Re: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560?
I have now a requirement and I need PVLANs but they are not supported in the 2960 (as far as I was reading at cisco.com) Private VLAN *Edge* is supported on the Catalyst 2960. See Configuration Guide Configuring Port-Based Traffic Control Configuring Protected Ports. (http://tinyurl.com/7drp4c) -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560?
why click tinyurl.com to redirect to cisco site? Do they have any relationship? Thank you --- On Mon, 1/19/09, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists li...@hojmark.org wrote: From: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists li...@hojmark.org Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560? To: 'luismi' asturlui...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Received: Monday, January 19, 2009, 6:33 PM I have now a requirement and I need PVLANs but they are not supported in the 2960 (as far as I was reading at cisco.com) Private VLAN *Edge* is supported on the Catalyst 2960. See Configuration Guide Configuring Port-Based Traffic Control Configuring Protected Ports. (http://tinyurl.com/7drp4c) -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __ Instant Messaging, free SMS, sharing photos and more... Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger at http://ca.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560?
ann kok wrote: why click tinyurl.com to redirect to cisco site? Do they have any relationship? Because the Cisco URL in question was long. That's the purpose of TinyURL and services like it. Peace... Sridhar ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560?
ann kok wrote: why click tinyurl.com to redirect to cisco site? Do they have any relationship? Some mail clients break long URLs by throwing in hard line breaks. Tinyurl allows a short link to be sent by email that redirects to the long ugly one. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 3750 or 3560?
Hi, I have a stack based on two 3750 and a 2960 connected to that stack using a cross etherchannel. I have now a requirement and I need PVLANs but they are not supported in the 2960 (as far as I was reading at cisco.com) So, I am thinking on replace the 2960 but I am not sure if I should replace it with a 3750 or 3560. High availability is a must and put another 3750 it could be a risk because a far as I read too, a failure in one of the devices of the stack can take down all the stack and that is a situation I would like to avoid, but in the other hand I think that a need 3750 could have some benefits, as a simply management, better perfomance... I would like to see comments or suggestions. Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560?
Hello: -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of luismi Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:56 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] 3750 or 3560? Hi, I have a stack based on two 3750 and a 2960 connected to that stack using a cross etherchannel. I have now a requirement and I need PVLANs but they are not supported in the 2960 (as far as I was reading at cisco.com) So, I am thinking on replace the 2960 but I am not sure if I should replace it with a 3750 or 3560. High availability is a must and put another 3750 it could be a risk because a far as I read too, a failure in one of the devices of the stack can take down all the stack and that is a situation I would like to avoid, but in the other hand I think that a need 3750 could have some benefits, as a simply management, better perfomance... I would like to see comments or suggestions. Thanks AFAIK the real difference between the 3750 and 3560 is the 3750's ability to stack. If you are not going to stack the switch then the 3560 will suffice for your needs. Please see: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps5023/prod_qas09186a00801b0971.html Regards, Mike PGP.sig Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
