[cia-drugs] Fw: Don't Escalate a Quagmire With Our Money
The wicked ENDTIME - NOT the RIGHTEOUS! http://Zetaheaven.org: --- On Mon, 4/12/10, AfterDowningStreet.org ad...@afterdowningstreet.org wrote: From: AfterDowningStreet.org ad...@afterdowningstreet.org Subject: Don't Escalate a Quagmire With Our Money To: broali...@yahoo.com Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 10:26 AM AfterDowningStreet.org We're on Facebook and Youtube and Twitter Don't Escalate a Quagmire With Our Money In the coming weeks, Congress will vote on spending $33 billion of your money to send another 30,000 troops, plus many more contractors, to Afghanistan. We are inflicting horrible suffering on the people of Afghanistan, making our own nation less safe, and spending resources we badly need. Tell congress members we need them to publicly commit to voting No, and to urge their colleagues to do the same. Call your Representative at (202) 224-3121. Here's a whip list tracking who has already committed to voting No and to publicly lobbying their colleagues to join them: http://defundwar.org Congressman Bill Delahunt is held a public forum on the question of war funding yesterday in Falmouth, Mass. See video: http://afterdowningstreet.org/node/51398 David Swanson's prepared remarks for the forum offer a detailed argument for voting No on the $33 billion. On tax day, let people know where their tax dollars will be going. Here are some resources: http://www.warresisters.org http://nationalpriorities.org/taxday2010 And plan ahead for Brown Bag Vigils all over the country on April 21st! ## Support Justice and Peace: Click Donate in the upper left corner of http://afterdowningstreet.org Please help us inform you of activities in your town by logging in at http://afterdowningstreet.org Then click on My account, on Edit, and on Personal Information, and type in your state and zip code. Please FORWARD this message to everyone you know who doesn't think we should have one set of laws for us and another for those we put in powerful positions. If you receive this from a friend, you can subscribe by registering at http://afterdowningstreet.org/user/register If you receive this directly from us and want to unsubscribe, click the Opt Out link at the bottom. You can also unsubscribe or resubscribe by editing your account on the website. One step opt out
[cia-drugs] FW: Pedophile-Controlled Schools Childcare in Wales and Ireland, or Ritual Abuse?
-- Forwarded Message From: dasg...@aol.com dasg...@aol.com Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:35:36 EDT To: Robert Millegan ramille...@aol.com Subject: Pedophile-Controlled Schools Childcare in Wales and Ireland, or Ritual Abuse? Paedophile ring 'abused children in State homes' http://www.independent.ie/national-news/paedophile-ring-abused-children-insta te-homes-1756642.html A well-organised paedophile ring involving civil servants, ex-clergy, members of political parties and even gardai =Irish police infiltrated the child-care system in Ireland. Now campaigners believe that there were links between the Dublin-based ring and members of a well-organised paedophile ring that infiltrated the child-care system in north Wales, which was exposed and broken up in the mid-1990s. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Illuminati/waterhouse_report .htm ... Victims of the scandal reacted with anger to the government's response to recommendations made in the damning Waterhouse Report. They accused ministers of completely ignoring them and demanded a national inquiry into child abuse. Steve Messham, spokesman for North Wales Abuse Survivors, said: The Report's recommendations do not go far enough. The victims are completely ignored. There is no mention of compensation, counselling or help and support for victims. The report exposed one of the worst child abuse scandals in history. Hundreds of children had been physically, sexually or emotionally abused in care homes in North Wales between 1974 and 1990. The inquiry heard from 240 people abused as children in 40 homes but there are thought to be hundreds more victims. At least 12 victims have committed suicide, one has been convicted for murder and hundreds of others say their lives have been destroyed by the abuse they endured. The report also mentioned 200 people who were abusers or alleged abusers, but not all of them were named. And so far, few of them have ever been prosecuted. Horrific ordeal of girl, six, who was physically and sexually abused by 23 of her primary school classmates By Luke Salkeld http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=yauthornamef=Luke+Salkeld 2nd April 2010 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262745/Probe-launched-physical-sexual -abuse-year-old-schoolgirl-classmates.html A devastated mother has told how her six-year-old daughter was physically and sexually abused by more than 20 of her classmates over a period of months. The little girl was stripped of her clothes and assaulted on a daily basis by pupils her own age within the grounds of a school in Wales. Her ordeal only came to light last night after her mother gave an anonymous television interview. The case has been investigated by police and social workers but an extraordinary cloak of secrecy was thrown over it. The mother said it took two years for school officials to investigate after she complained. A 'serious case review' finally confirmed that sexually harmful behaviour had taken place at the school, but said it was difficult to establish exactly what happened. All of the 23 children involved, aged six to ten, are too young to be prosecuted for the sustained abuse. None were even removed from the school. The school has not been named, to protect the youngster's identity, and the local education authority also remains anonymous. Because of the level of secrecy, there are doubts the authority will ever be held to account over its failings. It also means parents throughout Wales will be haunted by fears that their children attend the school where the ordeal took place. The girl's mother learned about the bullying and sex abuse when she spoke to another parent whose daughter was also being abused. She then broached the subject with her daughter. 'I will never forget the look on her face, the fear on her face,' she said last night. 'I said It is okay, you can tell Mummy, and then it all started to come out. She was telling me things that I think every mother dreads to hear from their daughter. It was horrendous what she'd gone through.' She continued: 'Every day she was being stripped. She was being physically and sexually abused every day. And every day she cried out for help and nobody ever came.' It was only when the six-year-old was moved to another school and her mother took legal action that the local education authority launched the serious case review. It then took two years to report its findings but those findings have not been made public. Incredibly, the local authority has since claimed that the case review had been robust and that the school had received excellent inspections before and after the incident. But the child's family say she was failed by the school and the system, as they took so long to act. The mother added: 'I think you can't excuse that. How
[cia-drugs] Boy Scouts negligent in sex case, Wikiparent reported to FBI child unreal images
Oregon jury finds Boy Scouts negligent in sex case By WILLIAM McCALL 4/13/10 PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) Jurors on Tuesday found the Boy Scouts of America negligent and awarded $1.4 million to a former Portland man who was abused by an assistant Scoutmaster in the early 1980s, following a three-week trial in which secret Scout perversion files were used as evidence. The jury also decided the Irving, Texas-based Scouts organization was liable for punitive damages that will be decided in a separate phase of the trial. That would be in addition to the $1.4 million. The Scouts denied allegations of negligence and said the files actually helped them keep child molesters out of their ranks. Lawyers for Kerry Lewis, the victim who filed the lawsuit, argued the Boy Scouts organization was reckless for allowing former assistant Scoutmaster Timur Dykes to continue to associate with the victim's Scout troop after Dykes acknowledged to a bishop for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints early in 1983 that he had molested 17 Boy Scouts. The church was the charter organization for an estimated third to one half of the Boy Scout troops in the nation in the 1980s. The church settled its portion of the Portland case before trial, but the jury ordered it to pay 25 percent of the $1.4 million in noneconomic damages, or $350,000. The Boy Scouts of America must pay 60 percent, or $840,000, while its Cascade Pacific Council must pay 15 percent, or $210,000. Dykes was later convicted three times of various abuse charges involving boys and served time in prison. Shortly before trial, he admitted in a deposition to abusing LewisAll lawyers in the case declined comment pending the second phase of the trial to determine whether to award $25 million in punitive damages. The case is set to resume April 20 and involves only the national Boy Scouts after the jury decided the Cascade Pacific Council was not liable for punitive damages. _http://www.komonews.com/news/local/90768949.html_ (http://www.komonews.com/news/local/90768949.html) Wikifounder reports Wikiparent to FBI over 'child porn' No real people pictured By Cade Metz in San Francisco Posted in Music and Media, 9th April 2010 21:20 GMT Updated Update: This story has been updated to show that Larry Sanger now says that the images in question do not depict real people and to include additional legal clarification. And it was later updated a second time with additional clarification about federal law 18USC 2258A, which requires electronic service providers to notify the NCMEC if they are made aware of child pronography. Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has reported the site's parent organization to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, saying he believes the Wikimedia Commons may be knowingly distributing child pornography. He says, however, that the images did not contain actual people. And he acknowledges that in publicly explaining his report to the FBI, his use of the term child pornography may have been misleading. In his report to the bureau, Sanger says that in his non-lawyer's opinion, he believes that the images violate a US law against obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children (18 USC §1466A(2)(A)). This law specifically says: It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist. A separate federal law (18 USC 2252) deals with certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors. _http://www.theregister.co.uk/2 010/04/09/sanger_reports_wikimedia_to_the_fbi/_ (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/09/sanger_reports_wikimedia_to_the_fbi/)
