Re: [c-nsp] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. FAIL List ops, you might want to firewall this as well as the similar cruft from Facebook, etc. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] ANM Upgrade 3.2 to 4.2
Dear All, I am planning to upgrade the ANM 3.2 to ANM 4.2. Does anybody have any experience on this. What are the best practices, precautions etc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command
Sorry, but I do not see the difference beetween IPv4 and IPv6 Behaviour here. As far as i remember you put the LAN-Interface vlan1 and the radio-(sub-)interface into the same bridge-group and configure the IPv4 (or Ipv6) on the bvi interface to emulate the normal behaviour of home-customer-CPE's. Juergen. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] About 7640 with WS-SUP 32-GE-3B
Hi Experts, Any expectations for the number of the broadband users that the 7640 with http://www.cisco.com/asiapac/campaigns/metroethernet/files/c6500_c7600_sup3 2_DS.pdf WS-SUP 32-GE-3B can support? Regards, Amin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command
This is the workaround when you can't put the address on the BVI, which you can't in some cases. Mike On 6/22/11 1:24 AM, Juergen Marenda j...@ilk.net wrote: Sorry, but I do not see the difference beetween IPv4 and IPv6 Behaviour here. As far as i remember you put the LAN-Interface vlan1 and the radio-(sub-)interface into the same bridge-group and configure the IPv4 (or Ipv6) on the bvi interface to emulate the normal behaviour of home-customer-CPE's. Juergen. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command
Because it's added only in 15.1(2)T http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/15_1/release/notes /151-2TNEWF.html#wp43436 On 22.06.2011 20:17, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: This is the workaround when you can't put the address on the BVI, which you can't in some cases. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Average throughput of a Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gig interface?
Hi, I have a basic question about the Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gigabit interfaces? What do people find is the average throughput of the gig interfaces? Assuming normal packet sizes and standard traffic how much milage do you really get out of these? I'm having an issue pushing past 110 megabits in one direction and 15 megabits in the other over one of these gig interfaces and wondered what I could realistically expect under real world conditions? Any feedback would be appreciated. Not sure if I have a problem or if the devices are working with in spec. Thanks Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IOS-XR: Permanent set default-afi all
There is a handy command on the IOS-XR: set default-afi all (it makes the output of show ip bgp summary more juniper like), but it affects only the current session though. Any ways to make it default? Can it be somehow set in your username settings? -- Grzegorz Janoszka ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Average throughput of a Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gig interface?
On 22.06.11 22:54, Scott Granados wrote: Hi, I have a basic question about the Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gigabit interfaces? What do people find is the average throughput of the gig interfaces? Assuming normal packet sizes and standard traffic how much milage do you really get out of these? I'm having an issue pushing past 110 megabits in one direction and 15 megabits in the other over one of these gig interfaces and wondered what I could realistically expect under real world conditions? Any feedback would be appreciated. Not sure if I have a problem or if the devices are working with in spec. What your CPU load? And what problems you've got on interface, drops, ignores, crc, etc? It can be faulty interface, but most likely you run out CPU power. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Average throughput of a Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gig interface?
We've got some doing a lot more than that with no issues. I've seen a G1 do 450Mb/s without major problems (can probaby do more?). Paul On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Scott Granados wrote: Hi, I have a basic question about the Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gigabit interfaces? What do people find is the average throughput of the gig interfaces? Assuming normal packet sizes and standard traffic how much milage do you really get out of these? I'm having an issue pushing past 110 megabits in one direction and 15 megabits in the other over one of these gig interfaces and wondered what I could realistically expect under real world conditions? Any feedback would be appreciated. Not sure if I have a problem or if the devices are working with in spec. Thanks Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Average throughput of a Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gig interface?
I have one that runs 300Mbps with CPU staying under 50% utilization for the most part, even while running BGP... -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 1:55 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Providers Subject: [c-nsp] Average throughput of a Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gig interface? Hi, I have a basic question about the Cisco 7200 VXR G1 gigabit interfaces? What do people find is the average throughput of the gig interfaces? Assuming normal packet sizes and standard traffic how much milage do you really get out of these? I'm having an issue pushing past 110 megabits in one direction and 15 megabits in the other over one of these gig interfaces and wondered what I could realistically expect under real world conditions? Any feedback would be appreciated. Not sure if I have a problem or if the devices are working with in spec. Thanks Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command
Hi, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:17:41PM +, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: This is the workaround when you can't put the address on the BVI, which you can't in some cases. Well, your setup is just plain routed mode, putting the IPv6 address on the dot11radio interface. The problem is that this just doesn't work on most of the 8xx and 18xx gear that has WiFi hardware built-in... it just doesn't take the command. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgphXRAUSNwbm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command
Hi, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:36:21PM +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote: Because it's added only in 15.1(2)T http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/15_1/release/notes /151-2TNEWF.html#wp43436 Which links here... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-addrg_bsc_con.html ... which says Bridge-Group Virtual Interfaces (BVIs) in IPv6 are not supported with NAT-PT and wireless interfaces Dot11Radio. Fun. I really wonder what's so deeply broken inside IOS that it has been impossible to add working IPv6 to dot11radio (routed or bridged!) in the course of *four* *major* releases (12.2T to 15.1T). But maybe I don't want to know. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de pgpz6up74w4D2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command
What about a plain L2 bridge between an Ethernet interface and the radio interface, then a physical cable (bridge) to another IPv6 routed/VLAN port? Lee -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:46 PM To: Nikolay Shopik Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Dot11Radio0 ipv6 command Hi, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:36:21PM +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote: Because it's added only in 15.1(2)T http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/15_1/release/notes /151-2TNEWF.html#wp43436 Which links here... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ ip6-addrg_bsc_con.html ... which says Bridge-Group Virtual Interfaces (BVIs) in IPv6 are not supported with NAT- PT and wireless interfaces Dot11Radio. Fun. I really wonder what's so deeply broken inside IOS that it has been impossible to add working IPv6 to dot11radio (routed or bridged!) in the course of *four* *major* releases (12.2T to 15.1T). But maybe I don't want to know. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
