Re: [c-nsp] TAC hits a new record level of aggravation...
On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 21:37 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: So Cisco is now sleeping with Microsoft? When I read the original post it seemed to me that Cisco sure as you know what wanted you to use a Windows box to access their T.A.C. site. I really hope I am wrong because I will never use Windows, and maybe not Cisco again. I hope you could get assistance from the TAC with only having to jump through the hoops you did. Sincerely, Richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] pix 6.1(3)
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 22:50 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: PIX fixup protocol helpers do their best to break whatever protocol they can lay their hands on. Now I finally understand that feature! Thanks Gert. It does do that for certain. Richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Not a valid host address error
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 23:55 +0330, h bagade wrote: what about ip address like 0.2.3.1 255.255.255.0! what's the rule for this one? that one is in the book as well. richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Hi all
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 23:39 +0100, Geert Nijs wrote: the technical knowledge present in this list The information and help available here is the best and welcome to the list. I have been benefiting from C-NSP for years and the people are also very kind. Try and help when you can and the community will answer back when you need some advice or assistance. I am not a service provider, just a guy who uses and works on Cisco gear. Most sincerely, Richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Proxy Registered Route Object ....
If someone could hip me off list as to what a Proxy Registered Route Object is, I would be grateful. Google has presented too much information for me to glean through right now. It seems to be a favorite way to do something. I just can't figure out what that may be. The routes I am looking at do not belong to people who observe good net etiquette. thank you, Richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] can someone from Cisco enlighten Steve and the rest of us?
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 00:26 -0400, Steve Fischer wrote: This would be more acceptable (at least to me), were this an issue with a 3560 switch, or a 2800 series router, but this was 2 core switches of their flagship product, the 6500. Enterprise data centers throughout the US. Like the one at my organization, rely heavily on this product, and it should be supported as such. I understand the problem, but given the criticality of these devices as they relate to the core infrastructure of so many organizations, transferring the call to India is not an acceptable way of dealing with it. Steve, I agree completely. I see some of the C-NSP posters don't even deal with TAC other than by email. It is a shame when a company asks the price they do for not only the hardware and software of the device, but the paid support should be useful and effective. I think it might be time that Cisco reexamine their outsourcing of support for mission critical hardware. I have spoken to some very bright people not only at Cisco, but Watchguard and a few other vendors whose support is India based. These are smart men and women, we just need to be able to understand what is being said on the other end of the phone, which is often complicated by the fact that I am on speakerphone. Cisco should be made aware of this in every way possible as long as it is constructive for the community. I applaud your patience and fortitude and I also know I would probably have not handled the situation as coolly as you did. Sorry you had to deal with this. Hopefully, as a result of your experience Cisco will work to improve how these network down emergencies are handled. Sincerely, Richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Possible timing problems
James said today: Clock Source INTERNAL (but the source of this clock is derived from LINE) Change this config so that timing is supplied by line (telco) rather than INTERNAL. Richard ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] urgent help for cisco800
On Monday January 11th, Adrian Kok asked: I use the usb to serial cable + console cable to connect the cisco800. the setting is speed: 9600 parity bit: no control: None data bit: 8 I can see the boot info in the hyperterminal but the keyboard is not responing. I reboot many times and the keyboard is still not working. Any idea and suggeston? Adrian, I use the USB to serial converter from Black Box and it works great as long as I keep the correct drivers on the various machines I use. Could you tell us what manufacturer or model you are using and maybe some of the other bright people may have something to add. I have also found that the converter works well, but it is a lot slower than a direct connection. Hope this helps some. Sincerely, Richard Golodner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Routing Table Size delivered to you....
I forgot how, but there exists a weekly digest of the table sizes that you can have emailed to you, or you can look at cidr or apnic too. If anybody remembers the link to the weekly digest please post it so others who may be interested can obtain it as well. most sincerely, Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 3:01 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Internet Routing Table Size On Saturday 11 October 2008 03:49:30 Uddin, Tahir wrote: Does anyone have a rough idea on the current internet routing table size. I see about 115K prefixes from one of my providers. I'd suggest keeping a weekly eye on: http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#General_Status http://thyme.apnic.net/current/data-summary We are seeing an average of about 265,000 routes (south east Asia). Cheers, Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Weird problem...
Ziv and Cisco NSP community, I have never seen any person refused an answer or reply based on their name or religion. This is a great list where everyone who can help does. Sometimes people just don't have an answer. That is the only reason I can think o you not getting a response to your query. Please do not bring ugliness to this helpful forum, it would be shameful. Respectfully, Richard Golodner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Some assitance please...
I am opening a new office and have a 1.5 Meg DSL circuit being dropped to the C.O. from ATT with a few static IP's. I would like to use the Cisco 1801 W instead of the ATT modem as it offers me al the features I want, but I am no DSL expert. I understand the 1801 has a DSL modem built in. I would like to by pass the ATT modem and use the Cisco as my DSL modem, router and firewall along with the bridged wireless LAN. Is this possible? And what kind of information should I get from the ATT tech who does the initial install? I imagine I will need the VPI /VCI, but what other information would be needed? If people have some better ideas please feel free to let me know. I appreciate all the help in the past and also want to say thanks in advance most sincerely, Richard Golodner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] FW: 1801 W with DSL
I am opening a new office and have a 1.5 Meg DSL circuit being dropped to the C.O. from ATT with a few static IP's. I would like to use the Cisco 1801 W instead of the ATT modem as it offers me al the features I want, but I am no DSL expert. I understand the 1801 has a DSL modem built in. I would like to by pass the ATT modem and use the Cisco as my DSL modem, router and firewall along with the bridged wireless LAN. Is this possible? And what kind of information should I get from the ATT tech who does the initial install? I imagine I will need the VPI /VCI, but what other information would be needed? If people have some better ideas please feel free to let me know. I appreciate all the help in the past and also want to say thanks in advance most sincerely, Richard Golodner ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Thanks again Jared....
Thank you again for keeping C-NSP up and running for another year. This is the best list for sharing ideas and helping one another out with our Cisco quandaries. Hats off to you Jared. Happy New Year! Richard Golodner President Infratection IT Services LLC ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
