Re: [c-nsp] BFD not working on ASR920

2022-04-05 Thread Mark Tinka




On 4/5/22 20:00, Bryan Holloway wrote:



Curious to hear what other options you are considering? We're also 
looking for alternatives ...


ACX7k...

Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] BFD not working on ASR920

2022-04-05 Thread Bryan Holloway


On 4/3/22 9:04 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:



On 4/3/22 20:30, Gert Doering wrote:


Netflow is sort of semi-supported, if I remember right - by using
the SPAN feature of the chip to siphon traffic off to the CPU, and
do netflow there, capped to 1GE of traffic.  Or something like that.

Did not try NAT or PPPoE on that box... but I'm sure there is excitement.

(Speaking of SPAN - trying to debug BGP using a local SPAM is a real
adventure, as packets sent by the local CPU are not seen on a RX/TX
mirror session... only the RSTs coming in from the other end gave a
clue what happened)


We are finding the ASR920 has reached its usefulness for us.

We are looking at other options now; and yes, from me, that also 
includes boxes shipping with Broadcom :-\...



Curious to hear what other options you are considering? We're also 
looking for alternatives ...


- bryan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/