Re: [c-nsp] cisco GGSN tethering
So that means We have to upgrade our hardware Can't the SAMI modules provide this feature Kind Regards Nareshchandra Paturi Sent from iPhone. On 25 Jul 2014, at 19:02, Fernando García lis...@cutre.net wrote: Yep, take a look at the ASR5000. They are not the ASR you would expect Enviado desde mi smartphone Sony Xperia™ Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:05:59AM -0700, naresh reddy via cisco-nsp wrote: my company has a requirement to implement tethering detection on the GPRS nodes we use GGSN release 6.0 Cisco is building GGSNs? Cool, didn't know that. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 512K routes approaching - have you adjusted your tcam settings
I forgot about that. The tcam settings on the Sup2T are dynamic. Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. O: 720.891.2502 | mack.mcbr...@viawest.com | www.viawest.com | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube -Original Message- From: Rolf Hanßen [mailto:n...@rhanssen.de] Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:16 AM To: Mack McBride Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 512K routes approaching - have you adjusted your tcam settings Hi Mack, I am wondering about including sup 2T? As far as I see Sup2T has no static CAM partition anymore and therefore needs no specific maximums set. kind regards Rolf As many readers on this list know the routing table is approaching 512K routes. For some it has already passed this threshold. For those that aren't familiar with the issues associated with passing this threshold, I suggest the following two documents: http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=672 http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-serie s-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html Effected devices include 6500s (including sup 2T), 7600s, nexus 7Ks and many devices by other vendors. This problem will likely impact us in some way over the next month even if we fixed our devices because We connect to other services that have not prepared. So be on the lookout for MLSCEF-SP-7-FIB_EXCEPTION messages in your logs. Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 and 'show mfib' commands
I'm at a new job and was looking at a few recent trouble tickets. I see that TAC had them use variations of the 'show mfib' commands, like 'show mfib linecard summary'. At my previous job, we had a few hundred 7600s but I don't recall TAC ever directing us to use those commands. I took a peek at them and it's not clear what I'm looking at. When I see mfib, I assume multicast FIB. I can't really tell if that's what I'm looking at or not, or the significance of the commands. I wasn't able to find much good info about these commands on CCO. Do any of you have any idea what these are really looking at? It seems that they might be useful for troubleshooting linecard issues but I'm entirely unfamiliar with them. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] cisco GGSN tethering
On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:43, nareshbtech--- via cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net wrote: So that means We have to upgrade our hardware Can't the SAMI modules provide this feature No. But talk to your favorite Cisco account team. They may be able to have a talk with you on virtualized ASR 5k. -- There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about. John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IOS XR - CBAC/ZBF or similar
I have been unable to find CBAC/ZBF or similar on IOS XR. I suspect these featires are not available but would be happy if someone could prove me wrong. Thanks Ivan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 and 'show mfib' commands
Hi John, Yes, mfib = multicast FIB. Are the boxes in question running multicast ? (hint: show run | i multicast) What were the previous tickets about (or opened for) ? I'm not sure why they would be used for anything other than troubleshooting multicast traffic, it could be specific to a linecard if that was the problem encountered. regards, Tony. From: John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2014 2:47 AM Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 7600 and 'show mfib' commands I'm at a new job and was looking at a few recent trouble tickets. I see that TAC had them use variations of the 'show mfib' commands, like 'show mfib linecard summary'. At my previous job, we had a few hundred 7600s but I don't recall TAC ever directing us to use those commands. I took a peek at them and it's not clear what I'm looking at. When I see mfib, I assume multicast FIB. I can't really tell if that's what I'm looking at or not, or the significance of the commands. I wasn't able to find much good info about these commands on CCO. Do any of you have any idea what these are really looking at? It seems that they might be useful for troubleshooting linecard issues but I'm entirely unfamiliar with them. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco 6880 - EVC/MPLS Limitations
Hi All, Trying to clarify some limitations surrounding the 6880X platform, in terms of its support for MPLS and EVC. Specifically, the combination of the two of them. From looking at the latest configuration guide (SUP2T/15.1SY) - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15-1SY/config_guide/sup2T/15_1_sy_swcg_2T/ethernet_virtual_connection.html#pgfId-1081503 - it initially looks as though EVC is reasonably well supported - until you get to the paragraph around restrictions. Specifically, what isn't supported on EVCs seems to include EoMPLS, QinQ and Bridge Domain Routing. In short - is it possible to terminate a pseudowire - or other MPLS L2 machinery - into an EVC, either directly, or via a bridge-domain, on the 6880? Regards, Chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
