Re: [c-nsp] OSM-2OC12 question

2008-09-25 Thread sthaug
 The 4 ports of Gig on the OSM-OC12 module are gig x/y ports, same
 feature set as the supervisor 720 gig ports or WS-X6516. They show up as
 int gig x/y. Only OSM-GEWAN module has fancy features enabled for GE.

Ah yes, I remembered wrong. Been too long since I worked with those
beasts...

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] SRB on 6500

2008-09-25 Thread Vikas Sharma
Hi,

Is it possible to run SRB3 on 6500-E chassis. I am sure this can be done by
using 6509-NEB-A, but not sure about 6509-E.

Regards,
Vikas Sharma
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Weird Port Loopback Issues with 3750 and ESX 3.5

2008-09-25 Thread aaron
Hey Guys,

 

I am hoping some of you out there may have experienced this problem in the
past. We have a spare NIC on a DELL X445 (Broadcom  NetXtreme BCM5793
1000Base-T) running ESX 3.5. No matter what I do I cannot seem to get this
NIC working properly. I have it connected to a 3750 switch GIG GLC-T SFP
port and I am getting err-disable loopback issues where the switch is
actually receiving its own keep alives on the same port. 

 

I have messed with the various duplex / speed settings at both ends and this
doesn't seem to resolve the issue. I have turned off inline power and mdix
auto. The cable is CAT5E UTP. Several cables have been tested and the length
is no longer than 10m. I have connected this NIC to a 3550 series switch and
the exact same thing happens. 

 

I have come to the conclusion that the NIC must be faulty or musn't have the
correct drivers installed. 

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks,

 

Aaron.

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Maximum number of class-map supported

2008-09-25 Thread David Granzer
Hello,

I can't find information about maximum number of class-map supported on a
particular platfom (e.g. 2800, 3800, NPE-G1) in one policy-map.  Does
anyone have link
to any documentation or does anyone know how many class-map are supported
in one policy-map ?

Regards,
David
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Maximum number of class-map supported

2008-09-25 Thread Aaron Riemer
AFIAK it's 256 mate.

Could be different for the different IOS versions though.

Cheers,

Aaron.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Granzer
Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2008 4:00 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Maximum number of class-map supported

Hello,

I can't find information about maximum number of class-map supported on
a
particular platfom (e.g. 2800, 3800, NPE-G1) in one policy-map.  Does
anyone have link
to any documentation or does anyone know how many class-map are
supported
in one policy-map ?

Regards,
David
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This message contains confidential information and is 
intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SXH3 ghost bugs - more details

2008-09-25 Thread Gert Doering
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:46:38PM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
 Seems they are not planning a special rebuild for this unfortunately.

Mmmh, bad news.

 We are trying to get them to build a engineering special
 generally available for TAC if you have a SR open they should
 be able to get it.

That would work fine for us, though.

Thanks,

gert
-- 
Gert Doering
Mobile communications ... right now writing from * Sardegna, Italy *
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(33)SXI

2008-09-25 Thread Phil Mayers

Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:

Not only postponed, but the feature matrix has been changed, so some
roadmapped features won't show up in SXI.


Any idea which ones?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Performance Of www.cisco.com

2008-09-25 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou

Someone heard all of you and made www.cisco.com extra-light!

--
Tassos

Sean Granger wrote on 24/9/2008 11:35 μμ:

Seconded.

In fact, it's a common sense thing that since it's not being done, is brilliant.


Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/08 01:43PM 

Seth Mattinen wrote:

It's been slow for me since this current iteration of the design came
out. I just attributed it to the tradeoff between flashy and functional.
I was stuck on a dialup modem (21k) once during an emergency after my
877 at home failed and trying to access my TAC case online was horribly
painful to the point of causing extreme rage.

Download speeds are fine, though.


My download speeds are fine too.  My biggest gripe is how things keep 
changing and how fancy the pages are getting.  I can understand some 
bling on the product and marketing pages but the support pages should be 
downright blah in my opinion.  I should be able to load up the support 
site in lynx if I have to and find what I'm looking for.  Today we have 
to deal with all those damn style sheets, indirect linking through CGIs, 
flash and javascript crap, having to (re)authenticate at every turn, and 
timeouts that are way too short (can you say Dynamic Config Tool?).


Like I said earlier, give the product and marketing pages the shiny 
bling and give the support pages the look, feel and function of what a 
professional Cisco engineer would except and need.  After all, we use 
the command line all day long.  We don't need a stinking GUI.


Justin

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp 
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Performance Of www.cisco.com

2008-09-25 Thread Irena Nikolova
And also without ts for some reason :)

Irena


2008/9/25 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Someone heard all of you and made www.cisco.com extra-light!

 --
 Tassos

 Sean Granger wrote on 24/9/2008 11:35 μμ:

  Seconded.

 In fact, it's a common sense thing that since it's not being done, is
 brilliant.

  Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/08 01:43PM 

 Seth Mattinen wrote:

 It's been slow for me since this current iteration of the design came
 out. I just attributed it to the tradeoff between flashy and functional.
 I was stuck on a dialup modem (21k) once during an emergency after my
 877 at home failed and trying to access my TAC case online was horribly
 painful to the point of causing extreme rage.

 Download speeds are fine, though.


 My download speeds are fine too.  My biggest gripe is how things keep
 changing and how fancy the pages are getting.  I can understand some bling
 on the product and marketing pages but the support pages should be downright
 blah in my opinion.  I should be able to load up the support site in lynx if
 I have to and find what I'm looking for.  Today we have to deal with all
 those damn style sheets, indirect linking through CGIs, flash and javascript
 crap, having to (re)authenticate at every turn, and timeouts that are way
 too short (can you say Dynamic Config Tool?).

 Like I said earlier, give the product and marketing pages the shiny bling
 and give the support pages the look, feel and function of what a
 professional Cisco engineer would except and need.  After all, we use the
 command line all day long.  We don't need a stinking GUI.

 Justin

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at
 http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

  ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Performance Of www.cisco.com

2008-09-25 Thread Raul Lopez Nevot
Suspicious... I can't believe that... maybe 'defaced' ?

2008/9/25 Irena Nikolova [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 And also without ts for some reason :)

 Irena


 2008/9/25 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Someone heard all of you and made www.cisco.com extra-light!
 
  --
  Tassos
 
  Sean Granger wrote on 24/9/2008 11:35 μμ:
 
   Seconded.
 
  In fact, it's a common sense thing that since it's not being done, is
  brilliant.
 
   Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/08 01:43PM 
 
  Seth Mattinen wrote:
 
  It's been slow for me since this current iteration of the design came
  out. I just attributed it to the tradeoff between flashy and
 functional.
  I was stuck on a dialup modem (21k) once during an emergency after my
  877 at home failed and trying to access my TAC case online was horribly
  painful to the point of causing extreme rage.
 
  Download speeds are fine, though.
 
 
  My download speeds are fine too.  My biggest gripe is how things keep
  changing and how fancy the pages are getting.  I can understand some
 bling
  on the product and marketing pages but the support pages should be
 downright
  blah in my opinion.  I should be able to load up the support site in
 lynx if
  I have to and find what I'm looking for.  Today we have to deal with all
  those damn style sheets, indirect linking through CGIs, flash and
 javascript
  crap, having to (re)authenticate at every turn, and timeouts that are
 way
  too short (can you say Dynamic Config Tool?).
 
  Like I said earlier, give the product and marketing pages the shiny
 bling
  and give the support pages the look, feel and function of what a
  professional Cisco engineer would except and need.  After all, we use
 the
  command line all day long.  We don't need a stinking GUI.
 
  Justin
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at
  http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
   ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Performance Of www.cisco.com

2008-09-25 Thread Kris Price

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:

Someone heard all of you and made www.cisco.com extra-light!


Ha. Some kind of s/t//g error perhaps.

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Performance Of www.cisco.com

2008-09-25 Thread Jay Hennigan

Irena Nikolova wrote:

And also without ts for some reason :)


rue bu i sure loads fas now.  :-)

--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] 10/100/1000 speeds in GE SFP ports

2008-09-25 Thread Saku Ytti
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.html

Is this accurate? Can someone find errors? I seem to recall cuSFP works in
10/100/1000 speeds in SUP720-3BXL supervisor ports (well other is dual
personality anyhow)
 Mostly, I'm highly disappointed if there aren't any GE SFP ports at all in
7600/6500/4900/4500 that'll do 10/100 speeds.

This mean, if you currently have 3750-12S and you're looking to step up,
you need to buy three linecards, 1GE SFP, 100M SFP and 10/100/1000 cu,
increasing costs in unacceptable way.

Anyone know what's the state in foundry, huawei and extreme?
-- 
  ++ytti
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Maximum number of class-map supported

2008-09-25 Thread David Granzer
Hello,

it seems that 256 is correct. I have tried on 2800 (12.4) and 7200
NPE400 (12.2SB) with the following output.

72-NPE400(config-pmap)#class 255
Max limit of 255 classes in a policy reached

and also I found the same answer here
http://6200networks.com/2007/11/26/modular-qos-cli-class-map-limitations/

Regards,
David


On 9/25/08, Aaron Riemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 AFIAK it's 256 mate.

  Could be different for the different IOS versions though.

  Cheers,

  Aaron.


  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Granzer
  Sent: Thursday, 25 September 2008 4:00 PM
  To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  Subject: [c-nsp] Maximum number of class-map supported

  Hello,

  I can't find information about maximum number of class-map supported on
  a
  particular platfom (e.g. 2800, 3800, NPE-G1) in one policy-map.  Does
  anyone have link
  to any documentation or does anyone know how many class-map are
  supported
  in one policy-map ?

  Regards,
  David

 ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

  LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This message contains confidential information and is 
 intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee 
 you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
 sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
 delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient 
 you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action 
 in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] shut interfaces become enabled for some secs while reloading

2008-09-25 Thread simon
Just disable the portfast,  it wont have enough time to establish any
connections then


 Has anyone met the above problem?

 I'm trying a 7200/G2 with 12.2(31)SB13 and i noticed that while reloading
 it, the shuted interfaces come up for 2 secs,
 which is more than enough time to send packets through them (having
 portfast enabled on the switch port).

 I guess the config is parsed sequentially, so if the shutdown command
 follows the ip address x.x.x.x command (which
 they do when doing sh run), ip connectivity is established first.

 The problem with the above is that if you have to prepare a second router
 having identical config with another one
 (keeping the interfaces of the second router in the shutdown state), you
 end up having duplicate ips for a while (in my
 case 2 secs) when reloading the second router. This small time is more
 than enough to make the hell out of arp/mac tables!!!

 I know there are many ways to avoid all this mess (remove/change ips, shut
 switch ports instead of router ports, etc),
 but i was mainly wondering if all this is expected/normal behavior.

 --
 Tassos
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10/100/1000 speeds in GE SFP ports

2008-09-25 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou

GLC-T works only in 1000 speed when in 67xx-SFP cards (hardware limitation?).

We use 6748-GE-TX for 10/100/1000BaseT in our 6500s/7600s, so we have the same 
issue as you.

Does anyone know what happens with the ES/SPA cards?

--
Tassos

Saku Ytti wrote on 25/9/2008 1:34 μμ:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.html

Is this accurate? Can someone find errors? I seem to recall cuSFP works in
10/100/1000 speeds in SUP720-3BXL supervisor ports (well other is dual
personality anyhow)
 Mostly, I'm highly disappointed if there aren't any GE SFP ports at all in
7600/6500/4900/4500 that'll do 10/100 speeds.

This mean, if you currently have 3750-12S and you're looking to step up,
you need to buy three linecards, 1GE SFP, 100M SFP and 10/100/1000 cu,
increasing costs in unacceptable way.

Anyone know what's the state in foundry, huawei and extreme?


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

2008-09-25 Thread Ved Labs
Searching through the Fourm for High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1 .

But did not found any conclusions .

Anyone who has any concrete inputs .
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10/100/1000 speeds in GE SFP ports

2008-09-25 Thread Johannes Resch
On Thu, September 25, 2008 13:23, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
 GLC-T works only in 1000 speed when in 67xx-SFP cards (hardware
 limitation?).

 We use 6748-GE-TX for 10/100/1000BaseT in our 6500s/7600s, so we have the
 same issue as you.

 Does anyone know what happens with the ES/SPA cards?

In ES20, SFP-GE-T work in 10/100/1000 modes (caution: any GLC-* type SFPs
are not supported with ES20 at all). Not sure about the state of support
for auto-negotiation though, I personally have only used it with hardcoded
speeds.

Regards,
-jr
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] 10GbE SPA

2008-09-25 Thread MKS
Hi list
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] 10GbE SPA

2008-09-25 Thread MKS
Hi list

Sorry about the spam earlier. I wanted to ask what's the difference between
SPA-1X10GE-L-V2   and
SPA-1XTENGE-XFP

When considering 10GbE WAN-PHY for 7600, what cards and optic form
factors are available?

Regards
MKS
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Throttles on an interface

2008-09-25 Thread Rodney Dunn
Can you post the 'sh int' and 'sh ver'?

I posted a ressponse just yesterday or the day before
about input drops can result in throttles.

If it's microburst the 72xx may not can handle the
rate.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:46:06PM -0700, Roy wrote:
 I have a PA-FE on a 7206VXR.  show int gives
 
 Received 7798 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 17 throttles
  393 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 393 ignored
 
 The throttles seems to be related to the input errors.  I also see
 throttles with no input errors.  We have double checked (and replaced)
 the cable and the ports without success.  Is there some sort of buffer
 tuning that would affect this?
 
 Roy
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

2008-09-25 Thread Varaillon Jean Christophe
Hi,

Doing a show proc cpu | e 0.00 would give you a list of sorted processes 
using a lot of CPU.

Also, the output of show proc cpu has the format a/y showing the CPU usage for 
traffic proccessing (interrupt) and protocols handling. This will tell you if 
your CPU is high due to high traffic.

HTH
Christophe

Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ved Labs
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 2:43 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

Searching through the Fourm for High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1 .

But did not found any conclusions .

Anyone who has any concrete inputs .
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3470 (20080925) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 3470 (20080925) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
 

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10/100/1000 speeds in GE SFP ports

2008-09-25 Thread Dan Armstrong

I second that.

I would give my right arm for a high density, inexpensive switch and/or 
blade  matching set of copper  fibre SFPs that did 10/100/1000.


10 Megabit is still pretty fast for a downlink from ISP-Customer.  
Switch vendors are so hell-bent on 10G, 40G+ stuff, they've forgotten 
about the simple ergonomic conveniences of the still massively used 
lower speed interfaces.





Saku Ytti wrote:

On (2008-09-25 13:43 +0200), Johannes Resch wrote:
 
  

In ES20, SFP-GE-T work in 10/100/1000 modes (caution: any GLC-* type SFPs
are not supported with ES20 at all). Not sure about the state of support
for auto-negotiation though, I personally have only used it with hardcoded
speeds.



What a sad state of affair. ES20 port price isn't very comparable
to 3750 port price when you just need that 10/100 option.

On a side note I noticed recently that brand spanking new cat4 E
10/100/1000 copper cards don't do auto MDI/X.
I'm pretty sure that MDI/X or multirate have no significant 
cost addition, MDI/X doesn't even have business driver not

to include it. I guess multirate has business driver, force customers
to buy more.

I'm really tempted to finance shop that'll produce RJ45 PoE - SFP
transceivers. So that you'd buy transceiver that plugs to PoE port
and offers SFP port. You'd get multirate and tons of SFP ports
without the insane mark-up and poor density that vendors offer for
no valid reason other than 'because we can'.


  


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

2008-09-25 Thread Ved Labs
The high CPU is due to interrupts and mostly caused due to IP input .
How do i go further .


dl#SH PROCesses Cpu Sorted | ex 0.0
CPU utilization for five seconds: 51%/43%; one minute: 47%; five minutes:
45%
 PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked  uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
 19162464784 124889936500  5.27%  1.14%  0.63%   0 OSPF-100
Router
 11475665160   3632136  20832  0.71%  0.26%  0.25%   0 MFI LFD Stats
Pr
  62   2106239882116315242 99  0.63%  0.59%  0.57%   0 IP Input
 17741091608 297395737138  0.15%  0.16%  0.14%   0 BGP Router

dl#SH PROCesses Cpu Sorted | ex 0.0
CPU utilization for five seconds: 44%/42%; one minute: 47%; five minutes:
45%
 PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked  uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
  62   2106239922116315312 99  0.47%  0.58%  0.56%   0 IP Input
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

2008-09-25 Thread Pete Templin

Ved Labs wrote:

Searching through the Fourm for High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1 .

But did not found any conclusions .


Please clarify for us: where and how did you search?

pt

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Throttles on an interface

2008-09-25 Thread Roy
Data below.  The machine has two fast E interfaces active (Fa0/0 and Fa
6/0) plus a few T1s.

Roy

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-IK9S-M), Version 12.2(15)T5,  RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
Image text-base: 0x60008954, data-base: 0x61DE

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.1(2710:044039) [nlaw-121E_npeb
117], DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE
BOOTLDR: 7200 Software (C7200-BOOT-M), Version 12.0(23)S1, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

mushroom uptime is 15 weeks, 4 days, 7 hours, 16 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 00:47:30 PDT Sun Jun 8 2008
System restarted at 00:49:23 PDT Sun Jun 8 2008
System image file is disk1:c7200-ik9s-mz.122-15.T5
Last reload reason: Reload Command

cisco 7206VXR (NPE400) processor (revision A) with 491520K/32768K bytes
of memory.
Processor board ID 16067072
R7000 CPU at 350Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 3.2, 256KB L2, 4096KB L3 Cache
6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.0

Last reset from power-on
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
Primary Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1.
2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
8 Serial network interface(s)
4 Channelized T1/PRI port(s)
125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.

16384K bytes of Flash PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 128K).
250880K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 1 (Sector size 512 bytes).
4096K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
Configuration register is 0x2102FastEthernet6/0 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is DEC21140, address is 0001.6388.00a8 (bia 0001.6388.00a8)
  Internet address is 1.1.1.1/30
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 15/255, rxload 68/255
  Encapsulation 802.1Q Virtual LAN, Vlan ID  1., loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 02:00:00
  Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of show interface counters 09:26:40
  Input queue: 0/150/171/15119 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output
drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 2678 bits/sec, 4339 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 6272000 bits/sec, 2042 packets/sec
 111824180 packets input, 2348806646 bytes
 Received 320815 broadcasts, 0 runts, 25 giants, 149 throttles
 40174 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 40136 ignored
 0 watchdog
 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
 48129003 packets output, 2732343828 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Rodney Dunn wrote:
 Can you post the 'sh int' and 'sh ver'?

 I posted a ressponse just yesterday or the day before
 about input drops can result in throttles.

 If it's microburst the 72xx may not can handle the
 rate.

 On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:46:06PM -0700, Roy wrote:
   
 I have a PA-FE on a 7206VXR.  show int gives

 Received 7798 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 17 throttles
  393 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 393 ignored

 The throttles seems to be related to the input errors.  I also see
 throttles with no input errors.  We have double checked (and replaced)
 the cable and the ports without success.  Is there some sort of buffer
 tuning that would affect this?

 Roy

 

   

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Traffic on IPSec Tunnel btw Pix and Router

2008-09-25 Thread Gamino, Rogelio (OCTO-Contractor)
What happens if you remove the static route?

route outside 10.180.0.0 255.255.0.0 180.200.200.141

I don't think I've had to put static routes on the vpn device for routes
at the other end of the tunnel. The acl (L2L in this case) should take
care of that.


Rogelio Gamino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(o) 202-741-5853
(c) 202-716-9965

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Everton Diniz
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:19 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] Traffic on IPSec Tunnel btw Pix and Router

Hi all,

I configure a tunnel btw pix and router. The traffic goes to PIX but
do not have return. I see only encaps on the router and decaps on the
PIX.
Is missing anything?

Tks

Router Output and Config
TEHTCVPNRT01#sh cry ip sa

interface: GigabitEthernet0/1
Crypto map tag: ra-L2L-vpn, local addr 180.200.200.141

   protected vrf: (none)
   local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.180.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.139.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   current_peer 200.150.180.62 port 500
 PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 81, #pkts encrypt: 81, #pkts digest: 81
#pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts verify: 0
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
#pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
#send errors 4, #recv errors 0

 local crypto endpt.: 180.200.200.141, remote crypto endpt.:
200.150.180.62  path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500, ip mtu idb
GigabitEthernet0/1
 current outbound spi: 0xEA23924(245512484)

 inbound esp sas:
  spi: 0x2E3660C5(775315653)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
conn id: 3004, flow_id: NETGX:4, crypto map: ra-L2L-vpn
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4429641/3573)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
Status: ACTIVE

 inbound ah sas:

 inbound pcp sas:

 outbound esp sas:
  spi: 0xEA23924(245512484)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
conn id: 3003, flow_id: NETGX:3, crypto map: ra-L2L-vpn
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4429640/3573)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
Status: ACTIVE

 outbound ah sas:

 outbound pcp sas:



crypto isakmp policy 11
 encr 3des
 hash md5
 authentication pre-share
 group 2
 lifetime 3600
crypto isakmp key 6 L2L address 200.150.180.62 no-xauth
crypto isakmp aggressive-mode disable
crypto ipsec transform-set aessha-pixrtr esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

crypto map ra-L2L-vpn 2 ipsec-isakmp
  set peer 200.150.180.62
 set transform-set aessha-pixrtr
 match address 120
 reverse-route

interface GigabitEthernet0/1
 ip address 180.200.200.141 255.255.255.192
crypto map ra-L2L-vpn

access-list 120 permit ip 10.180.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.139.1.0 0.0.0.255



++



PIX output and Config:
local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.139.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.180.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
   current_peer: 180.200.200.141:500
 PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts digest 0
#pkts decaps: 81, #pkts decrypt: 81, #pkts verify 81
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0, #pkts decompress
failed: 0
#send errors 0, #recv errors 0

 local crypto endpt.: 200.150.180.62 , remote crypto endpt.:
180.200.200.141
 path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 56, media mtu 1500
 current outbound spi: 2e3660c5

 inbound esp sas:
  spi: 0xea23924(245512484)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 4, crypto map: L2L-ons
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4607999/3478)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y


 inbound ah sas:


 inbound pcp sas:


 outbound esp sas:
  spi: 0x2e3660c5(775315653)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 3, crypto map: L2L-ons
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4608000/3478)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y


 outbound ah sas:


 outbound pcp sas:


ip address outside 200.150.180.62 255.255.255.224
ip address inside 10.139.1.111 255.255.255.0
access-list L2L permit ip 10.139.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.180.0.0
255.255.0.0
access-list L2Lnonat permit ip 10.139.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.180.0.0
255.255.0.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list L2Lnonat
route outside 10.180.0.0 255.255.0.0 180.200.200.141  1
sysopt connection permit-ipsec
crypto ipsec transform-set aessha-pixrtr esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 3600
crypto map L2L 1 ipsec-isakmp
crypto map L2L 1 match address L2L
crypto map L2L 1 set peer 180.200.200.141
crypto map L2L 1 

Re: [c-nsp] Debugging Cisco VPN Client Software ... Is it even possible ?

2008-09-25 Thread Kaj Niemi


On Sep 23, 2008, at 21:47, Justin Shore wrote:


Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
Any hot tips with how to debug VPN clients not being able to  
connect into a vpn

concentrator (from the _client_ perspective) ?


Yes.  Don't mix Vista with Cisco's VPN client.


Yeah, Vista is really all about SSL VPN Client although the 32 bit  
ipsec vpn client does work most of the time. Say bye bye to free  
licenses. ;-(




Kaj
--
Kaj J. Niemi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+358 45 63 12000



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Traffic on IPSec Tunnel btw Pix and Router

2008-09-25 Thread Everton Diniz
Nothing happens, i put the static route for test.
I could not make it work. The pix was change for a router and i put a
Tunnel interface and works ok.

tks for all!!!

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Gamino, Rogelio (OCTO-Contractor)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What happens if you remove the static route?

 route outside 10.180.0.0 255.255.0.0 180.200.200.141

 I don't think I've had to put static routes on the vpn device for routes
 at the other end of the tunnel. The acl (L2L in this case) should take
 care of that.


 Rogelio Gamino
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (o) 202-741-5853
 (c) 202-716-9965

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Everton Diniz
 Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:19 AM
 To: cisco-nsp
 Subject: [c-nsp] Traffic on IPSec Tunnel btw Pix and Router

 Hi all,

 I configure a tunnel btw pix and router. The traffic goes to PIX but
 do not have return. I see only encaps on the router and decaps on the
 PIX.
 Is missing anything?

 Tks

 Router Output and Config
 TEHTCVPNRT01#sh cry ip sa

 interface: GigabitEthernet0/1
Crypto map tag: ra-L2L-vpn, local addr 180.200.200.141

   protected vrf: (none)
   local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.180.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.139.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   current_peer 200.150.180.62 port 500
 PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 81, #pkts encrypt: 81, #pkts digest: 81
#pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts verify: 0
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
#pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
#send errors 4, #recv errors 0

 local crypto endpt.: 180.200.200.141, remote crypto endpt.:
 200.150.180.62  path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500, ip mtu idb
 GigabitEthernet0/1
 current outbound spi: 0xEA23924(245512484)

 inbound esp sas:
  spi: 0x2E3660C5(775315653)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
conn id: 3004, flow_id: NETGX:4, crypto map: ra-L2L-vpn
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4429641/3573)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
Status: ACTIVE

 inbound ah sas:

 inbound pcp sas:

 outbound esp sas:
  spi: 0xEA23924(245512484)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
conn id: 3003, flow_id: NETGX:3, crypto map: ra-L2L-vpn
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4429640/3573)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
Status: ACTIVE

 outbound ah sas:

 outbound pcp sas:



 crypto isakmp policy 11
  encr 3des
  hash md5
  authentication pre-share
  group 2
  lifetime 3600
 crypto isakmp key 6 L2L address 200.150.180.62 no-xauth
 crypto isakmp aggressive-mode disable
 crypto ipsec transform-set aessha-pixrtr esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

 crypto map ra-L2L-vpn 2 ipsec-isakmp
  set peer 200.150.180.62
  set transform-set aessha-pixrtr
  match address 120
  reverse-route

 interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  ip address 180.200.200.141 255.255.255.192
 crypto map ra-L2L-vpn

 access-list 120 permit ip 10.180.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.139.1.0 0.0.0.255



 ++



 PIX output and Config:
 local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.139.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.180.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
   current_peer: 180.200.200.141:500
 PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts digest 0
#pkts decaps: 81, #pkts decrypt: 81, #pkts verify 81
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0, #pkts decompress
 failed: 0
#send errors 0, #recv errors 0

 local crypto endpt.: 200.150.180.62 , remote crypto endpt.:
 180.200.200.141
 path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 56, media mtu 1500
 current outbound spi: 2e3660c5

 inbound esp sas:
  spi: 0xea23924(245512484)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 4, crypto map: L2L-ons
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4607999/3478)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y


 inbound ah sas:


 inbound pcp sas:


 outbound esp sas:
  spi: 0x2e3660c5(775315653)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 3, crypto map: L2L-ons
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4608000/3478)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y


 outbound ah sas:


 outbound pcp sas:


 ip address outside 200.150.180.62 255.255.255.224
 ip address inside 10.139.1.111 255.255.255.0
 access-list L2L permit ip 10.139.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.180.0.0
 255.255.0.0
 access-list L2Lnonat permit ip 10.139.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.180.0.0
 255.255.0.0
 nat (inside) 0 access-list L2Lnonat
 route outside 

[c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread david raistrick


Guys,

Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair 
of asa 5520s.


They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.

I've searched and searched to no avail, but man this seems familiar..

running 8.04.   in ASDM there is no VPN wizard to try. (only setup and 
HA).



Step 2 of vpnsetup site-to-site steps:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
 ^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)#


The only crypto options I have are:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto ?

configure mode commands/options:
  ca   Certification authority
  key  Long term key operations
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto






wtf?   anyone?

Licensed features for this user context:
Failover : Active/Active
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
GTP/GPRS : Disabled


And from the system side:

oma-i33-fw1# sh ver | inc VPN
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
VPN Peers: 750
WebVPN Peers : 2
This platform has an ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
oma-i33-fw1#






---
david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread Ge Moua
I believe IPSec on the ASA will only run in single/routed mode.  Try that.


Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking  Telecommunications Services

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david raistrick
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:15 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...


Guys,

Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair of
asa 5520s.

They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.

I've searched and searched to no avail, but man this seems familiar..

running 8.04.   in ASDM there is no VPN wizard to try. (only setup and 
HA).


Step 2 of vpnsetup site-to-site steps:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
  ^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)#


The only crypto options I have are:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto ?

configure mode commands/options:
   ca   Certification authority
   key  Long term key operations
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto






wtf?   anyone?

Licensed features for this user context:
Failover : Active/Active
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
GTP/GPRS : Disabled


And from the system side:

oma-i33-fw1# sh ver | inc VPN
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
VPN Peers: 750
WebVPN Peers : 2
This platform has an ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
oma-i33-fw1#






---
david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Layer 2 security issue

2008-09-25 Thread Mario Spinthiras
Does traffic which has specific mac addys (in band mgmt traffic , vtp ,
etc..) have something to do with this?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread jason . plank
I'm pretty sure that you are out of luck if you are using multiple contexts.

--
Regards,

Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -- Original message --
From: david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Guys,
 
 Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair 
 of asa 5520s.
 
 They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.
 
 I've searched and searched to no avail, but man this seems familiar..
 
 running 8.04.   in ASDM there is no VPN wizard to try. (only setup and 
 HA).
 
 
 Step 2 of vpnsetup site-to-site steps:
 
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
   ^
 ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)#
 
 
 The only crypto options I have are:
 
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto ?
 
 configure mode commands/options:
ca   Certification authority
key  Long term key operations
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto
 
 
 
 
 
 
 wtf?   anyone?
 
 Licensed features for this user context:
 Failover : Active/Active
 VPN-DES  : Enabled
 VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
 GTP/GPRS : Disabled
 
 
 And from the system side:
 
 oma-i33-fw1# sh ver | inc VPN
 VPN-DES  : Enabled
 VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
 VPN Peers: 750
 WebVPN Peers : 2
 This platform has an ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
 oma-i33-fw1#
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread Scott McGrath

VPN is a single context feature

david raistrick wrote:


Guys,

Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) 
pair of asa 5520s.


They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.

I've searched and searched to no avail, but man this seems familiar..

running 8.04.   in ASDM there is no VPN wizard to try. (only setup and 
HA).



Step 2 of vpnsetup site-to-site steps:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
 ^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)#


The only crypto options I have are:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto ?

configure mode commands/options:
  ca   Certification authority
  key  Long term key operations
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto






wtf?   anyone?

Licensed features for this user context:
Failover : Active/Active
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
GTP/GPRS : Disabled


And from the system side:

oma-i33-fw1# sh ver | inc VPN
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
VPN Peers: 750
WebVPN Peers : 2
This platform has an ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
oma-i33-fw1#






---
david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread jason . plank
Unsupported Features

Multiple context mode does not support the following features:

•Dynamic routing protocols

Security contexts support only static routes. You cannot enable OSPF or RIP in 
multiple context mode.

•VPN

•Multicast 

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa70/configuration/guide/contexts.html

--
Regards,

Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -- Original message --
From: david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Guys,
 
 Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair 
 of asa 5520s.
 
 They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.
 
 I've searched and searched to no avail, but man this seems familiar..
 
 running 8.04.   in ASDM there is no VPN wizard to try. (only setup and 
 HA).
 
 
 Step 2 of vpnsetup site-to-site steps:
 
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
   ^
 ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)#
 
 
 The only crypto options I have are:
 
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto ?
 
 configure mode commands/options:
ca   Certification authority
key  Long term key operations
 oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto
 
 
 
 
 
 
 wtf?   anyone?
 
 Licensed features for this user context:
 Failover : Active/Active
 VPN-DES  : Enabled
 VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
 GTP/GPRS : Disabled
 
 
 And from the system side:
 
 oma-i33-fw1# sh ver | inc VPN
 VPN-DES  : Enabled
 VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
 VPN Peers: 750
 WebVPN Peers : 2
 This platform has an ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
 oma-i33-fw1#
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread Ge Moua
Sounds like a good request for feature to Cisco.  I'm for it, I like to do
IPSec in mulitple context so I can tie them to different VRF upstream; or
better yet support for VRF-Aware IPSec on the ASA in multiple context mode.



Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking  Telecommunications Services
 
-Original Message-
From: Ge Moua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:22 PM
To: 'david raistrick'; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

I believe IPSec on the ASA will only run in single/routed mode.  Try that.


Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking  Telecommunications Services

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david raistrick
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:15 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...


Guys,

Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair of
asa 5520s.

They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.

I've searched and searched to no avail, but man this seems familiar..

running 8.04.   in ASDM there is no VPN wizard to try. (only setup and 
HA).


Step 2 of vpnsetup site-to-site steps:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
  ^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)#


The only crypto options I have are:

oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto ?

configure mode commands/options:
   ca   Certification authority
   key  Long term key operations
oma-i33-fw1/oma-prod(config)# crypto






wtf?   anyone?

Licensed features for this user context:
Failover : Active/Active
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
GTP/GPRS : Disabled


And from the system side:

oma-i33-fw1# sh ver | inc VPN
VPN-DES  : Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES : Enabled
VPN Peers: 750
WebVPN Peers : 2
This platform has an ASA 5520 VPN Plus license.
oma-i33-fw1#






---
david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread Justin M. Streiner

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, david raistrick wrote:

Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair of 
asa 5520s.


They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.


The box won't let you do VPNs in multiple context mode.

jms
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

2008-09-25 Thread Michael Balasko
Typing 7200 high cpu troubleshooting into google seems to work. May want
to try that road for a bit. 

Michael Balasko
CCSP,MCSE,MCNE,SCP
Network Specialist II


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ved Labs
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:31 AM
To: Pete Templin
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] High CPU - 7206 with NPE-G1

searched in this forum for previous history .

https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-September/053942.html

http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2004-April/009763.html

and other links also .
But didn't got concrete conclusions , what brough the CPU down
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread Justin C Darby
As far as I can remember you can't use VPN or do IPSEC in multiple context
mode and you have many, many restrictions in transparent mode (e.g. admin
VPN only). Silly, isn't it? :)

(I know you can't do VPN but I think this also applies to IPSEC. Someone
can feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)

Justin

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA doesn't like ipsec...

2008-09-25 Thread david raistrick



thanks everyone.   scratch that multi context mode to save some money. ;)



On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Justin M. Streiner wrote:


On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, david raistrick wrote:

Trying to turn up a vpn on a newly reinstalled (and out of support) pair of 
asa 5520s.


They're running in multiple context mode, and active/standby.


The box won't let you do VPNs in multiple context mode.

jms
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/





---
david raistrickhttp://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ELAM capture on SRB

2008-09-25 Thread Rodney Dunn
Tim,

Sorry for the delay..

See if this helps:

3#sh ip int br
Interface  IP-Address  OK? Method StatusProtocol
GigabitEthernet2/10192.168.10.1YES manual upup  
  
R3#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, c7600s3223_rp Software (c7600s3223_rp-ADVIPSERVICES-M), 
Version 12.2(33)SRC1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 23-May-08 01:37 by prod_rel_team

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

 R3 uptime is 1 week, 6 days, 5 hours, 55 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 1 week, 6 days, 5 hours, 56 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on (SP by power-on)
System image file is bootdisk:c7600s3223-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRC1
Last reload type: Normal Reload

cisco CISCO7606 (R7000) processor (revision 1.0) with 458752K/65536K bytes of 
memory.
Processor board ID FOX1221GAQF
R7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 0x27, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3 Cache
Last reset from power-on
1 Virtual Ethernet interface
33 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
2 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1915K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
  
  
R3#sh ip arp
Protocol  Address  Age (min)  Hardware Addr   Type   Interface
Internet  192.168.10.1-   001b.0def.7240  ARPA   GigabitEthernet2/10
Internet  192.168.10.2  175   001e.be8a.f880  ARPA   GigabitEthernet2/10
Internet  192.168.10.9   11   001b.0def.7280  ARPA   GigabitEthernet2/3
Internet  192.168.10.10   -   001b.0def.7240  ARPA   GigabitEthernet2/3
R3#ping 192.168.10.2

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.10.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms
R3#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
R3(config)#serv int
R3(config)#end
R3#sh mod
*Sep 25 18:10:37.377: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
R3#sh mod | incl Act
  53  Supervisor Engine 32 10GE (Active) WS-SUP32-10GE-3B   SAL1051BEKF
R3#show plat capture elam asic super slot 5
R3#$ elam trigger dbus ipv4 if IP_SA=192.168.10.1 IP_DA=192.168.10.2 
R3#show plat capture elam status
active ELAM info:
Slot Cpu   Asic   Inst Ver PB Elam
 ---   --- -- 
50   SUPERMAN 01.3Y
DBUS trigger: FORMAT=IP L3_PROTOCOL=IPV4 IP_SA=192.168.10.1 IP_DA=192.168.10.2
R3#show plat cap elam start
R3#show plat capture elam status
active ELAM info:
Slot Cpu   Asic   Inst Ver PB Elam
 ---   --- -- 
50   SUPERMAN 01.3Y
DBUS trigger: FORMAT=IP L3_PROTOCOL=IPV4 IP_SA=192.168.10.1 IP_DA=192.168.10.2
elam capture in progress
R3#!send a ping
R3#ping 192.168.10.2 rep 1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.10.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!
Success rate is 100 percent (1/1), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
R3#show plat capture elam status
active ELAM info:
Slot Cpu   Asic   Inst Ver PB Elam
 ---   --- -- 
50   SUPERMAN 01.3Y
DBUS trigger: FORMAT=IP L3_PROTOCOL=IPV4 IP_SA=192.168.10.1 IP_DA=192.168.10.2
elam capture completed
R3#!elam completed
R3#show plat cap elam data
DBUS data:
SEQ_NUM  [5] = 0x3
QOS  [3] = 0
QOS_TYPE [1] = 0
TYPE [4] = 0 [ETHERNET]
STATUS_BPDU  [1] = 0
IPO  [1] = 1
NO_ESTBLS[1] = 0
RBH  [3] = b000
CR   [1] = 0
TRUSTED  [1] = 0
NOTIFY_IL[1] = 0
NOTIFY_NL[1] = 0
DISABLE_NL   [1] = 0
DISABLE_IL   [1] = 0
DONT_FWD [1] = 0
INDEX_DIRECT [1] = 0
DONT_LEARN   [1] = 0
COND_LEARN   [1] = 0
BUNDLE_BYPASS[1] = 0
QOS_TIC  [1] = 0
INBAND   [1] = 0
IGNORE_QOSO  [1] = 0
IGNORE_QOSI  [1] = 1
IGNORE_ACLO  [1] = 0
IGNORE_ACLI  [1] = 1
PORT_QOS [1] = 0
CACHE_CNTRL  [2] = 0 [NORMAL]
VLAN [12] = 1030
SRC_FLOOD[1] = 0
SRC_INDEX[19] = 0x380
LEN  [16] = 118
FORMAT   [2] = 0 [IP]
MPLS_EXP [3] = 0x0
REC  [1] = 0
NO_STATS [1] = 0
VPN_INDEX[10] = 0x0
PACKET_TYPE  [3] = 0 [ETHERNET]
L3_PROTOCOL  [4] = 0 [IPV4]
L3_PT[8] = 1 [ICMP]

Re: [c-nsp] 10/100/1000 speeds in GE SFP ports

2008-09-25 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver
 _modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.html
 
 Is this accurate? Can someone find errors?

One funny thing is that the 6500 release note now (SXH) says:
48-port Gigabit or 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet SFP about the
6748-SFP, where the previous (SXF) phrase was: 48-port Gigabit
Ethernet SFP.

I haven't had a chance to test if anything's actually changed,
though.

(Yes, I've also heard the 'It's a hardware limitation. Forget
it' story).

-A

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10/100/1000 speeds in GE SFP ports

2008-09-25 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2008-09-25 22:56 +0200), Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:

 One funny thing is that the 6500 release note now (SXH) says:
 48-port Gigabit or 10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet SFP about the
 6748-SFP, where the previous (SXF) phrase was: 48-port Gigabit
 Ethernet SFP.
 
 I haven't had a chance to test if anything's actually changed,
 though.
 
 (Yes, I've also heard the 'It's a hardware limitation. Forget
 it' story).

Someone commented on the list about his 6724 or 6748 being
able to display DOM info, while lot of us had been told
hardware is unable to read the upper half where the data lives.
 But he had newer hardware revision than any of mine, so
it's entirely possible that there has been hardware upgrade,
but I couldn't find anything in PCN about that change.

If there had been, perhaps they added multirate too? Sounds
too good to be true though. Looking forward for someone
to report back with SXI :)

-- 
  ++ytti
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Debugging Cisco VPN Client Software ... Is it even possible ?

2008-09-25 Thread Mario Spinthiras
Ive found that Vista in the past has given me issues. What you can try doing
is disabling unnecessary protocols on the relevant adapters while as keeping
the specific one required by the virtual VPN adapter that it creates. To be
honest I found a viable solution by rebooting into Ubuntu , deleting my
Vista partition and expanding my ext3 to take the whole drive. That way I
deleted all my problems in one go.

The logfile is kind of off on troubleshooting issues , as is VPN entirely
unless your familiar with it's debugging and phases. Maybe my solution will
work for you.

Warm Regards,
Mario A. Spinthiras
http://www.blupenguin.com
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Debugging Cisco VPN Client Software ... Is it even possible ?

2008-09-25 Thread Justin Shore

Mario Spinthiras wrote:
Ive found that Vista in the past has given me issues. What you can try 
doing is disabling unnecessary protocols on the relevant adapters while 
as keeping the specific one required by the virtual VPN adapter that it 


I never tried that.  I haven't had to troubleshoot a non-Vista client 
VPN issue since Vista shipped.  The best solution I've found is to 
uninstall, reboot and reinstall the latest BETA.  The solution is a joke 
but surprisingly it usually works.


creates. To be honest I found a viable solution by rebooting into Ubuntu 
, deleting my Vista partition and expanding my ext3 to take the whole 
drive. That way I deleted all my problems in one go.


There's a solution that I can sink my teeth into.

The logfile is kind of off on troubleshooting issues , as is VPN 
entirely unless your familiar with it's debugging and phases. Maybe my 
solution will work for you.


I've had to delve into it before, digging into the nitty gritty of 
IPSec.  It's doable but VPN isn't my strong point.  It is doable though. 
 I prefer your second solution.



Justin
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] SNMP Monitoring VPN Traffic

2008-09-25 Thread Aaron Riemer
Hey guys,

 

I am taking a bit of a leap here. But I would like to know if it's
possible to actually monitor or graph bandwidth that each of our VPN
tunnels are utilising terminating at our ASA firewall. We have
implemented Cacti and weathermap monitoring. It would be great if we
could actually see bandwidth statistics with each of these tunnels.
Would there be some SNMP OID that I could graph for this?

 

Thanks again guys,

 

Aaron.


LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This message contains confidential information and is 
intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/