from cereal  crops.



Hermite Joseph, a mother working in the markets of Port au Prince,  told  

journalist Nick Whalen that her two kids are “like toothpicks” they’ re  

not getting enough nourishment.  Before, if you had a dollar twenty-five   

cents, you could buy vegetables, some rice, 10 cents of charcoal and a  

little  cooking oil. Right now, a little can of rice alone costs 65 cents,  

and is not good rice at all.  Oil is 25 cents.  Charcoal  is 25 cents.   

With a dollar twenty-five, you can’t even make a plate of rice  for one  

child.”



The St. Claire’s Church Food program, in the Tiplas Kazo  neighborhood of  

Port au Prince, serves 1000 free meals a day, almost all to  hungry  

children -- five times a week in partnership with the What If   

Foundation.  Children from Cite Soleil have been known to walk the five  

miles to  the church for a meal. The cost of rice, beans, vegetables, a  

little meat,  spices, cooking oil, propane for the stoves, have gone up  

dramatically. Because  of the rise in the cost of food, the portions are  

now smaller.  But hunger is on  the rise and more and more children come  

for the free meal.  Hungry adults used  to be allowed to eat the leftovers  

once all the children were fed, but now there  are few leftovers.



The New York Times lectured Haiti on April 18 that “Haiti, its   

agriculture industry in shambles, needs to better feed itself.”   

Unfortunately, the article did not talk at all about one of  the main  

causes of the shortages -- the fact that the U.S. and other  international  

financial bodies destroyed Haitian rice farmers to create a major  market  

for the heavily subsidized rice from U.S. farmers.  This is not the only   

cause of hunger in Haiti and other poor countries, but it is a major force.



Thirty years ago, Haiti raised nearly all the rice it needed.  What  

happened?



In 1986, after the expulsion of Haitian dictator Jean Claude “Baby Doc”   

Duvalier the International Monetary Fund (IMF) loaned Haiti $24.6 million  

in  desperately needed funds (Baby Doc had raided the treasury on the way  

out).   But, in order to get the IMF loan, Haiti was required to reduce  

tariff  protections for their Haitian rice and other agricultural products  

and some  industries to open up the country’s markets to competition from  

outside  countries.  The U.S. has by far the largest voice in decisions of  

the IMF.



Doctor Paul Farmer was in Haiti then and saw what happened.  “Within less  

than  two years, it became impossible for Haitian farmers to compete with  

what they  called ‘Miami rice.’  The whole local rice market in Haiti fell  

apart as  cheap, U.S. subsidized rice, some of it in the form of ‘food  

aid,’ flooded  the market. There was violence, ‘rice wars,’ and lives were  

lost.”



“American rice invaded the country,” recalled Charles Suffrard,  a leading  

rice grower in Haiti in an interview with the Washington Post in 2000.

By 1987 and 1988, there was so much rice coming into the country that  

many  stopped working the land.



Fr. Gerard Jean-Juste, a Haitian priest who has been the pastor at  St.  

Claire and an outspoken human rights advocate, agrees.  “In the 1980s,   

imported rice poured into Haiti, below the cost of what our farmers could   

produce it.  Farmers lost their businesses.  People from the countryside  

started  losing their jobs and moving to the cities.  After a few years of  

cheap imported rice, local production went way down.”



Still the international business community was not satisfied.  In  1994,  

as a condition for U.S. assistance in returning to Haiti to resume his   

elected Presidency, Jean-Bertrand Aristide was forced by the U.S., the  

IMF, and  the World Bank to open up the markets in Haiti even more.



But, Haiti is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, what reason  

could  the U.S. have in destroying the rice market of this tiny country?