Re: [c-nsp] round-trip differences towards google
Which would explain the differences between the round-trip times. You can see the latency value on every hop when you do traceroute, where does it increase? On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Rens r...@autempspourmoi.be wrote: They both leave my network via the same IP transit but then afterwards some hops are different... -Original Message- From: E. Versaevel [mailto:e...@infopact.nl] Sent: mercredi 8 juillet 2009 12:45 To: Rens Cc: 'David Freedman'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] round-trip differences towards google Is there a difference when you traceroute with different source ip's ? Rens schreef: I expect the return routing to be the same as for all my IP addresses since they are all advertised in the same way. I guess google doesn't handle them the same way? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Freedman Sent: mercredi 8 juillet 2009 12:21 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] round-trip differences towards google Rens wrote: Hi all, I'm having some difficulties understand some round-trip difference on the same router just by changing the source interface: your source address will of course become the destination address which google's equipment will want to send the ICMP replies back to, google's return routing will dictate the path latency. Dave. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Erik Versaevel ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Performance Of www.cisco.com
And also without ts for some reason :) Irena 2008/9/25 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Someone heard all of you and made www.cisco.com extra-light! -- Tassos Sean Granger wrote on 24/9/2008 11:35 μμ: Seconded. In fact, it's a common sense thing that since it's not being done, is brilliant. Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/08 01:43PM Seth Mattinen wrote: It's been slow for me since this current iteration of the design came out. I just attributed it to the tradeoff between flashy and functional. I was stuck on a dialup modem (21k) once during an emergency after my 877 at home failed and trying to access my TAC case online was horribly painful to the point of causing extreme rage. Download speeds are fine, though. My download speeds are fine too. My biggest gripe is how things keep changing and how fancy the pages are getting. I can understand some bling on the product and marketing pages but the support pages should be downright blah in my opinion. I should be able to load up the support site in lynx if I have to and find what I'm looking for. Today we have to deal with all those damn style sheets, indirect linking through CGIs, flash and javascript crap, having to (re)authenticate at every turn, and timeouts that are way too short (can you say Dynamic Config Tool?). Like I said earlier, give the product and marketing pages the shiny bling and give the support pages the look, feel and function of what a professional Cisco engineer would except and need. After all, we use the command line all day long. We don't need a stinking GUI. Justin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IOS testing procedures?
Hi, We'd like to deploy newer router IOS version, but first we'd like to assure that it will perform as expected. Are there any available procedures about testing IOS for production environment or every company that actually is doing this have it's own proprietary procedures? Thanks, Irena ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
