[c-nsp] elam packet capture

2008-12-24 Thread Thilak T
Hello

Can anyone please guide me to understand how to find out physical interface
to DEST_INDEX mapping. I did a elam capture to trave a IP packet going to a
CSS VIP.

RBUS data:
SEQ_NUM  [5] = 0x17
CCC  [3] = b100 [L3_RW]
CAP1 [1] = 0
CAP2 [1] = 0
QOS  [3] = 0
EGRESS   [1] = 0
DT   [1] = 0 [IP]
TL   [1] = 0 [B32]
FLOOD[1] = 0
*DEST_INDEX   [19] = 0x2E*
VLAN [12] = 250
RBH  [3] = b010
RDT  [1] = 0
GENERIC  [1] = 0
EXTRA_CICLE  [1] = 0
FABRIC_PRIO  [1] = 0
L2   [1] = 0
FCS1 [8] = 0x1
IP_TOS_VALID [1] = 1
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] elam packet capture

2008-12-24 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Thilak,


Try running this command:

Router-sp#test mcast ltl index ef
index 0xEF contain ports 4/48

(in your case change ef with 2e)

Arie

-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Thilak T
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:06
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] elam packet capture

Hello

Can anyone please guide me to understand how to find out physical
interface
to DEST_INDEX mapping. I did a elam capture to trave a IP packet going
to a
CSS VIP.

RBUS data:
SEQ_NUM  [5] = 0x17
CCC  [3] = b100 [L3_RW]
CAP1 [1] = 0
CAP2 [1] = 0
QOS  [3] = 0
EGRESS   [1] = 0
DT   [1] = 0 [IP]
TL   [1] = 0 [B32]
FLOOD[1] = 0
*DEST_INDEX   [19] = 0x2E*
VLAN [12] = 250
RBH  [3] = b010
RDT  [1] = 0
GENERIC  [1] = 0
EXTRA_CICLE  [1] = 0
FABRIC_PRIO  [1] = 0
L2   [1] = 0
FCS1 [8] = 0x1
IP_TOS_VALID [1] = 1
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Lab Tool

2008-12-24 Thread luismi
http://www.sins.com.au/nmis/

El mar, 23-12-2008 a las 23:07 +0530, Aman Chugh escribió:
 Hello List,
 
 I am looking for a tool for consolidating all my devices in my lab in
 differrent racks and which should act like a database of all my devices with
 infomation about the IOS code and software running on these devices, plus
 the ability to telnet to the device from a webpage. Please let me know some
 tools either free or $ which can be used for this purpose.
 
 TIA
 
 Aman
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] 6500 and VSS

2008-12-24 Thread Nick Griffin
Looking for some real world input here so coming to the pro's. Anyone using
6500's with VSS implemented? Looking for people's feedback who are using it
in production. I had heard awhile back  that there are issues with support
for ISSU, is this still the case? Just looking for some pro's and con's.

Thanks in advance,

Nick Griffin
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 6500 and VSS

2008-12-24 Thread Thomas Dupas
Issu should be supported in the SXI release, but haven't verified that
yet in real life (no other release yet to upgrade to)

About production experience: no real show-stoppers so far (besides the
upgrade/downtime one, which issu should solve), just remember that
mpls isn't supported (yet?)

Best regards,

Thomas Dupas

On 24-dec-08, at 18:02, Nick Griffin nick.jon.grif...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Looking for some real world input here so coming to the pro's.
 Anyone using
 6500's with VSS implemented? Looking for people's feedback who are
 using it
 in production. I had heard awhile back  that there are issues with
 support
 for ISSU, is this still the case? Just looking for some pro's and
 con's.

 Thanks in advance,

 Nick Griffin
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] elam packet capture

2008-12-24 Thread Thilak T
Thanks for the quick reply. I am running 12.2(18)SXF10a , test mcast ltl
index  doesn't seem to work.However in this case I could find the interface
number since I know where the was CSS connected. Can you guide me find the
index number someotherway.?


Here is what I did to find out.

bbr00m1#*show tcam interface gigabitEthernet 1/47 qos type1 arp detail*
* Global Defaults not shared
--
T - V(Value) M(Mask) R(Result)
A - ARP Packet
R - RARP Packet
X - XTAG
--
*Interface: 46 *  label: 511   lookup_type: 1  # *DEST_INDEX  [19] =
0x2E*  is *Interface: 46 *
protocol: ARP   packet-type: 3
+-+-+--+-++---+
|T|Index|AR|X| Dest Node  |  Source Node  |
+-+-+--+-++---+
 V 36839 -- 0  0  0 -
 M 36845 -- 0  0  0 -
 R rslt: 0   -

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Arie Vayner (avayner)
avay...@cisco.comwrote:

 Thilak,


 Try running this command:

 Router-sp#test mcast ltl index ef
 index 0xEF contain ports 4/48

 (in your case change ef with 2e)

 Arie

 -Original Message-
 From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
 [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Thilak T
 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:06
 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: [c-nsp] elam packet capture

 Hello

 Can anyone please guide me to understand how to find out physical
 interface
 to DEST_INDEX mapping. I did a elam capture to trave a IP packet going
 to a
 CSS VIP.

 RBUS data:
 SEQ_NUM  [5] = 0x17
 CCC  [3] = b100 [L3_RW]
 CAP1 [1] = 0
 CAP2 [1] = 0
 QOS  [3] = 0
 EGRESS   [1] = 0
 DT   [1] = 0 [IP]
 TL   [1] = 0 [B32]
 FLOOD[1] = 0
 *DEST_INDEX   [19] = 0x2E*
 VLAN [12] = 250
 RBH  [3] = b010
 RDT  [1] = 0
 GENERIC  [1] = 0
 EXTRA_CICLE  [1] = 0
 FABRIC_PRIO  [1] = 0
 L2   [1] = 0
 FCS1 [8] = 0x1
 IP_TOS_VALID [1] = 1
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] MPLS Label question

2008-12-24 Thread Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Hi All


MPLS Lable Untag removes all labels from MPLS packets and sent it as native
IP packet


my question is packets with untag label will be sent over IP interface not
MPLS interface and FIB lookup occur prefixes with this tag ?


best regards
--Ibrahim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 32 bit ASN

2008-12-24 Thread Brandon Ewing
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:55:01AM +0100, Marcus.Gerdon wrote:
 Hi @All,
 
 what information I got regarding AS32 is somewhat worrysome:
 
 12.0(32)S12   Q4/2008
   for 72  GSR
 

12.0(32)S12 is out as of yesterday with support for 4-byte AS on GRP and PRP
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/release/ntes/120SNEWF.html#wp3521658

I loaded it on a test router yesterday -- I immediately ran into the 
issue discussed last week on NANOG:

http://markmail.org/message/3ofvjyggayfxezna

-- 
Brandon Ewing(nicot...@warningg.com)


pgpFPx02JXeH5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] ASA question

2008-12-24 Thread adrian kok
Hi 

How can I empty the cache in ASA?

I transfer the ip from one server to other server, but
the ASA is still only reconizing in the old server

Thank you


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] ASA question

2008-12-24 Thread Garry
adrian kok wrote:
 Hi 
 
 How can I empty the cache in ASA?

Do you mean ARP cache? Have you tried clear arp?

-garry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] IPSec L2L tunnel - traffic from IVRF to other VRFs

2008-12-24 Thread Ramcharan, Vijay A
I've read the doc at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/security/configuration/guide/sec_vrf
_aware_ipsec_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1027
175 and ignoring the restriction about mapping VRF to VRF traffic have
tried (unsuccessfully) to circumvent this restriction. 

Is it at all possible to terminate an IPSec L2L tunnel in VRF A and then
have traffic exit that VRF A to reach resources located in VRF B or
possibly the global routing table? 

I see the security implications naturally of allowing traffic from
remote sites to leak across VRFs but if it's not possible then is there
some way of providing a central service type of resource to a bunch of
different sites (assume each site goes into a different VRF) which
connect to that resource via IPSec tunnels? 
 
[Site A]---IPSec tunnel over Internet---[Hub Router--VRF A--]
|
[VRF B]
|
(Central Service) 
 
Vijay Ramcharan 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] IPSec L2L tunnel - traffic from IVRF to other VRFs

2008-12-24 Thread David Prall
Give each VRF a rd, and do an import/export of that rd. Configure BGP, don't
even need to use it as your routing protocol. Each VRF should automagically
have the address family configured. Now under the ip vrf configuration
import the other VRF's rd. Now you have reachability at one location.
Another solution is to create a static route and point it at the physical
interface of the other VRF. You'll need to do this in both directions. 

David

--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
 boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ramcharan, Vijay A
 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:41 PM
 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Subject: [c-nsp] IPSec L2L tunnel - traffic from IVRF to other VRFs
 
 I've read the doc at
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/security/configuration/guide/sec_vr
 f
 _aware_ipsec_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp102
 7
 175 and ignoring the restriction about mapping VRF to VRF traffic have
 tried (unsuccessfully) to circumvent this restriction.
 
 Is it at all possible to terminate an IPSec L2L tunnel in VRF A and
 then
 have traffic exit that VRF A to reach resources located in VRF B or
 possibly the global routing table?
 
 I see the security implications naturally of allowing traffic from
 remote sites to leak across VRFs but if it's not possible then is there
 some way of providing a central service type of resource to a bunch
 of
 different sites (assume each site goes into a different VRF) which
 connect to that resource via IPSec tunnels?
 
 [Site A]---IPSec tunnel over Internet---[Hub Router--VRF A--]
   |
   [VRF B]
   |
   (Central Service)
 
 Vijay Ramcharan
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

2008-12-24 Thread L'argent


I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of 
VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian 
phone system. [transparent SIP gateway basically -- pass through caller 
id/name/etc] I believe a ISR 1841 can do it, but I'm not 100%.


Anyone been here/done that?

thanks,

LA
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

2008-12-24 Thread Jay Hennigan

L'argent wrote:


I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of 
VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian 
phone system. [transparent SIP gateway basically -- pass through caller 
id/name/etc] I believe a ISR 1841 can do it, but I'm not 100%.


Anyone been here/done that?


Not Cisco, but the Adtran TA904 will do that just fine, assuming SIP 
signaling on the VoIP side.  If you need SCCP for interoperability with 
Cisco, you'll need Cisco gear.


--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

2008-12-24 Thread Tim Jackson
IAD-2431-2T1E1... Has 2xFE 2xT1 can do all sorts of stuff.. Works
great for this...

--
Tim

On 12/24/08, L'argent larg...@ai.net wrote:

 I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of
 VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian
 phone system. [transparent SIP gateway basically -- pass through caller
 id/name/etc] I believe a ISR 1841 can do it, but I'm not 100%.

 Anyone been here/done that?

 thanks,

 LA
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


-- 
Sent from my mobile device
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

2008-12-24 Thread Martin Moens
1841 doesn't do voice. (It has no DSP's) 
28xx surely will do the trick, and also 2600XM with NM-HDV2-1T1/E1.

Martin


On Wednesday, 24 December, 2008 22:17 L'argent  wrote:

 I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of
 VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian
 phone system. [transparent SIP gateway basically -- pass through
 caller id/name/etc] I believe a ISR 1841 can do it, but I'm not 100%.
 
 Anyone been here/done that?
 
 thanks,
 
 LA
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] IPSec L2L tunnel - traffic from IVRF to other VRFs

2008-12-24 Thread Derick Winkworth
If security is an issue, put any old router in that will do VRFs and configure 
it with IOS FW or ACLs...  You can put an IOS FW on a stick with VLAN's going 
to it...

Or put an actual firewall in place...





From: Ramcharan, Vijay A vijay.ramcha...@verizonbusiness.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 2:40:53 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] IPSec L2L tunnel - traffic from IVRF to other VRFs

I've read the doc at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/security/configuration/guide/sec_vrf
_aware_ipsec_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1027
175 and ignoring the restriction about mapping VRF to VRF traffic have
tried (unsuccessfully) to circumvent this restriction. 

Is it at all possible to terminate an IPSec L2L tunnel in VRF A and then
have traffic exit that VRF A to reach resources located in VRF B or
possibly the global routing table? 

I see the security implications naturally of allowing traffic from
remote sites to leak across VRFs but if it's not possible then is there
some way of providing a central service type of resource to a bunch of
different sites (assume each site goes into a different VRF) which
connect to that resource via IPSec tunnels? 

[Site A]---IPSec tunnel over Internet---[Hub Router--VRF A--]
|
[VRF B]
|
(Central Service) 

Vijay Ramcharan 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] elam packet capture

2008-12-24 Thread Stig Johansen
Thanks for the quick reply. I am running 12.2(18)SXF10a , test mcast ltl 
index  doesn't seem to work.However in this case I could find the interface 
number since I know where the was CSS connected. Can you guide me find the 
index number someotherway.?

Take care to note that the test mcast ltl index-command is performed while 
attached to the supervisor. (The same place you do the elam packet captures). 

 Router-sp#test mcast ltl index ef
 index 0xEF contain ports 4/48

/Stig
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Small IAD - Voip to PRI

2008-12-24 Thread Martin Moens
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/voiceden
sity.pdf 

On Wednesday, 24 December, 2008 22:17 L'argent  wrote:

 I'm looking for a small box, pref Cisco, that will take 23 channels of
 VOIP and hand it off as a PRI suitable for use in a Norstar/Meridian
 phone system. [transparent SIP gateway basically -- pass through
 caller id/name/etc] I believe a ISR 1841 can do it, but I'm not 100%.
 
 Anyone been here/done that?
 
 thanks,
 
 LA
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/