RE: Config [7:20759]
Can router B ping the PC? From what you've said, (that there isn't a route
there) I doubt it. Until B can ping it, A won't be able to...
HTH
:-{)]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21025t=20759
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Config [7:20759]
That's what I'm having a problem with. RtrB can ping the PC RtrA can ping the RtrB e0 interface, but won't ping the PC. It was mentioned to make the default gateway on the PC the RtrB e0 address. I'll try that see what happens... thanx to all your help. That was exactly the answer I needed. Big THANX to whom ever said make the e0 interface the default gateway of the PC. I'm not sure if I really clearly understand why the PC would respond to RtrB's pings and not RtrA's. anyway. Another example of the benefits to joining a group such as this... hope I can return the favor in the future !!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21101t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Config [7:20759]
You dont have to add any static routes as your routers are directly connected and as you can ping B from A. If your ethernet interface is configured correctly you would be able to ping the pc if it is set with the default gateway as the address of etherrnet 0 of Router B syam - Original Message - From: Wesley J To: Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: Config [7:20759] I need help w/ a little config info... RtrA (s0 192.1.1.4) RtrB (s0 192.1.1.3) connected via serial cable. They can each ping each other. RtrB has a PC (ip address 192.168.1.1)connected to its' e0 int (192.168.1.10) through a hub. How can I ping from RtrA (s0 192.1.1.4)to the PC attached to RtrB(e0 192.168.1.10)? Do I need a static route on RtrB from the s0 interface to the e0 interface? TIA. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20766t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Config [7:20759]
You would need to configure a static route from RtrA towards the ethernet segment of RtrB. Something like ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1.3 configured on RtrA. What is happening is that RtrA does not know how to route packets to B's ethernet segment. The only route it knows about is it's serial link. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20785t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Config [7:20759]
Hey Paul, I'm not getting any communication between s0(192.1.1.3) e0 (192.168.1.10) on RtrB using an extended ping with e0 as the destination and s0 as the source. I entered ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 e0 and it doesn't show up in the route table. I entered ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 e0 and it shows up in the route table as Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0 and it still doesn't work. I know this is a simple thing to do, but it's not working out for me. What am I not doing Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20797t=20759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
