What Berlet said was fine, as far as it went, but Amy Goodman's
question, what could Democrats learn from Republicans, begs to be
answered by semantics professor George Lakoff. He often prefaces his
talks by saying that he asked that very question, and his resulting work
answers it. Berlet's answer was that Democrats could do local political
work, door to door, mailings, phone surveys, press the flesh, kiss
babies. Lakoff would not like Democrats to imitate the Hitlerians in
their evocation of fuhrer icon candidates, but that Democrats should
present the people-oriented nurturing icon to face off with the
anti-people corporate welfarist strict father Hitlerian strongman and
his advocacy of sacrifice for the Fourth Reich of Pat Robertson's
likudniks.
One thing I would like to point out is that John Kerry threw the
election in 2004 by refusing to end the Great Crusades. That election
would not have been close enough to steal if Kerry had been the antiwar
candidate, and that is really what the NY Times front page photo of the
national guard soldiers in Iraq is saying, that they are stuck in Iraq
and John Kerry refuses to represent them and get them out of there. But
the media spins it as semantics about a word. Read the banner, it seems
to say they're still stuck in Iraq because Kerry refused to run as the
antiwar candidate. Of course Kerry is Skull and Bones and such just a
judas goat candidate whose job it was to take the opening for electable
antiwar candidate and refuse to put an antiwar referendum to voters so
the election would be close enough again in 2004 as in 2000.
Yes, I remember Sean claiming that oil industry managers were against
the Iraq war. Greg Palast best exposes the oil industry conspiracy to
raise oil prices, with Michel Chossudovsky explaining that false crises
are all used to militarize areas on the map. Palast says that one goal
is to remove oil from the market in places such as Iraq and Iran. What I
would add to the point that it was about raising not lowering oil
prices, is that Sean always equates the outer circle such as oil company
managers and CFR members as the dot in a circle when they are only round
tablers, the quintessential outer circle, the very definition of circle
around the dot.
With Sean always speaking as if the neocons and other blowhard think
tankers and apologists du jour and standoff armor of the round table
around nazi eugenic illuminatoid dot are the illuminatoid dot, and Chip
attacking people who point beyond the standoff armor circle to the dot,
both Sean and Chip are screening for the nazi dot.
The neocon motivational circle led the US populace into the Vietnam
quagmire and into Iraq. Could we not look for the nazi dot now, if there
was a nazi dot inside the neocon circle with Vietnam? Would we not
notice four generations of the Bush family, again the nazi dot of Sam
and Prescott Bush backing Hitler from the 1920's? You could find the
equivalent of the neocon motivational circle leading the US populace
into WW2, couldn't you? But if the liberal motivational layer for WW2
had not been a trojan horse for the nazi dot inside that circle, they
would have hung Prescott Bush at Nuremburg, as George Herbert Walker
Bush implied in the 1980's.
What renders the Democrats mere placeholders and as such just as
convenient an outer circle as neocons within the Republican party, is
their circumscription within elitist hierarchicalism. David Levy, George
Mason University economics professor and director of the Center for
Public Choice, documents the nazi elitist hierarchical movement from
Plato to the present day totalitarian Republicans who will not admit
Democrats to any Congressional committee meetings(see current issue
Rollingstone mag). In other words, elitist hierchicalism hamstrung
Kerry's Iraqwar position and the Democrats will never represent the
people or labor because they first must present the left hand of
Rockefeller. Their elitist high-mindedness may be cast as
environmentalism, which sounds compassionate, but they will always be
mired in elitist hierarchicalism, just the left hand of militarized
corporatism as Darwinist corporatist selectionist vanguard. Our nazism
is more corporatist than racist, but it employs racist eugenics to drop
bombs on Lebanon, not just the south or Hezbollah militarized areas but
primarily civilian areas.
-Bob
--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, mark urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still remember when Sean used to shill for big oil saying that they
would not benefit from the afghan and iraq invasions, that their
profits were down and that they were against the Bush's middle east
plans.
I guess he looks like a giant asshole right about now and
gatekeeperocracy is making sure he gets face time so Amy can keep
getting that foundation funding so vital to her mission of injecting
zionist poison right into the brains of the dumbed down left wing
savants.
Chip Berlet is a government paid shill who goes after critics of
