Re: [c-nsp] SNMP query for just one interface?

2008-03-21 Thread Bill Nash

Find the ifIndex for the one interface, and instead of doing a table walk, 
just append that ifIndex to whichever interface object you're polling and 
do simple gets.

ifDescr.6
ifOperStatus.6
ifAdminStatus.6
etc.

- billn


On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 One more problem before the weekend ;-)

 Is it somehow possible to query just ONE interface of a Cisco router/switch?
 I need to see the traffic going through a certain interface, but this
 tiny management PC shouldn't see the other ports.

 I found a website which points into the right direction (I guess),

 snmp-server community public ro
 snmp-server community ourCommStr ro
 snmp-server community topsecret rw 60
 snmp-server community hideit ro view noRouteTable

 access-list 60 permit 10.1.1.1
 access-list 60 permit 10.2.2.2

 snmp-server view noRouteTable internet included
 snmp-server view noRouteTable ip.21 excluded
 snmp-server view noRouteTable ip.22 excluded
 snmp-server view noRouteTable ifMIB excluded


 but I'm still to stupid to query just one port without seeing anything
 else (other ports, cpu, ...)

 Please let me know/give me a hint how this can be done.


 Thanks and have a nice weekend everybody,
 Bernd


 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Traffic Analyzing?

2007-12-12 Thread Bill Nash

I'm not looking for MRTG. I'm looking for a traffic analyzer.
'Ooooh. Traffic analysis.. Netflow! You seek Netflow!'

- billn

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Shaun R. wrote:

 I don't know if something like this is even possible so I figured I would
 ask.  I was wondering if there was any type of software out there that would
 monitor traffic leaving the network and display reports about which
 ASN/Providers they are going down.  This would be useful for determining
 what providers I should peer with next.  For example if the software showed
 that 50% of my traffic was destined to travel to or across Level3 then it
 would be beneficial for me to bring in a pipe from level3.  Anything out
 there like this?

 ~Shaun


 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] multilink bundle

2007-12-05 Thread Bill Nash

Convert it to a full data pipe and find another way to transport the voice 
traffic over it? This is out of my scope, but it seems like VOIP could be 
a winner here.

- billn

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Joseph Jackson wrote:

 Just to answer everyones questions here's the story. 
  
 One end has a 7206 NPE G1 with 1 gig of ram
  
 other end has 7204 NPE 300 with 256 megs of ram
  
 Each router has a  PA-MC-T3= (the channelized ds3 card)  
  
 We do have a ds3 it just has channels 1-5 stripped of it to do voice
 between the locations.  I would like to use the rest of the DS3's
 bandwidth for data but I can't seem to find a way to do that without
 just using a crap load of T1's put into multilink bundles. 
  
  
  
 Any ideas?
  
  
 Thanks
  
 Joseph
 
 
 
 
   From: Doug Clements [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 5:10 PM
   To: Joseph Jackson
   Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
   Subject: Re: [c-nsp] multilink bundle
   
   
   On Dec 4, 2007 4:49 PM, Joseph Jackson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 
   Would it be considered retarded to put 23 T1's into a
 multilink bundle?
   
   
 
 
   I wouldn't try it, but assuming you're running 7500, there are
 hardware limitations:
   
 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft
 /120t/120t3/multippp.htm#wp1025005 
   
   
   --Doug 
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Getting Netflow information from an Extreme Networks network without Netflow/Sflow

2007-11-28 Thread Bill Nash

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Adam Powers wrote:

 I would definitely take a look at Luca Deri's nProbe (the same Italian that
 brought us ntop). This small linux/windows application simulates a router's
 
 I haven't worked with it myself but he even sells a small appliance that
 runs nprobe if you don't want to mess with building out an probe server
 yourself.
 
 http://www.ntop.org/nProbe.html
 

This probably isn't a bad move for those interested in flow statistics 
without getting into the nuts and bolts of how it works. This will come 
with the same caveat of finding an appropriate choke point to trap 
traffic via span/port mirror. This solution will only scale so far before 
you need to get exotic with your collector hardware. Given the original 
requirements of an older network, I don't think that's a problem right 
now.

To put some real numbers on this, 100megabit and 1gigabit are the simple 
limits of this solution. 

- billn
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] on the subject of SNMP

2007-11-27 Thread Bill Nash

Try looking for 'bridging' and 'forwarding' tables instead.

6500 is screwy (at last check, I'm a few years out of date by now) in that 
you need to append @$vlanNumber to the community string when polling the 
device to get information about a specific vlan. Once you get into that 
context, things might start to make a little more sense. I've no 
experience with FWSM, though, so caveat utilitor. Hope that helps.

- billn

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Justin M. Streiner wrote:

 Does anyone have an OID to:
 1. enumerate the VLANs configured in a vlan-group to be presented to an 
 FWSM in a 6500 via the firewall vlan-group command?
 
 I've searched the MIBs using many different combinations of vlan, 
 firewall, channel, etc, but have come up with nothing.
 
 2. list the spanning-tree priorities for the VLANs that are configured on 
 a device?
 
 I found several things in the MIBs that looked promising, but when I poll 
 them, I didn't get what I thought I'd get, or the OIDs I looked at were 
 deprecated.
 
 Cisco's MIB object navigator hasn't been much help, so any insight to get 
 pointed in the right direction is greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks
 jms
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Getting Netflow information from an Extreme Networks network without Netflow/Sflow

2007-11-27 Thread Bill Nash

You can implement tools like softflowd on a server to generate flows from 
traffic it sees on one (or more) of its interfaces, in combination with 
your available port mirroring option. Obvious limits are going to include 
figuring out where your traffic chokepoints are, to facilitate 
comprehensive monitoring, and whether or not you can get a big enough pipe 
on server hardware to handle your traffic volume. 

- billn

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mike Louis wrote:

 Hello All,
 
 I am working with a large client that uses extreme networks gear extensively. 
 Most of their gear is older i series and e series summit and black diamond 
 equipment. Anyone on this list have any experience with getting netflow top 
 talkers information from  a network like this without using netflow or sflow. 
 I am working on some other tools using NTOP for starters but i am not getting 
 the information that i need. I would like to use a tool that can support port 
 mirroring traffic to gather network statistics. The current gear that they 
 are using supports Sflow however its so old that even extreme recommended not 
 enabling it on links over 1Mbps. Netflow was a no go as well plus most of the 
 gear won't support it.
 
 Any ideas on some good network visibility tools for traffic anaylsis. 
 Specifically something similar to what information netflow can provide with 
 source/destination port/address information for a flow.
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Mike
 
 Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the 
 individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information 
 that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, confidential, and/or 
 exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
 hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
 communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
 communication in error, please notify the original sender immediately by 
 telephone or return email and destroy or delete this message along with any 
 attachments immediately.
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Network Topology Mapping

2007-10-28 Thread Bill Nash

This topic never fails to amaze me, that there are people who will build a 
network of size and not document it. (I'm not faulting you, I've just seen 
it happen a lot.)

I've built toolsets that do this, only to have people actively refuse to 
use them. I don't get it.

- billn

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Sami Joseph wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I have a corporate network with 6500s as core and 3560s as access, IP phones
 and a lot of other routers and PIXs.
 
 I need to have a full detailed network documentation and mapping of topology
 because we have such a big network a no documentation which always slows our
 troubleshooting.
 
 I am looking for guidance from you guys on what is the best way/tool/process
 to do it from your experience?
 
 any templates for the documentation?
 
 Thanks,
 Sam
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Network Topology Mapping

2007-10-28 Thread Bill Nash

Correlate ARP cache to bridge tables. You can do it from your core 
switches as a start. It's THE best way for finding anything talking on 
your network.

- billn

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Sami Joseph wrote:

 Hi Roland,
 
 Thanks.
 
 The point is i dont really know all the devices we have, so i cant be sure
 that they all have snmp and CDP configured.
 
 Is there a way around that?
 
 on the top of my head, i would do a port scan and based on that i would go
 into each device and make sure each has SNMP and CDP before i start
 discovering.
 
 Which open source one would you recommend ?
 
 How about CiscoWorks?
 
 Thanks,
 Sam
 
 On 10/28/07, Roland Dobbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On Oct 28, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Roger Oliver wrote:
 
   I'm very interested to hear what others do.
 
  PacketDesign RouteExplorer does good visualizations based upon BGP
  and IGP, and Narus InSight Manager does visualization based upon
  BGP.  There are also tools like lanmap, which watch packets via RSPAN
  in a given locality.
 
  Several of the open source and commercial NMS systems do SNMP-based
  autodiscovery; it's important to test these out and ensure they're
  tuned not to be overly aggressive prior to running the autodiscovery,
  monitor your network while it's taking place, do it during a
  maintenance window, etc.
 
  Some folks use GraphViz with a bit of Perl-fu on their configs to
  generate graphs, too.
 
  ---
  Roland Dobbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] // 408.527.6376 voice
 
 I don't sound like nobody.
 
  -- Elvis Presley
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Snmp monitoring of 10GigE Interfaces

2007-05-10 Thread Bill Nash

Alternatively, make sure you're using the 64 bit counters (ifHCInOctets 
ifHCOutOctets).

See the ifXtable in ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/IF-MIB.my

- billn

On Thu, 10 May 2007, Rhett Bassett wrote:

 Kumar Dasari wrote:
  I am having rather erratic and inconsistent results for bandwidth usage 
  reports from different SNMP software packages (MRTG, Cacti, Solarwinds etc) 
  when monitoring 10GigE interfaces on Cisco 7609 Routers. For example there 
  is discripency in what the snmp software says what the 5 min bps output 
  rate is, and what the show int te1/1 shows on the router itself. Software 
  is lower always. Any suggestions on how I can fix this?
 
 Increase your sample rate - you're probably hitting the SNMP counter
 rollover.
 
 Quoth the Cricket manual
 (http://cricket.sourceforge.net/support/doc/reference.html): an SNMP
 Counter32 can wrap in under 5 minutes at bandwidths above 100 Mbits,
 it's critical to fetch the data more often, or else RRD will not be able
 to correctly detect and process the counter wrap.
 
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Fast Reroute

2007-04-27 Thread Bill Nash

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120st/120st16/frr.htm

- billn

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Raman Sud wrote:

 Has anyone setup MPLS fast-reroute using RSVP? Is there a config that
 someone can share
  
 Thanks
  
 
 Raman Sud
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/