[c-nsp] SERVICES DOWN DUE FAILURE TO SWITCHING

2020-05-28 Thread emmanuel manoni
Hi all,

There was this failure in SP network I work for which I can't make sense of

Seamless MPLS has been deployed Networkwide, There is a cluster of access
layer routers,let me take one of them as 'A'.Router 'A' is in Ospf Area
5,It has three bgp RRs,these RRs are in the same cluster ID,and they've
peered to the network main RRs.All network RRs are in the same ISIS-L2
domain.One of Area 5 RRs is connected to another Ospf Area(Area 1) with
Router 'B' which is also an RR for area 1 access routers,with both ISIS and
Ospf connectivity.Router A has some MPLS L3VPN services available in Router
B. It was working fine.Recently,there was a new direct link introduced
between Router A and B.We decided to extend Area 5 to Router B via new
direct link, without adding Router B as an RR.Traffic was flowing via that
link with no any issue. Yesterday we had a failure in the new link between
Router A and B and Traffic from A to B failed to switch to old path.Weird
thing is some services switched to old path,many others didn't,and even
weirder Router A hosting same services for different sites with same vrf
for service (Routing Table) also had other sites ok,and others not ok. I
analyzed routing at the time, nothing seemed to be wrong except some sites
were up others were not in the same area/router.And situation autorestored
itself after almost an hour.

Anyone with more insight, kindly assist.Thanks in advance.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] BGP router process using way more memory on one system

2020-05-28 Thread Drew Weaver
I'll leave this here incase it helps anyone but I was able to get it to respond 
to a few simple validation commands by just clearing a BGP session.

Thanks,
-Drew

-Original Message-
From: Nick Hilliard  
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 3:51 AM
To: Drew Weaver 
Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' 
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP router process using way more memory on one system

Drew Weaver wrote on 24/05/2020 19:20:
> We have two routers that have a mirrored configuration. Peers, BGP 
> configuration, everything. Exactly the same [except for IP addresses]
> 
> One of the routers BGP router process is holding 617576024. The other 
> is holding 577596716.
> 
> The one that is holding more appears to be suffering from an out of 
> memory condition.

There were a couple of releases where the ipv4_rib process had a persistent 
memory leak.  Try this:

Router# admin process restart ipv4_rib

This is non service affecting - restarting the process temporarily stops FIB 
reprogramming, then does a full RIB reload from all RIB sources, then does a 
FIB check across the device. I.e. it's safer to do this than to hobble along 
with OOM errors.

Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR IS-IS authentication

2020-05-28 Thread Mark Tinka



On 27/May/20 21:08, Eric Van Tol wrote:
> Unless I get suggestions otherwise, I suppose I'll just not use keys, which 
> seems prohibitive, particularly if a password needs changing at some point. 
> The 'lsp-password' without a key chain seems to work just fine. :-/

In IOS and IOS XE, we use key chains.

In IOS XR, we use "lsp-password hmac-md5" at the "router isis" level,
and "hello-password hmac-md5" at the "router isis 1 interface" level.

Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/